Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:36130276

Highly significant improvement of protein sequence alignments with AlphaFold2.

Athanasios Baltzis · Leila Mansouri · Suzanne Jin · Björn E Langer · Ionas Erb · Cedric Notredame

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022 doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btac625

Paper

complete

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

absent

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:36130276
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:b8dc4bfced834c8450b765a84f572916a0250aaa61d3c73359ff394f1d8c4ff6
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T18:15:24Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T19:00:18Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Highly significant improvement of protein sequence alignments with AlphaFold2.
doi
10.1093/bioinformatics/btac625
pmid
36130276
authors array · 6 items
[0]
Athanasios Baltzis
[1]
Leila Mansouri
[2]
Suzanne Jin
[3]
Björn E Langer
[4]
Ionas Erb
[5]
Cedric Notredame
journal
Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
year
2022
abstract
MOTIVATION: Protein sequence alignments are essential to structural, evolutionary and functional analysis, but their accuracy is often limited by sequence similarity unless molecular structures are available. Protein structures predicted at experimental grade accuracy, as achieved by AlphaFold2, could therefore have a major impact on sequence analysis. RESULTS: Here, we find that multiple sequence alignments estimated on AlphaFold2 predictions are almost as accurate as alignments estimated on experimental structures and significantly closer to the structural reference than sequence-based alignments. We also show that AlphaFold2 structural models of relatively low quality can be used to obtain highly accurate alignments. These results suggest that, besides structure modeling, AlphaFold2 encodes higher-order dependencies that can be exploited for sequence analysis. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All data, analyses and results are available on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7031286). The code and scripts have been deposited in GitHub (https://github.com/cbcrg/msa-af2-nf) and the various containers in (https://cloud.sylabs.io/library/athbaltzis/af2/alphafold, https://hub.docker.com/r/athbaltzis/pred). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
claims array · 2 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
All data, analyses and results are available on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7031286).
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:36130276
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 3
quote
All data, analyses and results are available on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7031286).
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
Alignments computed from AlphaFold2 predictions achieved an average SoP accuracy of 93.95%, compared with 70.33% for sequence-based alignments, an improvement of 23.62 percentage points.
kind
quantitative
target object · 4 fields
value
0.0002
unit
p-value
tolerance
null
source
Across all MSAs, the difference is highly significant, with an average improvement by 23.62 percent points of MSA-AF2 over MSA-Seq (93.95% versus 70.33% and Wilcoxon test p-value = 0.0002, Table 1, Supplementary Table S1a).
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:36130276
locator
sections[11] "3.1 Alignments computation and comparisons" paragraph 2
quote
Across all MSAs, the difference is highly significant, with an average improvement by 23.62 percent points of MSA-AF2 over MSA-Seq (93.95% versus 70.33% and Wilcoxon test p-value = 0.0002, Table 1, Supplementary Table S1a).
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
Alignments computed from AlphaFold2 predictions achieved an average SoP accuracy of 93.95%, compared with 70.33% for sequence-based alignments, an improvement of 23.62 percentage points.
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:36130276
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
blocked
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 1 item
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:36130276
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btac625
sha256
sha256:0786c8b87fc7075214118cd3cfd0c6a09230a4ed2d2c97eb6896be0f63c98c8c
bytes
29186
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.1093/bioinformatics/btac625
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC9665868
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
gaps array · 0 items
analysis object · 4 fields
state
absent
methods array · 0 items
targets array · 1 item
[0] object · 8 fields
id
target-published-estimate
claim_id
claim-target-result
operation
null
unit
p-value
tolerance
null
state
complete
note
The threshold the paper applied to its own result, as the paper states it. A run that reproduces the effect is judged against this threshold.
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
method
[1]
operations
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
blocked
tier
R4
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R4
expressible
false
required_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The reader quoted the method the paper names (not named), but the corpus's method extractor could not map it onto a DSL operation, so the method is published but not expressible.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R4
reachable
false
accessions array · 0 items
resolved_accessions array · 0 items
statements array · 1 item
[0]
All data, analyses and results are available on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7031286).
basis
The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
assets array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:36130276
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:accession_absent
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T18:06:32Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
null
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
8772
completion_tokens
1826
cached_tokens
256
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:36130276
type
paper
label
pmid:36130276
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:36130276
type
manuscript
label
PMID 36130276 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:36130276
type
paper
label
pmid:36130276
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:36130276
type
manuscript
label
PMID 36130276 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-36130276
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:36130276
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-None
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:36130276
parent_hash
sha256:95db9486b036edf6632d3f6113594d6dcc83ddb82133dcf66ae213d523202edc
fork_of
null
gaps array · 7 items
[0]
execution.not_run
[1]
method
[2]
operations
[3]
review.human_critique
[4]
review.independent_reader
[5]
review.machine_critique
[6]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.0", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:36130276", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 2, "content_hash": "sha256:b8dc4bfced834c8450b765a84f572916a0250aaa61d3c73359ff394f1d8c4ff6", "created_at": "2026-11-01T18:15:24Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T19:00:18Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Highly significant improvement of protein sequence alignments with AlphaFold2.", "doi": "10.1093/bioinformatics/btac625", "pmid": "36130276", "authors": ["Athanasios Baltzis", "Leila Mansouri", "Suzanne Jin", "Björn E Langer", "Ionas Erb", "Cedric Notredame"], "journal": "Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)", "year": 2022, "abstract": "MOTIVATION: Protein sequence alignments are essential to structural, evolutionary and functional analysis, but their accuracy is often limited by sequence similarity unless molecular structures are available. Protein structures predicted at experimental grade accuracy, as achieved by AlphaFold2, could therefore have a major impact on sequence analysis.\nRESULTS: Here, we find that multiple sequence alignments estimated on AlphaFold2 predictions are almost as accurate as alignments estimated on experimental structures and significantly closer to the structural reference than sequence-based alignments. We also show that AlphaFold2 structural models of relatively low quality can be used to obtain highly accurate alignments. These results suggest that, besides structure modeling, AlphaFold2 encodes higher-order dependencies that can be exploited for sequence analysis.\nAVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All data, analyses and results are available on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7031286). The code and scripts have been deposited in GitHub (https://github.com/cbcrg/msa-af2-nf) and the various containers in (https://cloud.sylabs.io/library/athbaltzis/af2/alphafold, https://hub.docker.com/r/athbaltzis/pred).\nSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "All data, analyses and results are available on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7031286).", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36130276", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "All data, analyses and results are available on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7031286)."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "Alignments computed from AlphaFold2 predictions achieved an average SoP accuracy of 93.95%, compared with 70.33% for sequence-based alignments, an improvement of 23.62 percentage points.", "kind": "quantitative", "target": {"value": 0.0002, "unit": "p-value", "tolerance": null, "source": "Across all MSAs, the difference is highly significant, with an average improvement by 23.62 percent points of MSA-AF2 over MSA-Seq (93.95% versus 70.33% and Wilcoxon test p-value = 0.0002, Table 1, Supplementary Table S1a)."}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36130276", "locator": "sections[11] \"3.1 Alignments computation and comparisons\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Across all MSAs, the difference is highly significant, with an average improvement by 23.62 percent points of MSA-AF2 over MSA-Seq (93.95% versus 70.33% and Wilcoxon test p-value = 0.0002, Table 1, Supplementary Table S1a)."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "Alignments computed from AlphaFold2 predictions achieved an average SoP accuracy of 93.95%, compared with 70.33% for sequence-based alignments, an improvement of 23.62 percentage points.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:36130276"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:36130276", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btac625", "sha256": "sha256:0786c8b87fc7075214118cd3cfd0c6a09230a4ed2d2c97eb6896be0f63c98c8c", "bytes": 29186, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1093/bioinformatics/btac625", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC9665868", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}], "gaps": []}, "analysis": {"state": "absent", "methods": [], "targets": [{"id": "target-published-estimate", "claim_id": "claim-target-result", "operation": null, "expected_value": 0.0002, "unit": "p-value", "tolerance": null, "state": "complete", "note": "The threshold the paper applied to its own result, as the paper states it. A run that reproduces the effect is judged against this threshold."}], "gaps": ["method", "operations"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "data", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R4", "expressible": false, "required_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The reader quoted the method the paper names (not named), but the corpus's method extractor could not map it onto a DSL operation, so the method is published but not expressible."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R4", "reachable": false, "accessions": [], "resolved_accessions": [], "statements": ["All data, analyses and results are available on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7031286)."], "basis": "The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:36130276"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:None"]}, "gaps": ["data:accession_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T18:06:32Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": null, "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 8772, "completion_tokens": 1826, "cached_tokens": 256}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:36130276", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:36130276"}, {"id": "source:pmid:36130276", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 36130276 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:36130276", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:36130276"}, {"id": "source:pmid:36130276", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 36130276 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-36130276", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:36130276"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-None", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:None"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:36130276", "parent_hash": "sha256:95db9486b036edf6632d3f6113594d6dcc83ddb82133dcf66ae213d523202edc", "fork_of": null, "generation": 1}, "gaps": ["execution.not_run", "method", "operations", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}