Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:35117717

Construction of a prognostic model for lung adenocarcinoma based on bioinformatics analysis of metabolic genes.

Jie He · Wentao Li · Yu Li · Guangnan Liu

Translational cancer research · 2020 doi:10.21037/tcr-20-1571

Paper

complete

Experiment

complete

Data

partial

Analysis

complete

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:35117717
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:6090d79d82c3617ae10c2eaf3b14fd7ffd46ebd0fe6d17666f4871fe2aed8432
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T17:36:51Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:05:46Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Construction of a prognostic model for lung adenocarcinoma based on bioinformatics analysis of metabolic genes.
doi
10.21037/tcr-20-1571
pmid
35117717
authors array · 4 items
[0]
Jie He
[1]
Wentao Li
[2]
Yu Li
[3]
Guangnan Liu
journal
Translational cancer research
year
2020
abstract
BACKGROUND: Long-term observations and studies have found that the occurrence and development of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is associated with certain metabolic changes and that metabolic disorders are directly related to carcinogenic gene mutations. We attempted to establish a prognostic model for LUAD based on the expression profiles of metabolic genes. METHOD: We analyzed the gene expression profiles of patients with LUAD obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Univariate Cox regression was used to assess the correlation between each metabolic gene and survival. The survival-related metabolic genes were fit into the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) to establish a prognostic model for LUAD. After 100,000 times of calculations and model construction, we successfully established a prognostic model consisting of 16 genes that can classify patients with LUAD into high-risk and low-risk groups. Further, the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was built to determine the hub gene from16 metabolic genes. Finally, the top one hub gene was validated by real-time reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and immunohistochemistry in our 50 paired LUAD and adjacent tissues, and the prognostic performance of 16 metabolic genes was validated in GEO LUAD cohorts. RESULTS: Univariate Cox regression analysis and LASSO regression analysis results showed that the prognostic model established based on 16 metabolic genes could differentiate patients with LUAD with significantly different overall survival (OS) and that the prognosis of the high-risk group was worse than that of the low-risk group. In addition, the model can independently predict the OS of patients in both the training cohort and the validation cohort (training cohort: HR =2.44, 95% CI: 1.58-3.74, P<0.05; validation cohort: HR =2.15, 95% CI: 2.52-2.70, P<0.05). The decision curve analysis further showed that the combination use of the prognostic model and clinical features could better predict the survival of patients and benefit patients. In addition, Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses revealed several basic signaling pathways and biological processes of metabolic genes in LUAD. Combined with the clinical features and metabolic gene characteristics of patients with LUAD, we also constructed a survival nomogram with a C-index of 0.701 to predict the survival probability of patients. The calibration curve confirmed that the nomogram predications were consistent with the actual observation results. The top one hub gene was TYMS, which was determined by PPI. TYMS levels in LUAD were detected by RT-qPCR and the expression of TYMS was significantly up-regulated in the LUAD tissue of all 50 pairs (t=11.079, P<0.0001). Simultaneously, the correct of the prognostic model was validated, based on the data in GSE37745. CONCLUSIONS: We constructed and validated a new prognostic model based on metabolic genes. This model could provide guidance for the personalized treatment of patients and improve the accuracy of individualized prognoses for patients with LUAD.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
Univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between the expression of various differentially expressed genes and the OS of patients with LUAD. Considering the number of selected metabolic genes and their relationship with prognosis, genes with P<0.05 were identified as candidate genes. The candidate genes were further subjected to LASSO regression analysis.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:35117717
locator
sections[5] "Construction of a predictive model of metabolic genes" paragraph 2
quote
Univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between the expression of various differentially expressed genes and the OS of patients with LUAD. Considering the number of selected metabolic genes and their relationship with prognosis, genes with P<0.05 were identified as candidate genes. The candidate genes were further subjected to LASSO regression analysis.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
Metabolic gene expression profiles from 535 LUAD cases and 59 nontumor tissue samples as well as the clinical information of 522 patients with LUAD were downloaded from the official The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) website (https://gdc-portal.nci.nih.gov/).
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:35117717
locator
sections[3] "LUAD database and the clinical information of the patients" paragraph 2
quote
Metabolic gene expression profiles from 535 LUAD cases and 59 nontumor tissue samples as well as the clinical information of 522 patients with LUAD were downloaded from the official The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) website (https://gdc-portal.nci.nih.gov/).
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
A 16-gene metabolic prognostic model classified patients with LUAD into groups with significantly different overall survival and independently predicted survival in both the training and validation cohorts.
kind
quantitative
target object · 4 fields
value
95
unit
per cent
tolerance
null
source
Univariate Cox regression analysis and LASSO regression analysis results showed that the prognostic model established based on 16 metabolic genes could differentiate patients with LUAD with significantly different overall survival (OS) and that the prognosis of the high-risk group was worse than that of the low-risk group. In addition, the model can independently predict the OS of patients in both the training cohort and the validation cohort (training cohort: HR =2.44, 95% CI: 1.58–3.74, P<0.05; validation cohort: HR =2.15, 95% CI: 2.52–2.70, P<0.05).
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:35117717
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 3
quote
Univariate Cox regression analysis and LASSO regression analysis results showed that the prognostic model established based on 16 metabolic genes could differentiate patients with LUAD with significantly different overall survival (OS) and that the prognosis of the high-risk group was worse than that of the low-risk group. In addition, the model can independently predict the OS of patients in both the training cohort and the validation cohort (training cohort: HR =2.44, 95% CI: 1.58–3.74, P<0.05; validation cohort: HR =2.15, 95% CI: 2.52–2.70, P<0.05).
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
complete
objective
A 16-gene metabolic prognostic model classified patients with LUAD into groups with significantly different overall survival and independently predicted survival in both the training and validation cohorts.
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:35117717
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE37745
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE37745
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 0 items
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 2 items
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:35117717
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-1571
sha256
sha256:98d5ffa3a017f099ad7265401689ead6bbaa970a91ffe4544a9ee830c0a48744
bytes
45109
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.21037/tcr-20-1571
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC8798813
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body_without_references
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
[1] object · 15 fields
id
data:geo:GSE37745
role
raw
format
geo-series
media_type
application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json
uri
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE37745
sha256
null
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
GSE37745
version
null
note
Metabolic gene expression profiles from 535 LUAD cases and 59 nontumor tissue samples as well as the clinical information of 522 patients with LUAD were downloaded from the official The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) website (https://gdc-portal.nci.nih.gov/).
structure object · 15 fields
repository
GEO
access_route
GEO accession URL
access_statement_verbatim
Metabolic gene expression profiles from 535 LUAD cases and 59 nontumor tissue samples as well as the clinical information of 522 patients with LUAD were downloaded from the official The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) website (https://gdc-portal.nci.nih.gov/).
access_statement_kind
repository_route_statement
sample_accessions array · 196 items
[0]
GSM1019138
[1]
GSM1019139
[2]
GSM1019140
[3]
GSM1019141
[4]
GSM1019142
[5]
GSM1019143
[6]
GSM1019144
[7]
GSM1019145
[8]
GSM1019146
[9]
GSM1019147
[10]
GSM1019148
[11]
GSM1019149
[12]
GSM1019150
[13]
GSM1019151
[14]
GSM1019152
[15]
GSM1019153
[16]
GSM1019154
[17]
GSM1019155
[18]
GSM1019156
[19]
GSM1019157
[20]
GSM1019158
[21]
GSM1019159
[22]
GSM1019160
[23]
GSM1019161
[24]
GSM1019162
[25]
GSM1019163
[26]
GSM1019164
[27]
GSM1019165
[28]
GSM1019166
[29]
GSM1019167
[30]
GSM1019168
[31]
GSM1019169
[32]
GSM1019170
[33]
GSM1019171
[34]
GSM1019172
[35]
GSM1019173
[36]
GSM1019174
[37]
GSM1019175
[38]
GSM1019176
[39]
GSM1019177
[40]
GSM1019178
[41]
GSM1019179
[42]
GSM1019180
[43]
GSM1019181
[44]
GSM1019182
[45]
GSM1019183
[46]
GSM1019184
[47]
GSM1019185
[48]
GSM1019186
[49]
GSM1019187
[50]
GSM1019188
[51]
GSM1019189
[52]
GSM1019190
[53]
GSM1019191
[54]
GSM1019192
[55]
GSM1019193
[56]
GSM1019194
[57]
GSM1019195
[58]
GSM1019196
[59]
GSM1019197
[60]
GSM1019198
[61]
GSM1019199
[62]
GSM1019200
[63]
GSM1019201
[64]
GSM1019202
[65]
GSM1019203
[66]
GSM1019204
[67]
GSM1019205
[68]
GSM1019206
[69]
GSM1019207
[70]
GSM1019208
[71]
GSM1019209
[72]
GSM1019210
[73]
GSM1019211
[74]
GSM1019212
[75]
GSM1019213
[76]
GSM1019214
[77]
GSM1019215
[78]
GSM1019216
[79]
GSM1019217
[80]
GSM1019218
[81]
GSM1019219
[82]
GSM1019220
[83]
GSM1019221
[84]
GSM1019222
[85]
GSM1019223
[86]
GSM1019224
[87]
GSM1019225
[88]
GSM1019226
[89]
GSM1019227
[90]
GSM1019228
[91]
GSM1019229
[92]
GSM1019230
[93]
GSM1019231
[94]
GSM1019232
[95]
GSM1019233
[96]
GSM1019234
[97]
GSM1019235
[98]
GSM1019236
[99]
GSM1019237
[100]
GSM1019238
[101]
GSM1019239
[102]
GSM1019240
[103]
GSM1019241
[104]
GSM1019242
[105]
GSM1019243
[106]
GSM1019244
[107]
GSM1019245
[108]
GSM1019246
[109]
GSM1019247
[110]
GSM1019248
[111]
GSM1019249
[112]
GSM1019250
[113]
GSM1019251
[114]
GSM1019252
[115]
GSM1019253
[116]
GSM1019254
[117]
GSM1019255
[118]
GSM1019256
[119]
GSM1019257
[120]
GSM1019258
[121]
GSM1019259
[122]
GSM1019260
[123]
GSM1019261
[124]
GSM1019262
[125]
GSM1019263
[126]
GSM1019264
[127]
GSM1019265
[128]
GSM1019266
[129]
GSM1019267
[130]
GSM1019268
[131]
GSM1019269
[132]
GSM1019270
[133]
GSM1019271
[134]
GSM1019272
[135]
GSM1019273
[136]
GSM1019274
[137]
GSM1019275
[138]
GSM1019276
[139]
GSM1019277
[140]
GSM1019278
[141]
GSM1019279
[142]
GSM1019280
[143]
GSM1019281
[144]
GSM1019282
[145]
GSM1019283
[146]
GSM1019284
[147]
GSM1019285
[148]
GSM1019286
[149]
GSM1019287
[150]
GSM1019288
[151]
GSM1019289
[152]
GSM1019290
[153]
GSM1019291
[154]
GSM1019292
[155]
GSM1019293
[156]
GSM1019294
[157]
GSM1019295
[158]
GSM1019296
[159]
GSM1019297
[160]
GSM1019298
[161]
GSM1019299
[162]
GSM1019300
[163]
GSM1019301
[164]
GSM1019302
[165]
GSM1019303
[166]
GSM1019304
[167]
GSM1019305
[168]
GSM1019306
[169]
GSM1019307
[170]
GSM1019308
[171]
GSM1019309
[172]
GSM1019310
[173]
GSM1019311
[174]
GSM1019312
[175]
GSM1019313
[176]
GSM1019314
[177]
GSM1019315
[178]
GSM1019316
[179]
GSM1019317
[180]
GSM1019318
[181]
GSM1019319
[182]
GSM1019320
[183]
GSM1019321
[184]
GSM1019322
[185]
GSM1019323
[186]
GSM1019324
[187]
GSM1019325
[188]
GSM1019326
[189]
GSM1019327
[190]
GSM1019328
[191]
GSM1019329
[192]
GSM1019330
[193]
GSM1019331
[194]
GSM1019332
[195]
GSM1019333
sample_count
196
group_sizes
null
group_sizes_basis
null
platform
570
taxon
Homo sapiens
title
Biomarker discovery in non-small cell lung cancer: integrating gene expression profiling, meta-analysis and tissue microarray validation
resolution_checked_at
2026-11-01T15:39:54Z
resolution_check
identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read
downloaded
false
licence_read
false
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE37745 not downloaded
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE37745 licence not read
analysis object · 4 fields
state
complete
methods array · 6 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
survival_analysis
specific
cox_proportional_hazards
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
Univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between the expression of various differentially expressed genes and the OS of patients with LUAD. Considering the number of selected metabolic genes and their relationship with prognosis, genes with P<0.05 were identified as candidate genes. The candidate genes were further subjected to LASSO regression analysis.
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
differential_expression
specific
limma_voom
label
Differential expression analysis
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
normalise_counts
[1]
differential_expression_fit
[2]
fdr_bh
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
count_matrix_with_condition
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Limma
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
network_analysis
specific
ppi_network
label
Network / pathway analysis
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
build_graph
[1]
centrality_scores
[2]
pathway_enrich
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
edge_list
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
protein-protein interaction
[3] object · 10 fields
id
method-4
family
diagnostic_evaluation
specific
roc
label
Diagnostic test evaluation
dsl_operations array · 6 items
[0]
confusion_counts
[1]
roc_curve
[2]
sensitivity_specificity
[3]
solve_confusion_matrix
[4]
classification_metrics
[5]
published_precision_envelope
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
reference_standard_and_test
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
ROC curve
[4] object · 10 fields
id
method-5
family
model_calibration
specific
decision_curve
label
Model calibration / clinical utility
dsl_operations array · 2 items
[0]
calibration_bins
[1]
net_benefit
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
predictions_and_outcomes
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
decision curve analysis
[5] object · 10 fields
id
method-6
family
contingency_analysis
specific
chi_square
label
Categorical (contingency table) analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
chi_square_test
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
categorical_cross_tabulation
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
chi-square
targets array · 2 items
[0] object · 8 fields
id
target-published-estimate
claim_id
claim-target-result
operation
build_graph
unit
per cent
tolerance
null
state
complete
note
The published estimate as the reader quoted it from the paper. No tolerance is published because the paper states none.
[1] object · 8 fields
id
target-published-estimate-p-value
claim_id
claim-target-result
operation
build_graph
unit
p-value
tolerance
null
state
complete
note
The threshold the paper applied to its own result, as the paper states it. A run that reproduces the effect is judged against this threshold.
gaps array · 0 items
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
complete
tier
R1
blocked_on
nothing:replicable_now
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R1
reachable
true
accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE37745
resolved_accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE37745
statements array · 1 item
[0]
Metabolic gene expression profiles from 535 LUAD cases and 59 nontumor tissue samples as well as the clinical information of 522 patients with LUAD were downloaded from the official The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) website (https://gdc-portal.nci.nih.gov/).
basis
The paper names GSE37745 in GEO and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
assets array · 2 items
[0]
source:pmid:35117717
[1]
data:geo:GSE37745
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE37745
gaps array · 0 items
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T17:32:34Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
null
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
11686
completion_tokens
1460
cached_tokens
256
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:35117717
type
paper
label
pmid:35117717
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:35117717
type
manuscript
label
PMID 35117717 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE37745
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE37745
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:35117717
type
paper
label
pmid:35117717
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:35117717
type
manuscript
label
PMID 35117717 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE37745
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE37745
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-35117717
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:35117717
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-GSE37745
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE37745
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:35117717
parent_hash
sha256:8f1d0de47b0ed97b236e53d4f5c7e8240d9d0fd6355cef9c186ee7bb33ad508a
fork_of
null
gaps array · 6 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE37745 licence not read
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE37745 not downloaded
[2]
execution.not_run
[3]
review.human_critique
[4]
review.independent_reader
[5]
review.machine_critique
assays array · 3 items
[0] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.99
evidence array · 4 items
[0]
tion quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and immunohistochemistry in our 50 paired L
[1]
by PPI. TYMS levels in LUAD were detected by RT-qPCR and the expression of TYMS was significantly
[2]
n quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and immunohistochemistry in our 50 paired L
[3]
PPI. TYMS levels in LUAD were detected by RT-qPCR and the expression of TYMS was significantly
order_basis
paper_text_order:1235
id
assay:1
[1] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.99
evidence array · 4 items
[0]
tive polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and immunohistochemistry in our 50 paired LUAD and adjacent tissues,
[1]
g adenocarcinoma (magnification, ×100). IHC, immunohistochemistry.
[2]
tal evidence of TYMS at the protein level by IHC The staining status of the TYMS antibody was
[3]
tus of the TYMS antibody was evaluated by an IHC assay and the images of IHC are presented in
order_basis
paper_text_order:1248
id
assay:2
[2] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
survival_analysis
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
Univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between the expression of various differentially expressed genes and the OS of patients with LUAD. Considering the number of selected metabolic genes and their relationship with prognosis, genes with P<0.05 were identified as candidate genes. The candidate genes were further subjected to LASSO regression analysis.
order_basis
consumes_earlier_output
id
assay:3
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:35117717", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 4, "content_hash": "sha256:6090d79d82c3617ae10c2eaf3b14fd7ffd46ebd0fe6d17666f4871fe2aed8432", "created_at": "2026-11-01T17:36:51Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:05:46Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Construction of a prognostic model for lung adenocarcinoma based on bioinformatics analysis of metabolic genes.", "doi": "10.21037/tcr-20-1571", "pmid": "35117717", "authors": ["Jie He", "Wentao Li", "Yu Li", "Guangnan Liu"], "journal": "Translational cancer research", "year": 2020, "abstract": "BACKGROUND: Long-term observations and studies have found that the occurrence and development of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is associated with certain metabolic changes and that metabolic disorders are directly related to carcinogenic gene mutations. We attempted to establish a prognostic model for LUAD based on the expression profiles of metabolic genes.\nMETHOD: We analyzed the gene expression profiles of patients with LUAD obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Univariate Cox regression was used to assess the correlation between each metabolic gene and survival. The survival-related metabolic genes were fit into the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) to establish a prognostic model for LUAD. After 100,000 times of calculations and model construction, we successfully established a prognostic model consisting of 16 genes that can classify patients with LUAD into high-risk and low-risk groups. Further, the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was built to determine the hub gene from16 metabolic genes. Finally, the top one hub gene was validated by real-time reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and immunohistochemistry in our 50 paired LUAD and adjacent tissues, and the prognostic performance of 16 metabolic genes was validated in GEO LUAD cohorts.\nRESULTS: Univariate Cox regression analysis and LASSO regression analysis results showed that the prognostic model established based on 16 metabolic genes could differentiate patients with LUAD with significantly different overall survival (OS) and that the prognosis of the high-risk group was worse than that of the low-risk group. In addition, the model can independently predict the OS of patients in both the training cohort and the validation cohort (training cohort: HR =2.44, 95% CI: 1.58-3.74, P<0.05; validation cohort: HR =2.15, 95% CI: 2.52-2.70, P<0.05). The decision curve analysis further showed that the combination use of the prognostic model and clinical features could better predict the survival of patients and benefit patients. In addition, Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses revealed several basic signaling pathways and biological processes of metabolic genes in LUAD. Combined with the clinical features and metabolic gene characteristics of patients with LUAD, we also constructed a survival nomogram with a C-index of 0.701 to predict the survival probability of patients. The calibration curve confirmed that the nomogram predications were consistent with the actual observation results. The top one hub gene was TYMS, which was determined by PPI. TYMS levels in LUAD were detected by RT-qPCR and the expression of TYMS was significantly up-regulated in the LUAD tissue of all 50 pairs (t=11.079, P<0.0001). Simultaneously, the correct of the prognostic model was validated, based on the data in GSE37745.\nCONCLUSIONS: We constructed and validated a new prognostic model based on metabolic genes. This model could provide guidance for the personalized treatment of patients and improve the accuracy of individualized prognoses for patients with LUAD.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "Univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between the expression of various differentially expressed genes and the OS of patients with LUAD. Considering the number of selected metabolic genes and their relationship with prognosis, genes with P<0.05 were identified as candidate genes. The candidate genes were further subjected to LASSO regression analysis.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35117717", "locator": "sections[5] \"Construction of a predictive model of metabolic genes\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between the expression of various differentially expressed genes and the OS of patients with LUAD. Considering the number of selected metabolic genes and their relationship with prognosis, genes with P<0.05 were identified as candidate genes. The candidate genes were further subjected to LASSO regression analysis."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "Metabolic gene expression profiles from 535 LUAD cases and 59 nontumor tissue samples as well as the clinical information of 522 patients with LUAD were downloaded from the official The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) website (https://gdc-portal.nci.nih.gov/).", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35117717", "locator": "sections[3] \"LUAD database and the clinical information of the patients\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Metabolic gene expression profiles from 535 LUAD cases and 59 nontumor tissue samples as well as the clinical information of 522 patients with LUAD were downloaded from the official The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) website (https://gdc-portal.nci.nih.gov/)."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "A 16-gene metabolic prognostic model classified patients with LUAD into groups with significantly different overall survival and independently predicted survival in both the training and validation cohorts.", "kind": "quantitative", "target": {"value": 95.0, "unit": "per cent", "tolerance": null, "source": "Univariate Cox regression analysis and LASSO regression analysis results showed that the prognostic model established based on 16 metabolic genes could differentiate patients with LUAD with significantly different overall survival (OS) and that the prognosis of the high-risk group was worse than that of the low-risk group. In addition, the model can independently predict the OS of patients in both the training cohort and the validation cohort (training cohort: HR =2.44, 95% CI: 1.58–3.74, P<0.05; validation cohort: HR =2.15, 95% CI: 2.52–2.70, P<0.05)."}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35117717", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "Univariate Cox regression analysis and LASSO regression analysis results showed that the prognostic model established based on 16 metabolic genes could differentiate patients with LUAD with significantly different overall survival (OS) and that the prognosis of the high-risk group was worse than that of the low-risk group. In addition, the model can independently predict the OS of patients in both the training cohort and the validation cohort (training cohort: HR =2.44, 95% CI: 1.58–3.74, P<0.05; validation cohort: HR =2.15, 95% CI: 2.52–2.70, P<0.05)."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "A 16-gene metabolic prognostic model classified patients with LUAD into groups with significantly different overall survival and independently predicted survival in both the training and validation cohorts.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:35117717"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE37745"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE37745"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:35117717", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-1571", "sha256": "sha256:98d5ffa3a017f099ad7265401689ead6bbaa970a91ffe4544a9ee830c0a48744", "bytes": 45109, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.21037/tcr-20-1571", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC8798813", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE37745", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE37745", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE37745", "version": null, "note": "Metabolic gene expression profiles from 535 LUAD cases and 59 nontumor tissue samples as well as the clinical information of 522 patients with LUAD were downloaded from the official The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) website (https://gdc-portal.nci.nih.gov/).", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "Metabolic gene expression profiles from 535 LUAD cases and 59 nontumor tissue samples as well as the clinical information of 522 patients with LUAD were downloaded from the official The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) website (https://gdc-portal.nci.nih.gov/).", "access_statement_kind": "repository_route_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1019138", "GSM1019139", "GSM1019140", "GSM1019141", "GSM1019142", "GSM1019143", "GSM1019144", "GSM1019145", "GSM1019146", "GSM1019147", "GSM1019148", "GSM1019149", "GSM1019150", "GSM1019151", "GSM1019152", "GSM1019153", "GSM1019154", "GSM1019155", "GSM1019156", "GSM1019157", "GSM1019158", "GSM1019159", "GSM1019160", "GSM1019161", "GSM1019162", "GSM1019163", "GSM1019164", "GSM1019165", "GSM1019166", "GSM1019167", "GSM1019168", "GSM1019169", "GSM1019170", "GSM1019171", "GSM1019172", "GSM1019173", "GSM1019174", "GSM1019175", "GSM1019176", "GSM1019177", "GSM1019178", "GSM1019179", "GSM1019180", "GSM1019181", "GSM1019182", "GSM1019183", "GSM1019184", "GSM1019185", "GSM1019186", "GSM1019187", "GSM1019188", "GSM1019189", "GSM1019190", "GSM1019191", "GSM1019192", "GSM1019193", "GSM1019194", "GSM1019195", "GSM1019196", "GSM1019197", "GSM1019198", "GSM1019199", "GSM1019200", "GSM1019201", "GSM1019202", "GSM1019203", "GSM1019204", "GSM1019205", "GSM1019206", "GSM1019207", "GSM1019208", "GSM1019209", "GSM1019210", "GSM1019211", "GSM1019212", "GSM1019213", "GSM1019214", "GSM1019215", "GSM1019216", "GSM1019217", "GSM1019218", "GSM1019219", "GSM1019220", "GSM1019221", "GSM1019222", "GSM1019223", "GSM1019224", "GSM1019225", "GSM1019226", "GSM1019227", "GSM1019228", "GSM1019229", "GSM1019230", "GSM1019231", "GSM1019232", "GSM1019233", "GSM1019234", "GSM1019235", "GSM1019236", "GSM1019237", "GSM1019238", "GSM1019239", "GSM1019240", "GSM1019241", "GSM1019242", "GSM1019243", "GSM1019244", "GSM1019245", "GSM1019246", "GSM1019247", "GSM1019248", "GSM1019249", "GSM1019250", "GSM1019251", "GSM1019252", "GSM1019253", "GSM1019254", "GSM1019255", "GSM1019256", "GSM1019257", "GSM1019258", "GSM1019259", "GSM1019260", "GSM1019261", "GSM1019262", "GSM1019263", "GSM1019264", "GSM1019265", "GSM1019266", "GSM1019267", "GSM1019268", "GSM1019269", "GSM1019270", "GSM1019271", "GSM1019272", "GSM1019273", "GSM1019274", "GSM1019275", "GSM1019276", "GSM1019277", "GSM1019278", "GSM1019279", "GSM1019280", "GSM1019281", "GSM1019282", "GSM1019283", "GSM1019284", "GSM1019285", "GSM1019286", "GSM1019287", "GSM1019288", "GSM1019289", "GSM1019290", "GSM1019291", "GSM1019292", "GSM1019293", "GSM1019294", "GSM1019295", "GSM1019296", "GSM1019297", "GSM1019298", "GSM1019299", "GSM1019300", "GSM1019301", "GSM1019302", "GSM1019303", "GSM1019304", "GSM1019305", "GSM1019306", "GSM1019307", "GSM1019308", "GSM1019309", "GSM1019310", "GSM1019311", "GSM1019312", "GSM1019313", "GSM1019314", "GSM1019315", "GSM1019316", "GSM1019317", "GSM1019318", "GSM1019319", "GSM1019320", "GSM1019321", "GSM1019322", "GSM1019323", "GSM1019324", "GSM1019325", "GSM1019326", "GSM1019327", "GSM1019328", "GSM1019329", "GSM1019330", "GSM1019331", "GSM1019332", "GSM1019333"], "sample_count": 196, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "570", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Biomarker discovery in non-small cell lung cancer: integrating gene expression profiling, meta-analysis and tissue microarray validation", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE37745 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE37745 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "Univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between the expression of various differentially expressed genes and the OS of patients with LUAD. Considering the number of selected metabolic genes and their relationship with prognosis, genes with P<0.05 were identified as candidate genes. The candidate genes were further subjected to LASSO regression analysis."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "differential_expression", "specific": "limma_voom", "label": "Differential expression analysis", "dsl_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["count_matrix_with_condition"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Limma"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "ppi_network", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["build_graph", "centrality_scores", "pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "protein-protein interaction"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "diagnostic_evaluation", "specific": "roc", "label": "Diagnostic test evaluation", "dsl_operations": ["confusion_counts", "roc_curve", "sensitivity_specificity", "solve_confusion_matrix", "classification_metrics", "published_precision_envelope"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["reference_standard_and_test"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "ROC curve"}}, {"id": "method-5", "family": "model_calibration", "specific": "decision_curve", "label": "Model calibration / clinical utility", "dsl_operations": ["calibration_bins", "net_benefit"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["predictions_and_outcomes"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "decision curve analysis"}}, {"id": "method-6", "family": "contingency_analysis", "specific": "chi_square", "label": "Categorical (contingency table) analysis", "dsl_operations": ["chi_square_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["categorical_cross_tabulation"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "chi-square"}}], "targets": [{"id": "target-published-estimate", "claim_id": "claim-target-result", "operation": "build_graph", "expected_value": 95.0, "unit": "per cent", "tolerance": null, "state": "complete", "note": "The published estimate as the reader quoted it from the paper. No tolerance is published because the paper states none."}, {"id": "target-published-estimate-p-value", "claim_id": "claim-target-result", "operation": "build_graph", "expected_value": 0.05, "unit": "p-value", "tolerance": null, "state": "complete", "note": "The threshold the paper applied to its own result, as the paper states it. A run that reproduces the effect is judged against this threshold."}], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE37745"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE37745"], "statements": ["Metabolic gene expression profiles from 535 LUAD cases and 59 nontumor tissue samples as well as the clinical information of 522 patients with LUAD were downloaded from the official The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) website (https://gdc-portal.nci.nih.gov/)."], "basis": "The paper names GSE37745 in GEO and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "assets": ["source:pmid:35117717", "data:geo:GSE37745"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE37745"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T17:32:34Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": null}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 11686, "completion_tokens": 1460, "cached_tokens": 256}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:35117717", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:35117717"}, {"id": "source:pmid:35117717", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 35117717 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE37745", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE37745"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:35117717", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:35117717"}, {"id": "source:pmid:35117717", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 35117717 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE37745", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE37745"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-35117717", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:35117717"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE37745", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE37745"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:35117717", "parent_hash": "sha256:8f1d0de47b0ed97b236e53d4f5c7e8240d9d0fd6355cef9c186ee7bb33ad508a", "fork_of": null, "generation": 3}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE37745 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE37745 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "qpcr", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["tion quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and immunohistochemistry in our 50 paired L", "by PPI. TYMS levels in LUAD were detected by RT-qPCR and the expression of TYMS was significantly", "n quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and immunohistochemistry in our 50 paired L", "PPI. TYMS levels in LUAD were detected by RT-qPCR and the expression of TYMS was significantly"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1235", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "ihc", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["tive polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and immunohistochemistry in our 50 paired LUAD and adjacent tissues,", "g adenocarcinoma (magnification, ×100). IHC, immunohistochemistry.", "tal evidence of TYMS at the protein level by IHC The staining status of the TYMS antibody was", "tus of the TYMS antibody was evaluated by an IHC assay and the images of IHC are presented in"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1248", "id": "assay:2"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["Univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between the expression of various differentially expressed genes and the OS of patients with LUAD. Considering the number of selected metabolic genes and their relationship with prognosis, genes with P<0.05 were identified as candidate genes. The candidate genes were further subjected to LASSO regression analysis."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:3"}]}