Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:36566175

Construction and validation of a metabolic-related genes prognostic model for oral squamous cell carcinoma based on bioinformatics.

Jingfei Zhang · Chenxi Ma · Han Qin · Zhi Wang · Chao Zhu · Xiujuan Liu · Xiuyan Hao · Jinghua Liu · Ling Li · Zhen Cai

BMC medical genomics · 2022 doi:10.1186/s12920-022-01417-3

Paper

complete

Experiment

complete

Data

partial

Analysis

complete

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:36566175
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:a8028050e9c83b9b1d527e4316fea8f44c16f2e100074bfd4aac314751a5822c
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T19:01:06Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:50:56Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Construction and validation of a metabolic-related genes prognostic model for oral squamous cell carcinoma based on bioinformatics.
doi
10.1186/s12920-022-01417-3
pmid
36566175
authors array · 10 items
[0]
Jingfei Zhang
[1]
Chenxi Ma
[2]
Han Qin
[3]
Zhi Wang
[4]
Chao Zhu
[5]
Xiujuan Liu
[6]
Xiuyan Hao
[7]
Jinghua Liu
[8]
Ling Li
[9]
Zhen Cai
journal
BMC medical genomics
year
2022
abstract
BACKGROUND: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) accounts for a frequently-occurring head and neck cancer, which is characterized by high rates of morbidity and mortality. Metabolism-related genes (MRGs) show close association with OSCC development, metastasis and progression, so we constructed an MRGs-based OSCC prognosis model for evaluating OSCC prognostic outcome. METHODS: This work obtained gene expression profile as well as the relevant clinical information from the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, determined the MRGs related to OSCC by difference analysis, screened the prognosis-related MRGs by performing univariate Cox analysis, and used such identified MRGs for constructing the OSCC prognosis prediction model through Lasso-Cox regression. Besides, we validated the model with the GSE41613 dataset based on Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. RESULTS: The present work screened 317 differentially expressed MRGs from the database, identified 12 OSCC prognostic MRGs through univariate Cox regression, and then established a clinical prognostic model composed of 11 MRGs by Lasso-Cox analysis. Based on the optimal risk score threshold, cases were classified as low- or high-risk group. As suggested by Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis, survival rate was obviously different between the two groups in the TCGA training set (P < 0.001). According to subsequent univariate and multivariate Cox regression, risk score served as the factor to predict prognosis relative to additional clinical features (P < 0.001). Besides, area under ROC curve (AUC) values for patient survival at 1, 3 and 5 years were determined as 0.63, 0.70, and 0.76, separately, indicating that the prognostic model has good predictive accuracy. Then, we validated this clinical prognostic model using GSE41613. To enhance our model prediction accuracy, age, gender, risk score together with TNM stage were incorporated in a nomogram. As indicated by results of ROC curve and calibration curve analyses, the as-constructed nomogram had enhanced prediction accuracy compared with clinicopathological features alone, besides, combining clinicopathological characteristics with risk score contributed to predicting patient prognosis and guiding clinical decision-making. CONCLUSION: In this study, 11 MRGs prognostic models based on TCGA database showed superior predictive performance and had a certain clinical application prospect in guiding individualized.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
This work employed R software (Version 4.1.2) limma R package for screening metabolic DEGs within cancer compared with non-carcinoma samples upon |log2FC|> 0.5 and FDR < 0.05 thresholds. Then, we used the glmnet R package to integrate survival status, survival time, as well as DEGs expression profiles.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:36566175
locator
sections[4] "Screening differentially expressed genes (DEGs)" paragraph 2
quote
This work employed R software (Version 4.1.2) limma R package for screening metabolic DEGs within cancer compared with non-carcinoma samples upon |log2FC|> 0.5 and FDR < 0.05 thresholds. Then, we used the glmnet R package to integrate survival status, survival time, as well as DEGs expression profiles.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO: GSE41613) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ and the cancer genome database (TCGA: OSCC) https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:36566175
locator
sections[25] "notes" paragraph 1
quote
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO: GSE41613) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ and the cancer genome database (TCGA: OSCC) https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/.
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
Besides, area under ROC curve (AUC) values for patient survival at 1, 3 and 5 years were determined as 0.63, 0.70, and 0.76, separately, indicating that the prognostic model has good predictive accuracy.
kind
qualitative
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:36566175
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 3
quote
Besides, area under ROC curve (AUC) values for patient survival at 1, 3 and 5 years were determined as 0.63, 0.70, and 0.76, separately, indicating that the prognostic model has good predictive accuracy.
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
complete
objective
Besides, area under ROC curve (AUC) values for patient survival at 1, 3 and 5 years were determined as 0.63, 0.70, and 0.76, separately, indicating that the prognostic model has good predictive accuracy.
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:36566175
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE172577
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE172577
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 0 items
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 3 items
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:36566175
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-022-01417-3
sha256
sha256:eb6885c8dbd98eff02b3c8d7cdcd96adabca5a512ef4ca3682ae2f57bbc83899
bytes
38191
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.1186/s12920-022-01417-3
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC9789624
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body_without_references
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
[1] object · 15 fields
id
data:geo:GSE172577
role
raw
format
geo-series
media_type
application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json
uri
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE172577
sha256
null
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
GSE172577
version
null
note
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO: GSE41613) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ and the cancer genome database (TCGA: OSCC) https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/.
structure object · 15 fields
repository
GEO
access_route
GEO accession URL
access_statement_verbatim
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO: GSE41613) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ and the cancer genome database (TCGA: OSCC) https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/.
access_statement_kind
data_availability_statement
sample_accessions array · 6 items
[0]
GSM5258385
[1]
GSM5258386
[2]
GSM5258387
[3]
GSM5258388
[4]
GSM5258389
[5]
GSM5258390
sample_count
6
group_sizes
null
group_sizes_basis
null
platform
24676
taxon
Homo sapiens
title
Single-cell profiling of tumor-infiltrating TCF7+ T cells reveals a T lymphocyte subset associated with tertiary lymphoid structures and superior prognosis in oral cancer
resolution_checked_at
2026-11-01T18:46:34Z
resolution_check
identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read
downloaded
false
licence_read
false
[2] object · 15 fields
id
data:geo:GSE41613
role
raw
format
geo-series
media_type
application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json
uri
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE41613
sha256
null
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
GSE41613
version
null
note
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO: GSE41613) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ and the cancer genome database (TCGA: OSCC) https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/.
structure object · 15 fields
repository
GEO
access_route
GEO accession URL
access_statement_verbatim
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO: GSE41613) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ and the cancer genome database (TCGA: OSCC) https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/.
access_statement_kind
data_availability_statement
sample_accessions array · 97 items
[0]
GSM1020099
[1]
GSM1020100
[2]
GSM1020101
[3]
GSM1020102
[4]
GSM1020103
[5]
GSM1020104
[6]
GSM1020105
[7]
GSM1020106
[8]
GSM1020107
[9]
GSM1020108
[10]
GSM1020109
[11]
GSM1020110
[12]
GSM1020111
[13]
GSM1020112
[14]
GSM1020113
[15]
GSM1020114
[16]
GSM1020115
[17]
GSM1020116
[18]
GSM1020117
[19]
GSM1020118
[20]
GSM1020119
[21]
GSM1020120
[22]
GSM1020121
[23]
GSM1020122
[24]
GSM1020123
[25]
GSM1020124
[26]
GSM1020125
[27]
GSM1020126
[28]
GSM1020127
[29]
GSM1020128
[30]
GSM1020129
[31]
GSM1020130
[32]
GSM1020131
[33]
GSM1020132
[34]
GSM1020133
[35]
GSM1020134
[36]
GSM1020135
[37]
GSM1020136
[38]
GSM1020137
[39]
GSM1020138
[40]
GSM1020139
[41]
GSM1020140
[42]
GSM1020141
[43]
GSM1020142
[44]
GSM1020143
[45]
GSM1020144
[46]
GSM1020145
[47]
GSM1020146
[48]
GSM1020147
[49]
GSM1020148
[50]
GSM1020149
[51]
GSM1020150
[52]
GSM1020151
[53]
GSM1020152
[54]
GSM1020153
[55]
GSM1020154
[56]
GSM1020155
[57]
GSM1020156
[58]
GSM1020157
[59]
GSM1020158
[60]
GSM1020159
[61]
GSM1020160
[62]
GSM1020161
[63]
GSM1020162
[64]
GSM1020163
[65]
GSM1020164
[66]
GSM1020165
[67]
GSM1020166
[68]
GSM1020167
[69]
GSM1020168
[70]
GSM1020169
[71]
GSM1020170
[72]
GSM1020171
[73]
GSM1020172
[74]
GSM1020173
[75]
GSM1020174
[76]
GSM1020175
[77]
GSM1020176
[78]
GSM1020177
[79]
GSM1020178
[80]
GSM1020179
[81]
GSM1020180
[82]
GSM1020181
[83]
GSM1020182
[84]
GSM1020183
[85]
GSM1020184
[86]
GSM1020185
[87]
GSM1020186
[88]
GSM1020187
[89]
GSM1020188
[90]
GSM1020189
[91]
GSM1020190
[92]
GSM1020191
[93]
GSM1020192
[94]
GSM1020193
[95]
GSM1020194
[96]
GSM1020195
sample_count
97
group_sizes
null
group_sizes_basis
null
platform
570
taxon
Homo sapiens
title
A 13-gene signature prognostic of HPV-negative OSCC: discovery and external validation
resolution_checked_at
2026-11-01T15:39:54Z
resolution_check
identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read
downloaded
false
licence_read
false
gaps array · 4 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE172577 not downloaded
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE172577 licence not read
[2]
asset:data:geo:GSE41613 not downloaded
[3]
asset:data:geo:GSE41613 licence not read
analysis object · 4 fields
state
complete
methods array · 5 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
survival_analysis
specific
cox_proportional_hazards
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
This work employed R software (Version 4.1.2) limma R package for screening metabolic DEGs within cancer compared with non-carcinoma samples upon |log2FC|> 0.5 and FDR < 0.05 thresholds. Then, we used the glmnet R package to integrate survival status, survival time, as well as DEGs expression profiles.
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
survival_analysis
specific
kaplan_meier
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
survival_km
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
Kaplan-Meier
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
survival_analysis
specific
log_rank_test
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
logrank_test
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
log-rank
[3] object · 10 fields
id
method-4
family
differential_expression
specific
limma_voom
label
Differential expression analysis
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
normalise_counts
[1]
differential_expression_fit
[2]
fdr_bh
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 1 field
log2fc_threshold
carcinoma samples upon |log2FC|> 0
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
count_matrix_with_condition
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
limma
[4] object · 10 fields
id
method-5
family
diagnostic_evaluation
specific
roc
label
Diagnostic test evaluation
dsl_operations array · 6 items
[0]
confusion_counts
[1]
roc_curve
[2]
sensitivity_specificity
[3]
solve_confusion_matrix
[4]
classification_metrics
[5]
published_precision_envelope
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
reference_standard_and_test
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
ROC curve
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 0 items
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
complete
tier
R1
blocked_on
nothing:replicable_now
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R1
reachable
true
accessions array · 2 items
[0]
GSE41613
[1]
GSE172577
resolved_accessions array · 2 items
[0]
GSE41613
[1]
GSE172577
statements array · 1 item
[0]
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO: GSE41613) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ and the cancer genome database (TCGA: OSCC) https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/.
basis
The paper names GSE41613, GSE172577 in Gene Expression Omnibus and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
assets array · 2 items
[0]
source:pmid:36566175
[1]
data:geo:GSE172577
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE172577
gaps array · 0 items
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T18:21:30Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
10460
completion_tokens
1879
cached_tokens
128
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:36566175
type
paper
label
pmid:36566175
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:36566175
type
manuscript
label
PMID 36566175 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE172577
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE172577
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:36566175
type
paper
label
pmid:36566175
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:36566175
type
manuscript
label
PMID 36566175 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE172577
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE172577
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-36566175
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:36566175
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-GSE172577
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE172577
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:36566175
parent_hash
sha256:930ebc02dcc4e1a5e52985c8b7727d8d6f29abb6057825840f6a811936717a15
fork_of
null
gaps array · 8 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE172577 licence not read
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE172577 not downloaded
[2]
asset:data:geo:GSE41613 licence not read
[3]
asset:data:geo:GSE41613 not downloaded
[4]
execution.not_run
[5]
review.human_critique
[6]
review.independent_reader
[7]
review.machine_critique
assays array · 1 item
[0] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
survival_analysis
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
This work employed R software (Version 4.1.2) limma R package for screening metabolic DEGs within cancer compared with non-carcinoma samples upon |log2FC|> 0.5 and FDR < 0.05 thresholds. Then, we used the glmnet R package to integrate survival status, survival time, as well as DEGs expression profiles.
order_basis
analysis_only
id
assay:1
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:36566175", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 4, "content_hash": "sha256:a8028050e9c83b9b1d527e4316fea8f44c16f2e100074bfd4aac314751a5822c", "created_at": "2026-11-01T19:01:06Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:50:56Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Construction and validation of a metabolic-related genes prognostic model for oral squamous cell carcinoma based on bioinformatics.", "doi": "10.1186/s12920-022-01417-3", "pmid": "36566175", "authors": ["Jingfei Zhang", "Chenxi Ma", "Han Qin", "Zhi Wang", "Chao Zhu", "Xiujuan Liu", "Xiuyan Hao", "Jinghua Liu", "Ling Li", "Zhen Cai"], "journal": "BMC medical genomics", "year": 2022, "abstract": "BACKGROUND: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) accounts for a frequently-occurring head and neck cancer, which is characterized by high rates of morbidity and mortality. Metabolism-related genes (MRGs) show close association with OSCC development, metastasis and progression, so we constructed an MRGs-based OSCC prognosis model for evaluating OSCC prognostic outcome.\nMETHODS: This work obtained gene expression profile as well as the relevant clinical information from the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, determined the MRGs related to OSCC by difference analysis, screened the prognosis-related MRGs by performing univariate Cox analysis, and used such identified MRGs for constructing the OSCC prognosis prediction model through Lasso-Cox regression. Besides, we validated the model with the GSE41613 dataset based on Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database.\nRESULTS: The present work screened 317 differentially expressed MRGs from the database, identified 12 OSCC prognostic MRGs through univariate Cox regression, and then established a clinical prognostic model composed of 11 MRGs by Lasso-Cox analysis. Based on the optimal risk score threshold, cases were classified as low- or high-risk group. As suggested by Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis, survival rate was obviously different between the two groups in the TCGA training set (P < 0.001). According to subsequent univariate and multivariate Cox regression, risk score served as the factor to predict prognosis relative to additional clinical features (P < 0.001). Besides, area under ROC curve (AUC) values for patient survival at 1, 3 and 5 years were determined as 0.63, 0.70, and 0.76, separately, indicating that the prognostic model has good predictive accuracy. Then, we validated this clinical prognostic model using GSE41613. To enhance our model prediction accuracy, age, gender, risk score together with TNM stage were incorporated in a nomogram. As indicated by results of ROC curve and calibration curve analyses, the as-constructed nomogram had enhanced prediction accuracy compared with clinicopathological features alone, besides, combining clinicopathological characteristics with risk score contributed to predicting patient prognosis and guiding clinical decision-making.\nCONCLUSION: In this study, 11 MRGs prognostic models based on TCGA database showed superior predictive performance and had a certain clinical application prospect in guiding individualized.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "This work employed R software (Version 4.1.2) limma R package for screening metabolic DEGs within cancer compared with non-carcinoma samples upon |log2FC|> 0.5 and FDR < 0.05 thresholds. Then, we used the glmnet R package to integrate survival status, survival time, as well as DEGs expression profiles.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36566175", "locator": "sections[4] \"Screening differentially expressed genes (DEGs)\" paragraph 2", "quote": "This work employed R software (Version 4.1.2) limma R package for screening metabolic DEGs within cancer compared with non-carcinoma samples upon |log2FC|> 0.5 and FDR < 0.05 thresholds. Then, we used the glmnet R package to integrate survival status, survival time, as well as DEGs expression profiles."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO: GSE41613) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ and the cancer genome database (TCGA: OSCC) https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36566175", "locator": "sections[25] \"notes\" paragraph 1", "quote": "The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO: GSE41613) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ and the cancer genome database (TCGA: OSCC) https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "Besides, area under ROC curve (AUC) values for patient survival at 1, 3 and 5 years were determined as 0.63, 0.70, and 0.76, separately, indicating that the prognostic model has good predictive accuracy.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36566175", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "Besides, area under ROC curve (AUC) values for patient survival at 1, 3 and 5 years were determined as 0.63, 0.70, and 0.76, separately, indicating that the prognostic model has good predictive accuracy."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "Besides, area under ROC curve (AUC) values for patient survival at 1, 3 and 5 years were determined as 0.63, 0.70, and 0.76, separately, indicating that the prognostic model has good predictive accuracy.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:36566175"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE172577"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE172577"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:36566175", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-022-01417-3", "sha256": "sha256:eb6885c8dbd98eff02b3c8d7cdcd96adabca5a512ef4ca3682ae2f57bbc83899", "bytes": 38191, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1186/s12920-022-01417-3", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC9789624", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE172577", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE172577", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE172577", "version": null, "note": "The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO: GSE41613) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ and the cancer genome database (TCGA: OSCC) https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO: GSE41613) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ and the cancer genome database (TCGA: OSCC) https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM5258385", "GSM5258386", "GSM5258387", "GSM5258388", "GSM5258389", "GSM5258390"], "sample_count": 6, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "24676", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Single-cell profiling of tumor-infiltrating TCF7+ T cells reveals a T lymphocyte subset associated with tertiary lymphoid structures and superior prognosis in oral cancer", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T18:46:34Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE41613", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE41613", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE41613", "version": null, "note": "The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO: GSE41613) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ and the cancer genome database (TCGA: OSCC) https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO: GSE41613) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ and the cancer genome database (TCGA: OSCC) https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1020099", "GSM1020100", "GSM1020101", "GSM1020102", "GSM1020103", "GSM1020104", "GSM1020105", "GSM1020106", "GSM1020107", "GSM1020108", "GSM1020109", "GSM1020110", "GSM1020111", "GSM1020112", "GSM1020113", "GSM1020114", "GSM1020115", "GSM1020116", "GSM1020117", "GSM1020118", "GSM1020119", "GSM1020120", "GSM1020121", "GSM1020122", "GSM1020123", "GSM1020124", "GSM1020125", "GSM1020126", "GSM1020127", "GSM1020128", "GSM1020129", "GSM1020130", "GSM1020131", "GSM1020132", "GSM1020133", "GSM1020134", "GSM1020135", "GSM1020136", "GSM1020137", "GSM1020138", "GSM1020139", "GSM1020140", "GSM1020141", "GSM1020142", "GSM1020143", "GSM1020144", "GSM1020145", "GSM1020146", "GSM1020147", "GSM1020148", "GSM1020149", "GSM1020150", "GSM1020151", "GSM1020152", "GSM1020153", "GSM1020154", "GSM1020155", "GSM1020156", "GSM1020157", "GSM1020158", "GSM1020159", "GSM1020160", "GSM1020161", "GSM1020162", "GSM1020163", "GSM1020164", "GSM1020165", "GSM1020166", "GSM1020167", "GSM1020168", "GSM1020169", "GSM1020170", "GSM1020171", "GSM1020172", "GSM1020173", "GSM1020174", "GSM1020175", "GSM1020176", "GSM1020177", "GSM1020178", "GSM1020179", "GSM1020180", "GSM1020181", "GSM1020182", "GSM1020183", "GSM1020184", "GSM1020185", "GSM1020186", "GSM1020187", "GSM1020188", "GSM1020189", "GSM1020190", "GSM1020191", "GSM1020192", "GSM1020193", "GSM1020194", "GSM1020195"], "sample_count": 97, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "570", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "A 13-gene signature prognostic of HPV-negative OSCC: discovery and external validation", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE172577 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE172577 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE41613 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE41613 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "This work employed R software (Version 4.1.2) limma R package for screening metabolic DEGs within cancer compared with non-carcinoma samples upon |log2FC|> 0.5 and FDR < 0.05 thresholds. Then, we used the glmnet R package to integrate survival status, survival time, as well as DEGs expression profiles."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "kaplan_meier", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "Kaplan-Meier"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "log_rank_test", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["logrank_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "log-rank"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "differential_expression", "specific": "limma_voom", "label": "Differential expression analysis", "dsl_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {"log2fc_threshold": "carcinoma samples upon |log2FC|> 0"}, "data_shapes": ["count_matrix_with_condition"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "limma"}}, {"id": "method-5", "family": "diagnostic_evaluation", "specific": "roc", "label": "Diagnostic test evaluation", "dsl_operations": ["confusion_counts", "roc_curve", "sensitivity_specificity", "solve_confusion_matrix", "classification_metrics", "published_precision_envelope"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["reference_standard_and_test"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "ROC curve"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE41613", "GSE172577"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE41613", "GSE172577"], "statements": ["The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO: GSE41613) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ and the cancer genome database (TCGA: OSCC) https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/."], "basis": "The paper names GSE41613, GSE172577 in Gene Expression Omnibus and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "assets": ["source:pmid:36566175", "data:geo:GSE172577"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE172577"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T18:21:30Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 10460, "completion_tokens": 1879, "cached_tokens": 128}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:36566175", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:36566175"}, {"id": "source:pmid:36566175", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 36566175 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE172577", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE172577"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:36566175", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:36566175"}, {"id": "source:pmid:36566175", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 36566175 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE172577", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE172577"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-36566175", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:36566175"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE172577", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE172577"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:36566175", "parent_hash": "sha256:930ebc02dcc4e1a5e52985c8b7727d8d6f29abb6057825840f6a811936717a15", "fork_of": null, "generation": 3}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE172577 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE172577 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE41613 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE41613 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["This work employed R software (Version 4.1.2) limma R package for screening metabolic DEGs within cancer compared with non-carcinoma samples upon |log2FC|> 0.5 and FDR < 0.05 thresholds. Then, we used the glmnet R package to integrate survival status, survival time, as well as DEGs expression profiles."], "order_basis": "analysis_only", "id": "assay:1"}]}