Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:36969169

Identification of a novel immune landscape signature as effective diagnostic markers related to immune cell infiltration in diabetic nephropathy.

Huandi Zhou · Lin Mu · Zhifen Yang · Yonghong Shi

Frontiers in immunology · 2023 doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1113212

Paper

complete

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

partial

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:36969169
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:e2dc019cfd5fe358e0769bf2d521375df70ee82b696fa9eda24afbb7eac70e6f
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T19:01:37Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:09:08Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Identification of a novel immune landscape signature as effective diagnostic markers related to immune cell infiltration in diabetic nephropathy.
doi
10.3389/fimmu.2023.1113212
pmid
36969169
authors array · 4 items
[0]
Huandi Zhou
[1]
Lin Mu
[2]
Zhifen Yang
[3]
Yonghong Shi
journal
Frontiers in immunology
year
2023
abstract
Background: The study aimed to identify core biomarkers related to diagnosis and immune microenvironment regulation and explore the immune molecular mechanism of diabetic nephropathy (DN) through bioinformatics analysis. Methods: GSE30529, GSE99325, and GSE104954 were merged with removing batch effects, and different expression genes (DEGs) were screened at a criterion |log2FC| >0.5 and adjusted P <0.05. KEGG, GO, and GSEA analyses were performed. Hub genes were screened by conducting PPI networks and calculating node genes using five algorithms with CytoHubba, followed by LASSO and ROC analysis to accurately identify diagnostic biomarkers. In addition, two different GEO datasets, GSE175759 and GSE47184, and an experiment cohort with 30 controls and 40 DN patients detected by IHC, were used to validate the biomarkers. Moreover, ssGSEA was performed to analyze the immune microenvironment in DN. Wilcoxon test and LASSO regression were used to determine the core immune signatures. The correlation between biomarkers and crucial immune signatures was calculated by Spearman analysis. Finally, cMap was used to explore potential drugs treating renal tubule injury in DN patients. Results: A total of 509 DEGs, including 338 upregulated and 171 downregulated genes, were screened out. "chemokine signaling pathway" and "cell adhesion molecules" were enriched in both GSEA and KEGG analysis. CCR2, CX3CR1, and SELP, especially for the combination model of the three genes, were identified as core biomarkers with high diagnostic capabilities with striking AUC, sensitivity, and specificity in both merged and validated datasets and IHC validation. Immune infiltration analysis showed a notable infiltration advantage for APC co-stimulation, CD8+ T cells, checkpoint, cytolytic activity, macrophages, MHC class I, and parainflammation in the DN group. In addition, the correlation analysis showed that CCR2, CX3CR1, and SELP were strongly and positively correlated with checkpoint, cytolytic activity, macrophages, MHC class I, and parainflammation in the DN group. Finally, dilazep was screened out as an underlying compound for DN analyzed by CMap. Conclusions: CCR2, CX3CR1, and SELP are underlying diagnostic biomarkers for DN, especially in their combination. APC co-stimulation, CD8+ T cells, checkpoint, cytolytic activity, macrophages, MHC class I, and parainflammation may participate in the occurrence and development of DN. At last, dilazep may be a promising drug for treating DN.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
To validate the diagnostic of six hub genes, ROC was conducted to calculate the AUC, specificity, and sensitivity.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:36969169
locator
sections[18] "Diagnostic effectiveness of six hub genes and validation of screened core genes" paragraph 2
quote
To validate the diagnostic of six hub genes, ROC was conducted to calculate the AUC, specificity, and sensitivity.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:36969169
locator
sections[24] "Data availability statement" paragraph 2
quote
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
Amazingly and meaningfully, the combined AUC of CCR2, CX3CR1, and SELP reached an incredible 1.000 (95% CI 0.956–1.000), with sensitivity = 100% and specificity = 100% ( Figures 5B ).
kind
qualitative
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:36969169
locator
sections[18] "Diagnostic effectiveness of six hub genes and validation of screened core genes" paragraph 2
quote
Amazingly and meaningfully, the combined AUC of CCR2, CX3CR1, and SELP reached an incredible 1.000 (95% CI 0.956–1.000), with sensitivity = 100% and specificity = 100% ( Figures 5B ).
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
Amazingly and meaningfully, the combined AUC of CCR2, CX3CR1, and SELP reached an incredible 1.000 (95% CI 0.956–1.000), with sensitivity = 100% and specificity = 100% ( Figures 5B ).
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:36969169
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
blocked
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
blocked
blocked_on
method:group_comparison_wilcoxon
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
step:run_analysis blocked on method:group_comparison_wilcoxon
[1]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 1 item
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:36969169
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1113212
sha256
sha256:3d5d35b6e523da7400dddc24d0734febfe6df816459bf2f9934bfb8dd0255d16
bytes
63429
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.3389/fimmu.2023.1113212
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC10030848
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body_without_references
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
gaps array · 0 items
analysis object · 4 fields
state
partial
methods array · 6 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
group_comparison
specific
wilcoxon
label
Group comparison
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 1 item
[0]
group_comparison_wilcoxon
expressible
false
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
two_or_more_groups_continuous
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
Wilcoxon
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
principal_component_analysis
specific
pca
label
Principal component analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
pca_fit
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
wide_numeric_matrix
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
PCA
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
differential_expression
specific
limma_voom
label
Differential expression analysis
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
normalise_counts
[1]
differential_expression_fit
[2]
fdr_bh
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
count_matrix_with_condition
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
limma
[3] object · 10 fields
id
method-4
family
network_analysis
specific
ppi_network
label
Network / pathway analysis
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
build_graph
[1]
centrality_scores
[2]
pathway_enrich
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
edge_list
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
PPI
[4] object · 10 fields
id
method-5
family
diagnostic_evaluation
specific
roc
label
Diagnostic test evaluation
dsl_operations array · 6 items
[0]
confusion_counts
[1]
roc_curve
[2]
sensitivity_specificity
[3]
solve_confusion_matrix
[4]
classification_metrics
[5]
published_precision_envelope
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
reference_standard_and_test
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
ROC analysis
[5] object · 10 fields
id
method-6
family
null
specific
null
label
receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 0 items
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
To validate the diagnostic of six hub genes, ROC was conducted to calculate the AUC, specificity, and sensitivity.
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
method.reader_named_unmapped
[1]
method.group_comparison_wilcoxon
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
blocked
tier
R4
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
false
required_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 1 item
[0]
group_comparison_wilcoxon
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: wilcoxon.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R4
reachable
false
accessions array · 0 items
resolved_accessions array · 0 items
statements array · 1 item
[0]
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
basis
The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
assets array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:36969169
steps array · 0 items
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
operation
group_comparison_wilcoxon
priority
null
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:accession_absent
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T18:34:46Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
16555
completion_tokens
2281
cached_tokens
128
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:36969169
type
paper
label
pmid:36969169
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:36969169
type
manuscript
label
PMID 36969169 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:36969169
type
paper
label
pmid:36969169
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:36969169
type
manuscript
label
PMID 36969169 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-36969169
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:36969169
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-None
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:36969169
parent_hash
sha256:0e37c0dc5cbef888e075ad2673c134a78c4bbcc8938041b8e04f3728515e0784
fork_of
null
gaps array · 8 items
[0]
execution.not_run
[1]
method.group_comparison_wilcoxon
[2]
method.reader_named_unmapped
[3]
review.human_critique
[4]
review.independent_reader
[5]
review.machine_critique
[6]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
[7]
step:run_analysis blocked on method:group_comparison_wilcoxon
assays array · 2 items
[0] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.99
evidence array · 2 items
[0]
h 30 controls and 40 DN patients detected by IHC, were used to validate the biomarkers. Moreo
[1]
ty in both merged and validated datasets and IHC validation. Immune infiltration analysis sho
order_basis
paper_text_order:888
id
assay:1
[1] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
group_comparison
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
Wilcoxon
order_basis
consumes_earlier_output
id
assay:2
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:36969169", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 3, "content_hash": "sha256:e2dc019cfd5fe358e0769bf2d521375df70ee82b696fa9eda24afbb7eac70e6f", "created_at": "2026-11-01T19:01:37Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:09:08Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Identification of a novel immune landscape signature as effective diagnostic markers related to immune cell infiltration in diabetic nephropathy.", "doi": "10.3389/fimmu.2023.1113212", "pmid": "36969169", "authors": ["Huandi Zhou", "Lin Mu", "Zhifen Yang", "Yonghong Shi"], "journal": "Frontiers in immunology", "year": 2023, "abstract": "Background: The study aimed to identify core biomarkers related to diagnosis and immune microenvironment regulation and explore the immune molecular mechanism of diabetic nephropathy (DN) through bioinformatics analysis.\nMethods: GSE30529, GSE99325, and GSE104954 were merged with removing batch effects, and different expression genes (DEGs) were screened at a criterion |log2FC| >0.5 and adjusted P <0.05. KEGG, GO, and GSEA analyses were performed. Hub genes were screened by conducting PPI networks and calculating node genes using five algorithms with CytoHubba, followed by LASSO and ROC analysis to accurately identify diagnostic biomarkers. In addition, two different GEO datasets, GSE175759 and GSE47184, and an experiment cohort with 30 controls and 40 DN patients detected by IHC, were used to validate the biomarkers. Moreover, ssGSEA was performed to analyze the immune microenvironment in DN. Wilcoxon test and LASSO regression were used to determine the core immune signatures. The correlation between biomarkers and crucial immune signatures was calculated by Spearman analysis. Finally, cMap was used to explore potential drugs treating renal tubule injury in DN patients.\nResults: A total of 509 DEGs, including 338 upregulated and 171 downregulated genes, were screened out. \"chemokine signaling pathway\" and \"cell adhesion molecules\" were enriched in both GSEA and KEGG analysis. CCR2, CX3CR1, and SELP, especially for the combination model of the three genes, were identified as core biomarkers with high diagnostic capabilities with striking AUC, sensitivity, and specificity in both merged and validated datasets and IHC validation. Immune infiltration analysis showed a notable infiltration advantage for APC co-stimulation, CD8+ T cells, checkpoint, cytolytic activity, macrophages, MHC class I, and parainflammation in the DN group. In addition, the correlation analysis showed that CCR2, CX3CR1, and SELP were strongly and positively correlated with checkpoint, cytolytic activity, macrophages, MHC class I, and parainflammation in the DN group. Finally, dilazep was screened out as an underlying compound for DN analyzed by CMap.\nConclusions: CCR2, CX3CR1, and SELP are underlying diagnostic biomarkers for DN, especially in their combination. APC co-stimulation, CD8+ T cells, checkpoint, cytolytic activity, macrophages, MHC class I, and parainflammation may participate in the occurrence and development of DN. At last, dilazep may be a promising drug for treating DN.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "To validate the diagnostic of six hub genes, ROC was conducted to calculate the AUC, specificity, and sensitivity.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36969169", "locator": "sections[18] \"Diagnostic effectiveness of six hub genes and validation of screened core genes\" paragraph 2", "quote": "To validate the diagnostic of six hub genes, ROC was conducted to calculate the AUC, specificity, and sensitivity."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36969169", "locator": "sections[24] \"Data availability statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "Amazingly and meaningfully, the combined AUC of CCR2, CX3CR1, and SELP reached an incredible 1.000 (95% CI 0.956–1.000), with sensitivity = 100% and specificity = 100% ( Figures 5B ).", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36969169", "locator": "sections[18] \"Diagnostic effectiveness of six hub genes and validation of screened core genes\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Amazingly and meaningfully, the combined AUC of CCR2, CX3CR1, and SELP reached an incredible 1.000 (95% CI 0.956–1.000), with sensitivity = 100% and specificity = 100% ( Figures 5B )."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "Amazingly and meaningfully, the combined AUC of CCR2, CX3CR1, and SELP reached an incredible 1.000 (95% CI 0.956–1.000), with sensitivity = 100% and specificity = 100% ( Figures 5B ).", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:36969169"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "method:group_comparison_wilcoxon", "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:run_analysis blocked on method:group_comparison_wilcoxon", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:36969169", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1113212", "sha256": "sha256:3d5d35b6e523da7400dddc24d0734febfe6df816459bf2f9934bfb8dd0255d16", "bytes": 63429, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3389/fimmu.2023.1113212", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC10030848", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}], "gaps": []}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "wilcoxon", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "Wilcoxon"}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "principal_component_analysis", "specific": "pca", "label": "Principal component analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pca_fit"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["wide_numeric_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "PCA"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "differential_expression", "specific": "limma_voom", "label": "Differential expression analysis", "dsl_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["count_matrix_with_condition"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "limma"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "ppi_network", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["build_graph", "centrality_scores", "pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "PPI"}}, {"id": "method-5", "family": "diagnostic_evaluation", "specific": "roc", "label": "Diagnostic test evaluation", "dsl_operations": ["confusion_counts", "roc_curve", "sensitivity_specificity", "solve_confusion_matrix", "classification_metrics", "published_precision_envelope"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["reference_standard_and_test"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "ROC analysis"}}, {"id": "method-6", "family": null, "specific": null, "label": "receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": null, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": [], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "To validate the diagnostic of six hub genes, ROC was conducted to calculate the AUC, specificity, and sensitivity."}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_named_unmapped", "method.group_comparison_wilcoxon"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "data", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": false, "required_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: wilcoxon."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R4", "reachable": false, "accessions": [], "resolved_accessions": [], "statements": ["The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author."], "basis": "The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:36969169"], "steps": []}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [{"operation": "group_comparison_wilcoxon", "unlocks_papers": null, "priority": null}], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:None"]}, "gaps": ["data:accession_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T18:34:46Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 16555, "completion_tokens": 2281, "cached_tokens": 128}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:36969169", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:36969169"}, {"id": "source:pmid:36969169", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 36969169 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:36969169", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:36969169"}, {"id": "source:pmid:36969169", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 36969169 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-36969169", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:36969169"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-None", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:None"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:36969169", "parent_hash": "sha256:0e37c0dc5cbef888e075ad2673c134a78c4bbcc8938041b8e04f3728515e0784", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["execution.not_run", "method.group_comparison_wilcoxon", "method.reader_named_unmapped", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent", "step:run_analysis blocked on method:group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "ihc", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["h 30 controls and 40 DN patients detected by IHC, were used to validate the biomarkers. Moreo", "ty in both merged and validated datasets and IHC validation. Immune infiltration analysis sho"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:888", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "group_comparison", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 0.7, "evidence": ["Wilcoxon"], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:2"}]}