Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:36849551

Construction of a prognostic prediction model for renal clear cell carcinoma combining clinical traits.

Yujie Weng · Pengfei Ning

Scientific reports · 2023 doi:10.1038/s41598-023-30020-4

Paper

complete

Experiment

complete

Data

partial

Analysis

complete

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:36849551
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:1882363de7cc45873689930e33fdf754c5a4d05fc95b1f71c735b53af18dc1b1
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T19:01:29Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:08:57Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Construction of a prognostic prediction model for renal clear cell carcinoma combining clinical traits.
doi
10.1038/s41598-023-30020-4
pmid
36849551
authors array · 2 items
[0]
Yujie Weng
[1]
Pengfei Ning
journal
Scientific reports
year
2023
abstract
Kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) is one of the common malignant tumors of the urinary system. Patients with different risk levels are other in terms of disease progression patterns and disease regression. The poorer prognosis for high-risk patients compared to low-risk patients. Therefore, it is essential to accurately high-risk screen patients and gives accurate and timely treatment. Differential gene analysis, weighted correlation network analysis, Protein-protein interaction network, and univariate Cox analysis were performed sequentially on the train set. Next, the KIRC prognostic model was constructed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) test set and the Gene Expression Omnibus dataset verified the model's validity. Finally, the constructed models were analyzed; including gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and immune analysis. The differences in pathways and immune functions between the high-risk and low-risk groups were observed to provide a reference for clinical treatment and diagnosis. A four-step key gene screen resulted in 17 key factors associated with disease prognosis, including 14 genes and 3 clinical features. The LASSO regression algorithm selected the seven most critical key factors to construct the model: age, grade, stage, GDF3, CASR, CLDN10, and COL9A2. In the training set, the accuracy of the model in predicting 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates was 0.883, 0.819, and 0.830, respectively. The accuracy of the TCGA dataset was 0.831, 0.801, and 0.791, and the accuracy of the GSE29609 dataset was 0.812, 0.809, and 0.851 in the test set. Model scoring divided the sample into a high-risk group and a low-risk group. There were significant differences in disease progression and risk scores between the two groups. GSEA analysis revealed that the enriched pathways in the high-risk group mainly included proteasome and primary immunodeficiency. Immunological analysis showed that CD8 (+) T cells, M1 macrophages, PDCD1, and CTLA4 were upregulated in the high-risk group. In contrast, antigen-presenting cell stimulation and T-cell co-suppression were more active in the high-risk group. This study added clinical characteristics to constructing the KIRC prognostic model to improve prediction accuracy. It provides help to assess the risk of patients more accurately. The differences in pathways and immunity between high and low-risk groups were also analyzed to provide ideas for treating KIRC patients.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
Twenty-four prognostic key factors, including three clinical traits (age, grade, stage) and 21 genes, were screened by univariate Cox regression analysis
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:36849551
locator
sections[17] "Univariate Cox regression analysis for key prognostic factors" paragraph 2
quote
Twenty-four prognostic key factors, including three clinical traits (age, grade, stage) and 21 genes, were screened by univariate Cox regression analysis
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
The data used in this study are public. The dataset downloaded from the GEO database is GSE29609. TCGA Database: https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/. GEO Database: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/. GSE29609: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE29609.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:36849551
locator
sections[24] "Data availability" paragraph 2
quote
The data used in this study are public. The dataset downloaded from the GEO database is GSE29609. TCGA Database: https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/. GEO Database: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/. GSE29609: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE29609.
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
The LASSO prognostic model achieved 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival prediction accuracies of 0.883, 0.819, and 0.830, respectively, in the training set.
kind
qualitative
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:36849551
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 1
quote
In the training set, the accuracy of the model in predicting 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates was 0.883, 0.819, and 0.830, respectively.
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
complete
objective
The LASSO prognostic model achieved 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival prediction accuracies of 0.883, 0.819, and 0.830, respectively, in the training set.
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:36849551
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE29609
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE29609
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 0 items
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 2 items
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:36849551
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30020-4
sha256
sha256:9a900d91907be6c11de21c821755f99d444b46c5a658bbe1951b460f5fa98e67
bytes
40775
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.1038/s41598-023-30020-4
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC9970964
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
[1] object · 15 fields
id
data:geo:GSE29609
role
raw
format
geo-series
media_type
application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json
uri
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE29609
sha256
null
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
GSE29609
version
null
note
The data used in this study are public. The dataset downloaded from the GEO database is GSE29609. TCGA Database: https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/. GEO Database: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/. GSE29609: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE29609.
structure object · 15 fields
repository
GEO
access_route
GEO accession URL
access_statement_verbatim
The data used in this study are public. The dataset downloaded from the GEO database is GSE29609. TCGA Database: https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/. GEO Database: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/. GSE29609: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE29609.
access_statement_kind
data_availability_statement
sample_accessions array · 39 items
[0]
GSM733579
[1]
GSM733580
[2]
GSM733581
[3]
GSM733582
[4]
GSM733583
[5]
GSM733584
[6]
GSM733585
[7]
GSM733586
[8]
GSM733587
[9]
GSM733588
[10]
GSM733589
[11]
GSM733590
[12]
GSM733591
[13]
GSM733592
[14]
GSM733593
[15]
GSM733594
[16]
GSM733595
[17]
GSM733596
[18]
GSM733597
[19]
GSM733598
[20]
GSM733599
[21]
GSM733600
[22]
GSM733601
[23]
GSM733602
[24]
GSM733603
[25]
GSM733604
[26]
GSM733605
[27]
GSM733606
[28]
GSM733607
[29]
GSM733608
[30]
GSM733609
[31]
GSM733610
[32]
GSM733611
[33]
GSM733612
[34]
GSM733613
[35]
GSM733614
[36]
GSM733615
[37]
GSM733616
[38]
GSM733617
sample_count
39
group_sizes
null
group_sizes_basis
null
platform
1708
taxon
Homo sapiens
title
Clear-cell renal cell carcinomas tumors
resolution_checked_at
2026-11-01T15:39:54Z
resolution_check
identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read
downloaded
false
licence_read
false
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE29609 not downloaded
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE29609 licence not read
analysis object · 4 fields
state
complete
methods array · 3 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
survival_analysis
specific
cox_proportional_hazards
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
Twenty-four prognostic key factors, including three clinical traits (age, grade, stage) and 21 genes, were screened by univariate Cox regression analysis
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
network_analysis
specific
ppi_network
label
Network / pathway analysis
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
build_graph
[1]
centrality_scores
[2]
pathway_enrich
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
edge_list
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
Protein-protein interaction
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
diagnostic_evaluation
specific
roc
label
Diagnostic test evaluation
dsl_operations array · 6 items
[0]
confusion_counts
[1]
roc_curve
[2]
sensitivity_specificity
[3]
solve_confusion_matrix
[4]
classification_metrics
[5]
published_precision_envelope
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
reference_standard_and_test
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
ROC curve
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 0 items
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
complete
tier
R1
blocked_on
nothing:replicable_now
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R1
reachable
true
accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE29609
resolved_accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE29609
statements array · 1 item
[0]
The data used in this study are public. The dataset downloaded from the GEO database is GSE29609. TCGA Database: https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/. GEO Database: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/. GSE29609: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE29609.
basis
The paper names GSE29609 in GEO and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
assets array · 2 items
[0]
source:pmid:36849551
[1]
data:geo:GSE29609
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE29609
gaps array · 0 items
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T18:32:11Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
11685
completion_tokens
1386
cached_tokens
264
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:36849551
type
paper
label
pmid:36849551
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:36849551
type
manuscript
label
PMID 36849551 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE29609
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE29609
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:36849551
type
paper
label
pmid:36849551
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:36849551
type
manuscript
label
PMID 36849551 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE29609
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE29609
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-36849551
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:36849551
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-GSE29609
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE29609
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:36849551
parent_hash
sha256:db450084451c9c49cfbaeb923396756d1f7eb181faa42a1743a3fe74a3d5a55f
fork_of
null
gaps array · 6 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE29609 licence not read
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE29609 not downloaded
[2]
execution.not_run
[3]
review.human_critique
[4]
review.independent_reader
[5]
review.machine_critique
assays array · 2 items
[0] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_id
methylation_array
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.85
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
RSORT-ABS, QUANTISEQ, MCPCOUNTER, XCELL, and EPIC. Immune function analysis is implemented usi
order_basis
paper_text_order:4449
id
assay:1
[1] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
survival_analysis
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
Twenty-four prognostic key factors, including three clinical traits (age, grade, stage) and 21 genes, were screened by univariate Cox regression analysis
order_basis
consumes_earlier_output
id
assay:2
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:36849551", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 3, "content_hash": "sha256:1882363de7cc45873689930e33fdf754c5a4d05fc95b1f71c735b53af18dc1b1", "created_at": "2026-11-01T19:01:29Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:08:57Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Construction of a prognostic prediction model for renal clear cell carcinoma combining clinical traits.", "doi": "10.1038/s41598-023-30020-4", "pmid": "36849551", "authors": ["Yujie Weng", "Pengfei Ning"], "journal": "Scientific reports", "year": 2023, "abstract": "Kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) is one of the common malignant tumors of the urinary system. Patients with different risk levels are other in terms of disease progression patterns and disease regression. The poorer prognosis for high-risk patients compared to low-risk patients. Therefore, it is essential to accurately high-risk screen patients and gives accurate and timely treatment. Differential gene analysis, weighted correlation network analysis, Protein-protein interaction network, and univariate Cox analysis were performed sequentially on the train set. Next, the KIRC prognostic model was constructed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) test set and the Gene Expression Omnibus dataset verified the model's validity. Finally, the constructed models were analyzed; including gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and immune analysis. The differences in pathways and immune functions between the high-risk and low-risk groups were observed to provide a reference for clinical treatment and diagnosis. A four-step key gene screen resulted in 17 key factors associated with disease prognosis, including 14 genes and 3 clinical features. The LASSO regression algorithm selected the seven most critical key factors to construct the model: age, grade, stage, GDF3, CASR, CLDN10, and COL9A2. In the training set, the accuracy of the model in predicting 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates was 0.883, 0.819, and 0.830, respectively. The accuracy of the TCGA dataset was 0.831, 0.801, and 0.791, and the accuracy of the GSE29609 dataset was 0.812, 0.809, and 0.851 in the test set. Model scoring divided the sample into a high-risk group and a low-risk group. There were significant differences in disease progression and risk scores between the two groups. GSEA analysis revealed that the enriched pathways in the high-risk group mainly included proteasome and primary immunodeficiency. Immunological analysis showed that CD8 (+) T cells, M1 macrophages, PDCD1, and CTLA4 were upregulated in the high-risk group. In contrast, antigen-presenting cell stimulation and T-cell co-suppression were more active in the high-risk group. This study added clinical characteristics to constructing the KIRC prognostic model to improve prediction accuracy. It provides help to assess the risk of patients more accurately. The differences in pathways and immunity between high and low-risk groups were also analyzed to provide ideas for treating KIRC patients.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "Twenty-four prognostic key factors, including three clinical traits (age, grade, stage) and 21 genes, were screened by univariate Cox regression analysis", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36849551", "locator": "sections[17] \"Univariate Cox regression analysis for key prognostic factors\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Twenty-four prognostic key factors, including three clinical traits (age, grade, stage) and 21 genes, were screened by univariate Cox regression analysis"}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The data used in this study are public. The dataset downloaded from the GEO database is GSE29609. TCGA Database: https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/. GEO Database: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/. GSE29609: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE29609.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36849551", "locator": "sections[24] \"Data availability\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The data used in this study are public. The dataset downloaded from the GEO database is GSE29609. TCGA Database: https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/. GEO Database: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/. GSE29609: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE29609."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "The LASSO prognostic model achieved 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival prediction accuracies of 0.883, 0.819, and 0.830, respectively, in the training set.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36849551", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 1", "quote": "In the training set, the accuracy of the model in predicting 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates was 0.883, 0.819, and 0.830, respectively."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "The LASSO prognostic model achieved 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival prediction accuracies of 0.883, 0.819, and 0.830, respectively, in the training set.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:36849551"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE29609"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE29609"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:36849551", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30020-4", "sha256": "sha256:9a900d91907be6c11de21c821755f99d444b46c5a658bbe1951b460f5fa98e67", "bytes": 40775, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1038/s41598-023-30020-4", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC9970964", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE29609", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE29609", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE29609", "version": null, "note": "The data used in this study are public. The dataset downloaded from the GEO database is GSE29609. TCGA Database: https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/. GEO Database: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/. GSE29609: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE29609.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The data used in this study are public. The dataset downloaded from the GEO database is GSE29609. TCGA Database: https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/. GEO Database: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/. GSE29609: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE29609.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM733579", "GSM733580", "GSM733581", "GSM733582", "GSM733583", "GSM733584", "GSM733585", "GSM733586", "GSM733587", "GSM733588", "GSM733589", "GSM733590", "GSM733591", "GSM733592", "GSM733593", "GSM733594", "GSM733595", "GSM733596", "GSM733597", "GSM733598", "GSM733599", "GSM733600", "GSM733601", "GSM733602", "GSM733603", "GSM733604", "GSM733605", "GSM733606", "GSM733607", "GSM733608", "GSM733609", "GSM733610", "GSM733611", "GSM733612", "GSM733613", "GSM733614", "GSM733615", "GSM733616", "GSM733617"], "sample_count": 39, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "1708", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Clear-cell renal cell carcinomas tumors", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE29609 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE29609 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "Twenty-four prognostic key factors, including three clinical traits (age, grade, stage) and 21 genes, were screened by univariate Cox regression analysis"}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "ppi_network", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["build_graph", "centrality_scores", "pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "Protein-protein interaction"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "diagnostic_evaluation", "specific": "roc", "label": "Diagnostic test evaluation", "dsl_operations": ["confusion_counts", "roc_curve", "sensitivity_specificity", "solve_confusion_matrix", "classification_metrics", "published_precision_envelope"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["reference_standard_and_test"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "ROC curve"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE29609"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE29609"], "statements": ["The data used in this study are public. The dataset downloaded from the GEO database is GSE29609. TCGA Database: https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/. GEO Database: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/. GSE29609: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE29609."], "basis": "The paper names GSE29609 in GEO and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "assets": ["source:pmid:36849551", "data:geo:GSE29609"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE29609"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T18:32:11Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 11685, "completion_tokens": 1386, "cached_tokens": 264}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:36849551", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:36849551"}, {"id": "source:pmid:36849551", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 36849551 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE29609", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE29609"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:36849551", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:36849551"}, {"id": "source:pmid:36849551", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 36849551 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE29609", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE29609"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-36849551", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:36849551"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE29609", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE29609"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:36849551", "parent_hash": "sha256:db450084451c9c49cfbaeb923396756d1f7eb181faa42a1743a3fe74a3d5a55f", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE29609 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE29609 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "methylation_array", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.85, "evidence": ["RSORT-ABS, QUANTISEQ, MCPCOUNTER, XCELL, and EPIC. Immune function analysis is implemented usi"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:4449", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["Twenty-four prognostic key factors, including three clinical traits (age, grade, stage) and 21 genes, were screened by univariate Cox regression analysis"], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:2"}]}