Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:37415224

Deciphering a cell death-associated signature for predicting prognosis and response to immunotherapy in lung squamous cell carcinoma.

Guangxian Mao · Dongyong Yang · Bin Liu · Yu Zhang · Sijia Ma · Shang Dai · Guoqiang Wang · Wenxiang Tang · Huafei Lu · Shangli Cai · Jialiang Zhu · Huaping Yang

Respiratory research · 2023 doi:10.1186/s12931-023-02402-9

Paper

complete

Experiment

complete

Data

partial

Analysis

partial

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:37415224
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:a9549617d6fa9363244799bb51a113e59d7a257a3cbc3eaccceb7bf0b85b9162
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T19:02:10Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:09:50Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Deciphering a cell death-associated signature for predicting prognosis and response to immunotherapy in lung squamous cell carcinoma.
doi
10.1186/s12931-023-02402-9
pmid
37415224
authors array · 12 items
[0]
Guangxian Mao
[1]
Dongyong Yang
[2]
Bin Liu
[3]
Yu Zhang
[4]
Sijia Ma
[5]
Shang Dai
[6]
Guoqiang Wang
[7]
Wenxiang Tang
[8]
Huafei Lu
[9]
Shangli Cai
[10]
Jialiang Zhu
[11]
Huaping Yang
journal
Respiratory research
year
2023
abstract
BACKGROUND: Lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) is a subtype of non-small cell carcinoma, accounting for about 30% of all lung cancers. Yet, the evaluation of prognostic outcome and therapy response of patients with LUSC remains to be resolved. This study aimed to explore the prognostic value of cell death pathways and develop a cell death-associated signature for predicting prognosis and guiding treatment in LUSC. METHODS: Transcriptome profiles and corresponding clinical information of LUSC patients were gathered from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA-LUSC, n = 493) and Gene Expression Omnibus database (GSE74777, n = 107). The cell death-related genes including autophagy (n = 348), apoptosis (n = 163), and necrosis (n = 166) were retrieved from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes and Gene Ontology databases. In the training cohort (TCGA-LUSC), LASSO Cox regression was used to construct four prognostic signatures of respective autophagy, apoptosis, and necrosis pathway and genes of three pathways. After comparing the four signatures, the cell death index (CDI), the signature of combined genes, was further validated in the GSE74777 dataset. We also investigated the clinical significance of the CDI signature in predicting the immunotherapeutic response of LUSC patients. RESULTS: The CDI signature was significantly associated with the overall survival of LUSC patients in the training cohort (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.62‒2.82; P < 0.001) and in the validation cohort (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.01‒3.72; P = 0.04). The differentially expressed genes between the high- and low-risk groups contained cell death-associated cytokines and were enriched in immune-associated pathways. We also found a higher infiltration of naive CD4+ T cells, monocytes, activated dendritic cells, neutrophils, and lower infiltration of plasma cells and resting memory CD4+ T cells in the high-risk group. Tumor stemness indices, mRNAsi and mDNAsi, were both negatively correlated with the risk score of the CDI. Moreover, LUSC patients in the low-risk group are more likely to respond to immunotherapy than those in the high-risk group (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a reliable cell death-associated signature (CDI) that closely correlated with prognosis and the tumor microenvironment in LUSC, which may assist in predicting the prognosis and response to immunotherapy for patients with LUSC.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
Then, the screened genes were included in the construction of four risk-scoring models by LASSO Cox regression.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:37415224
locator
sections[4] "Construction and validation of cell death-related prognostic signature" paragraph 2
quote
Then, the screened genes were included in the construction of four risk-scoring models by LASSO Cox regression.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the TCGA database (TCGA-LUSC) and the GEO database (GSE74777).
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:37415224
locator
sections[24] "Data availability" paragraph 2
quote
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the TCGA database (TCGA-LUSC) and the GEO database (GSE74777).
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
The CDI signature was significantly associated with the overall survival of LUSC patients in the training cohort and in the validation cohort.
kind
quantitative
target object · 4 fields
value
95
unit
per cent
tolerance
null
source
The CDI signature was significantly associated with the overall survival of LUSC patients in the training cohort (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.62‒2.82; P < 0.001) and in the validation cohort (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.01‒3.72; P = 0.04).
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:37415224
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 3
quote
The CDI signature was significantly associated with the overall survival of LUSC patients in the training cohort (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.62‒2.82; P < 0.001) and in the validation cohort (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.01‒3.72; P = 0.04).
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
complete
objective
The CDI signature was significantly associated with the overall survival of LUSC patients in the training cohort and in the validation cohort.
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:37415224
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE74777
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE74777
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 0 items
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 2 items
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:37415224
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-023-02402-9
sha256
sha256:ea92377cced5a99cc1508201712abed7edc0205e198f459a9ffb3afc0acc2056
bytes
50493
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.1186/s12931-023-02402-9
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC10324233
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
[1] object · 15 fields
id
data:geo:GSE74777
role
raw
format
geo-series
media_type
application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json
uri
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE74777
sha256
null
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
GSE74777
version
null
note
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the TCGA database (TCGA-LUSC) and the GEO database (GSE74777).
structure object · 15 fields
repository
GEO
access_route
GEO accession URL
access_statement_verbatim
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the TCGA database (TCGA-LUSC) and the GEO database (GSE74777).
access_statement_kind
data_availability_statement
sample_accessions array · 107 items
[0]
GSM1932967
[1]
GSM1932968
[2]
GSM1932969
[3]
GSM1932970
[4]
GSM1932971
[5]
GSM1932972
[6]
GSM1932973
[7]
GSM1932974
[8]
GSM1932975
[9]
GSM1932976
[10]
GSM1932977
[11]
GSM1932978
[12]
GSM1932979
[13]
GSM1932980
[14]
GSM1932981
[15]
GSM1932982
[16]
GSM1932983
[17]
GSM1932984
[18]
GSM1932985
[19]
GSM1932986
[20]
GSM1932987
[21]
GSM1932988
[22]
GSM1932989
[23]
GSM1932990
[24]
GSM1932991
[25]
GSM1932992
[26]
GSM1932993
[27]
GSM1932994
[28]
GSM1932995
[29]
GSM1932996
[30]
GSM1932997
[31]
GSM1932998
[32]
GSM1932999
[33]
GSM1933000
[34]
GSM1933001
[35]
GSM1933002
[36]
GSM1933003
[37]
GSM1933004
[38]
GSM1933005
[39]
GSM1933006
[40]
GSM1933007
[41]
GSM1933008
[42]
GSM1933009
[43]
GSM1933010
[44]
GSM1933011
[45]
GSM1933012
[46]
GSM1933013
[47]
GSM1933014
[48]
GSM1933015
[49]
GSM1933016
[50]
GSM1933017
[51]
GSM1933018
[52]
GSM1933019
[53]
GSM1933020
[54]
GSM1933021
[55]
GSM1933022
[56]
GSM1933023
[57]
GSM1933024
[58]
GSM1933025
[59]
GSM1933026
[60]
GSM1933027
[61]
GSM1933028
[62]
GSM1933029
[63]
GSM1933030
[64]
GSM1933031
[65]
GSM1933032
[66]
GSM1933033
[67]
GSM1933034
[68]
GSM1933035
[69]
GSM1933036
[70]
GSM1933037
[71]
GSM1933038
[72]
GSM1933039
[73]
GSM1933040
[74]
GSM1933041
[75]
GSM1933042
[76]
GSM1933043
[77]
GSM1933044
[78]
GSM1933045
[79]
GSM1933046
[80]
GSM1933047
[81]
GSM1933048
[82]
GSM1933049
[83]
GSM1933050
[84]
GSM1933051
[85]
GSM1933052
[86]
GSM1933053
[87]
GSM1933054
[88]
GSM1933055
[89]
GSM1933056
[90]
GSM1933057
[91]
GSM1933058
[92]
GSM1933059
[93]
GSM1933060
[94]
GSM1933061
[95]
GSM1933062
[96]
GSM1933063
[97]
GSM1933064
[98]
GSM1933065
[99]
GSM1933066
[100]
GSM1933067
[101]
GSM1933068
[102]
GSM1933069
[103]
GSM1933070
[104]
GSM1933071
[105]
GSM1933072
[106]
GSM1933073
sample_count
107
group_sizes
null
group_sizes_basis
null
platform
17586
taxon
Homo sapiens
title
Expression profiling of Early Stage Lung Squamous Cell Carcinomas
resolution_checked_at
2026-11-01T15:39:55Z
resolution_check
identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read
downloaded
false
licence_read
false
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE74777 not downloaded
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE74777 licence not read
analysis object · 4 fields
state
partial
methods array · 6 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
survival_analysis
specific
cox_proportional_hazards
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
Then, the screened genes were included in the construction of four risk-scoring models by LASSO Cox regression.
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
group_comparison
specific
wilcoxon
label
Group comparison
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 1 item
[0]
group_comparison_wilcoxon
expressible
false
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
two_or_more_groups_continuous
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Wilcoxon
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
survival_analysis
specific
kaplan_meier
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
survival_km
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Kaplan-Meier
[3] object · 10 fields
id
method-4
family
survival_analysis
specific
log_rank_test
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
logrank_test
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
log-rank
[4] object · 10 fields
id
method-5
family
correlation_analysis
specific
spearman
label
Correlation analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
spearman_rho
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
paired_numeric_columns
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Spearman correlation
[5] object · 10 fields
id
method-6
family
diagnostic_evaluation
specific
roc
label
Diagnostic test evaluation
dsl_operations array · 6 items
[0]
confusion_counts
[1]
roc_curve
[2]
sensitivity_specificity
[3]
solve_confusion_matrix
[4]
classification_metrics
[5]
published_precision_envelope
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
reference_standard_and_test
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
ROC analysis
targets array · 1 item
[0] object · 8 fields
id
target-published-estimate
claim_id
claim-target-result
operation
classification_metrics
unit
per cent
tolerance
null
state
complete
note
The published estimate as the reader quoted it from the paper. No tolerance is published because the paper states none.
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
method.reader_differs_from_extractor
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
complete
tier
R1
blocked_on
nothing:replicable_now
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R1
reachable
true
accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE74777
resolved_accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE74777
statements array · 1 item
[0]
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the TCGA database (TCGA-LUSC) and the GEO database (GSE74777).
basis
The paper names GSE74777 in Gene Expression Omnibus and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
assets array · 2 items
[0]
source:pmid:37415224
[1]
data:geo:GSE74777
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE74777
gaps array · 0 items
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T18:46:11Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
14783
completion_tokens
1142
cached_tokens
264
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:37415224
type
paper
label
pmid:37415224
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:37415224
type
manuscript
label
PMID 37415224 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE74777
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE74777
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:37415224
type
paper
label
pmid:37415224
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:37415224
type
manuscript
label
PMID 37415224 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE74777
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE74777
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-37415224
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:37415224
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-GSE74777
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE74777
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:37415224
parent_hash
sha256:0ac9ddf38f985d4f1515131e4de4542aecae1570ed0a1e94d5c92fd19cb0f5ba
fork_of
null
gaps array · 7 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE74777 licence not read
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE74777 not downloaded
[2]
execution.not_run
[3]
method.reader_differs_from_extractor
[4]
review.human_critique
[5]
review.independent_reader
[6]
review.machine_critique
assays array · 2 items
[0] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_id
apoptosis_assay
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.93
evidence array · 2 items
[0]
related genes including autophagy (n = 348), apoptosis (n = 163), and necrosis (n = 166) were retri
[1]
ognostic signatures of respective autophagy, apoptosis, and necrosis pathway and genes of three pat
order_basis
paper_text_order:778
id
assay:1
[1] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
survival_analysis
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
Then, the screened genes were included in the construction of four risk-scoring models by LASSO Cox regression.
order_basis
consumes_earlier_output
id
assay:2
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:37415224", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 3, "content_hash": "sha256:a9549617d6fa9363244799bb51a113e59d7a257a3cbc3eaccceb7bf0b85b9162", "created_at": "2026-11-01T19:02:10Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:09:50Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Deciphering a cell death-associated signature for predicting prognosis and response to immunotherapy in lung squamous cell carcinoma.", "doi": "10.1186/s12931-023-02402-9", "pmid": "37415224", "authors": ["Guangxian Mao", "Dongyong Yang", "Bin Liu", "Yu Zhang", "Sijia Ma", "Shang Dai", "Guoqiang Wang", "Wenxiang Tang", "Huafei Lu", "Shangli Cai", "Jialiang Zhu", "Huaping Yang"], "journal": "Respiratory research", "year": 2023, "abstract": "BACKGROUND: Lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) is a subtype of non-small cell carcinoma, accounting for about 30% of all lung cancers. Yet, the evaluation of prognostic outcome and therapy response of patients with LUSC remains to be resolved. This study aimed to explore the prognostic value of cell death pathways and develop a cell death-associated signature for predicting prognosis and guiding treatment in LUSC.\nMETHODS: Transcriptome profiles and corresponding clinical information of LUSC patients were gathered from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA-LUSC, n = 493) and Gene Expression Omnibus database (GSE74777, n = 107). The cell death-related genes including autophagy (n = 348), apoptosis (n = 163), and necrosis (n = 166) were retrieved from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes and Gene Ontology databases. In the training cohort (TCGA-LUSC), LASSO Cox regression was used to construct four prognostic signatures of respective autophagy, apoptosis, and necrosis pathway and genes of three pathways. After comparing the four signatures, the cell death index (CDI), the signature of combined genes, was further validated in the GSE74777 dataset. We also investigated the clinical significance of the CDI signature in predicting the immunotherapeutic response of LUSC patients.\nRESULTS: The CDI signature was significantly associated with the overall survival of LUSC patients in the training cohort (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.62‒2.82; P < 0.001) and in the validation cohort (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.01‒3.72; P = 0.04). The differentially expressed genes between the high- and low-risk groups contained cell death-associated cytokines and were enriched in immune-associated pathways. We also found a higher infiltration of naive CD4+ T cells, monocytes, activated dendritic cells, neutrophils, and lower infiltration of plasma cells and resting memory CD4+ T cells in the high-risk group. Tumor stemness indices, mRNAsi and mDNAsi, were both negatively correlated with the risk score of the CDI. Moreover, LUSC patients in the low-risk group are more likely to respond to immunotherapy than those in the high-risk group (P = 0.002).\nCONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a reliable cell death-associated signature (CDI) that closely correlated with prognosis and the tumor microenvironment in LUSC, which may assist in predicting the prognosis and response to immunotherapy for patients with LUSC.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "Then, the screened genes were included in the construction of four risk-scoring models by LASSO Cox regression.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:37415224", "locator": "sections[4] \"Construction and validation of cell death-related prognostic signature\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Then, the screened genes were included in the construction of four risk-scoring models by LASSO Cox regression."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the TCGA database (TCGA-LUSC) and the GEO database (GSE74777).", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:37415224", "locator": "sections[24] \"Data availability\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the TCGA database (TCGA-LUSC) and the GEO database (GSE74777)."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "The CDI signature was significantly associated with the overall survival of LUSC patients in the training cohort and in the validation cohort.", "kind": "quantitative", "target": {"value": 95.0, "unit": "per cent", "tolerance": null, "source": "The CDI signature was significantly associated with the overall survival of LUSC patients in the training cohort (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.62‒2.82; P < 0.001) and in the validation cohort (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.01‒3.72; P = 0.04)."}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:37415224", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "The CDI signature was significantly associated with the overall survival of LUSC patients in the training cohort (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.62‒2.82; P < 0.001) and in the validation cohort (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.01‒3.72; P = 0.04)."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "The CDI signature was significantly associated with the overall survival of LUSC patients in the training cohort and in the validation cohort.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:37415224"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE74777"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE74777"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:37415224", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-023-02402-9", "sha256": "sha256:ea92377cced5a99cc1508201712abed7edc0205e198f459a9ffb3afc0acc2056", "bytes": 50493, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1186/s12931-023-02402-9", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC10324233", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE74777", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE74777", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE74777", "version": null, "note": "The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the TCGA database (TCGA-LUSC) and the GEO database (GSE74777).", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the TCGA database (TCGA-LUSC) and the GEO database (GSE74777).", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1932967", "GSM1932968", "GSM1932969", "GSM1932970", "GSM1932971", "GSM1932972", "GSM1932973", "GSM1932974", "GSM1932975", "GSM1932976", "GSM1932977", "GSM1932978", "GSM1932979", "GSM1932980", "GSM1932981", "GSM1932982", "GSM1932983", "GSM1932984", "GSM1932985", "GSM1932986", "GSM1932987", "GSM1932988", "GSM1932989", "GSM1932990", "GSM1932991", "GSM1932992", "GSM1932993", "GSM1932994", "GSM1932995", "GSM1932996", "GSM1932997", "GSM1932998", "GSM1932999", "GSM1933000", "GSM1933001", "GSM1933002", "GSM1933003", "GSM1933004", "GSM1933005", "GSM1933006", "GSM1933007", "GSM1933008", "GSM1933009", "GSM1933010", "GSM1933011", "GSM1933012", "GSM1933013", "GSM1933014", "GSM1933015", "GSM1933016", "GSM1933017", "GSM1933018", "GSM1933019", "GSM1933020", "GSM1933021", "GSM1933022", "GSM1933023", "GSM1933024", "GSM1933025", "GSM1933026", "GSM1933027", "GSM1933028", "GSM1933029", "GSM1933030", "GSM1933031", "GSM1933032", "GSM1933033", "GSM1933034", "GSM1933035", "GSM1933036", "GSM1933037", "GSM1933038", "GSM1933039", "GSM1933040", "GSM1933041", "GSM1933042", "GSM1933043", "GSM1933044", "GSM1933045", "GSM1933046", "GSM1933047", "GSM1933048", "GSM1933049", "GSM1933050", "GSM1933051", "GSM1933052", "GSM1933053", "GSM1933054", "GSM1933055", "GSM1933056", "GSM1933057", "GSM1933058", "GSM1933059", "GSM1933060", "GSM1933061", "GSM1933062", "GSM1933063", "GSM1933064", "GSM1933065", "GSM1933066", "GSM1933067", "GSM1933068", "GSM1933069", "GSM1933070", "GSM1933071", "GSM1933072", "GSM1933073"], "sample_count": 107, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "17586", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Expression profiling of Early Stage Lung Squamous Cell Carcinomas", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:55Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE74777 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE74777 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "Then, the screened genes were included in the construction of four risk-scoring models by LASSO Cox regression."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "wilcoxon", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Wilcoxon"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "kaplan_meier", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Kaplan-Meier"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "log_rank_test", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["logrank_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "log-rank"}}, {"id": "method-5", "family": "correlation_analysis", "specific": "spearman", "label": "Correlation analysis", "dsl_operations": ["spearman_rho"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["paired_numeric_columns"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Spearman correlation"}}, {"id": "method-6", "family": "diagnostic_evaluation", "specific": "roc", "label": "Diagnostic test evaluation", "dsl_operations": ["confusion_counts", "roc_curve", "sensitivity_specificity", "solve_confusion_matrix", "classification_metrics", "published_precision_envelope"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["reference_standard_and_test"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "ROC analysis"}}], "targets": [{"id": "target-published-estimate", "claim_id": "claim-target-result", "operation": "classification_metrics", "expected_value": 95.0, "unit": "per cent", "tolerance": null, "state": "complete", "note": "The published estimate as the reader quoted it from the paper. No tolerance is published because the paper states none."}], "gaps": ["method.reader_differs_from_extractor"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE74777"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE74777"], "statements": ["The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the TCGA database (TCGA-LUSC) and the GEO database (GSE74777)."], "basis": "The paper names GSE74777 in Gene Expression Omnibus and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "assets": ["source:pmid:37415224", "data:geo:GSE74777"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE74777"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T18:46:11Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 14783, "completion_tokens": 1142, "cached_tokens": 264}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:37415224", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:37415224"}, {"id": "source:pmid:37415224", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 37415224 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE74777", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE74777"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:37415224", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:37415224"}, {"id": "source:pmid:37415224", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 37415224 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE74777", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE74777"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-37415224", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:37415224"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE74777", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE74777"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:37415224", "parent_hash": "sha256:0ac9ddf38f985d4f1515131e4de4542aecae1570ed0a1e94d5c92fd19cb0f5ba", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE74777 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE74777 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.reader_differs_from_extractor", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "apoptosis_assay", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.93, "evidence": ["related genes including autophagy (n = 348), apoptosis (n = 163), and necrosis (n = 166) were retri", "ognostic signatures of respective autophagy, apoptosis, and necrosis pathway and genes of three pat"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:778", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["Then, the screened genes were included in the construction of four risk-scoring models by LASSO Cox regression."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:2"}]}