Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:37098532

Comprehensive research into prognostic and immune signatures of transcription factor family in breast cancer.

Qing Wu · Shiyao Zheng · Nan Lin · Xianhe Xie

BMC medical genomics · 2023 doi:10.1186/s12920-023-01521-y

Paper

complete

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

partial

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:37098532
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:c6e73d100791203f3c700bf2fe51b80689b8536b0a7d4427994486541cd54b17
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T19:01:46Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:51:46Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Comprehensive research into prognostic and immune signatures of transcription factor family in breast cancer.
doi
10.1186/s12920-023-01521-y
pmid
37098532
authors array · 4 items
[0]
Qing Wu
[1]
Shiyao Zheng
[2]
Nan Lin
[3]
Xianhe Xie
journal
BMC medical genomics
year
2023
abstract
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BRCA) is the most common malignancy with high morbidity and mortality in women, and transcription factor (TF) is closely related to the occurrence and development of BRCA. This study was designed to identify a prognostic gene signature based on TF family to reveal immune characteristics and prognostic survival of BRCA. METHODS: In this study, RNA-sequence with corresponding clinical data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and GSE42568. Prognostic differentially expressed transcription factor family genes (TFDEGs) were screened to construct a risk score model, after which BRCA patients were stratified into low-risk and high-risk groups based on their corresponding risk scores. Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis was applied to evaluate the prognostic implication of risk score model, and a nomogram model was developed and validated with the TCGA and GSE20685. Furthermore, the GSEA revealed pathological processes and signaling pathways enriched in the low-risk and high-risk groups. Finally, analyses regarding levels of immune infiltration, immune checkpoints and chemotactic factors were all completed to investigate the correlation between the risk score and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). RESULTS: A prognostic 9-gene signature based on TFDEGs was selected to establish a risk score model. According to KM analyses, high-risk group witnessed a significantly worse overall survival (OS) than low-risk group in both TCGA-BRCA and GSE20685. Furthermore, the nomogram model proved great possibility in predicting the OS of BRCA patients. As indicted in GSEA analysis, tumor-associated pathological processes and pathways were relatively enriched in high-risk group, and the risk score was negatively correlated with ESTIMATE score, infiltration levels of CD4+ and CD8+T cells, as well as expression levels of immune checkpoints and chemotactic factors. CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic model based on TFDEGs could distinguish as a novel biomarker for predicting prognosis of BRCA patients; in addition, it may also be utilized to identify potential benefit population from immunotherapy in different TIME and predict potential drug targets.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis was applied to evaluate the prognostic implication of risk score model, and a nomogram model was developed and validated with the TCGA and GSE20685.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:37098532
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 2
quote
Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis was applied to evaluate the prognostic implication of risk score model, and a nomogram model was developed and validated with the TCGA and GSE20685.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
The data sets used and/or analyzed in this study are available from the cancer genome database (TCGA-BRCA) (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov), NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO: datasets of GSE42568 and GSE20685) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/), Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) (http://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb/index.jsp), KEGG pathway database (www.kegg.jp/kegg/kegg1.html), Connectivity Map (CMap) database (https://clue.io), Human Protein Atlas (HPA) database (http://www.proteinatlas.org/): HPA054267 (patient id: 4193), HPA003984 (patient id: 2091), HPA023083 (patient id: 2805), HPA005941 (patient id: 1939), CAB019405 (patient id: 2898), HPA028866 (patient id: 2091), HPA006206 (patient id: 2428), CAB009155 (patient id: 2015), HPA045214 (patient id: 2160), MethSurv database (https://biit.cs.ut.ee/methsurv/), and ImmuCellAI (http://bioinfo.life.hust.edu.cn/ImmuCellAI) database. Besides, R code, data input, and output of this study were provided in Additional file 1: R code and data.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:37098532
locator
sections[27] "Availability of data and material" paragraph 2
quote
The data sets used and/or analyzed in this study are available from the cancer genome database (TCGA-BRCA) (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov), NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO: datasets of GSE42568 and GSE20685) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/), Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) (http://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb/index.jsp), KEGG pathway database (www.kegg.jp/kegg/kegg1.html), Connectivity Map (CMap) database (https://clue.io), Human Protein Atlas (HPA) database (http://www.proteinatlas.org/): HPA054267 (patient id: 4193), HPA003984 (patient id: 2091), HPA023083 (patient id: 2805), HPA005941 (patient id: 1939), CAB019405 (patient id: 2898), HPA028866 (patient id: 2091), HPA006206 (patient id: 2428), CAB009155 (patient id: 2015), HPA045214 (patient id: 2160), MethSurv database (https://biit.cs.ut.ee/methsurv/), and ImmuCellAI (http://bioinfo.life.hust.edu.cn/ImmuCellAI) database. Besides, R code, data input, and output of this study were provided in Additional file 1: R code and data.
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
A prognostic 9-gene signature based on TFDEGs was selected to establish a risk score model.
kind
qualitative
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:37098532
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 3
quote
A prognostic 9-gene signature based on TFDEGs was selected to establish a risk score model.
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
A prognostic 9-gene signature based on TFDEGs was selected to establish a risk score model.
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:37098532
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
blocked
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 1 item
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:37098532
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-023-01521-y
sha256
sha256:0ef2c591f146b35893d2a78b1b2c0688b6bb8a5bc69de192d919e1c3fc987b11
bytes
55994
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.1186/s12920-023-01521-y
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC10127334
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
gaps array · 0 items
analysis object · 4 fields
state
partial
methods array · 5 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
survival_analysis
specific
kaplan_meier
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
survival_km
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis was applied to evaluate the prognostic implication of risk score model, and a nomogram model was developed and validated with the TCGA and GSE20685.
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
group_comparison
specific
wilcoxon
label
Group comparison
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 1 item
[0]
group_comparison_wilcoxon
expressible
false
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
two_or_more_groups_continuous
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Wilcoxon
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
survival_analysis
specific
log_rank_test
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
logrank_test
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
log-rank
[3] object · 10 fields
id
method-4
family
network_analysis
specific
ppi_network
label
Network / pathway analysis
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
build_graph
[1]
centrality_scores
[2]
pathway_enrich
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
edge_list
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
PPI
[4] object · 10 fields
id
method-5
family
network_analysis
specific
pathway_enrichment
label
Network / pathway analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
pathway_enrich
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
edge_list
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
pathway enrichment
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
method.reader_differs_from_extractor
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
blocked
tier
R4
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
survival_km
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: kaplan_meier.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R4
reachable
false
accessions array · 0 items
resolved_accessions array · 0 items
statements array · 1 item
[0]
The data sets used and/or analyzed in this study are available from the cancer genome database (TCGA-BRCA) (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov), NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO: datasets of GSE42568 and GSE20685) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/), Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) (http://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb/index.jsp), KEGG pathway database (www.kegg.jp/kegg/kegg1.html), Connectivity Map (CMap) database (https://clue.io), Human Protein Atlas (HPA) database (http://www.proteinatlas.org/): HPA054267 (patient id: 4193), HPA003984 (patient id: 2091), HPA023083 (patient id: 2805), HPA005941 (patient id: 1939), CAB019405 (patient id: 2898), HPA028866 (patient id: 2091), HPA006206 (patient id: 2428), CAB009155 (patient id: 2015), HPA045214 (patient id: 2160), MethSurv database (https://biit.cs.ut.ee/methsurv/), and ImmuCellAI (http://bioinfo.life.hust.edu.cn/ImmuCellAI) database. Besides, R code, data input, and output of this study were provided in Additional file 1: R code and data.
basis
The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
survival_km
assets array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:37098532
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:accession_absent
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T18:37:53Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
16713
completion_tokens
3779
cached_tokens
264
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:37098532
type
paper
label
pmid:37098532
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:37098532
type
manuscript
label
PMID 37098532 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:37098532
type
paper
label
pmid:37098532
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:37098532
type
manuscript
label
PMID 37098532 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-37098532
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:37098532
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-None
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:37098532
parent_hash
sha256:87806a1ef4e500bf83c22cb4de1934e216cbbc9f2992e2265830bd0981aa8483
fork_of
null
gaps array · 6 items
[0]
execution.not_run
[1]
method.reader_differs_from_extractor
[2]
review.human_critique
[3]
review.independent_reader
[4]
review.machine_critique
[5]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
assays array · 1 item
[0] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
survival_analysis
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
survival_km
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis was applied to evaluate the prognostic implication of risk score model, and a nomogram model was developed and validated with the TCGA and GSE20685.
order_basis
analysis_only
id
assay:1
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:37098532", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 4, "content_hash": "sha256:c6e73d100791203f3c700bf2fe51b80689b8536b0a7d4427994486541cd54b17", "created_at": "2026-11-01T19:01:46Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:51:46Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Comprehensive research into prognostic and immune signatures of transcription factor family in breast cancer.", "doi": "10.1186/s12920-023-01521-y", "pmid": "37098532", "authors": ["Qing Wu", "Shiyao Zheng", "Nan Lin", "Xianhe Xie"], "journal": "BMC medical genomics", "year": 2023, "abstract": "BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BRCA) is the most common malignancy with high morbidity and mortality in women, and transcription factor (TF) is closely related to the occurrence and development of BRCA. This study was designed to identify a prognostic gene signature based on TF family to reveal immune characteristics and prognostic survival of BRCA.\nMETHODS: In this study, RNA-sequence with corresponding clinical data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and GSE42568. Prognostic differentially expressed transcription factor family genes (TFDEGs) were screened to construct a risk score model, after which BRCA patients were stratified into low-risk and high-risk groups based on their corresponding risk scores. Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis was applied to evaluate the prognostic implication of risk score model, and a nomogram model was developed and validated with the TCGA and GSE20685. Furthermore, the GSEA revealed pathological processes and signaling pathways enriched in the low-risk and high-risk groups. Finally, analyses regarding levels of immune infiltration, immune checkpoints and chemotactic factors were all completed to investigate the correlation between the risk score and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME).\nRESULTS: A prognostic 9-gene signature based on TFDEGs was selected to establish a risk score model. According to KM analyses, high-risk group witnessed a significantly worse overall survival (OS) than low-risk group in both TCGA-BRCA and GSE20685. Furthermore, the nomogram model proved great possibility in predicting the OS of BRCA patients. As indicted in GSEA analysis, tumor-associated pathological processes and pathways were relatively enriched in high-risk group, and the risk score was negatively correlated with ESTIMATE score, infiltration levels of CD4+ and CD8+T cells, as well as expression levels of immune checkpoints and chemotactic factors.\nCONCLUSIONS: The prognostic model based on TFDEGs could distinguish as a novel biomarker for predicting prognosis of BRCA patients; in addition, it may also be utilized to identify potential benefit population from immunotherapy in different TIME and predict potential drug targets.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis was applied to evaluate the prognostic implication of risk score model, and a nomogram model was developed and validated with the TCGA and GSE20685.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:37098532", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis was applied to evaluate the prognostic implication of risk score model, and a nomogram model was developed and validated with the TCGA and GSE20685."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The data sets used and/or analyzed in this study are available from the cancer genome database (TCGA-BRCA) (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov), NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO: datasets of GSE42568 and GSE20685) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/), Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) (http://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb/index.jsp), KEGG pathway database (www.kegg.jp/kegg/kegg1.html), Connectivity Map (CMap) database (https://clue.io), Human Protein Atlas (HPA) database (http://www.proteinatlas.org/): HPA054267 (patient id: 4193), HPA003984 (patient id: 2091), HPA023083 (patient id: 2805), HPA005941 (patient id: 1939), CAB019405 (patient id: 2898), HPA028866 (patient id: 2091), HPA006206 (patient id: 2428), CAB009155 (patient id: 2015), HPA045214 (patient id: 2160), MethSurv database (https://biit.cs.ut.ee/methsurv/), and ImmuCellAI (http://bioinfo.life.hust.edu.cn/ImmuCellAI) database. Besides, R code, data input, and output of this study were provided in Additional file 1: R code and data.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:37098532", "locator": "sections[27] \"Availability of data and material\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The data sets used and/or analyzed in this study are available from the cancer genome database (TCGA-BRCA) (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov), NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO: datasets of GSE42568 and GSE20685) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/), Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) (http://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb/index.jsp), KEGG pathway database (www.kegg.jp/kegg/kegg1.html), Connectivity Map (CMap) database (https://clue.io), Human Protein Atlas (HPA) database (http://www.proteinatlas.org/): HPA054267 (patient id: 4193), HPA003984 (patient id: 2091), HPA023083 (patient id: 2805), HPA005941 (patient id: 1939), CAB019405 (patient id: 2898), HPA028866 (patient id: 2091), HPA006206 (patient id: 2428), CAB009155 (patient id: 2015), HPA045214 (patient id: 2160), MethSurv database (https://biit.cs.ut.ee/methsurv/), and ImmuCellAI (http://bioinfo.life.hust.edu.cn/ImmuCellAI) database. Besides, R code, data input, and output of this study were provided in Additional file 1: R code and data."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "A prognostic 9-gene signature based on TFDEGs was selected to establish a risk score model.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:37098532", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "A prognostic 9-gene signature based on TFDEGs was selected to establish a risk score model."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "A prognostic 9-gene signature based on TFDEGs was selected to establish a risk score model.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:37098532"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:37098532", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-023-01521-y", "sha256": "sha256:0ef2c591f146b35893d2a78b1b2c0688b6bb8a5bc69de192d919e1c3fc987b11", "bytes": 55994, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1186/s12920-023-01521-y", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC10127334", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}], "gaps": []}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "kaplan_meier", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis was applied to evaluate the prognostic implication of risk score model, and a nomogram model was developed and validated with the TCGA and GSE20685."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "wilcoxon", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Wilcoxon"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "log_rank_test", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["logrank_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "log-rank"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "ppi_network", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["build_graph", "centrality_scores", "pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "PPI"}}, {"id": "method-5", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "pathway_enrichment", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "pathway enrichment"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_differs_from_extractor"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "data", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: kaplan_meier."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R4", "reachable": false, "accessions": [], "resolved_accessions": [], "statements": ["The data sets used and/or analyzed in this study are available from the cancer genome database (TCGA-BRCA) (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov), NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO: datasets of GSE42568 and GSE20685) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/), Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) (http://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb/index.jsp), KEGG pathway database (www.kegg.jp/kegg/kegg1.html), Connectivity Map (CMap) database (https://clue.io), Human Protein Atlas (HPA) database (http://www.proteinatlas.org/): HPA054267 (patient id: 4193), HPA003984 (patient id: 2091), HPA023083 (patient id: 2805), HPA005941 (patient id: 1939), CAB019405 (patient id: 2898), HPA028866 (patient id: 2091), HPA006206 (patient id: 2428), CAB009155 (patient id: 2015), HPA045214 (patient id: 2160), MethSurv database (https://biit.cs.ut.ee/methsurv/), and ImmuCellAI (http://bioinfo.life.hust.edu.cn/ImmuCellAI) database. Besides, R code, data input, and output of this study were provided in Additional file 1: R code and data."], "basis": "The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "assets": ["source:pmid:37098532"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:None"]}, "gaps": ["data:accession_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T18:37:53Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 16713, "completion_tokens": 3779, "cached_tokens": 264}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:37098532", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:37098532"}, {"id": "source:pmid:37098532", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 37098532 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:37098532", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:37098532"}, {"id": "source:pmid:37098532", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 37098532 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-37098532", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:37098532"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-None", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:None"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:37098532", "parent_hash": "sha256:87806a1ef4e500bf83c22cb4de1934e216cbbc9f2992e2265830bd0981aa8483", "fork_of": null, "generation": 3}, "gaps": ["execution.not_run", "method.reader_differs_from_extractor", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"], "assays": [{"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["survival_km"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis was applied to evaluate the prognostic implication of risk score model, and a nomogram model was developed and validated with the TCGA and GSE20685."], "order_basis": "analysis_only", "id": "assay:1"}]}