Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:35647198

Identification of an Inflammatory Response-Related Gene Signature to Predict Survival and Immune Status in Glioma Patients.

Zhaoyue Yan · Yushuai Gao · Jinliang Yu · Zhiyuan Shen · Xingyao Bu

Journal of immunology research · 2022 doi:10.1155/2022/8972730

Paper

complete

Experiment

complete

Data

partial

Analysis

partial

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:35647198
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:6daf2a4d6013757202d6e63a17b3e0fe1b60cf3e3b67bec16da01afb8abf8a70
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T18:14:34Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:06:39Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Identification of an Inflammatory Response-Related Gene Signature to Predict Survival and Immune Status in Glioma Patients.
doi
10.1155/2022/8972730
pmid
35647198
authors array · 5 items
[0]
Zhaoyue Yan
[1]
Yushuai Gao
[2]
Jinliang Yu
[3]
Zhiyuan Shen
[4]
Xingyao Bu
journal
Journal of immunology research
year
2022
abstract
Background: Glioma is the most common primary brain tumor with high mortality and poor outcomes. As a hallmark of cancers, inflammatory responses are crucial for their progression. The present study is aimed at exploring the prognostic value of inflammatory response-related genes (IRRGs) and constructing a prognostic IRRG signature for gliomas. Materials and Methods: We investigated the relationship between IRRGs and gliomas by integrating the transcriptomic data for gliomas from public databases. Differentially expressed IRRGs (DE-IRRGs) were identified in the GSE4290 cohort. Further, univariate, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to construct an IRRG signature using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort. Gliomas from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) cohort were employed for independent validation. The performance of gene signature was assessed by survival and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. The differences in clinical correlations, immune infiltrate types, immunotherapeutic response predictions, and pathway enrichment among subgroups were investigated via bioinformatic algorithms. Results: In total, 37 DE-IRRGs were determined, of which 31 were found to be associated with survival. Ultimately, eight genes were retained to construct an IRRG signature that further classified glioma patients into two groups; the high-risk group suffered a poorer outcome as compared to the low-risk group. Furthermore, the high-risk group was significantly correlated with several risk factors, including older age, higher tumor grade, IDH wild type, 1p19q noncodel, and MGMT unmethylation. The nomogram was constructed by integrating the risk scores and other independent clinical characteristics. Moreover, the high-risk group had a greater immune infiltration and was most likely to benefit from immunotherapy. Gene set enrichment analysis suggested that immune and oncogenic pathways were enriched in high-risk glioma patients. Conclusion: We constructed a signature composed of eight IRRGs for gliomas, which could effectively predict survival and guide decision-making for treatment.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
First, the univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to detect the prognostic DE-IRRGs based on TCGA data. Only the overall survival- (OS-) associated genes (P < 0.05) were further analyzed. Subsequently, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was used to obtain an optimal predictive model by minimizing the risk of overfitting [28]. Finally, a prognostic signature was constructed using the coefficients derived from multivariate Cox regression analysis
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:35647198
locator
sections[4] "2.2. Construction and Validation of a Prognostic IRRG Signature" paragraph 2
quote
First, the univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to detect the prognostic DE-IRRGs based on TCGA data. Only the overall survival- (OS-) associated genes (P < 0.05) were further analyzed. Subsequently, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was used to obtain an optimal predictive model by minimizing the risk of overfitting [28]. Finally, a prognostic signature was constructed using the coefficients derived from multivariate Cox regression analysis
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
The data of this study are available in GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), TCGA database (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/), and CGGA database (http://www.cgga.org.cn/).
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:35647198
locator
sections[22] "Data Availability" paragraph 2
quote
The data of this study are available in GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), TCGA database (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/), and CGGA database (http://www.cgga.org.cn/).
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
We constructed a signature composed of eight IRRGs for gliomas, which could effectively predict survival and guide decision-making for treatment.
kind
qualitative
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:35647198
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 4
quote
We constructed a signature composed of eight IRRGs for gliomas, which could effectively predict survival and guide decision-making for treatment.
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
complete
objective
We constructed a signature composed of eight IRRGs for gliomas, which could effectively predict survival and guide decision-making for treatment.
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:35647198
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE4290
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE4290
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 0 items
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 2 items
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:35647198
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8972730
sha256
sha256:cb69730082f719ae6d5caf32a90b42b4dcaa1d4688f218d9c7b73cd826cf8a51
bytes
58683
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.1155/2022/8972730
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC9132661
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
[1] object · 15 fields
id
data:geo:GSE4290
role
raw
format
geo-series
media_type
application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json
uri
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE4290
sha256
null
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
GSE4290
version
null
note
The data of this study are available in GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), TCGA database (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/), and CGGA database (http://www.cgga.org.cn/).
structure object · 15 fields
repository
GEO
access_route
GEO accession URL
access_statement_verbatim
The data of this study are available in GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), TCGA database (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/), and CGGA database (http://www.cgga.org.cn/).
access_statement_kind
data_availability_statement
sample_accessions array · 180 items
[0]
GSM97793
[1]
GSM97794
[2]
GSM97795
[3]
GSM97796
[4]
GSM97797
[5]
GSM97798
[6]
GSM97799
[7]
GSM97800
[8]
GSM97801
[9]
GSM97802
[10]
GSM97803
[11]
GSM97804
[12]
GSM97805
[13]
GSM97806
[14]
GSM97807
[15]
GSM97808
[16]
GSM97809
[17]
GSM97810
[18]
GSM97811
[19]
GSM97812
[20]
GSM97813
[21]
GSM97814
[22]
GSM97815
[23]
GSM97816
[24]
GSM97817
[25]
GSM97818
[26]
GSM97819
[27]
GSM97820
[28]
GSM97821
[29]
GSM97822
[30]
GSM97823
[31]
GSM97824
[32]
GSM97825
[33]
GSM97826
[34]
GSM97827
[35]
GSM97828
[36]
GSM97829
[37]
GSM97830
[38]
GSM97831
[39]
GSM97832
[40]
GSM97833
[41]
GSM97834
[42]
GSM97835
[43]
GSM97836
[44]
GSM97837
[45]
GSM97838
[46]
GSM97839
[47]
GSM97840
[48]
GSM97841
[49]
GSM97842
[50]
GSM97843
[51]
GSM97844
[52]
GSM97845
[53]
GSM97846
[54]
GSM97847
[55]
GSM97848
[56]
GSM97849
[57]
GSM97850
[58]
GSM97851
[59]
GSM97852
[60]
GSM97853
[61]
GSM97854
[62]
GSM97855
[63]
GSM97856
[64]
GSM97857
[65]
GSM97858
[66]
GSM97859
[67]
GSM97860
[68]
GSM97861
[69]
GSM97862
[70]
GSM97863
[71]
GSM97864
[72]
GSM97865
[73]
GSM97866
[74]
GSM97867
[75]
GSM97868
[76]
GSM97869
[77]
GSM97870
[78]
GSM97871
[79]
GSM97872
[80]
GSM97873
[81]
GSM97874
[82]
GSM97875
[83]
GSM97876
[84]
GSM97877
[85]
GSM97878
[86]
GSM97879
[87]
GSM97880
[88]
GSM97881
[89]
GSM97882
[90]
GSM97883
[91]
GSM97884
[92]
GSM97885
[93]
GSM97886
[94]
GSM97887
[95]
GSM97888
[96]
GSM97889
[97]
GSM97890
[98]
GSM97891
[99]
GSM97892
[100]
GSM97893
[101]
GSM97894
[102]
GSM97895
[103]
GSM97896
[104]
GSM97897
[105]
GSM97898
[106]
GSM97899
[107]
GSM97900
[108]
GSM97901
[109]
GSM97902
[110]
GSM97903
[111]
GSM97904
[112]
GSM97905
[113]
GSM97906
[114]
GSM97907
[115]
GSM97908
[116]
GSM97909
[117]
GSM97910
[118]
GSM97911
[119]
GSM97912
[120]
GSM97913
[121]
GSM97914
[122]
GSM97915
[123]
GSM97916
[124]
GSM97917
[125]
GSM97918
[126]
GSM97919
[127]
GSM97920
[128]
GSM97921
[129]
GSM97922
[130]
GSM97923
[131]
GSM97924
[132]
GSM97925
[133]
GSM97926
[134]
GSM97927
[135]
GSM97928
[136]
GSM97929
[137]
GSM97930
[138]
GSM97931
[139]
GSM97932
[140]
GSM97933
[141]
GSM97934
[142]
GSM97935
[143]
GSM97936
[144]
GSM97937
[145]
GSM97938
[146]
GSM97939
[147]
GSM97940
[148]
GSM97941
[149]
GSM97942
[150]
GSM97943
[151]
GSM97944
[152]
GSM97945
[153]
GSM97946
[154]
GSM97947
[155]
GSM97948
[156]
GSM97949
[157]
GSM97950
[158]
GSM97951
[159]
GSM97952
[160]
GSM97953
[161]
GSM97954
[162]
GSM97955
[163]
GSM97956
[164]
GSM97957
[165]
GSM97958
[166]
GSM97959
[167]
GSM97960
[168]
GSM97961
[169]
GSM97962
[170]
GSM97963
[171]
GSM97964
[172]
GSM97965
[173]
GSM97966
[174]
GSM97967
[175]
GSM97968
[176]
GSM97969
[177]
GSM97970
[178]
GSM97971
[179]
GSM97972
sample_count
180
group_sizes
null
group_sizes_basis
null
platform
570
taxon
Homo sapiens
title
Expression data of glioma samples from Henry Ford Hospital
resolution_checked_at
2026-11-01T15:39:54Z
resolution_check
identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read
downloaded
false
licence_read
false
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE4290 not downloaded
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE4290 licence not read
analysis object · 4 fields
state
partial
methods array · 8 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
survival_analysis
specific
cox_proportional_hazards
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
First, the univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to detect the prognostic DE-IRRGs based on TCGA data. Only the overall survival- (OS-) associated genes (P < 0.05) were further analyzed. Subsequently, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was used to obtain an optimal predictive model by minimizing the risk of overfitting [28]. Finally, a prognostic signature was constructed using the coefficients derived from multivariate Cox regression analysis
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
group_comparison
specific
student_t_test
label
Group comparison
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 1 item
[0]
student_t
expressible
false
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
two_or_more_groups_continuous
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Student's t-test
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
group_comparison
specific
wilcoxon
label
Group comparison
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 1 item
[0]
group_comparison_wilcoxon
expressible
false
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
two_or_more_groups_continuous
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Wilcoxon
[3] object · 10 fields
id
method-4
family
survival_analysis
specific
log_rank_test
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
logrank_test
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
log-rank
[4] object · 10 fields
id
method-5
family
correlation_analysis
specific
spearman
label
Correlation analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
spearman_rho
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
paired_numeric_columns
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Spearman's correlation
[5] object · 10 fields
id
method-6
family
network_analysis
specific
pathway_enrichment
label
Network / pathway analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
pathway_enrich
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
edge_list
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
pathway enrichment
[6] object · 10 fields
id
method-7
family
diagnostic_evaluation
specific
roc
label
Diagnostic test evaluation
dsl_operations array · 6 items
[0]
confusion_counts
[1]
roc_curve
[2]
sensitivity_specificity
[3]
solve_confusion_matrix
[4]
classification_metrics
[5]
published_precision_envelope
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
reference_standard_and_test
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
ROC curve
[7] object · 10 fields
id
method-8
family
contingency_analysis
specific
chi_square
label
Categorical (contingency table) analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
chi_square_test
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
categorical_cross_tabulation
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
chi-square
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
method.reader_differs_from_extractor
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
complete
tier
R1
blocked_on
nothing:replicable_now
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R1
reachable
true
accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE4290
resolved_accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE4290
statements array · 1 item
[0]
The data of this study are available in GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), TCGA database (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/), and CGGA database (http://www.cgga.org.cn/).
basis
The paper names GSE4290 in GEO database and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
assets array · 2 items
[0]
source:pmid:35647198
[1]
data:geo:GSE4290
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE4290
gaps array · 0 items
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T17:48:22Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
17031
completion_tokens
1505
cached_tokens
128
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:35647198
type
paper
label
pmid:35647198
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:35647198
type
manuscript
label
PMID 35647198 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE4290
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE4290
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:35647198
type
paper
label
pmid:35647198
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:35647198
type
manuscript
label
PMID 35647198 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE4290
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE4290
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-35647198
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:35647198
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-GSE4290
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE4290
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:35647198
parent_hash
sha256:699ef076853dec2fdb458b29ded2e2d639b36fa5ad8052ccf1e9a0cdbff19f3a
fork_of
null
gaps array · 7 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE4290 licence not read
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE4290 not downloaded
[2]
execution.not_run
[3]
method.reader_differs_from_extractor
[4]
review.human_critique
[5]
review.independent_reader
[6]
review.machine_critique
assays array · 1 item
[0] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
survival_analysis
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
First, the univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to detect the prognostic DE-IRRGs based on TCGA data. Only the overall survival- (OS-) associated genes (P < 0.05) were further analyzed. Subsequently, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was used to obtain an optimal predictive model by minimizing the risk of overfitting [28]. Finally, a prognostic signature was constructed using the coefficients derived from multivariate Cox regression analysis
order_basis
analysis_only
id
assay:1
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:35647198", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 4, "content_hash": "sha256:6daf2a4d6013757202d6e63a17b3e0fe1b60cf3e3b67bec16da01afb8abf8a70", "created_at": "2026-11-01T18:14:34Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:06:39Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Identification of an Inflammatory Response-Related Gene Signature to Predict Survival and Immune Status in Glioma Patients.", "doi": "10.1155/2022/8972730", "pmid": "35647198", "authors": ["Zhaoyue Yan", "Yushuai Gao", "Jinliang Yu", "Zhiyuan Shen", "Xingyao Bu"], "journal": "Journal of immunology research", "year": 2022, "abstract": "Background: Glioma is the most common primary brain tumor with high mortality and poor outcomes. As a hallmark of cancers, inflammatory responses are crucial for their progression. The present study is aimed at exploring the prognostic value of inflammatory response-related genes (IRRGs) and constructing a prognostic IRRG signature for gliomas.\nMaterials and Methods: We investigated the relationship between IRRGs and gliomas by integrating the transcriptomic data for gliomas from public databases. Differentially expressed IRRGs (DE-IRRGs) were identified in the GSE4290 cohort. Further, univariate, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to construct an IRRG signature using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort. Gliomas from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) cohort were employed for independent validation. The performance of gene signature was assessed by survival and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. The differences in clinical correlations, immune infiltrate types, immunotherapeutic response predictions, and pathway enrichment among subgroups were investigated via bioinformatic algorithms.\nResults: In total, 37 DE-IRRGs were determined, of which 31 were found to be associated with survival. Ultimately, eight genes were retained to construct an IRRG signature that further classified glioma patients into two groups; the high-risk group suffered a poorer outcome as compared to the low-risk group. Furthermore, the high-risk group was significantly correlated with several risk factors, including older age, higher tumor grade, IDH wild type, 1p19q noncodel, and MGMT unmethylation. The nomogram was constructed by integrating the risk scores and other independent clinical characteristics. Moreover, the high-risk group had a greater immune infiltration and was most likely to benefit from immunotherapy. Gene set enrichment analysis suggested that immune and oncogenic pathways were enriched in high-risk glioma patients.\nConclusion: We constructed a signature composed of eight IRRGs for gliomas, which could effectively predict survival and guide decision-making for treatment.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "First, the univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to detect the prognostic DE-IRRGs based on TCGA data. Only the overall survival- (OS-) associated genes (P < 0.05) were further analyzed. Subsequently, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was used to obtain an optimal predictive model by minimizing the risk of overfitting [28]. Finally, a prognostic signature was constructed using the coefficients derived from multivariate Cox regression analysis", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35647198", "locator": "sections[4] \"2.2. Construction and Validation of a Prognostic IRRG Signature\" paragraph 2", "quote": "First, the univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to detect the prognostic DE-IRRGs based on TCGA data. Only the overall survival- (OS-) associated genes (P < 0.05) were further analyzed. Subsequently, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was used to obtain an optimal predictive model by minimizing the risk of overfitting [28]. Finally, a prognostic signature was constructed using the coefficients derived from multivariate Cox regression analysis"}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The data of this study are available in GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), TCGA database (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/), and CGGA database (http://www.cgga.org.cn/).", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35647198", "locator": "sections[22] \"Data Availability\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The data of this study are available in GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), TCGA database (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/), and CGGA database (http://www.cgga.org.cn/)."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "We constructed a signature composed of eight IRRGs for gliomas, which could effectively predict survival and guide decision-making for treatment.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35647198", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 4", "quote": "We constructed a signature composed of eight IRRGs for gliomas, which could effectively predict survival and guide decision-making for treatment."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "We constructed a signature composed of eight IRRGs for gliomas, which could effectively predict survival and guide decision-making for treatment.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:35647198"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE4290"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE4290"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:35647198", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8972730", "sha256": "sha256:cb69730082f719ae6d5caf32a90b42b4dcaa1d4688f218d9c7b73cd826cf8a51", "bytes": 58683, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1155/2022/8972730", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC9132661", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE4290", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE4290", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE4290", "version": null, "note": "The data of this study are available in GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), TCGA database (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/), and CGGA database (http://www.cgga.org.cn/).", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The data of this study are available in GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), TCGA database (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/), and CGGA database (http://www.cgga.org.cn/).", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM97793", "GSM97794", "GSM97795", "GSM97796", "GSM97797", "GSM97798", "GSM97799", "GSM97800", "GSM97801", "GSM97802", "GSM97803", "GSM97804", "GSM97805", "GSM97806", "GSM97807", "GSM97808", "GSM97809", "GSM97810", "GSM97811", "GSM97812", "GSM97813", "GSM97814", "GSM97815", "GSM97816", "GSM97817", "GSM97818", "GSM97819", "GSM97820", "GSM97821", "GSM97822", "GSM97823", "GSM97824", "GSM97825", "GSM97826", "GSM97827", "GSM97828", "GSM97829", "GSM97830", "GSM97831", "GSM97832", "GSM97833", "GSM97834", "GSM97835", "GSM97836", "GSM97837", "GSM97838", "GSM97839", "GSM97840", "GSM97841", "GSM97842", "GSM97843", "GSM97844", "GSM97845", "GSM97846", "GSM97847", "GSM97848", "GSM97849", "GSM97850", "GSM97851", "GSM97852", "GSM97853", "GSM97854", "GSM97855", "GSM97856", "GSM97857", "GSM97858", "GSM97859", "GSM97860", "GSM97861", "GSM97862", "GSM97863", "GSM97864", "GSM97865", "GSM97866", "GSM97867", "GSM97868", "GSM97869", "GSM97870", "GSM97871", "GSM97872", "GSM97873", "GSM97874", "GSM97875", "GSM97876", "GSM97877", "GSM97878", "GSM97879", "GSM97880", "GSM97881", "GSM97882", "GSM97883", "GSM97884", "GSM97885", "GSM97886", "GSM97887", "GSM97888", "GSM97889", "GSM97890", "GSM97891", "GSM97892", "GSM97893", "GSM97894", "GSM97895", "GSM97896", "GSM97897", "GSM97898", "GSM97899", "GSM97900", "GSM97901", "GSM97902", "GSM97903", "GSM97904", "GSM97905", "GSM97906", "GSM97907", "GSM97908", "GSM97909", "GSM97910", "GSM97911", "GSM97912", "GSM97913", "GSM97914", "GSM97915", "GSM97916", "GSM97917", "GSM97918", "GSM97919", "GSM97920", "GSM97921", "GSM97922", "GSM97923", "GSM97924", "GSM97925", "GSM97926", "GSM97927", "GSM97928", "GSM97929", "GSM97930", "GSM97931", "GSM97932", "GSM97933", "GSM97934", "GSM97935", "GSM97936", "GSM97937", "GSM97938", "GSM97939", "GSM97940", "GSM97941", "GSM97942", "GSM97943", "GSM97944", "GSM97945", "GSM97946", "GSM97947", "GSM97948", "GSM97949", "GSM97950", "GSM97951", "GSM97952", "GSM97953", "GSM97954", "GSM97955", "GSM97956", "GSM97957", "GSM97958", "GSM97959", "GSM97960", "GSM97961", "GSM97962", "GSM97963", "GSM97964", "GSM97965", "GSM97966", "GSM97967", "GSM97968", "GSM97969", "GSM97970", "GSM97971", "GSM97972"], "sample_count": 180, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "570", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Expression data of glioma samples from Henry Ford Hospital", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE4290 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE4290 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "First, the univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to detect the prognostic DE-IRRGs based on TCGA data. Only the overall survival- (OS-) associated genes (P < 0.05) were further analyzed. Subsequently, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was used to obtain an optimal predictive model by minimizing the risk of overfitting [28]. Finally, a prognostic signature was constructed using the coefficients derived from multivariate Cox regression analysis"}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "student_t_test", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["student_t"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Student's t-test"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "wilcoxon", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Wilcoxon"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "log_rank_test", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["logrank_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "log-rank"}}, {"id": "method-5", "family": "correlation_analysis", "specific": "spearman", "label": "Correlation analysis", "dsl_operations": ["spearman_rho"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["paired_numeric_columns"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Spearman's correlation"}}, {"id": "method-6", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "pathway_enrichment", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "pathway enrichment"}}, {"id": "method-7", "family": "diagnostic_evaluation", "specific": "roc", "label": "Diagnostic test evaluation", "dsl_operations": ["confusion_counts", "roc_curve", "sensitivity_specificity", "solve_confusion_matrix", "classification_metrics", "published_precision_envelope"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["reference_standard_and_test"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "ROC curve"}}, {"id": "method-8", "family": "contingency_analysis", "specific": "chi_square", "label": "Categorical (contingency table) analysis", "dsl_operations": ["chi_square_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["categorical_cross_tabulation"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "chi-square"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_differs_from_extractor"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE4290"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE4290"], "statements": ["The data of this study are available in GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), TCGA database (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/), and CGGA database (http://www.cgga.org.cn/)."], "basis": "The paper names GSE4290 in GEO database and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "assets": ["source:pmid:35647198", "data:geo:GSE4290"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE4290"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T17:48:22Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 17031, "completion_tokens": 1505, "cached_tokens": 128}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:35647198", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:35647198"}, {"id": "source:pmid:35647198", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 35647198 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE4290", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE4290"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:35647198", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:35647198"}, {"id": "source:pmid:35647198", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 35647198 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE4290", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE4290"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-35647198", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:35647198"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE4290", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE4290"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:35647198", "parent_hash": "sha256:699ef076853dec2fdb458b29ded2e2d639b36fa5ad8052ccf1e9a0cdbff19f3a", "fork_of": null, "generation": 3}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE4290 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE4290 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.reader_differs_from_extractor", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["First, the univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to detect the prognostic DE-IRRGs based on TCGA data. Only the overall survival- (OS-) associated genes (P < 0.05) were further analyzed. Subsequently, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was used to obtain an optimal predictive model by minimizing the risk of overfitting [28]. Finally, a prognostic signature was constructed using the coefficients derived from multivariate Cox regression analysis"], "order_basis": "analysis_only", "id": "assay:1"}]}