Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:36404634

Cancer associated fibroblast derived gene signature determines cancer subtypes and prognostic model construction in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

Sangqing Wu · Cheng Huang · Liangping Su · Ping-Pui Wong · Yongsheng Huang · Renhui Chen · Peiliang Lin · Yuchu Ye · Pang Song · Ping Han · Xiaoming Huang

Cancer medicine · 2023 doi:10.1002/cam4.5383

Paper

complete

Experiment

complete

Data

partial

Analysis

complete

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:36404634
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:a95b1bdf6a7f7e370d1970d5b2b30a1a66ffebe28e1e007e87db246d9383b414
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T19:00:51Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:08:07Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Cancer associated fibroblast derived gene signature determines cancer subtypes and prognostic model construction in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.
doi
10.1002/cam4.5383
pmid
36404634
authors array · 11 items
[0]
Sangqing Wu
[1]
Cheng Huang
[2]
Liangping Su
[3]
Ping-Pui Wong
[4]
Yongsheng Huang
[5]
Renhui Chen
[6]
Peiliang Lin
[7]
Yuchu Ye
[8]
Pang Song
[9]
Ping Han
[10]
Xiaoming Huang
journal
Cancer medicine
year
2023
abstract
BACKGROUND: Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are the most common type of head and neck cancer with an unimproved prognosis over the past decades. Although the role of cancer-associated-fibroblast (CAF) has been demonstrated in HNSCC, the correlation between CAF-derived gene expression and patient prognosis remains unknown. METHODS: A total of 528 patients from TCGA database and 270 patients from GSE65858 database were contained in this study. After extracting 66 CAF-related gene expression data from TCGA database, consensus clustering was performed to identify different HNSCC subtypes. Limma package was used to distinguish the differentially expression genes (DEGs) between these subtypes, followed by Lasso regression analysis to construct a prognostic model. The model was validated by performing Kaplan-Meier survival, ROC and risk curve, univariate and multivariate COX regression analysis. GO, KEGG, GSEA, ESTIMATE and ssGSEA analyses was performed to explort the potential mechanism leading to different prognosis. RESULTS: Based on the 66 CAF-related gene expression pattern we stratitied HNSCC patients into two previously unreported subtypes with different clinical outcomes. A prognostic model composed of 15 DEGs was constructed and validated. In addition, bioinformatics analysis showed that the prognostic risk of HNSCC patients was also negatively correlated to immune infiltration, implying the role of tumor immune escape in HNSCC prognosis and treatment option. CONCLUSIONS: The study develops a reliable prognostic prediction tool and provides a theoretical treatment guidance for HNSCC patients.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
R package “survival” was used to perform univariate COX regression analysis to extract DEGs related to patient prognosis (p < 0.05). Subsequently, those DEGs were included to construct a Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso) regression model using the R package “glmnet” and “survival”.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:36404634
locator
sections[7] "Survival analysis and construction of prognostic model" paragraph 2
quote
R package “survival” was used to perform univariate COX regression analysis to extract DEGs related to patient prognosis (p < 0.05). Subsequently, those DEGs were included to construct a Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso) regression model using the R package “glmnet” and “survival”.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the TCGA repository, https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/, and GEO repository, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:36404634
locator
sections[30] "DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT" paragraph 2
quote
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the TCGA repository, https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/, and GEO repository, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/.
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
Furthermore, the risk score was identified as an independent prognostic indicator according to univariate COX regression (training cohort, HR = 6.358, 95% CI: 3.240–12.477, p < 0.001; validation cohort, HR = 2.496, 95% CI: 1.425–4.372, p = 0.001) and multivariate COX regression (training cohort, HR = 6.343, 95% CI: 3.145–12.795, p < 0.001; validation cohort, HR = 3.363, 95% CI: 1.901–5.950, p < 0.001) (Figure 4G,H).
kind
quantitative
target object · 4 fields
value
95
unit
per cent
tolerance
null
source
Furthermore, the risk score was identified as an independent prognostic indicator according to univariate COX regression (training cohort, HR = 6.358, 95% CI: 3.240–12.477, p < 0.001; validation cohort, HR = 2.496, 95% CI: 1.425–4.372, p = 0.001) and multivariate COX regression (training cohort, HR = 6.343, 95% CI: 3.145–12.795, p < 0.001; validation cohort, HR = 3.363, 95% CI: 1.901–5.950, p < 0.001) (Figure 4G,H).
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:36404634
locator
sections[17] "Combined Kaplan–Meier survival curve, ROC curve, risk curve and independent prognostic analysis indicates a good performance of the HNSCC prognostic model" paragraph 4
quote
Furthermore, the risk score was identified as an independent prognostic indicator according to univariate COX regression (training cohort, HR = 6.358, 95% CI: 3.240–12.477, p < 0.001; validation cohort, HR = 2.496, 95% CI: 1.425–4.372, p = 0.001) and multivariate COX regression (training cohort, HR = 6.343, 95% CI: 3.145–12.795, p < 0.001; validation cohort, HR = 3.363, 95% CI: 1.901–5.950, p < 0.001) (Figure 4G,H).
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
complete
objective
Furthermore, the risk score was identified as an independent prognostic indicator according to univariate COX regression (training cohort, HR = 6.358, 95% CI: 3.240–12.477, p < 0.001; validation cohort, HR = 2.496, 95% CI: 1.425–4.372, p = 0.001) and multivariate COX regression (training cohort, HR = 6.343, 95% CI: 3.145–12.795, p < 0.001; validation cohort, HR = 3.363, 95% CI: 1.901–5.950, p < 0.001) (Figure 4G,H).
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:36404634
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE65858
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE65858
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 0 items
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 2 items
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:36404634
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5383
sha256
sha256:4398e9ef43dcd1b03ab4657af0ac4c3a58b91ca2f736a47fa4c96b21093f85c8
bytes
33021
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.1002/cam4.5383
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC10028128
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body_without_references
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
[1] object · 15 fields
id
data:geo:GSE65858
role
raw
format
geo-series
media_type
application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json
uri
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE65858
sha256
null
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
GSE65858
version
null
note
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the TCGA repository, https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/, and GEO repository, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/.
structure object · 15 fields
repository
GEO
access_route
GEO accession URL
access_statement_verbatim
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the TCGA repository, https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/, and GEO repository, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/.
access_statement_kind
data_availability_statement
sample_accessions array · 270 items
[0]
GSM1607684
[1]
GSM1607685
[2]
GSM1607686
[3]
GSM1607687
[4]
GSM1607688
[5]
GSM1607689
[6]
GSM1607690
[7]
GSM1607691
[8]
GSM1607692
[9]
GSM1607693
[10]
GSM1607694
[11]
GSM1607695
[12]
GSM1607696
[13]
GSM1607697
[14]
GSM1607698
[15]
GSM1607699
[16]
GSM1607700
[17]
GSM1607701
[18]
GSM1607702
[19]
GSM1607703
[20]
GSM1607704
[21]
GSM1607705
[22]
GSM1607706
[23]
GSM1607707
[24]
GSM1607708
[25]
GSM1607709
[26]
GSM1607710
[27]
GSM1607711
[28]
GSM1607712
[29]
GSM1607713
[30]
GSM1607714
[31]
GSM1607715
[32]
GSM1607716
[33]
GSM1607717
[34]
GSM1607718
[35]
GSM1607719
[36]
GSM1607720
[37]
GSM1607721
[38]
GSM1607722
[39]
GSM1607723
[40]
GSM1607724
[41]
GSM1607725
[42]
GSM1607726
[43]
GSM1607727
[44]
GSM1607728
[45]
GSM1607729
[46]
GSM1607730
[47]
GSM1607731
[48]
GSM1607732
[49]
GSM1607733
[50]
GSM1607734
[51]
GSM1607735
[52]
GSM1607736
[53]
GSM1607737
[54]
GSM1607738
[55]
GSM1607739
[56]
GSM1607740
[57]
GSM1607741
[58]
GSM1607742
[59]
GSM1607743
[60]
GSM1607744
[61]
GSM1607745
[62]
GSM1607746
[63]
GSM1607747
[64]
GSM1607748
[65]
GSM1607749
[66]
GSM1607750
[67]
GSM1607751
[68]
GSM1607752
[69]
GSM1607753
[70]
GSM1607754
[71]
GSM1607755
[72]
GSM1607756
[73]
GSM1607757
[74]
GSM1607758
[75]
GSM1607759
[76]
GSM1607760
[77]
GSM1607761
[78]
GSM1607762
[79]
GSM1607763
[80]
GSM1607764
[81]
GSM1607765
[82]
GSM1607766
[83]
GSM1607767
[84]
GSM1607768
[85]
GSM1607769
[86]
GSM1607770
[87]
GSM1607771
[88]
GSM1607772
[89]
GSM1607773
[90]
GSM1607774
[91]
GSM1607775
[92]
GSM1607776
[93]
GSM1607777
[94]
GSM1607778
[95]
GSM1607779
[96]
GSM1607780
[97]
GSM1607781
[98]
GSM1607782
[99]
GSM1607783
[100]
GSM1607784
[101]
GSM1607785
[102]
GSM1607786
[103]
GSM1607787
[104]
GSM1607788
[105]
GSM1607789
[106]
GSM1607790
[107]
GSM1607791
[108]
GSM1607792
[109]
GSM1607793
[110]
GSM1607794
[111]
GSM1607795
[112]
GSM1607796
[113]
GSM1607797
[114]
GSM1607798
[115]
GSM1607799
[116]
GSM1607800
[117]
GSM1607801
[118]
GSM1607802
[119]
GSM1607803
[120]
GSM1607804
[121]
GSM1607805
[122]
GSM1607806
[123]
GSM1607807
[124]
GSM1607808
[125]
GSM1607809
[126]
GSM1607810
[127]
GSM1607811
[128]
GSM1607812
[129]
GSM1607813
[130]
GSM1607814
[131]
GSM1607815
[132]
GSM1607816
[133]
GSM1607817
[134]
GSM1607818
[135]
GSM1607819
[136]
GSM1607820
[137]
GSM1607821
[138]
GSM1607822
[139]
GSM1607823
[140]
GSM1607824
[141]
GSM1607825
[142]
GSM1607826
[143]
GSM1607827
[144]
GSM1607828
[145]
GSM1607829
[146]
GSM1607830
[147]
GSM1607831
[148]
GSM1607832
[149]
GSM1607833
[150]
GSM1607834
[151]
GSM1607835
[152]
GSM1607836
[153]
GSM1607837
[154]
GSM1607838
[155]
GSM1607839
[156]
GSM1607840
[157]
GSM1607841
[158]
GSM1607842
[159]
GSM1607843
[160]
GSM1607844
[161]
GSM1607845
[162]
GSM1607846
[163]
GSM1607847
[164]
GSM1607848
[165]
GSM1607849
[166]
GSM1607850
[167]
GSM1607851
[168]
GSM1607852
[169]
GSM1607853
[170]
GSM1607854
[171]
GSM1607855
[172]
GSM1607856
[173]
GSM1607857
[174]
GSM1607858
[175]
GSM1607859
[176]
GSM1607860
[177]
GSM1607861
[178]
GSM1607862
[179]
GSM1607863
[180]
GSM1607864
[181]
GSM1607865
[182]
GSM1607866
[183]
GSM1607867
[184]
GSM1607868
[185]
GSM1607869
[186]
GSM1607870
[187]
GSM1607871
[188]
GSM1607872
[189]
GSM1607873
[190]
GSM1607874
[191]
GSM1607875
[192]
GSM1607876
[193]
GSM1607877
[194]
GSM1607878
[195]
GSM1607879
[196]
GSM1607880
[197]
GSM1607881
[198]
GSM1607882
[199]
GSM1607883
[200]
GSM1607884
[201]
GSM1607885
[202]
GSM1607886
[203]
GSM1607887
[204]
GSM1607888
[205]
GSM1607889
[206]
GSM1607890
[207]
GSM1607891
[208]
GSM1607892
[209]
GSM1607893
[210]
GSM1607894
[211]
GSM1607895
[212]
GSM1607896
[213]
GSM1607897
[214]
GSM1607898
[215]
GSM1607899
[216]
GSM1607900
[217]
GSM1607901
[218]
GSM1607902
[219]
GSM1607903
[220]
GSM1607904
[221]
GSM1607905
[222]
GSM1607906
[223]
GSM1607907
[224]
GSM1607908
[225]
GSM1607909
[226]
GSM1607910
[227]
GSM1607911
[228]
GSM1607912
[229]
GSM1607913
[230]
GSM1607914
[231]
GSM1607915
[232]
GSM1607916
[233]
GSM1607917
[234]
GSM1607918
[235]
GSM1607919
[236]
GSM1607920
[237]
GSM1607921
[238]
GSM1607922
[239]
GSM1607923
[240]
GSM1607924
[241]
GSM1607925
[242]
GSM1607926
[243]
GSM1607927
[244]
GSM1607928
[245]
GSM1607929
[246]
GSM1607930
[247]
GSM1607931
[248]
GSM1607932
[249]
GSM1607933
[250]
GSM1607934
[251]
GSM1607935
[252]
GSM1607936
[253]
GSM1607937
[254]
GSM1607938
[255]
GSM1607939
[256]
GSM1607940
[257]
GSM1607941
[258]
GSM1607942
[259]
GSM1607943
[260]
GSM1607944
[261]
GSM1607945
[262]
GSM1607946
[263]
GSM1607947
[264]
GSM1607948
[265]
GSM1607949
[266]
GSM1607950
[267]
GSM1607951
[268]
GSM1607952
[269]
GSM1607953
sample_count
270
group_sizes
null
group_sizes_basis
null
platform
10558
taxon
Homo sapiens
title
Gene expression patterns and TP53 mutations are associated with HPV RNA status, lymph node metastasis, and survival in head and neck cancer
resolution_checked_at
2026-11-01T15:39:55Z
resolution_check
identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read
downloaded
false
licence_read
false
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE65858 not downloaded
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE65858 licence not read
analysis object · 4 fields
state
complete
methods array · 4 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
survival_analysis
specific
cox_proportional_hazards
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
R package “survival” was used to perform univariate COX regression analysis to extract DEGs related to patient prognosis (p < 0.05). Subsequently, those DEGs were included to construct a Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso) regression model using the R package “glmnet” and “survival”.
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
survival_analysis
specific
kaplan_meier
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
survival_km
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
Kaplan-Meier
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
differential_expression
specific
limma_voom
label
Differential expression analysis
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
normalise_counts
[1]
differential_expression_fit
[2]
fdr_bh
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
count_matrix_with_condition
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
Limma
[3] object · 10 fields
id
method-4
family
correlation_analysis
specific
pearson
label
Correlation analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
pearson_r
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
paired_numeric_columns
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Pearson correlation
targets array · 2 items
[0] object · 8 fields
id
target-published-estimate
claim_id
claim-target-result
operation
cox_ph
unit
per cent
tolerance
null
state
complete
note
The published estimate as the reader quoted it from the paper. No tolerance is published because the paper states none.
[1] object · 8 fields
id
target-published-estimate-p-value
claim_id
claim-target-result
operation
cox_ph
unit
p-value
tolerance
null
state
complete
note
The threshold the paper applied to its own result, as the paper states it. A run that reproduces the effect is judged against this threshold.
gaps array · 0 items
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
complete
tier
R1
blocked_on
nothing:replicable_now
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R1
reachable
true
accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE65858
resolved_accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE65858
statements array · 1 item
[0]
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the TCGA repository, https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/, and GEO repository, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/.
basis
The paper names GSE65858 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
assets array · 2 items
[0]
source:pmid:36404634
[1]
data:geo:GSE65858
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE65858
gaps array · 0 items
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T18:16:06Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
9717
completion_tokens
2237
cached_tokens
264
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:36404634
type
paper
label
pmid:36404634
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:36404634
type
manuscript
label
PMID 36404634 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE65858
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE65858
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:36404634
type
paper
label
pmid:36404634
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:36404634
type
manuscript
label
PMID 36404634 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE65858
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE65858
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-36404634
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:36404634
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-GSE65858
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE65858
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:36404634
parent_hash
sha256:3f5675d3f46e7de7693af2556abaccb5b63f75de3ea81f3ef6a979976735fcb1
fork_of
null
gaps array · 6 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE65858 licence not read
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE65858 not downloaded
[2]
execution.not_run
[3]
review.human_critique
[4]
review.independent_reader
[5]
review.machine_critique
assays array · 1 item
[0] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
survival_analysis
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
R package “survival” was used to perform univariate COX regression analysis to extract DEGs related to patient prognosis (p < 0.05). Subsequently, those DEGs were included to construct a Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso) regression model using the R package “glmnet” and “survival”.
order_basis
analysis_only
id
assay:1
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:36404634", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 3, "content_hash": "sha256:a95b1bdf6a7f7e370d1970d5b2b30a1a66ffebe28e1e007e87db246d9383b414", "created_at": "2026-11-01T19:00:51Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:08:07Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Cancer associated fibroblast derived gene signature determines cancer subtypes and prognostic model construction in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.", "doi": "10.1002/cam4.5383", "pmid": "36404634", "authors": ["Sangqing Wu", "Cheng Huang", "Liangping Su", "Ping-Pui Wong", "Yongsheng Huang", "Renhui Chen", "Peiliang Lin", "Yuchu Ye", "Pang Song", "Ping Han", "Xiaoming Huang"], "journal": "Cancer medicine", "year": 2023, "abstract": "BACKGROUND: Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are the most common type of head and neck cancer with an unimproved prognosis over the past decades. Although the role of cancer-associated-fibroblast (CAF) has been demonstrated in HNSCC, the correlation between CAF-derived gene expression and patient prognosis remains unknown.\nMETHODS: A total of 528 patients from TCGA database and 270 patients from GSE65858 database were contained in this study. After extracting 66 CAF-related gene expression data from TCGA database, consensus clustering was performed to identify different HNSCC subtypes. Limma package was used to distinguish the differentially expression genes (DEGs) between these subtypes, followed by Lasso regression analysis to construct a prognostic model. The model was validated by performing Kaplan-Meier survival, ROC and risk curve, univariate and multivariate COX regression analysis. GO, KEGG, GSEA, ESTIMATE and ssGSEA analyses was performed to explort the potential mechanism leading to different prognosis.\nRESULTS: Based on the 66 CAF-related gene expression pattern we stratitied HNSCC patients into two previously unreported subtypes with different clinical outcomes. A prognostic model composed of 15 DEGs was constructed and validated. In addition, bioinformatics analysis showed that the prognostic risk of HNSCC patients was also negatively correlated to immune infiltration, implying the role of tumor immune escape in HNSCC prognosis and treatment option.\nCONCLUSIONS: The study develops a reliable prognostic prediction tool and provides a theoretical treatment guidance for HNSCC patients.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "R package “survival” was used to perform univariate COX regression analysis to extract DEGs related to patient prognosis (p < 0.05). Subsequently, those DEGs were included to construct a Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso) regression model using the R package “glmnet” and “survival”.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36404634", "locator": "sections[7] \"Survival analysis and construction of prognostic model\" paragraph 2", "quote": "R package “survival” was used to perform univariate COX regression analysis to extract DEGs related to patient prognosis (p < 0.05). Subsequently, those DEGs were included to construct a Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso) regression model using the R package “glmnet” and “survival”."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the TCGA repository, https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/, and GEO repository, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36404634", "locator": "sections[30] \"DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the TCGA repository, https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/, and GEO repository, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "Furthermore, the risk score was identified as an independent prognostic indicator according to univariate COX regression (training cohort, HR = 6.358, 95% CI: 3.240–12.477, p < 0.001; validation cohort, HR = 2.496, 95% CI: 1.425–4.372, p = 0.001) and multivariate COX regression (training cohort, HR = 6.343, 95% CI: 3.145–12.795, p < 0.001; validation cohort, HR = 3.363, 95% CI: 1.901–5.950, p < 0.001) (Figure 4G,H).", "kind": "quantitative", "target": {"value": 95.0, "unit": "per cent", "tolerance": null, "source": "Furthermore, the risk score was identified as an independent prognostic indicator according to univariate COX regression (training cohort, HR = 6.358, 95% CI: 3.240–12.477, p < 0.001; validation cohort, HR = 2.496, 95% CI: 1.425–4.372, p = 0.001) and multivariate COX regression (training cohort, HR = 6.343, 95% CI: 3.145–12.795, p < 0.001; validation cohort, HR = 3.363, 95% CI: 1.901–5.950, p < 0.001) (Figure 4G,H)."}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36404634", "locator": "sections[17] \"Combined Kaplan–Meier survival curve, ROC curve, risk curve and independent prognostic analysis indicates a good performance of the HNSCC prognostic model\" paragraph 4", "quote": "Furthermore, the risk score was identified as an independent prognostic indicator according to univariate COX regression (training cohort, HR = 6.358, 95% CI: 3.240–12.477, p < 0.001; validation cohort, HR = 2.496, 95% CI: 1.425–4.372, p = 0.001) and multivariate COX regression (training cohort, HR = 6.343, 95% CI: 3.145–12.795, p < 0.001; validation cohort, HR = 3.363, 95% CI: 1.901–5.950, p < 0.001) (Figure 4G,H)."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "Furthermore, the risk score was identified as an independent prognostic indicator according to univariate COX regression (training cohort, HR = 6.358, 95% CI: 3.240–12.477, p < 0.001; validation cohort, HR = 2.496, 95% CI: 1.425–4.372, p = 0.001) and multivariate COX regression (training cohort, HR = 6.343, 95% CI: 3.145–12.795, p < 0.001; validation cohort, HR = 3.363, 95% CI: 1.901–5.950, p < 0.001) (Figure 4G,H).", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:36404634"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE65858"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE65858"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:36404634", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5383", "sha256": "sha256:4398e9ef43dcd1b03ab4657af0ac4c3a58b91ca2f736a47fa4c96b21093f85c8", "bytes": 33021, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1002/cam4.5383", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC10028128", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE65858", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE65858", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE65858", "version": null, "note": "The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the TCGA repository, https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/, and GEO repository, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the TCGA repository, https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/, and GEO repository, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1607684", "GSM1607685", "GSM1607686", "GSM1607687", "GSM1607688", "GSM1607689", "GSM1607690", "GSM1607691", "GSM1607692", "GSM1607693", "GSM1607694", "GSM1607695", "GSM1607696", "GSM1607697", "GSM1607698", "GSM1607699", "GSM1607700", "GSM1607701", "GSM1607702", "GSM1607703", "GSM1607704", "GSM1607705", "GSM1607706", "GSM1607707", "GSM1607708", "GSM1607709", "GSM1607710", "GSM1607711", "GSM1607712", "GSM1607713", "GSM1607714", "GSM1607715", "GSM1607716", "GSM1607717", "GSM1607718", "GSM1607719", "GSM1607720", "GSM1607721", "GSM1607722", "GSM1607723", "GSM1607724", "GSM1607725", "GSM1607726", "GSM1607727", "GSM1607728", "GSM1607729", "GSM1607730", "GSM1607731", "GSM1607732", "GSM1607733", "GSM1607734", "GSM1607735", "GSM1607736", "GSM1607737", "GSM1607738", "GSM1607739", "GSM1607740", "GSM1607741", "GSM1607742", "GSM1607743", "GSM1607744", "GSM1607745", "GSM1607746", "GSM1607747", "GSM1607748", "GSM1607749", "GSM1607750", "GSM1607751", "GSM1607752", "GSM1607753", "GSM1607754", "GSM1607755", "GSM1607756", "GSM1607757", "GSM1607758", "GSM1607759", "GSM1607760", "GSM1607761", "GSM1607762", "GSM1607763", "GSM1607764", "GSM1607765", "GSM1607766", "GSM1607767", "GSM1607768", "GSM1607769", "GSM1607770", "GSM1607771", "GSM1607772", "GSM1607773", "GSM1607774", "GSM1607775", "GSM1607776", "GSM1607777", "GSM1607778", "GSM1607779", "GSM1607780", "GSM1607781", "GSM1607782", "GSM1607783", "GSM1607784", "GSM1607785", "GSM1607786", "GSM1607787", "GSM1607788", "GSM1607789", "GSM1607790", "GSM1607791", "GSM1607792", "GSM1607793", "GSM1607794", "GSM1607795", "GSM1607796", "GSM1607797", "GSM1607798", "GSM1607799", "GSM1607800", "GSM1607801", "GSM1607802", "GSM1607803", "GSM1607804", "GSM1607805", "GSM1607806", "GSM1607807", "GSM1607808", "GSM1607809", "GSM1607810", "GSM1607811", "GSM1607812", "GSM1607813", "GSM1607814", "GSM1607815", "GSM1607816", "GSM1607817", "GSM1607818", "GSM1607819", "GSM1607820", "GSM1607821", "GSM1607822", "GSM1607823", "GSM1607824", "GSM1607825", "GSM1607826", "GSM1607827", "GSM1607828", "GSM1607829", "GSM1607830", "GSM1607831", "GSM1607832", "GSM1607833", "GSM1607834", "GSM1607835", "GSM1607836", "GSM1607837", "GSM1607838", "GSM1607839", "GSM1607840", "GSM1607841", "GSM1607842", "GSM1607843", "GSM1607844", "GSM1607845", "GSM1607846", "GSM1607847", "GSM1607848", "GSM1607849", "GSM1607850", "GSM1607851", "GSM1607852", "GSM1607853", "GSM1607854", "GSM1607855", "GSM1607856", "GSM1607857", "GSM1607858", "GSM1607859", "GSM1607860", "GSM1607861", "GSM1607862", "GSM1607863", "GSM1607864", "GSM1607865", "GSM1607866", "GSM1607867", "GSM1607868", "GSM1607869", "GSM1607870", "GSM1607871", "GSM1607872", "GSM1607873", "GSM1607874", "GSM1607875", "GSM1607876", "GSM1607877", "GSM1607878", "GSM1607879", "GSM1607880", "GSM1607881", "GSM1607882", "GSM1607883", "GSM1607884", "GSM1607885", "GSM1607886", "GSM1607887", "GSM1607888", "GSM1607889", "GSM1607890", "GSM1607891", "GSM1607892", "GSM1607893", "GSM1607894", "GSM1607895", "GSM1607896", "GSM1607897", "GSM1607898", "GSM1607899", "GSM1607900", "GSM1607901", "GSM1607902", "GSM1607903", "GSM1607904", "GSM1607905", "GSM1607906", "GSM1607907", "GSM1607908", "GSM1607909", "GSM1607910", "GSM1607911", "GSM1607912", "GSM1607913", "GSM1607914", "GSM1607915", "GSM1607916", "GSM1607917", "GSM1607918", "GSM1607919", "GSM1607920", "GSM1607921", "GSM1607922", "GSM1607923", "GSM1607924", "GSM1607925", "GSM1607926", "GSM1607927", "GSM1607928", "GSM1607929", "GSM1607930", "GSM1607931", "GSM1607932", "GSM1607933", "GSM1607934", "GSM1607935", "GSM1607936", "GSM1607937", "GSM1607938", "GSM1607939", "GSM1607940", "GSM1607941", "GSM1607942", "GSM1607943", "GSM1607944", "GSM1607945", "GSM1607946", "GSM1607947", "GSM1607948", "GSM1607949", "GSM1607950", "GSM1607951", "GSM1607952", "GSM1607953"], "sample_count": 270, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "10558", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Gene expression patterns and TP53 mutations are associated with HPV RNA status, lymph node metastasis, and survival in head and neck cancer", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:55Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE65858 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE65858 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "R package “survival” was used to perform univariate COX regression analysis to extract DEGs related to patient prognosis (p < 0.05). Subsequently, those DEGs were included to construct a Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso) regression model using the R package “glmnet” and “survival”."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "kaplan_meier", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "Kaplan-Meier"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "differential_expression", "specific": "limma_voom", "label": "Differential expression analysis", "dsl_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["count_matrix_with_condition"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "Limma"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "correlation_analysis", "specific": "pearson", "label": "Correlation analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pearson_r"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["paired_numeric_columns"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Pearson correlation"}}], "targets": [{"id": "target-published-estimate", "claim_id": "claim-target-result", "operation": "cox_ph", "expected_value": 95.0, "unit": "per cent", "tolerance": null, "state": "complete", "note": "The published estimate as the reader quoted it from the paper. No tolerance is published because the paper states none."}, {"id": "target-published-estimate-p-value", "claim_id": "claim-target-result", "operation": "cox_ph", "expected_value": 0.001, "unit": "p-value", "tolerance": null, "state": "complete", "note": "The threshold the paper applied to its own result, as the paper states it. A run that reproduces the effect is judged against this threshold."}], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE65858"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE65858"], "statements": ["The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the TCGA repository, https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/, and GEO repository, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/."], "basis": "The paper names GSE65858 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "assets": ["source:pmid:36404634", "data:geo:GSE65858"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE65858"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T18:16:06Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 9717, "completion_tokens": 2237, "cached_tokens": 264}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:36404634", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:36404634"}, {"id": "source:pmid:36404634", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 36404634 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE65858", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE65858"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:36404634", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:36404634"}, {"id": "source:pmid:36404634", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 36404634 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE65858", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE65858"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-36404634", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:36404634"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE65858", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE65858"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:36404634", "parent_hash": "sha256:3f5675d3f46e7de7693af2556abaccb5b63f75de3ea81f3ef6a979976735fcb1", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE65858 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE65858 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["R package “survival” was used to perform univariate COX regression analysis to extract DEGs related to patient prognosis (p < 0.05). Subsequently, those DEGs were included to construct a Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso) regression model using the R package “glmnet” and “survival”."], "order_basis": "analysis_only", "id": "assay:1"}]}