Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:35967414

Classification of colon adenocarcinoma based on immunological characterizations: Implications for prognosis and immunotherapy.

Midie Xu · Jinjia Chang · Wenfeng Wang · Xin Wang · Xu Wang · Weiwei Weng · Cong Tan · Meng Zhang · Shujuan Ni · Lei Wang · Zhaohui Huang · Zhenzhong Deng · Wenhua Li · Dan Huang · Weiqi Sheng

Frontiers in immunology · 2022 doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.934083

Paper

complete

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

complete

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:35967414
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:4e4c3ccd1d887e6ec879b619e08e8f6764d91c84da1c2499bd0e8c0996cd7493
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T18:15:05Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:07:16Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Classification of colon adenocarcinoma based on immunological characterizations: Implications for prognosis and immunotherapy.
doi
10.3389/fimmu.2022.934083
pmid
35967414
authors array · 15 items
[0]
Midie Xu
[1]
Jinjia Chang
[2]
Wenfeng Wang
[3]
Xin Wang
[4]
Xu Wang
[5]
Weiwei Weng
[6]
Cong Tan
[7]
Meng Zhang
[8]
Shujuan Ni
[9]
Lei Wang
[10]
Zhaohui Huang
[11]
Zhenzhong Deng
[12]
Wenhua Li
[13]
Dan Huang
[14]
Weiqi Sheng
journal
Frontiers in immunology
year
2022
abstract
Accurate immune molecular typing is pivotal for screening out patients with colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) who may benefit from immunotherapy and whose tumor microenvironment (TME) was needed for reprogramming to beneficial immune-mediated responses. However, little is known about the immune characteristic of COAD. Here, by calculating the enrichment score of immune characteristics in three online COAD datasets (TCGA-COAD, GSE39582, and GSE17538), we identified 17 prognostic-related immune characteristics that overlapped in at least two datasets. We determined that COADs could be stratified into three immune subtypes (IS1-IS3), based on consensus clustering of these 17 immune characteristics. Each of the three ISs was associated with distinct clinicopathological characteristics, genetic aberrations, tumor-infiltrating immune cell composition, immunophenotyping (immune "hot" and immune "cold"), and cytokine profiles, as well as different clinical outcomes and immunotherapy/therapeutic response. Patients with the IS1 tumor had high immune infiltration but immunosuppressive phenotype, IS3 tumor is an immune "hot" phenotype, whereas those with the IS2 tumor had an immune "cold" phenotype. We further verified the distinct immune phenotype of IS1 and IS3 by an in-house COAD cohort. We propose that the immune subtyping can be utilized to identify COAD patients who will be affected by the tumor immune microenvironment. Furthermore, the ISs may provide a guide for personalized cancer immunotherapy and for tumor prognosis.
claims array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: We applied 4 COAD datasets from two online databases: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/) database, and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (including three datasets: GSE39582, GSE17538 and GSE72970; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). We had uploaded all the working sheets as additional files in the submission system.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:35967414
locator
sections[22] "Data availability statement" paragraph 2
quote
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: We applied 4 COAD datasets from two online databases: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/) database, and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (including three datasets: GSE39582, GSE17538 and GSE72970; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). We had uploaded all the working sheets as additional files in the submission system.
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
null
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:35967414
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
blocked
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 1 item
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:35967414
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.934083
sha256
sha256:88d81a1531a939cf91464b92b12440c344937a226d54b6f194b5237f210e8db6
bytes
78175
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.3389/fimmu.2022.934083
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC9363576
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
gaps array · 0 items
analysis object · 4 fields
state
complete
methods array · 5 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
group_comparison
specific
anova
label
Group comparison
dsl_operations array · 4 items
[0]
group_summary
[1]
welch_t
[2]
bootstrap_mean_difference
[3]
group_comparison_anova
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
two_or_more_groups_continuous
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
ANOVA
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
survival_analysis
specific
cox_proportional_hazards
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Cox regression
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
correlation_analysis
specific
pearson
label
Correlation analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
pearson_r
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
paired_numeric_columns
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Pearson correlation
[3] object · 10 fields
id
method-4
family
clustering
specific
hierarchical
label
Clustering
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
hierarchical_cluster
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
feature_matrix
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
hierarchical clustering
[4] object · 10 fields
id
method-5
family
network_analysis
specific
ppi_network
label
Network / pathway analysis
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
build_graph
[1]
centrality_scores
[2]
pathway_enrich
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
edge_list
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
PPI
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 0 items
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
blocked
tier
R4
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 4 items
[0]
group_summary
[1]
welch_t
[2]
bootstrap_mean_difference
[3]
group_comparison_anova
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: anova.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R4
reachable
false
accessions array · 0 items
resolved_accessions array · 0 items
statements array · 1 item
[0]
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: We applied 4 COAD datasets from two online databases: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/) database, and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (including three datasets: GSE39582, GSE17538 and GSE72970; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). We had uploaded all the working sheets as additional files in the submission system.
basis
The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 4 items
[0]
group_summary
[1]
welch_t
[2]
bootstrap_mean_difference
[3]
group_comparison_anova
assets array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:35967414
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:accession_absent
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T18:00:12Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
null
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
21458
completion_tokens
2162
cached_tokens
264
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:35967414
type
paper
label
pmid:35967414
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:35967414
type
manuscript
label
PMID 35967414 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:35967414
type
paper
label
pmid:35967414
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:35967414
type
manuscript
label
PMID 35967414 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-35967414
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:35967414
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-None
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:35967414
parent_hash
sha256:664b0219660cb997e5ad5b58f9453e9378a721e4f2688de1810465d32b5ca129
fork_of
null
gaps array · 5 items
[0]
execution.not_run
[1]
review.human_critique
[2]
review.independent_reader
[3]
review.machine_critique
[4]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
assays array · 3 items
[0] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_id
microarray
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.99
evidence array · 2 items
[0]
t tool (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/). The microarray gene expression profiles and patients’ clini
[1]
the Helsinki Declaration. A series of tissue microarray (TMA) slides, which includes 223 patients wi
order_basis
paper_text_order:2108
id
assay:1
[1] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.99
evidence array · 3 items
[0]
hanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC), were used for immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis. IHC analysis on these sample
[1]
(FUSCC), were used for immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis. IHC analysis on these samples was
[2]
sed for immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis. IHC analysis on these samples was approved by th
order_basis
paper_text_order:3243
id
assay:2
[2] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
group_comparison
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 4 items
[0]
group_summary
[1]
welch_t
[2]
bootstrap_mean_difference
[3]
group_comparison_anova
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
ANOVA
order_basis
consumes_earlier_output
id
assay:3
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:35967414", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 4, "content_hash": "sha256:4e4c3ccd1d887e6ec879b619e08e8f6764d91c84da1c2499bd0e8c0996cd7493", "created_at": "2026-11-01T18:15:05Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:07:16Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Classification of colon adenocarcinoma based on immunological characterizations: Implications for prognosis and immunotherapy.", "doi": "10.3389/fimmu.2022.934083", "pmid": "35967414", "authors": ["Midie Xu", "Jinjia Chang", "Wenfeng Wang", "Xin Wang", "Xu Wang", "Weiwei Weng", "Cong Tan", "Meng Zhang", "Shujuan Ni", "Lei Wang", "Zhaohui Huang", "Zhenzhong Deng", "Wenhua Li", "Dan Huang", "Weiqi Sheng"], "journal": "Frontiers in immunology", "year": 2022, "abstract": "Accurate immune molecular typing is pivotal for screening out patients with colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) who may benefit from immunotherapy and whose tumor microenvironment (TME) was needed for reprogramming to beneficial immune-mediated responses. However, little is known about the immune characteristic of COAD. Here, by calculating the enrichment score of immune characteristics in three online COAD datasets (TCGA-COAD, GSE39582, and GSE17538), we identified 17 prognostic-related immune characteristics that overlapped in at least two datasets. We determined that COADs could be stratified into three immune subtypes (IS1-IS3), based on consensus clustering of these 17 immune characteristics. Each of the three ISs was associated with distinct clinicopathological characteristics, genetic aberrations, tumor-infiltrating immune cell composition, immunophenotyping (immune \"hot\" and immune \"cold\"), and cytokine profiles, as well as different clinical outcomes and immunotherapy/therapeutic response. Patients with the IS1 tumor had high immune infiltration but immunosuppressive phenotype, IS3 tumor is an immune \"hot\" phenotype, whereas those with the IS2 tumor had an immune \"cold\" phenotype. We further verified the distinct immune phenotype of IS1 and IS3 by an in-house COAD cohort. We propose that the immune subtyping can be utilized to identify COAD patients who will be affected by the tumor immune microenvironment. Furthermore, the ISs may provide a guide for personalized cancer immunotherapy and for tumor prognosis.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: We applied 4 COAD datasets from two online databases: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/) database, and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (including three datasets: GSE39582, GSE17538 and GSE72970; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). We had uploaded all the working sheets as additional files in the submission system.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35967414", "locator": "sections[22] \"Data availability statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: We applied 4 COAD datasets from two online databases: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/) database, and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (including three datasets: GSE39582, GSE17538 and GSE72970; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). We had uploaded all the working sheets as additional files in the submission system."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": null, "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:35967414"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:35967414", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.934083", "sha256": "sha256:88d81a1531a939cf91464b92b12440c344937a226d54b6f194b5237f210e8db6", "bytes": 78175, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3389/fimmu.2022.934083", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC9363576", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}], "gaps": []}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "anova", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "ANOVA"}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Cox regression"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "correlation_analysis", "specific": "pearson", "label": "Correlation analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pearson_r"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["paired_numeric_columns"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Pearson correlation"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "clustering", "specific": "hierarchical", "label": "Clustering", "dsl_operations": ["hierarchical_cluster"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["feature_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "hierarchical clustering"}}, {"id": "method-5", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "ppi_network", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["build_graph", "centrality_scores", "pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "PPI"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "data", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: anova."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R4", "reachable": false, "accessions": [], "resolved_accessions": [], "statements": ["Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: We applied 4 COAD datasets from two online databases: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/) database, and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (including three datasets: GSE39582, GSE17538 and GSE72970; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). We had uploaded all the working sheets as additional files in the submission system."], "basis": "The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "assets": ["source:pmid:35967414"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:None"]}, "gaps": ["data:accession_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T18:00:12Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": null, "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 21458, "completion_tokens": 2162, "cached_tokens": 264}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:35967414", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:35967414"}, {"id": "source:pmid:35967414", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 35967414 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:35967414", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:35967414"}, {"id": "source:pmid:35967414", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 35967414 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-35967414", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:35967414"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-None", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:None"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:35967414", "parent_hash": "sha256:664b0219660cb997e5ad5b58f9453e9378a721e4f2688de1810465d32b5ca129", "fork_of": null, "generation": 3}, "gaps": ["execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "microarray", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["t tool (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/). The microarray gene expression profiles and patients’ clini", "the Helsinki Declaration. A series of tissue microarray (TMA) slides, which includes 223 patients wi"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:2108", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "ihc", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["hanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC), were used for immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis. IHC analysis on these sample", "(FUSCC), were used for immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis. IHC analysis on these samples was", "sed for immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis. IHC analysis on these samples was approved by th"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:3243", "id": "assay:2"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "group_comparison", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 0.8, "evidence": ["ANOVA"], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:3"}]}