Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:35692818

Predicting Differences in Treatment Response and Survival Time of Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients Based on a Prognostic Risk Model of Glycolysis-Related Genes.

Rongchang Zhao · Dan Ding · Yan Ding · Rongbo Han · Xiujuan Wang · Chunrong Zhu

Frontiers in genetics · 2022 doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.828543

Paper

complete

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

partial

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:35692818
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:bc92000bb5d0ca7df7c4ad5ad4ff44e2c29c1be466c18529c15f64a77fc3dade
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T18:14:39Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:06:45Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Predicting Differences in Treatment Response and Survival Time of Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients Based on a Prognostic Risk Model of Glycolysis-Related Genes.
doi
10.3389/fgene.2022.828543
pmid
35692818
authors array · 6 items
[0]
Rongchang Zhao
[1]
Dan Ding
[2]
Yan Ding
[3]
Rongbo Han
[4]
Xiujuan Wang
[5]
Chunrong Zhu
journal
Frontiers in genetics
year
2022
abstract
Background: Multiple factors influence the survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Specifically, the therapeutic outcomes of treatments and the probability of recurrence of the disease differ among patients with the same stage of LUAD. Therefore, effective prognostic predictors need to be identified. Methods: Based on the tumor mutation burden (TMB) data obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, LUAD patients were divided into high and low TMB groups, and differentially expressed glycolysis-related genes between the two groups were screened. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and Cox regression were used to obtain a prognostic model. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and a calibration curve were generated to evaluate the nomogram that was constructed based on clinicopathological characteristics and the risk score. Two data sets (GSE68465 and GSE11969) from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) were used to verify the prognostic performance of the gene. Furthermore, differences in immune cell distribution, immune-related molecules, and drug susceptibility were assessed for their relationship with the risk score. Results: We constructed a 5-gene signature (FKBP4, HMMR, B4GALT1, SLC2A1, STC1) capable of dividing patients into two risk groups. There was a significant difference in overall survival (OS) times between the high-risk group and the low-risk group (p < 0.001), with the low-risk group having a better survival outcome. Through multivariate Cox analysis, the risk score was confirmed to be an independent prognostic factor (HR = 2.709, 95% CI = 1.981-3.705, p < 0.001), and the ROC curve and nomogram exhibited accurate prediction performance. Validation of the data obtained in the GEO database yielded similar results. Furthermore, there were significant differences in sensitivity to immunotherapy, cisplatin, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, docetaxel, gefitinib, and erlotinib between the low-risk and high-risk groups. Conclusion: Our results reveal that glycolysis-related genes are feasible predictors of survival and the treatment response of patients with LUAD.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
Univariate Cox regression analysis was used to screen for genes associated with prognosis with p < 0.0001. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and LASSO regression analysis were used to construct prognostic model.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:35692818
locator
sections[9] "Statistical Analysis" paragraph 2
quote
Univariate Cox regression analysis was used to screen for genes associated with prognosis with p < 0.0001. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and LASSO regression analysis were used to construct prognostic model.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: The Cancer Genome Atlas, Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), accession numbers GSE68465 and GSE11969.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:35692818
locator
sections[18] "Data Availability Statement" paragraph 2
quote
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: The Cancer Genome Atlas, Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), accession numbers GSE68465 and GSE11969.
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
We constructed a 5-gene signature (FKBP4, HMMR, B4GALT1, SLC2A1, STC1) capable of dividing patients into two risk groups.
kind
qualitative
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:35692818
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 3
quote
We constructed a 5-gene signature (FKBP4, HMMR, B4GALT1, SLC2A1, STC1) capable of dividing patients into two risk groups.
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
We constructed a 5-gene signature (FKBP4, HMMR, B4GALT1, SLC2A1, STC1) capable of dividing patients into two risk groups.
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:35692818
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
blocked
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 1 item
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:35692818
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.828543
sha256
sha256:59bc3b7425cd66fccc927a09fa63d4b4c6d522c2abaaed9b5d708b221fddb0a1
bytes
47943
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.3389/fgene.2022.828543
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC9174756
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
gaps array · 0 items
analysis object · 4 fields
state
partial
methods array · 6 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
survival_analysis
specific
cox_proportional_hazards
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
Univariate Cox regression analysis was used to screen for genes associated with prognosis with p < 0.0001. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and LASSO regression analysis were used to construct prognostic model.
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
group_comparison
specific
wilcoxon
label
Group comparison
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 1 item
[0]
group_comparison_wilcoxon
expressible
false
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
two_or_more_groups_continuous
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Wilcoxon
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
survival_analysis
specific
kaplan_meier
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
survival_km
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
KM
[3] object · 10 fields
id
method-4
family
survival_analysis
specific
log_rank_test
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
logrank_test
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
log-rank
[4] object · 10 fields
id
method-5
family
diagnostic_evaluation
specific
roc
label
Diagnostic test evaluation
dsl_operations array · 6 items
[0]
confusion_counts
[1]
roc_curve
[2]
sensitivity_specificity
[3]
solve_confusion_matrix
[4]
classification_metrics
[5]
published_precision_envelope
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
reference_standard_and_test
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
ROC curve
[5] object · 10 fields
id
method-6
family
contingency_analysis
specific
chi_square
label
Categorical (contingency table) analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
chi_square_test
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
categorical_cross_tabulation
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Chi-Square
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
method.reader_differs_from_extractor
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
blocked
tier
R4
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R4
reachable
false
accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE68465 and GSE11969
resolved_accessions array · 0 items
statements array · 1 item
[0]
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: The Cancer Genome Atlas, Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), accession numbers GSE68465 and GSE11969.
basis
The paper names GSE68465 and GSE11969, but the accession does not resolve in the repository (no reason recorded), so the data cannot be reached from here. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
assets array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:35692818
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:accession_absent
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T17:49:57Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
14341
completion_tokens
1321
cached_tokens
264
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:35692818
type
paper
label
pmid:35692818
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:35692818
type
manuscript
label
PMID 35692818 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:35692818
type
paper
label
pmid:35692818
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:35692818
type
manuscript
label
PMID 35692818 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-35692818
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:35692818
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-None
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:35692818
parent_hash
sha256:e0186ca65bffedc4ac33fb2522511a13965842e476e328388d641bf23d636e97
fork_of
null
gaps array · 6 items
[0]
execution.not_run
[1]
method.reader_differs_from_extractor
[2]
review.human_critique
[3]
review.independent_reader
[4]
review.machine_critique
[5]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
assays array · 1 item
[0] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
survival_analysis
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
Univariate Cox regression analysis was used to screen for genes associated with prognosis with p < 0.0001. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and LASSO regression analysis were used to construct prognostic model.
order_basis
analysis_only
id
assay:1
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:35692818", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 4, "content_hash": "sha256:bc92000bb5d0ca7df7c4ad5ad4ff44e2c29c1be466c18529c15f64a77fc3dade", "created_at": "2026-11-01T18:14:39Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:06:45Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Predicting Differences in Treatment Response and Survival Time of Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients Based on a Prognostic Risk Model of Glycolysis-Related Genes.", "doi": "10.3389/fgene.2022.828543", "pmid": "35692818", "authors": ["Rongchang Zhao", "Dan Ding", "Yan Ding", "Rongbo Han", "Xiujuan Wang", "Chunrong Zhu"], "journal": "Frontiers in genetics", "year": 2022, "abstract": "Background: Multiple factors influence the survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Specifically, the therapeutic outcomes of treatments and the probability of recurrence of the disease differ among patients with the same stage of LUAD. Therefore, effective prognostic predictors need to be identified. Methods: Based on the tumor mutation burden (TMB) data obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, LUAD patients were divided into high and low TMB groups, and differentially expressed glycolysis-related genes between the two groups were screened. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and Cox regression were used to obtain a prognostic model. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and a calibration curve were generated to evaluate the nomogram that was constructed based on clinicopathological characteristics and the risk score. Two data sets (GSE68465 and GSE11969) from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) were used to verify the prognostic performance of the gene. Furthermore, differences in immune cell distribution, immune-related molecules, and drug susceptibility were assessed for their relationship with the risk score. Results: We constructed a 5-gene signature (FKBP4, HMMR, B4GALT1, SLC2A1, STC1) capable of dividing patients into two risk groups. There was a significant difference in overall survival (OS) times between the high-risk group and the low-risk group (p < 0.001), with the low-risk group having a better survival outcome. Through multivariate Cox analysis, the risk score was confirmed to be an independent prognostic factor (HR = 2.709, 95% CI = 1.981-3.705, p < 0.001), and the ROC curve and nomogram exhibited accurate prediction performance. Validation of the data obtained in the GEO database yielded similar results. Furthermore, there were significant differences in sensitivity to immunotherapy, cisplatin, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, docetaxel, gefitinib, and erlotinib between the low-risk and high-risk groups. Conclusion: Our results reveal that glycolysis-related genes are feasible predictors of survival and the treatment response of patients with LUAD.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "Univariate Cox regression analysis was used to screen for genes associated with prognosis with p < 0.0001. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and LASSO regression analysis were used to construct prognostic model.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35692818", "locator": "sections[9] \"Statistical Analysis\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Univariate Cox regression analysis was used to screen for genes associated with prognosis with p < 0.0001. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and LASSO regression analysis were used to construct prognostic model."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: The Cancer Genome Atlas, Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), accession numbers GSE68465 and GSE11969.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35692818", "locator": "sections[18] \"Data Availability Statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: The Cancer Genome Atlas, Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), accession numbers GSE68465 and GSE11969."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "We constructed a 5-gene signature (FKBP4, HMMR, B4GALT1, SLC2A1, STC1) capable of dividing patients into two risk groups.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35692818", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "We constructed a 5-gene signature (FKBP4, HMMR, B4GALT1, SLC2A1, STC1) capable of dividing patients into two risk groups."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "We constructed a 5-gene signature (FKBP4, HMMR, B4GALT1, SLC2A1, STC1) capable of dividing patients into two risk groups.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:35692818"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:35692818", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.828543", "sha256": "sha256:59bc3b7425cd66fccc927a09fa63d4b4c6d522c2abaaed9b5d708b221fddb0a1", "bytes": 47943, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3389/fgene.2022.828543", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC9174756", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}], "gaps": []}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "Univariate Cox regression analysis was used to screen for genes associated with prognosis with p < 0.0001. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and LASSO regression analysis were used to construct prognostic model."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "wilcoxon", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Wilcoxon"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "kaplan_meier", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "KM"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "log_rank_test", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["logrank_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "log-rank"}}, {"id": "method-5", "family": "diagnostic_evaluation", "specific": "roc", "label": "Diagnostic test evaluation", "dsl_operations": ["confusion_counts", "roc_curve", "sensitivity_specificity", "solve_confusion_matrix", "classification_metrics", "published_precision_envelope"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["reference_standard_and_test"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "ROC curve"}}, {"id": "method-6", "family": "contingency_analysis", "specific": "chi_square", "label": "Categorical (contingency table) analysis", "dsl_operations": ["chi_square_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["categorical_cross_tabulation"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Chi-Square"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_differs_from_extractor"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "data", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R4", "reachable": false, "accessions": ["GSE68465 and GSE11969"], "resolved_accessions": [], "statements": ["The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: The Cancer Genome Atlas, Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), accession numbers GSE68465 and GSE11969."], "basis": "The paper names GSE68465 and GSE11969, but the accession does not resolve in the repository (no reason recorded), so the data cannot be reached from here. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "assets": ["source:pmid:35692818"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:None"]}, "gaps": ["data:accession_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T17:49:57Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 14341, "completion_tokens": 1321, "cached_tokens": 264}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:35692818", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:35692818"}, {"id": "source:pmid:35692818", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 35692818 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:35692818", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:35692818"}, {"id": "source:pmid:35692818", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 35692818 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-35692818", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:35692818"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-None", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:None"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:35692818", "parent_hash": "sha256:e0186ca65bffedc4ac33fb2522511a13965842e476e328388d641bf23d636e97", "fork_of": null, "generation": 3}, "gaps": ["execution.not_run", "method.reader_differs_from_extractor", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"], "assays": [{"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["Univariate Cox regression analysis was used to screen for genes associated with prognosis with p < 0.0001. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and LASSO regression analysis were used to construct prognostic model."], "order_basis": "analysis_only", "id": "assay:1"}]}