Hierarchical clustering identifies oxidative stress-related subgroups for the prediction of prognosis and immune microenvironment in gastric cancer

{"sci_version": "1.0", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:37928388", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 2, "content_hash": "sha256:47566b7fb6e497c18600300add55add08cdc6c576dfbcdd511c144de99d5041a", "created_at": "2026-11-01T10:25:48Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T14:01:32Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "converter": "sep_to_sci_v1", "source_package_schema": "urn:bntrg:sep:1.0.0"}, "paper": {"state": "partial", "title": "Hierarchical clustering identifies oxidative stress-related subgroups for the prediction of prognosis and immune microenvironment in gastric cancer", "doi": "10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20804", "pmid": "37928388", "authors": null, "journal": "Heliyon", "year": 2023, "abstract": null, "claims": [{"id": "claim-1", "statement": "the overall survival difference between the two oxidative-stress-related gastric cancer subgroups", "kind": "quantitative", "state": "complete", "target": {"value": 0.01, "unit": "p-value", "tolerance": null, "source": "chars 12212-12368 of source sha256 a8dd6088f1e5b1369a4868d964e3238312c3d9eb9a826deabf4aa15ac08a1deb"}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:37928388", "locator": "chars 12212-12368 of source sha256 a8dd6088f1e5b1369a4868d964e3238312c3d9eb9a826deabf4aa15ac08a1deb", "quote": "Furthermore, when compared to GC patients from the C1 subgroup, GC patients in the C2 subgroup exhibited a better overall survival rate (Fig. 2E, p = 0.01)."}]}], "gaps": ["abstract", "authors"]}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "the overall survival difference between the two oxidative-stress-related gastric cancer subgroups", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate and its interval from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The number a replication must land on, and the sentence it came from.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:37928388"], "outputs": ["the published estimate, its unit and its interval"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data behind the published result", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:not_downloaded", "description": "The published result cannot be recomputed without the data the paper analysed.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the analysis programme", "kind": "analysis", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "method:diagnostic_evaluation_roc", "description": "Re-run the paper's analysis on the source data and produce the registered result.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["materials:the source data behind pmid:37928388, at the location the paper names"], "outputs": ["the registered result"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "provide_capability_bench_workcell", "order": 4, "name": "Provide General bench workcell (liquid transfer, plate handling, incubation)", "kind": "computational", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "instrument not yet purchased", "description": "Make this capability available to the experiment: amplicon_seq, animal_model, apoptosis_assay, cell_culture, cell_imaging, chip_seq, clinical_cohort, clinical_trial, elisa, flow_cytometry, ihc, image_quantification, mass_spectrometry, methylation_array, microarray, qpcr, rna_seq, transfection, western_blot", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": ["the source data behind pmid:37928388, at the location the paper names", "the analysis programme that recomputes the published estimate"], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded", "step:provide_capability_bench_workcell blocked on instrument not yet purchased", "step:run_analysis blocked on method:diagnostic_evaluation_roc"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:37928388", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20804", "sha256": "sha256:a8dd6088f1e5b1369a4868d964e3238312c3d9eb9a826deabf4aa15ac08a1deb", "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20804", "version": null, "note": "Source read by the package builder: full_text.", "structure": {"access_state": "full_text"}}, {"id": "materials:the source data behind pmid:37928388, at the location the paper names", "role": "raw", "format": "unknown", "media_type": "application/octet-stream", "uri": "TCGA", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "unknown", "state": "declared", "reader": null, "reader_status": "unknown", "identifier": null, "version": null, "note": "the source data behind pmid:37928388, at the location the paper names", "structure": {"material_kind": "dataset", "access_state": "named_not_verified"}}, {"id": "materials:the analysis programme that recomputes the published estimate", "role": "code", "format": "unknown", "media_type": "application/octet-stream", "uri": null, "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "unknown", "state": "unavailable", "reader": null, "reader_status": "unknown", "identifier": null, "version": null, "note": "the analysis programme that recomputes the published estimate", "structure": {"material_kind": "code", "access_state": "absent"}}, {"id": "data:availability", "role": "raw", "format": "unknown", "media_type": "application/octet-stream", "uri": null, "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "declared", "reader": null, "reader_status": "unknown", "identifier": "TCGA", "version": null, "note": "The data come from TCGA database (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/) and the GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/); further requires can be directed to the corresponding author.", "structure": {"access_route": "repository_accession", "location": "section [data-availability]: Availability of data and material"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:37928388:1", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:1daa552616466e618c43e099cbfb27b1ccd61ddcc2dda4c8124b7647d5d8f611", "bytes": 702, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[15]/table-wrap[1]#tbl1", "version": null, "note": "Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses assessed the independent prognostic value of ORGs risk score in GC patients.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC10622623", "section_index": 15, "section_title": "Establishment and verification of a prognostic model", "row_count": 7, "column_count": 6}, "table": {"label": "Table 1", "caption": "Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses assessed the independent prognostic value of ORGs risk score in GC patients.", "rows": [["Characteristics", "Total(N)", "Univariate analysis", "Multivariate analysis"], ["Hazard ratio (95 % CI)", "P value", "Hazard ratio (95 % CI)", "P value"], ["Age", "374", "1.028 (1.011–1.046)", "0.001", "1.031 (1.014–1.049)", "<0.001"], ["Sex", "374", "", "", "", ""], ["MALE", "241", "Reference", "", "", ""], ["FEMALE", "133", "0.792 (0.557–1.128)", "0.196", "", ""], ["risk score", "374", "8.692 (3.226–23.415)", "<0.001", "10.338 (3.815–28.014)", "<0.001"]], "row_count": 7, "column_count": 6, "numeric_cells": 17, "header_rows": 2, "locator": "section[15]/table-wrap[1]#tbl1"}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:availability not verified", "asset:materials:the analysis programme that recomputes the published estimate not verified", "asset:materials:the source data behind pmid:37928388, at the location the paper names not verified", "asset:source:pmid:37928388 not verified"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "clustering", "specific": "kaplan-meier", "label": "Clustering", "dsl_operations": ["hierarchical_cluster"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["feature_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "Initially, we conducted an assessment of 41 ORGs linked to the predictive significance of patients with GC from the TCGA database. To accomplish this, we employed the univariate Cox regression analysis technique. Subsequently, utilizing the R software's ConcensusClusterPlus tool, we executed consensus clustering by considering the gene expression profiles of the aforementioned 41 ORGs [31]. Afterwards, the optimal number of clusters was assessed, and this procedure was iterated 1000 times to guarantee the credibility of findings. Following that, a cluster map was created utilizing the pheatmap tool in R. To compare the overall survival rates between the two subgroups, we conducted Kaplan-Meier analysis employing the survminer and survival packages in R software."}}], "targets": [{"id": "target-1", "claim_id": "claim-1", "operation": null, "expected_value": 0.01, "unit": "p-value", "tolerance": null, "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "partial", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["differential_expression", "gwas", "machine_learning", "meta_analysis", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "pca", "statistical_regression", "survival_analysis"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}, {"capability_id": "capability:bench_workcell", "label": "General bench workcell (liquid transfer, plate handling, incubation)", "assay_families": ["amplicon_seq", "animal_model", "apoptosis_assay", "cell_culture", "cell_imaging", "chip_seq", "clinical_cohort", "clinical_trial", "elisa", "flow_cytometry", "ihc", "image_quantification", "mass_spectrometry", "methylation_array", "microarray", "qpcr", "rna_seq", "transfection", "western_blot"], "availability_state": "purchasable", "tier_unlocked": "R3", "candidate": "Supplier-neutral 96/384-well liquid handler"}], "gaps": ["capability:capability:bench_workcell purchasable"]}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"axis": "method", "tier": "R1", "blocker": null, "detail": {"outcome": "determined", "family": "clustering", "specific_method": "hierarchical", "required_operations": ["hierarchical_cluster"], "basis": "Every DSL operation this method needs already exists."}}, "capability": {"axis": "capability", "tier": "R1", "blocker": null, "detail": {"families": [], "applies": false, "basis": "This paper needs no bench capability: it computes on data it already has."}}, "data": {"axis": "data", "tier": "R1", "blocker": null, "detail": {"applies": true, "reachable": true, "accessions": [{"kind": "geo_series", "text": "GSE84437"}, {"kind": "tcga", "text": "TCGA"}], "statements": [], "basis": "The record names where the data can be obtained."}}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["hierarchical_cluster"], "assets": ["source:pmid:37928388", "asset:table:pmid:37928388:1"], "steps": ["read_published_estimate"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": ["unknown", "xml"], "capabilities": ["capability:bench_workcell"], "data_gaps": ["source:pmid:37928388", "materials:the source data behind pmid:37928388, at the location the paper names", "materials:the analysis programme that recomputes the published estimate", "data:availability"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"status": "blocked", "providers": [{"provider": "minimax-m3-1-flash", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "peer-review-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "35a558221f67c3bbd7a6c86da4bd7c33fd18586d11b8c1b5c6fa3dae55d44f1c", "source_hash": "a8dd6088f1e5b1369a4868d964e3238312c3d9eb9a826deabf4aa15ac08a1deb", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:45d8e769d47eab4422dd3e6e714b53edab507303752c8dd72123812c75a1a13a", "raw_response_chars": 2141}, {"provider": "minimax-m3", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "peer-review-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "3f6f60d98eb1b3d1f39395314d66cb3bba28540798e985aace0956fd979b118f", "source_hash": "a8dd6088f1e5b1369a4868d964e3238312c3d9eb9a826deabf4aa15ac08a1deb", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:217d88b5f32a0438691b80d88d406202c18a8bcf2dd37ab0869148df07ae862f", "raw_response_chars": 2038}], "target_providers": [{"provider": "minimax-m3-1-flash", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "01e813ab8893b2b37fea56cb3bfc93b98a0e8941ed51bb15b9837c92cbe45d3c", "source_hash": "a8dd6088f1e5b1369a4868d964e3238312c3d9eb9a826deabf4aa15ac08a1deb", "raw_response": "{\"parent_value\":0.01,\"unit\":\"\",\"evidence\":\"Furthermore, when compared to GC patients from the C1 subgroup, GC patients in the C2 subgroup exhibited a better overall survival rate (Fig. 2E, p = 0.01).\",\"target_result\":\"p = 0.01\",\"number_stated\":true}", "reading": {"parent_value": 0.01, "unit": "", "evidence": "Furthermore, when compared to GC patients from the C1 subgroup, GC patients in the C2 subgroup exhibited a better overall survival rate (Fig. 2E, p = 0.01).", "target_result": "p = 0.01", "number_stated": true, "source_locator": "chars 12212-12368 of source sha256 a8dd6088f1e5b1369a4868d964e3238312c3d9eb9a826deabf4aa15ac08a1deb"}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T14:39:08.520167+00:00"}, {"provider": "minimax-m3", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "5eb6fb0388a33794d54cc8464eaa1a8f755cf93e8f61069e9c03ecd3a3578234", "source_hash": "a8dd6088f1e5b1369a4868d964e3238312c3d9eb9a826deabf4aa15ac08a1deb", "raw_response": "{\"parent_value\":0.01,\"unit\":\"p-value\",\"evidence\":\"Furthermore, when compared to GC patients from the C1 subgroup, GC patients in the C2 subgroup exhibited a better overall survival rate (Fig. 2E, p = 0.01).\",\"target_result\":\"p = 0.01\",\"number_stated\":true}", "reading": {"parent_value": 0.01, "unit": "p-value", "evidence": "Furthermore, when compared to GC patients from the C1 subgroup, GC patients in the C2 subgroup exhibited a better overall survival rate (Fig. 2E, p = 0.01).", "target_result": "p = 0.01", "number_stated": true, "source_locator": "chars 12212-12368 of source sha256 a8dd6088f1e5b1369a4868d964e3238312c3d9eb9a826deabf4aa15ac08a1deb"}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T14:39:32.305781+00:00"}], "agreement": true, "disagreements": {"target_result": {"minimax-m3-1-flash": "The C1 oxidative stress-related gastric cancer subgroup had a worse overall survival rate than the C2 subgroup (p = 0.01).", "minimax-m3": "In the TCGA gastric cancer cohort, the oxidative-stress-related C2 subgroup had a better overall survival rate than the C1 subgroup (p = 0.01).", "decisive": false}, "analysis_methods": {"minimax-m3-1-flash": ["Consensus clustering based on oxidative stress-related genes", "Kaplan-Meier survival analysis"], "minimax-m3": ["Univariate Cox regression screening of oxidative-stress-related genes", "Consensus clustering based on the selected oxidative-stress-related genes, with K = 2", "Kaplan-Meier analysis comparing overall survival between the C1 and C2 subgroups"], "decisive": false}, "source_claims": {"minimax-m3-1-flash": ["Consensus clustering identified two gastric cancer subgroups, C1 and C2, based on oxidative stress-related genes.", "Gastric cancer patients in the C2 subgroup had a better overall survival rate than those in the C1 subgroup.", "The difference in overall survival between the two subgroups was statistically significant at p = 0.01.", "The C1 subgroup was associated with poor prognosis and activated immune-related pathways."], "minimax-m3": ["Consensus clustering identified two oxidative-stress-related gastric cancer subgroups, with K = 2 achieving the optimal clustering stability: 167 patients in C1 and 207 patients in C2.", "Compared with patients in the C1 subgroup, patients in the C2 subgroup exhibited a better overall survival rate (p = 0.01).", "The two oxidative-stress-related subtypes were reported to have markedly different survival rates."], "decisive": false}, "unit": {"minimax-m3-1-flash": "", "minimax-m3": "p-value", "decisive": false, "resolution": "One reader left the unit blank. The other named 'p-value', and the paper carries that unit in its own text, so the source settles the difference.", "support": ["The criteria for determining differentially expressed genes were as follows: adjusted p-value <0.05 and absolute log fold change (|logFC|) ≥ 1.", "The thresholds were set as |NES| > 1 and adjusted p-value <0.05."]}}, "agreement_basis": {"policy": "decisive_fields", "decisive_fields": ["number_stated", "parent_value", "unit", "work_type"], "advisory_fields": ["analysis_methods", "source_claims", "target_result"]}, "blinded": true}, "human_critique": {"status": "not_run", "reviewer": null, "signed_at": null, "conflict_checked": false, "commentary": null}, "stages": [{"key": "target_materials", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "independent_readings", "status": "passed", "reason": "Both readers returned the same number from the same sentence. The only difference was that one reader left the unit blank; the paper's own text carries the unit the other reader named, so the source resolved it.", "evidence": {"provider_errors": []}}, {"key": "source_resolution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "protocol_reconstruction", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_execution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_comparison", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "publication", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}], "gaps": ["review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.blocked"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "package:e82cfb0aef3d6f530ebce744928d86d3c6e13215c480cdc3b3f57d69d526cf4a", "type": "sep_package", "label": "SEP v1 package for pmid:37928388"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity:conversion:pmid:37928388", "type": "conversion", "used": ["package:e82cfb0aef3d6f530ebce744928d86d3c6e13215c480cdc3b3f57d69d526cf4a"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:minimax-m3", "type": "model", "label": "minimax-m3"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-m3-1-flash", "type": "model", "label": "minimax-m3-1-flash"}, {"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}], "source_run_id": "run-20261023T122449232913", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:37928388", "parent_hash": "sha256:e5b3d36ad8523f1229316bb20b4ac8837868c2aeda9c17615da022587a31437b", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["abstract", "asset:data:availability not verified", "asset:materials:the analysis programme that recomputes the published estimate not verified", "asset:materials:the source data behind pmid:37928388, at the location the paper names not verified", "asset:source:pmid:37928388 not verified", "authors", "capability:capability:bench_workcell purchasable", "execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.blocked", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded", "step:provide_capability_bench_workcell blocked on instrument not yet purchased", "step:run_analysis blocked on method:diagnostic_evaluation_roc"]}