Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:36959804

Identification and verification of the temozolomide resistance feature gene DACH1 in gliomas.

Qiang Gu · Lang Li · Jiahao Yao · Fa-Yan Dong · Yifan Gan · Shuhuai Zhou · Xinyu Wang · Xue-Feng Wang

Frontiers in oncology · 2023 doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1120103

Paper

complete

Experiment

complete

Data

partial

Analysis

partial

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:36959804
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:e4dfc09a77751780d2693cf277654ab1d371d9d05f69be00dc89bfeb9df975b0
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T19:01:36Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:51:33Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Identification and verification of the temozolomide resistance feature gene DACH1 in gliomas.
doi
10.3389/fonc.2023.1120103
pmid
36959804
authors array · 8 items
[0]
Qiang Gu
[1]
Lang Li
[2]
Jiahao Yao
[3]
Fa-Yan Dong
[4]
Yifan Gan
[5]
Shuhuai Zhou
[6]
Xinyu Wang
[7]
Xue-Feng Wang
journal
Frontiers in oncology
year
2023
abstract
Introduction: The most important chemotherapy treatment for glioma patients is temozolomide. However, the development of drug resistance severely restricts the use of temozolomide. Therefore, elucidating the mechanism of temozolomide resistance, enhancing temozolomide sensitivity, and extending patient survival are urgent tasks for researchers. Methods: Temozolomide resistance hub differential genes were identified using differential analysis and protein interaction analysis from the GEO datasets (GSE100736 and GSE113510). These genes were further studied in glioma patients treated with temozolomide in the TCGA and CGGA databases. Patients from the mRNAseq_325 dataset (CGGA) were considered as the training set to construct a risk model for predicting glioma sensitivity to temozolomide, while patients from the mRNAseq_693 dataset (CGGA) and TCGA-GBM dataset were considered as the validation set to evaluate the performance of models. PCR and western blot were performed to determine the difference in expression of the feature gene DACH1 between glioma cells and temozolomide-resistant glioma cells. The alterations in the sensitivity of tumor cells to temozolomide were also observed after DACH1 was silenced. The patients were then divided into two groups based on the expression of DACH1, and the differences in patient survival rates, molecular pathway activation, and level of immune infiltration were compared. Results: Based on four signature genes (AHR, DACH1, MGMT, and YAP1), a risk model for predicting glioma sensitivity to temozolomide was constructed, and the results of timeROC in both the training and validation sets showed that the model had good predictive performance. The expression of the signature gene DACH1 was significantly downregulated in temozolomide-resistant cells, according to the results of the PCR and western blot experiments. The sensitivity of tumor cells to temozolomide was significantly reduced after DACH1 was silenced. DACH1 probably regulates temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma through the transcriptional dysregulation in cancer and ECM. Discussion: This study constructs a risk model that can predict glioma susceptibility to temozolomide and validates the function of the feature gene DACH1, which provides a promising target for the research of temozolomide resistance.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
The t-test was used to compare two groups, and double-factor variance analysis was used to compare several groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the survival rates of high-risk and low-risk groups. Risk models were constructed by multivariate Cox regression analysis.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:36959804
locator
sections[17] "Statistical analysis" paragraph 2
quote
The t-test was used to compare two groups, and double-factor variance analysis was used to compare several groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the survival rates of high-risk and low-risk groups. Risk models were constructed by multivariate Cox regression analysis.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:36959804
locator
sections[32] "Data availability statement" paragraph 2
quote
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
The four-gene risk model demonstrated good predictive performance, with 1-, 3-, and 5-year AUC values of 0.728, 0.738, and 0.781 in the training set and 0.699, 0.712, and 0.708 in validation set I.
kind
qualitative
target
null
evidence array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:36959804
locator
sections[20] "Construction and evaluation of a risk model for predicting glioma sensitivity to temozolomide" paragraph 2
quote
The AUC values for 1, 3, and 5 years were 0.728, 0.738, and 0.781 in CGGA-mRNAseq_325 ( Figure 3G ) and 0.699, 0.712, and 0.708 in CGGA-mRNAseq_693 ( Figure 3H ).
[1] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:36959804
locator
sections[20] "Construction and evaluation of a risk model for predicting glioma sensitivity to temozolomide" paragraph 2
quote
The results showed that the model performed well in terms of prediction.
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
complete
objective
The four-gene risk model demonstrated good predictive performance, with 1-, 3-, and 5-year AUC values of 0.728, 0.738, and 0.781 in the training set and 0.699, 0.712, and 0.708 in validation set I.
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:36959804
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE100736
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE100736
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 0 items
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 3 items
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:36959804
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1120103
sha256
sha256:b3dacb54861d3a65e9e1b5343f48f9e4daaa418d98ab6369c9f9a7f562136755
bytes
51240
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.3389/fonc.2023.1120103
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC10028258
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
[1] object · 15 fields
id
data:geo:GSE100736
role
raw
format
geo-series
media_type
application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json
uri
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE100736
sha256
null
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
GSE100736
version
null
note
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
structure object · 15 fields
repository
GEO
access_route
GEO accession URL
access_statement_verbatim
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
access_statement_kind
data_availability_statement
sample_accessions array · 6 items
[0]
GSM2692159
[1]
GSM2692160
[2]
GSM2692161
[3]
GSM2692162
[4]
GSM2692163
[5]
GSM2692164
sample_count
6
group_sizes
null
group_sizes_basis
null
platform
23646
taxon
Homo sapiens
title
LncRNA and mRNA expression data from TMZ-resistant cell line
resolution_checked_at
2026-11-01T18:46:34Z
resolution_check
identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read
downloaded
false
licence_read
false
[2] object · 15 fields
id
data:geo:GSE113510
role
raw
format
geo-series
media_type
application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json
uri
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE113510
sha256
null
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
GSE113510
version
null
note
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
structure object · 15 fields
repository
GEO
access_route
GEO accession URL
access_statement_verbatim
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
access_statement_kind
data_availability_statement
sample_accessions array · 6 items
[0]
GSM3108207
[1]
GSM3108208
[2]
GSM3108209
[3]
GSM3108210
[4]
GSM3108211
[5]
GSM3108212
sample_count
6
group_sizes
null
group_sizes_basis
null
platform
21047
taxon
Homo sapiens
title
The different expression of long non-coding RNAs and messenger RNAs in temozolomide-resistant glioblastoma cells and parental glioblastoma cells
resolution_checked_at
2026-11-01T18:46:34Z
resolution_check
identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read
downloaded
false
licence_read
false
gaps array · 4 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE100736 not downloaded
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE100736 licence not read
[2]
asset:data:geo:GSE113510 not downloaded
[3]
asset:data:geo:GSE113510 licence not read
analysis object · 4 fields
state
partial
methods array · 3 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
group_comparison
specific
anova
label
Group comparison
dsl_operations array · 4 items
[0]
group_summary
[1]
welch_t
[2]
bootstrap_mean_difference
[3]
group_comparison_anova
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
two_or_more_groups_continuous
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
The t-test was used to compare two groups, and double-factor variance analysis was used to compare several groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the survival rates of high-risk and low-risk groups. Risk models were constructed by multivariate Cox regression analysis.
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
survival_analysis
specific
kaplan_meier
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
survival_km
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Kaplan-Meier
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
survival_analysis
specific
cox_proportional_hazards
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Cox regression
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
method.reader_differs_from_extractor
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
complete
tier
R1
blocked_on
nothing:replicable_now
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 4 items
[0]
group_summary
[1]
welch_t
[2]
bootstrap_mean_difference
[3]
group_comparison_anova
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: anova.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R1
reachable
true
accessions array · 2 items
[0]
GSE100736
[1]
GSE113510
resolved_accessions array · 2 items
[0]
GSE100736
[1]
GSE113510
statements array · 1 item
[0]
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
basis
The paper names GSE100736, GSE113510 in GEO and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 4 items
[0]
group_summary
[1]
welch_t
[2]
bootstrap_mean_difference
[3]
group_comparison_anova
assets array · 2 items
[0]
source:pmid:36959804
[1]
data:geo:GSE100736
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE100736
gaps array · 0 items
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T18:34:36Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
14873
completion_tokens
2203
cached_tokens
264
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:36959804
type
paper
label
pmid:36959804
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:36959804
type
manuscript
label
PMID 36959804 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE100736
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE100736
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:36959804
type
paper
label
pmid:36959804
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:36959804
type
manuscript
label
PMID 36959804 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE100736
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE100736
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-36959804
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:36959804
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-GSE100736
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE100736
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:36959804
parent_hash
sha256:3d4f4b8ac9b350e6344ec31256d16c7fc1fda07253439d5616fbe53801131e33
fork_of
null
gaps array · 9 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE100736 licence not read
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE100736 not downloaded
[2]
asset:data:geo:GSE113510 licence not read
[3]
asset:data:geo:GSE113510 not downloaded
[4]
execution.not_run
[5]
method.reader_differs_from_extractor
[6]
review.human_critique
[7]
review.independent_reader
[8]
review.machine_critique
assays array · 2 items
[0] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_id
western_blot
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.99
evidence array · 2 items
[0]
evaluate the performance of models. PCR and western blot were performed to determine the difference i
[1]
lls, according to the results of the PCR and western blot experiments. The sensitivity of tumor cells
order_basis
paper_text_order:1004
id
assay:1
[1] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
group_comparison
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 4 items
[0]
group_summary
[1]
welch_t
[2]
bootstrap_mean_difference
[3]
group_comparison_anova
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
The t-test was used to compare two groups, and double-factor variance analysis was used to compare several groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the survival rates of high-risk and low-risk groups. Risk models were constructed by multivariate Cox regression analysis.
order_basis
consumes_earlier_output
id
assay:2
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:36959804", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 4, "content_hash": "sha256:e4dfc09a77751780d2693cf277654ab1d371d9d05f69be00dc89bfeb9df975b0", "created_at": "2026-11-01T19:01:36Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:51:33Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Identification and verification of the temozolomide resistance feature gene DACH1 in gliomas.", "doi": "10.3389/fonc.2023.1120103", "pmid": "36959804", "authors": ["Qiang Gu", "Lang Li", "Jiahao Yao", "Fa-Yan Dong", "Yifan Gan", "Shuhuai Zhou", "Xinyu Wang", "Xue-Feng Wang"], "journal": "Frontiers in oncology", "year": 2023, "abstract": "Introduction: The most important chemotherapy treatment for glioma patients is temozolomide. However, the development of drug resistance severely restricts the use of temozolomide. Therefore, elucidating the mechanism of temozolomide resistance, enhancing temozolomide sensitivity, and extending patient survival are urgent tasks for researchers.\nMethods: Temozolomide resistance hub differential genes were identified using differential analysis and protein interaction analysis from the GEO datasets (GSE100736 and GSE113510). These genes were further studied in glioma patients treated with temozolomide in the TCGA and CGGA databases. Patients from the mRNAseq_325 dataset (CGGA) were considered as the training set to construct a risk model for predicting glioma sensitivity to temozolomide, while patients from the mRNAseq_693 dataset (CGGA) and TCGA-GBM dataset were considered as the validation set to evaluate the performance of models. PCR and western blot were performed to determine the difference in expression of the feature gene DACH1 between glioma cells and temozolomide-resistant glioma cells. The alterations in the sensitivity of tumor cells to temozolomide were also observed after DACH1 was silenced. The patients were then divided into two groups based on the expression of DACH1, and the differences in patient survival rates, molecular pathway activation, and level of immune infiltration were compared.\nResults: Based on four signature genes (AHR, DACH1, MGMT, and YAP1), a risk model for predicting glioma sensitivity to temozolomide was constructed, and the results of timeROC in both the training and validation sets showed that the model had good predictive performance. The expression of the signature gene DACH1 was significantly downregulated in temozolomide-resistant cells, according to the results of the PCR and western blot experiments. The sensitivity of tumor cells to temozolomide was significantly reduced after DACH1 was silenced. DACH1 probably regulates temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma through the transcriptional dysregulation in cancer and ECM.\nDiscussion: This study constructs a risk model that can predict glioma susceptibility to temozolomide and validates the function of the feature gene DACH1, which provides a promising target for the research of temozolomide resistance.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "The t-test was used to compare two groups, and double-factor variance analysis was used to compare several groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the survival rates of high-risk and low-risk groups. Risk models were constructed by multivariate Cox regression analysis.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36959804", "locator": "sections[17] \"Statistical analysis\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The t-test was used to compare two groups, and double-factor variance analysis was used to compare several groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the survival rates of high-risk and low-risk groups. Risk models were constructed by multivariate Cox regression analysis."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36959804", "locator": "sections[32] \"Data availability statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "The four-gene risk model demonstrated good predictive performance, with 1-, 3-, and 5-year AUC values of 0.728, 0.738, and 0.781 in the training set and 0.699, 0.712, and 0.708 in validation set I.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36959804", "locator": "sections[20] \"Construction and evaluation of a risk model for predicting glioma sensitivity to temozolomide\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The AUC values for 1, 3, and 5 years were 0.728, 0.738, and 0.781 in CGGA-mRNAseq_325 ( Figure 3G ) and 0.699, 0.712, and 0.708 in CGGA-mRNAseq_693 ( Figure 3H )."}, {"asset": "source:pmid:36959804", "locator": "sections[20] \"Construction and evaluation of a risk model for predicting glioma sensitivity to temozolomide\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The results showed that the model performed well in terms of prediction."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "The four-gene risk model demonstrated good predictive performance, with 1-, 3-, and 5-year AUC values of 0.728, 0.738, and 0.781 in the training set and 0.699, 0.712, and 0.708 in validation set I.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:36959804"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE100736"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE100736"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:36959804", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1120103", "sha256": "sha256:b3dacb54861d3a65e9e1b5343f48f9e4daaa418d98ab6369c9f9a7f562136755", "bytes": 51240, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3389/fonc.2023.1120103", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC10028258", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE100736", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE100736", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE100736", "version": null, "note": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM2692159", "GSM2692160", "GSM2692161", "GSM2692162", "GSM2692163", "GSM2692164"], "sample_count": 6, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "23646", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "LncRNA and mRNA expression data from TMZ-resistant cell line", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T18:46:34Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE113510", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE113510", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE113510", "version": null, "note": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM3108207", "GSM3108208", "GSM3108209", "GSM3108210", "GSM3108211", "GSM3108212"], "sample_count": 6, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "21047", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "The different expression of long non-coding RNAs and messenger RNAs in temozolomide-resistant glioblastoma cells and parental glioblastoma cells", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T18:46:34Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE100736 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE100736 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE113510 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE113510 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "anova", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "The t-test was used to compare two groups, and double-factor variance analysis was used to compare several groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the survival rates of high-risk and low-risk groups. Risk models were constructed by multivariate Cox regression analysis."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "kaplan_meier", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Kaplan-Meier"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Cox regression"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_differs_from_extractor"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: anova."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE100736", "GSE113510"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE100736", "GSE113510"], "statements": ["The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author."], "basis": "The paper names GSE100736, GSE113510 in GEO and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "assets": ["source:pmid:36959804", "data:geo:GSE100736"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE100736"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T18:34:36Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 14873, "completion_tokens": 2203, "cached_tokens": 264}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:36959804", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:36959804"}, {"id": "source:pmid:36959804", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 36959804 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE100736", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE100736"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:36959804", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:36959804"}, {"id": "source:pmid:36959804", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 36959804 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE100736", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE100736"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-36959804", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:36959804"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE100736", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE100736"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:36959804", "parent_hash": "sha256:3d4f4b8ac9b350e6344ec31256d16c7fc1fda07253439d5616fbe53801131e33", "fork_of": null, "generation": 3}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE100736 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE100736 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE113510 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE113510 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.reader_differs_from_extractor", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "western_blot", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["evaluate the performance of models. PCR and western blot were performed to determine the difference i", "lls, according to the results of the PCR and western blot experiments. The sensitivity of tumor cells"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1004", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "group_comparison", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["The t-test was used to compare two groups, and double-factor variance analysis was used to compare several groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the survival rates of high-risk and low-risk groups. Risk models were constructed by multivariate Cox regression analysis."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:2"}]}