Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:35137551

Clinical and molecular assessment of an onco-immune signature with prognostic significance in patients with colorectal cancer.

Pankaj Ahluwalia · Ashis K Mondal · Meenakshi Ahluwalia · Nikhil S Sahajpal · Kimya Jones · Yasmeen Jilani · Gagandeep K Gahlay · Amanda Barrett · Vamsi Kota · Amyn M Rojiani · Ravindra Kolhe

Cancer medicine · 2022 doi:10.1002/cam4.4568

Paper

complete

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

partial

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:35137551
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:d363c0bd7288f2de6036edcfa5e4b465ec76e0a0207c547977da44f341de57b8
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T17:36:53Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T21:27:11Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Clinical and molecular assessment of an onco-immune signature with prognostic significance in patients with colorectal cancer.
doi
10.1002/cam4.4568
pmid
35137551
authors array · 11 items
[0]
Pankaj Ahluwalia
[1]
Ashis K Mondal
[2]
Meenakshi Ahluwalia
[3]
Nikhil S Sahajpal
[4]
Kimya Jones
[5]
Yasmeen Jilani
[6]
Gagandeep K Gahlay
[7]
Amanda Barrett
[8]
Vamsi Kota
[9]
Amyn M Rojiani
[10]
Ravindra Kolhe
journal
Cancer medicine
year
2022
abstract
Understanding the complex tumor microenvironment is key to the development of personalized therapies for the treatment of cancer including colorectal cancer (CRC). In the past decade, significant advances in the field of immunotherapy have changed the paradigm of cancer treatment. Despite significant improvements, tumor heterogeneity and lack of appropriate classification tools for CRC have prevented accurate risk stratification and identification of a wider patient population that may potentially benefit from targeted therapies. To identify novel signatures for accurate prognostication of CRC, we quantified gene expression of 12 immune-related genes using a medium-throughput NanoString quantification platform in 93 CRC patients. Multivariate prognostic analysis identified a combined four-gene prognostic signature (TGFB1, PTK2, RORC, and SOCS1) (HR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.05-2.95, *p < 0.02). The survival trend was captured in an independent gene expression data set: GSE17536 (177 patients; HR: 3.31, 95% CI: 1.99-5.55, *p < 0.01) and GSE14333 (226 patients; HR: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.35-4.53, *p < 0.01). Further, gene set enrichment analysis of the TCGA data set associated higher prognostic scores with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and inflammatory pathways. Comparatively, a lower prognostic score was correlated with oxidative phosphorylation and MYC and E2F targets. Analysis of immune parameters identified infiltration of T-reg cells, CD8+ T cells, M2 macrophages, and B cells in high-risk patient groups along with upregulation of immune exhaustion genes. This molecular study has identified a novel prognostic gene signature with clinical utility in CRC. Therefore, along with prognostic features, characterization of immune cell infiltrates and immunosuppression provides actionable information that should be considered while employing personalized medicine.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze clinicopathological variables. Patients were stratified into low‐ and high‐risk groups according to the median risk score, and survival was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method and the log‐rank test.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:35137551
locator
sections[7] "Identification of prognostic gene signature" paragraph 2
quote
Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze clinicopathological variables.
[1] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:35137551
locator
sections[7] "Identification of prognostic gene signature" paragraph 2
quote
Patients were stratified into low‐ and high‐risk groups according to the median risk score, and survival was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method and the log‐rank test.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
The data sets used and/or analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:35137551
locator
sections[26] "DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT" paragraph 2
quote
The data sets used and/or analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
The survival trend was captured in an independent gene expression data set: GSE17536 (177 patients; HR: 3.31, 95% CI: 1.99–5.55, *p < 0.01) and GSE14333 (226 patients; HR: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.35–4.53, *p < 0.01).
kind
quantitative
target object · 4 fields
value
95
unit
per cent
tolerance
null
source
Multivariate prognostic analysis identified a combined four‐gene prognostic signature (TGFB1, PTK2, RORC, and SOCS1) (HR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.05–2.95, *p < 0.02).
evidence array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:35137551
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 1
quote
Multivariate prognostic analysis identified a combined four‐gene prognostic signature (TGFB1, PTK2, RORC, and SOCS1) (HR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.05–2.95, *p < 0.02).
[1] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:35137551
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 1
quote
The survival trend was captured in an independent gene expression data set: GSE17536 (177 patients; HR: 3.31, 95% CI: 1.99–5.55, *p < 0.01) and GSE14333 (226 patients; HR: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.35–4.53, *p < 0.01).
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
The survival trend was captured in an independent gene expression data set: GSE17536 (177 patients; HR: 3.31, 95% CI: 1.99–5.55, *p < 0.01) and GSE14333 (226 patients; HR: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.35–4.53, *p < 0.01).
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:35137551
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
blocked
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 1 item
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:35137551
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4568
sha256
sha256:e7ea4b8c48d6e254732cb4b75ed041aeeb5bb1f68a07e78fd924fe6cf9e9a9c6
bytes
41669
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.1002/cam4.4568
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC8921909
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
gaps array · 0 items
analysis object · 4 fields
state
partial
methods array · 1 item
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
null
specific
null
label
Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, and the log‐rank test
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 0 items
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
reordered
quote
Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze clinicopathological variables. Patients were stratified into low‐ and high‐risk groups according to the median risk score, and survival was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method and the log‐rank test.
targets array · 1 item
[0] object · 8 fields
id
target-published-estimate
claim_id
claim-target-result
operation
null
unit
per cent
tolerance
null
state
complete
note
The published estimate as the reader quoted it from the paper. No tolerance is published because the paper states none.
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
method.reader_named_unmapped
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
blocked
tier
R4
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R4
expressible
false
required_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The reader quoted the method the paper names (Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, and the log‐rank test), but the corpus's method extractor could not map it onto a DSL operation, so the method is published but not expressible.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R4
reachable
false
accessions array · 0 items
resolved_accessions array · 0 items
statements array · 1 item
[0]
The data sets used and/or analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
basis
The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
assets array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:35137551
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:accession_absent
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T17:33:26Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
reordered
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
12863
completion_tokens
1775
cached_tokens
128
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:35137551
type
paper
label
pmid:35137551
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:35137551
type
manuscript
label
PMID 35137551 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:35137551
type
paper
label
pmid:35137551
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:35137551
type
manuscript
label
PMID 35137551 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-35137551
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:35137551
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-None
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:35137551
parent_hash
sha256:2673d56cfafae21eb9fe258d61b2365ae2a6c7e073e337c3b25e07f2f63734b3
fork_of
null
gaps array · 6 items
[0]
execution.not_run
[1]
method.reader_named_unmapped
[2]
review.human_critique
[3]
review.independent_reader
[4]
review.machine_critique
[5]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.0", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:35137551", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 3, "content_hash": "sha256:d363c0bd7288f2de6036edcfa5e4b465ec76e0a0207c547977da44f341de57b8", "created_at": "2026-11-01T17:36:53Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T21:27:11Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Clinical and molecular assessment of an onco-immune signature with prognostic significance in patients with colorectal cancer.", "doi": "10.1002/cam4.4568", "pmid": "35137551", "authors": ["Pankaj Ahluwalia", "Ashis K Mondal", "Meenakshi Ahluwalia", "Nikhil S Sahajpal", "Kimya Jones", "Yasmeen Jilani", "Gagandeep K Gahlay", "Amanda Barrett", "Vamsi Kota", "Amyn M Rojiani", "Ravindra Kolhe"], "journal": "Cancer medicine", "year": 2022, "abstract": "Understanding the complex tumor microenvironment is key to the development of personalized therapies for the treatment of cancer including colorectal cancer (CRC). In the past decade, significant advances in the field of immunotherapy have changed the paradigm of cancer treatment. Despite significant improvements, tumor heterogeneity and lack of appropriate classification tools for CRC have prevented accurate risk stratification and identification of a wider patient population that may potentially benefit from targeted therapies. To identify novel signatures for accurate prognostication of CRC, we quantified gene expression of 12 immune-related genes using a medium-throughput NanoString quantification platform in 93 CRC patients. Multivariate prognostic analysis identified a combined four-gene prognostic signature (TGFB1, PTK2, RORC, and SOCS1) (HR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.05-2.95, *p < 0.02). The survival trend was captured in an independent gene expression data set: GSE17536 (177 patients; HR: 3.31, 95% CI: 1.99-5.55, *p < 0.01) and GSE14333 (226 patients; HR: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.35-4.53, *p < 0.01). Further, gene set enrichment analysis of the TCGA data set associated higher prognostic scores with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and inflammatory pathways. Comparatively, a lower prognostic score was correlated with oxidative phosphorylation and MYC and E2F targets. Analysis of immune parameters identified infiltration of T-reg cells, CD8+ T cells, M2 macrophages, and B cells in high-risk patient groups along with upregulation of immune exhaustion genes. This molecular study has identified a novel prognostic gene signature with clinical utility in CRC. Therefore, along with prognostic features, characterization of immune cell infiltrates and immunosuppression provides actionable information that should be considered while employing personalized medicine.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze clinicopathological variables. Patients were stratified into low‐ and high‐risk groups according to the median risk score, and survival was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method and the log‐rank test.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35137551", "locator": "sections[7] \"Identification of prognostic gene signature\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze clinicopathological variables."}, {"asset": "source:pmid:35137551", "locator": "sections[7] \"Identification of prognostic gene signature\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Patients were stratified into low‐ and high‐risk groups according to the median risk score, and survival was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method and the log‐rank test."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The data sets used and/or analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35137551", "locator": "sections[26] \"DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The data sets used and/or analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "The survival trend was captured in an independent gene expression data set: GSE17536 (177 patients; HR: 3.31, 95% CI: 1.99–5.55, *p < 0.01) and GSE14333 (226 patients; HR: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.35–4.53, *p < 0.01).", "kind": "quantitative", "target": {"value": 95.0, "unit": "per cent", "tolerance": null, "source": "Multivariate prognostic analysis identified a combined four‐gene prognostic signature (TGFB1, PTK2, RORC, and SOCS1) (HR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.05–2.95, *p < 0.02)."}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35137551", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 1", "quote": "Multivariate prognostic analysis identified a combined four‐gene prognostic signature (TGFB1, PTK2, RORC, and SOCS1) (HR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.05–2.95, *p < 0.02)."}, {"asset": "source:pmid:35137551", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 1", "quote": "The survival trend was captured in an independent gene expression data set: GSE17536 (177 patients; HR: 3.31, 95% CI: 1.99–5.55, *p < 0.01) and GSE14333 (226 patients; HR: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.35–4.53, *p < 0.01)."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "The survival trend was captured in an independent gene expression data set: GSE17536 (177 patients; HR: 3.31, 95% CI: 1.99–5.55, *p < 0.01) and GSE14333 (226 patients; HR: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.35–4.53, *p < 0.01).", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:35137551"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:35137551", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4568", "sha256": "sha256:e7ea4b8c48d6e254732cb4b75ed041aeeb5bb1f68a07e78fd924fe6cf9e9a9c6", "bytes": 41669, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1002/cam4.4568", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC8921909", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}], "gaps": []}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": null, "specific": null, "label": "Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, and the log‐rank test", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": null, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": [], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "reordered", "quote": "Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze clinicopathological variables. Patients were stratified into low‐ and high‐risk groups according to the median risk score, and survival was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method and the log‐rank test."}}], "targets": [{"id": "target-published-estimate", "claim_id": "claim-target-result", "operation": null, "expected_value": 95.0, "unit": "per cent", "tolerance": null, "state": "complete", "note": "The published estimate as the reader quoted it from the paper. No tolerance is published because the paper states none."}], "gaps": ["method.reader_named_unmapped"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "data", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R4", "expressible": false, "required_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The reader quoted the method the paper names (Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, and the log‐rank test), but the corpus's method extractor could not map it onto a DSL operation, so the method is published but not expressible."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R4", "reachable": false, "accessions": [], "resolved_accessions": [], "statements": ["The data sets used and/or analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request."], "basis": "The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:35137551"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:None"]}, "gaps": ["data:accession_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T17:33:26Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "reordered", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 12863, "completion_tokens": 1775, "cached_tokens": 128}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:35137551", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:35137551"}, {"id": "source:pmid:35137551", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 35137551 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:35137551", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:35137551"}, {"id": "source:pmid:35137551", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 35137551 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-35137551", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:35137551"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-None", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:None"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:35137551", "parent_hash": "sha256:2673d56cfafae21eb9fe258d61b2365ae2a6c7e073e337c3b25e07f2f63734b3", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["execution.not_run", "method.reader_named_unmapped", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}