← All .science files
pmid:35692818
Predicting Differences in Treatment Response and Survival Time of Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients Based on a Prognostic Risk Model of Glycolysis-Related Genes.
Rongchang Zhao · Dan Ding · Yan Ding · Rongbo Han · Xiujuan Wang · Chunrong Zhu
Frontiers in genetics · 2022 doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.828543
Paper
complete
Experiment
partial
Data
partial
Analysis
partial
Execution
absent
Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
paper object · 10 fields
authors array · 6 items
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
[1] object · 6 fields
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
outputs array · 1 item
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 1 item
data object · 3 fields
assets array · 1 item
[0] object · 15 fields
structure object · 4 fields
gaps array · 0 items
analysis object · 4 fields
methods array · 6 items
[0] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[1] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 1 item
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[2] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[3] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[4] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 6 items
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[5] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
capability object · 3 fields
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
assay_families array · 9 items
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
required_operations array · 1 item
missing_operations array · 0 items
capability object · 4 fields
data object · 6 fields
accessions array · 1 item
resolved_accessions array · 0 items
statements array · 1 item
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
assets array · 1 item
steps array · 1 item
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
gaps array · 1 item
review object · 5 fields
machine_critique object · 5 fields
reader object · 5 fields
evidence_check object · 2 fields
usage object · 3 fields
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
gaps array · 3 items
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
[1] object · 3 fields
[2] object · 3 fields
[1] object · 4 fields
agents array · 2 items
lineage object · 4 fields
gaps array · 6 items
assays array · 1 item
[0] object · 11 fields
required_operations array · 1 item
source_hashes object · 1 field
evidence array · 1 item
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:35692818", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 4, "content_hash": "sha256:bc92000bb5d0ca7df7c4ad5ad4ff44e2c29c1be466c18529c15f64a77fc3dade", "created_at": "2026-11-01T18:14:39Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:06:45Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Predicting Differences in Treatment Response and Survival Time of Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients Based on a Prognostic Risk Model of Glycolysis-Related Genes.", "doi": "10.3389/fgene.2022.828543", "pmid": "35692818", "authors": ["Rongchang Zhao", "Dan Ding", "Yan Ding", "Rongbo Han", "Xiujuan Wang", "Chunrong Zhu"], "journal": "Frontiers in genetics", "year": 2022, "abstract": "Background: Multiple factors influence the survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Specifically, the therapeutic outcomes of treatments and the probability of recurrence of the disease differ among patients with the same stage of LUAD. Therefore, effective prognostic predictors need to be identified. Methods: Based on the tumor mutation burden (TMB) data obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, LUAD patients were divided into high and low TMB groups, and differentially expressed glycolysis-related genes between the two groups were screened. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and Cox regression were used to obtain a prognostic model. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and a calibration curve were generated to evaluate the nomogram that was constructed based on clinicopathological characteristics and the risk score. Two data sets (GSE68465 and GSE11969) from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) were used to verify the prognostic performance of the gene. Furthermore, differences in immune cell distribution, immune-related molecules, and drug susceptibility were assessed for their relationship with the risk score. Results: We constructed a 5-gene signature (FKBP4, HMMR, B4GALT1, SLC2A1, STC1) capable of dividing patients into two risk groups. There was a significant difference in overall survival (OS) times between the high-risk group and the low-risk group (p < 0.001), with the low-risk group having a better survival outcome. Through multivariate Cox analysis, the risk score was confirmed to be an independent prognostic factor (HR = 2.709, 95% CI = 1.981-3.705, p < 0.001), and the ROC curve and nomogram exhibited accurate prediction performance. Validation of the data obtained in the GEO database yielded similar results. Furthermore, there were significant differences in sensitivity to immunotherapy, cisplatin, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, docetaxel, gefitinib, and erlotinib between the low-risk and high-risk groups. Conclusion: Our results reveal that glycolysis-related genes are feasible predictors of survival and the treatment response of patients with LUAD.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "Univariate Cox regression analysis was used to screen for genes associated with prognosis with p < 0.0001. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and LASSO regression analysis were used to construct prognostic model.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35692818", "locator": "sections[9] \"Statistical Analysis\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Univariate Cox regression analysis was used to screen for genes associated with prognosis with p < 0.0001. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and LASSO regression analysis were used to construct prognostic model."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: The Cancer Genome Atlas, Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), accession numbers GSE68465 and GSE11969.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35692818", "locator": "sections[18] \"Data Availability Statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: The Cancer Genome Atlas, Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), accession numbers GSE68465 and GSE11969."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "We constructed a 5-gene signature (FKBP4, HMMR, B4GALT1, SLC2A1, STC1) capable of dividing patients into two risk groups.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35692818", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "We constructed a 5-gene signature (FKBP4, HMMR, B4GALT1, SLC2A1, STC1) capable of dividing patients into two risk groups."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "We constructed a 5-gene signature (FKBP4, HMMR, B4GALT1, SLC2A1, STC1) capable of dividing patients into two risk groups.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:35692818"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:35692818", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.828543", "sha256": "sha256:59bc3b7425cd66fccc927a09fa63d4b4c6d522c2abaaed9b5d708b221fddb0a1", "bytes": 47943, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3389/fgene.2022.828543", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC9174756", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}], "gaps": []}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "Univariate Cox regression analysis was used to screen for genes associated with prognosis with p < 0.0001. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and LASSO regression analysis were used to construct prognostic model."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "wilcoxon", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Wilcoxon"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "kaplan_meier", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "KM"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "log_rank_test", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["logrank_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "log-rank"}}, {"id": "method-5", "family": "diagnostic_evaluation", "specific": "roc", "label": "Diagnostic test evaluation", "dsl_operations": ["confusion_counts", "roc_curve", "sensitivity_specificity", "solve_confusion_matrix", "classification_metrics", "published_precision_envelope"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["reference_standard_and_test"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "ROC curve"}}, {"id": "method-6", "family": "contingency_analysis", "specific": "chi_square", "label": "Categorical (contingency table) analysis", "dsl_operations": ["chi_square_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["categorical_cross_tabulation"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Chi-Square"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_differs_from_extractor"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "data", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R4", "reachable": false, "accessions": ["GSE68465 and GSE11969"], "resolved_accessions": [], "statements": ["The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: The Cancer Genome Atlas, Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), accession numbers GSE68465 and GSE11969."], "basis": "The paper names GSE68465 and GSE11969, but the accession does not resolve in the repository (no reason recorded), so the data cannot be reached from here. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "assets": ["source:pmid:35692818"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:None"]}, "gaps": ["data:accession_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T17:49:57Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 14341, "completion_tokens": 1321, "cached_tokens": 264}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:35692818", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:35692818"}, {"id": "source:pmid:35692818", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 35692818 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:35692818", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:35692818"}, {"id": "source:pmid:35692818", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 35692818 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-35692818", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:35692818"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-None", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:None"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:35692818", "parent_hash": "sha256:e0186ca65bffedc4ac33fb2522511a13965842e476e328388d641bf23d636e97", "fork_of": null, "generation": 3}, "gaps": ["execution.not_run", "method.reader_differs_from_extractor", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"], "assays": [{"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["Univariate Cox regression analysis was used to screen for genes associated with prognosis with p < 0.0001. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and LASSO regression analysis were used to construct prognostic model."], "order_basis": "analysis_only", "id": "assay:1"}]}