Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:37968767

A sialyltransferases-related gene signature serves as a potential predictor of prognosis and therapeutic response for bladder cancer.

Penglong Cao · Mingying Chen · Tianya Zhang · Qin Zheng · Mulin Liu

European journal of medical research · 2023 doi:10.1186/s40001-023-01496-7

Paper

complete

Experiment

complete

Data

partial

Analysis

partial

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:37968767
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:80964cddc20be5425720b7e222d8372655e229975d7c54eac528a3288b1e8bae
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T19:02:52Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:10:40Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
A sialyltransferases-related gene signature serves as a potential predictor of prognosis and therapeutic response for bladder cancer.
doi
10.1186/s40001-023-01496-7
pmid
37968767
authors array · 5 items
[0]
Penglong Cao
[1]
Mingying Chen
[2]
Tianya Zhang
[3]
Qin Zheng
[4]
Mulin Liu
journal
European journal of medical research
year
2023
abstract
BACKGROUND: Aberrant glycosylation, catalyzed by the specific glycosyltransferase, is one of the dominant features of cancers. Among the glycosyltransferase subfamilies, sialyltransferases (SiaTs) are an essential part which has close linkages with tumor-associated events, such as tumor growth, metastasis and angiogenesis. Considering the relationship between SiaTs and cancer, the current study attempted to establish an effective prognostic model with SiaTs-related genes (SRGs) to predict patients' outcome and therapeutic responsiveness of bladder cancer. METHODS: RNA-seq data, clinical information and genomic mutation data were downloaded (TCGA-BLCA and GSE13507 datasets). The comprehensive landscape of the 20 SiaTs was analyzed, and the differentially expressed SiaTs-related genes were screened with "DESeq2" R package. ConsensusClusterPlus was applied for clustering, following with survival analysis with Kaplan-Meier curve. The overall survival related SRGs were determined with univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was performed to generate a SRGs-related prognostic model. The predictive value was estimated with Kaplan-Meier plot and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, which was further validated with the constructed nomogram and decision curve. RESULTS: In bladder cancer tissues, 17 out of the 20 SiaTs were differentially expressed with CNV changes and somatic mutations. Two SiaTs_Clusters were determined based on the expression of the 20 SiaTs, and two gene_Clusters were identified based on the expression of differentially expressed genes between SiaTs_Clusters. The SRGs-related prognostic model was generated with 7 key genes (CD109, TEAD4, FN1, TM4SF1, CDCA7L, ATOH8 and GZMA), and the accuracy for outcome prediction was validated with ROC curve and a constructed nomogram. The SRGs-related prognostic signature could separate patients into high- and low-risk group, where the high-risk group showed poorer outcome, more abundant immune infiltration, and higher expression of immune checkpoint genes. In addition, the risk score derived from the SRGs-related prognostic model could be utilized as a predictor to evaluate the responsiveness of patients to the medical therapies. CONCLUSIONS: The SRGs-related prognostic signature could potentially aid in the prediction of the survival outcome and therapy response for patients with bladder cancer, contributing to the development of personalized treatment and appropriate medical decisions.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
In order to eliminate the influence of overfitting, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis was performed, and the best prognostic genes were identified, which were CD109, TEAD4, FN1, TM4SF1, CDCA7L, ATOH8, and GZMA (Fig. 5D, E).
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:37968767
locator
sections[18] "Identification of differentially expressed genes and the construction of the SRGs-related prognostic signature" paragraph 3
quote
In order to eliminate the influence of overfitting, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis was performed, and the best prognostic genes were identified, which were CD109, TEAD4, FN1, TM4SF1, CDCA7L, ATOH8, and GZMA (Fig. 5D, E).
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
All figures adopted in this study to support the findings are included in the article.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:37968767
locator
sections[29] "notes" paragraph 1
quote
All figures adopted in this study to support the findings are included in the article.
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
The SRGs-related prognostic signature could separate patients into high- and low-risk group, where the high-risk group showed poorer outcome, more abundant immune infiltration, and higher expression of immune checkpoint genes.
kind
qualitative
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:37968767
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 3
quote
The SRGs-related prognostic signature could separate patients into high- and low-risk group, where the high-risk group showed poorer outcome, more abundant immune infiltration, and higher expression of immune checkpoint genes.
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
complete
objective
The SRGs-related prognostic signature could separate patients into high- and low-risk group, where the high-risk group showed poorer outcome, more abundant immune infiltration, and higher expression of immune checkpoint genes.
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:37968767
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE13507
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE13507
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 0 items
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 2 items
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:37968767
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01496-7
sha256
sha256:3a33694063124ff808f2f0d75c809561bddb501cc2d20c58938116455ab1e6fe
bytes
41794
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.1186/s40001-023-01496-7
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC10647093
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body_without_references
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
[1] object · 15 fields
id
data:geo:GSE13507
role
raw
format
geo-series
media_type
application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json
uri
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE13507
sha256
null
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
GSE13507
version
null
note
All figures adopted in this study to support the findings are included in the article.
structure object · 15 fields
repository
GEO
access_route
GEO accession URL
access_statement_verbatim
All figures adopted in this study to support the findings are included in the article.
access_statement_kind
data_availability_statement
sample_accessions array · 256 items
[0]
GSM340537
[1]
GSM340538
[2]
GSM340539
[3]
GSM340540
[4]
GSM340541
[5]
GSM340542
[6]
GSM340543
[7]
GSM340544
[8]
GSM340545
[9]
GSM340546
[10]
GSM340547
[11]
GSM340548
[12]
GSM340549
[13]
GSM340550
[14]
GSM340551
[15]
GSM340552
[16]
GSM340553
[17]
GSM340554
[18]
GSM340555
[19]
GSM340556
[20]
GSM340557
[21]
GSM340558
[22]
GSM340559
[23]
GSM340560
[24]
GSM340561
[25]
GSM340562
[26]
GSM340563
[27]
GSM340564
[28]
GSM340565
[29]
GSM340566
[30]
GSM340567
[31]
GSM340568
[32]
GSM340569
[33]
GSM340570
[34]
GSM340571
[35]
GSM340572
[36]
GSM340573
[37]
GSM340574
[38]
GSM340575
[39]
GSM340576
[40]
GSM340577
[41]
GSM340578
[42]
GSM340579
[43]
GSM340580
[44]
GSM340581
[45]
GSM340582
[46]
GSM340583
[47]
GSM340584
[48]
GSM340585
[49]
GSM340586
[50]
GSM340587
[51]
GSM340588
[52]
GSM340589
[53]
GSM340590
[54]
GSM340591
[55]
GSM340592
[56]
GSM340593
[57]
GSM340594
[58]
GSM340595
[59]
GSM340596
[60]
GSM340597
[61]
GSM340598
[62]
GSM340599
[63]
GSM340600
[64]
GSM340601
[65]
GSM340602
[66]
GSM340603
[67]
GSM340604
[68]
GSM340605
[69]
GSM340606
[70]
GSM340607
[71]
GSM340608
[72]
GSM340609
[73]
GSM340610
[74]
GSM340611
[75]
GSM340612
[76]
GSM340613
[77]
GSM340614
[78]
GSM340615
[79]
GSM340616
[80]
GSM340617
[81]
GSM340618
[82]
GSM340619
[83]
GSM340620
[84]
GSM340621
[85]
GSM340622
[86]
GSM340623
[87]
GSM340624
[88]
GSM340625
[89]
GSM340626
[90]
GSM340627
[91]
GSM340628
[92]
GSM340629
[93]
GSM340630
[94]
GSM340631
[95]
GSM340632
[96]
GSM340633
[97]
GSM340634
[98]
GSM340635
[99]
GSM340636
[100]
GSM340637
[101]
GSM340638
[102]
GSM340639
[103]
GSM340640
[104]
GSM340641
[105]
GSM340642
[106]
GSM340643
[107]
GSM340644
[108]
GSM340645
[109]
GSM340646
[110]
GSM340647
[111]
GSM340648
[112]
GSM340649
[113]
GSM340650
[114]
GSM340651
[115]
GSM340652
[116]
GSM340653
[117]
GSM340654
[118]
GSM340655
[119]
GSM340656
[120]
GSM340657
[121]
GSM340658
[122]
GSM340659
[123]
GSM340660
[124]
GSM340661
[125]
GSM340662
[126]
GSM340663
[127]
GSM340664
[128]
GSM340665
[129]
GSM340666
[130]
GSM340667
[131]
GSM340668
[132]
GSM340669
[133]
GSM340670
[134]
GSM340671
[135]
GSM340672
[136]
GSM340673
[137]
GSM340674
[138]
GSM340675
[139]
GSM340676
[140]
GSM340677
[141]
GSM340678
[142]
GSM340679
[143]
GSM340680
[144]
GSM340681
[145]
GSM340682
[146]
GSM340683
[147]
GSM340684
[148]
GSM340685
[149]
GSM340686
[150]
GSM340687
[151]
GSM340688
[152]
GSM340689
[153]
GSM340690
[154]
GSM340691
[155]
GSM340692
[156]
GSM340693
[157]
GSM340694
[158]
GSM340695
[159]
GSM340696
[160]
GSM340697
[161]
GSM340698
[162]
GSM340699
[163]
GSM340700
[164]
GSM340701
[165]
GSM340702
[166]
GSM340703
[167]
GSM340704
[168]
GSM340705
[169]
GSM340706
[170]
GSM340707
[171]
GSM340708
[172]
GSM340709
[173]
GSM340710
[174]
GSM340711
[175]
GSM340712
[176]
GSM340713
[177]
GSM340714
[178]
GSM340715
[179]
GSM340716
[180]
GSM340717
[181]
GSM340718
[182]
GSM340719
[183]
GSM340720
[184]
GSM340721
[185]
GSM340722
[186]
GSM340723
[187]
GSM340724
[188]
GSM340725
[189]
GSM340726
[190]
GSM340727
[191]
GSM340728
[192]
GSM340729
[193]
GSM340730
[194]
GSM340731
[195]
GSM340732
[196]
GSM340733
[197]
GSM340734
[198]
GSM340735
[199]
GSM340736
[200]
GSM340737
[201]
GSM340738
[202]
GSM340739
[203]
GSM340740
[204]
GSM340741
[205]
GSM340742
[206]
GSM340743
[207]
GSM340744
[208]
GSM340745
[209]
GSM340746
[210]
GSM340747
[211]
GSM340748
[212]
GSM340749
[213]
GSM340750
[214]
GSM340751
[215]
GSM340752
[216]
GSM340753
[217]
GSM340754
[218]
GSM340755
[219]
GSM340756
[220]
GSM340757
[221]
GSM340758
[222]
GSM340759
[223]
GSM340760
[224]
GSM340761
[225]
GSM340762
[226]
GSM340763
[227]
GSM340764
[228]
GSM340765
[229]
GSM340766
[230]
GSM340767
[231]
GSM340768
[232]
GSM340769
[233]
GSM340770
[234]
GSM340771
[235]
GSM340772
[236]
GSM340773
[237]
GSM340774
[238]
GSM340775
[239]
GSM340776
[240]
GSM340777
[241]
GSM340778
[242]
GSM340779
[243]
GSM340780
[244]
GSM340781
[245]
GSM340782
[246]
GSM340783
[247]
GSM340784
[248]
GSM340785
[249]
GSM340786
[250]
GSM340787
[251]
GSM340788
[252]
GSM340789
[253]
GSM340790
[254]
GSM340791
[255]
GSM340792
sample_count
256
group_sizes
null
group_sizes_basis
null
platform
6102
taxon
Homo sapiens
title
Predective Value of Prognosis-Related Gene Expression Study in Primary Bladder Cancer
resolution_checked_at
2026-11-01T15:39:54Z
resolution_check
identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read
downloaded
false
licence_read
false
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE13507 not downloaded
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE13507 licence not read
analysis object · 4 fields
state
partial
methods array · 5 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
survival_analysis
specific
cox_proportional_hazards
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
In order to eliminate the influence of overfitting, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis was performed, and the best prognostic genes were identified, which were CD109, TEAD4, FN1, TM4SF1, CDCA7L, ATOH8, and GZMA (Fig. 5D, E).
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
group_comparison
specific
anova
label
Group comparison
dsl_operations array · 4 items
[0]
group_summary
[1]
welch_t
[2]
bootstrap_mean_difference
[3]
group_comparison_anova
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
two_or_more_groups_continuous
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
ANOVA
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
survival_analysis
specific
kaplan_meier
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
survival_km
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
Kaplan-Meier
[3] object · 10 fields
id
method-4
family
differential_expression
specific
deseq2
label
Differential expression analysis
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
normalise_counts
[1]
differential_expression_fit
[2]
fdr_bh
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
count_matrix_with_condition
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
DESeq2
[4] object · 10 fields
id
method-5
family
diagnostic_evaluation
specific
roc
label
Diagnostic test evaluation
dsl_operations array · 6 items
[0]
confusion_counts
[1]
roc_curve
[2]
sensitivity_specificity
[3]
solve_confusion_matrix
[4]
classification_metrics
[5]
published_precision_envelope
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
reference_standard_and_test
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
ROC curve
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
method.reader_differs_from_extractor
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
complete
tier
R1
blocked_on
nothing:replicable_now
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R1
reachable
true
accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE13507
resolved_accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE13507
statements array · 1 item
[0]
All figures adopted in this study to support the findings are included in the article.
basis
The paper names GSE13507 in Gene Expression Omnibus and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
assets array · 2 items
[0]
source:pmid:37968767
[1]
data:geo:GSE13507
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE13507
gaps array · 0 items
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T18:59:10Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
12021
completion_tokens
1944
cached_tokens
264
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:37968767
type
paper
label
pmid:37968767
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:37968767
type
manuscript
label
PMID 37968767 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE13507
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE13507
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:37968767
type
paper
label
pmid:37968767
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:37968767
type
manuscript
label
PMID 37968767 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE13507
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE13507
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-37968767
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:37968767
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-GSE13507
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE13507
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:37968767
parent_hash
sha256:b4c1bce8fa238d3d7ae5a7632a9f6052c53142fbb601d101067971c8421837cb
fork_of
null
gaps array · 7 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE13507 licence not read
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE13507 not downloaded
[2]
execution.not_run
[3]
method.reader_differs_from_extractor
[4]
review.human_critique
[5]
review.independent_reader
[6]
review.machine_critique
assays array · 2 items
[0] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_id
rna_seq
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.93
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
c responsiveness of bladder cancer. METHODS: RNA-seq data, clinical information and genomic mutat
order_basis
paper_text_order:660
id
assay:1
[1] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
survival_analysis
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
In order to eliminate the influence of overfitting, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis was performed, and the best prognostic genes were identified, which were CD109, TEAD4, FN1, TM4SF1, CDCA7L, ATOH8, and GZMA (Fig. 5D, E).
order_basis
consumes_earlier_output
id
assay:2
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:37968767", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 3, "content_hash": "sha256:80964cddc20be5425720b7e222d8372655e229975d7c54eac528a3288b1e8bae", "created_at": "2026-11-01T19:02:52Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:10:40Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "A sialyltransferases-related gene signature serves as a potential predictor of prognosis and therapeutic response for bladder cancer.", "doi": "10.1186/s40001-023-01496-7", "pmid": "37968767", "authors": ["Penglong Cao", "Mingying Chen", "Tianya Zhang", "Qin Zheng", "Mulin Liu"], "journal": "European journal of medical research", "year": 2023, "abstract": "BACKGROUND: Aberrant glycosylation, catalyzed by the specific glycosyltransferase, is one of the dominant features of cancers. Among the glycosyltransferase subfamilies, sialyltransferases (SiaTs) are an essential part which has close linkages with tumor-associated events, such as tumor growth, metastasis and angiogenesis. Considering the relationship between SiaTs and cancer, the current study attempted to establish an effective prognostic model with SiaTs-related genes (SRGs) to predict patients' outcome and therapeutic responsiveness of bladder cancer.\nMETHODS: RNA-seq data, clinical information and genomic mutation data were downloaded (TCGA-BLCA and GSE13507 datasets). The comprehensive landscape of the 20 SiaTs was analyzed, and the differentially expressed SiaTs-related genes were screened with \"DESeq2\" R package. ConsensusClusterPlus was applied for clustering, following with survival analysis with Kaplan-Meier curve. The overall survival related SRGs were determined with univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was performed to generate a SRGs-related prognostic model. The predictive value was estimated with Kaplan-Meier plot and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, which was further validated with the constructed nomogram and decision curve.\nRESULTS: In bladder cancer tissues, 17 out of the 20 SiaTs were differentially expressed with CNV changes and somatic mutations. Two SiaTs_Clusters were determined based on the expression of the 20 SiaTs, and two gene_Clusters were identified based on the expression of differentially expressed genes between SiaTs_Clusters. The SRGs-related prognostic model was generated with 7 key genes (CD109, TEAD4, FN1, TM4SF1, CDCA7L, ATOH8 and GZMA), and the accuracy for outcome prediction was validated with ROC curve and a constructed nomogram. The SRGs-related prognostic signature could separate patients into high- and low-risk group, where the high-risk group showed poorer outcome, more abundant immune infiltration, and higher expression of immune checkpoint genes. In addition, the risk score derived from the SRGs-related prognostic model could be utilized as a predictor to evaluate the responsiveness of patients to the medical therapies.\nCONCLUSIONS: The SRGs-related prognostic signature could potentially aid in the prediction of the survival outcome and therapy response for patients with bladder cancer, contributing to the development of personalized treatment and appropriate medical decisions.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "In order to eliminate the influence of overfitting, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis was performed, and the best prognostic genes were identified, which were CD109, TEAD4, FN1, TM4SF1, CDCA7L, ATOH8, and GZMA (Fig. 5D, E).", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:37968767", "locator": "sections[18] \"Identification of differentially expressed genes and the construction of the SRGs-related prognostic signature\" paragraph 3", "quote": "In order to eliminate the influence of overfitting, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis was performed, and the best prognostic genes were identified, which were CD109, TEAD4, FN1, TM4SF1, CDCA7L, ATOH8, and GZMA (Fig. 5D, E)."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "All figures adopted in this study to support the findings are included in the article.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:37968767", "locator": "sections[29] \"notes\" paragraph 1", "quote": "All figures adopted in this study to support the findings are included in the article."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "The SRGs-related prognostic signature could separate patients into high- and low-risk group, where the high-risk group showed poorer outcome, more abundant immune infiltration, and higher expression of immune checkpoint genes.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:37968767", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "The SRGs-related prognostic signature could separate patients into high- and low-risk group, where the high-risk group showed poorer outcome, more abundant immune infiltration, and higher expression of immune checkpoint genes."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "The SRGs-related prognostic signature could separate patients into high- and low-risk group, where the high-risk group showed poorer outcome, more abundant immune infiltration, and higher expression of immune checkpoint genes.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:37968767"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE13507"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE13507"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:37968767", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01496-7", "sha256": "sha256:3a33694063124ff808f2f0d75c809561bddb501cc2d20c58938116455ab1e6fe", "bytes": 41794, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1186/s40001-023-01496-7", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC10647093", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE13507", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE13507", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE13507", "version": null, "note": "All figures adopted in this study to support the findings are included in the article.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "All figures adopted in this study to support the findings are included in the article.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM340537", "GSM340538", "GSM340539", "GSM340540", "GSM340541", "GSM340542", "GSM340543", "GSM340544", "GSM340545", "GSM340546", "GSM340547", "GSM340548", "GSM340549", "GSM340550", "GSM340551", "GSM340552", "GSM340553", "GSM340554", "GSM340555", "GSM340556", "GSM340557", "GSM340558", "GSM340559", "GSM340560", "GSM340561", "GSM340562", "GSM340563", "GSM340564", "GSM340565", "GSM340566", "GSM340567", "GSM340568", "GSM340569", "GSM340570", "GSM340571", "GSM340572", "GSM340573", "GSM340574", "GSM340575", "GSM340576", "GSM340577", "GSM340578", "GSM340579", "GSM340580", "GSM340581", "GSM340582", "GSM340583", "GSM340584", "GSM340585", "GSM340586", "GSM340587", "GSM340588", "GSM340589", "GSM340590", "GSM340591", "GSM340592", "GSM340593", "GSM340594", "GSM340595", "GSM340596", "GSM340597", "GSM340598", "GSM340599", "GSM340600", "GSM340601", "GSM340602", "GSM340603", "GSM340604", "GSM340605", "GSM340606", "GSM340607", "GSM340608", "GSM340609", "GSM340610", "GSM340611", "GSM340612", "GSM340613", "GSM340614", "GSM340615", "GSM340616", "GSM340617", "GSM340618", "GSM340619", "GSM340620", "GSM340621", "GSM340622", "GSM340623", "GSM340624", "GSM340625", "GSM340626", "GSM340627", "GSM340628", "GSM340629", "GSM340630", "GSM340631", "GSM340632", "GSM340633", "GSM340634", "GSM340635", "GSM340636", "GSM340637", "GSM340638", "GSM340639", "GSM340640", "GSM340641", "GSM340642", "GSM340643", "GSM340644", "GSM340645", "GSM340646", "GSM340647", "GSM340648", "GSM340649", "GSM340650", "GSM340651", "GSM340652", "GSM340653", "GSM340654", "GSM340655", "GSM340656", "GSM340657", "GSM340658", "GSM340659", "GSM340660", "GSM340661", "GSM340662", "GSM340663", "GSM340664", "GSM340665", "GSM340666", "GSM340667", "GSM340668", "GSM340669", "GSM340670", "GSM340671", "GSM340672", "GSM340673", "GSM340674", "GSM340675", "GSM340676", "GSM340677", "GSM340678", "GSM340679", "GSM340680", "GSM340681", "GSM340682", "GSM340683", "GSM340684", "GSM340685", "GSM340686", "GSM340687", "GSM340688", "GSM340689", "GSM340690", "GSM340691", "GSM340692", "GSM340693", "GSM340694", "GSM340695", "GSM340696", "GSM340697", "GSM340698", "GSM340699", "GSM340700", "GSM340701", "GSM340702", "GSM340703", "GSM340704", "GSM340705", "GSM340706", "GSM340707", "GSM340708", "GSM340709", "GSM340710", "GSM340711", "GSM340712", "GSM340713", "GSM340714", "GSM340715", "GSM340716", "GSM340717", "GSM340718", "GSM340719", "GSM340720", "GSM340721", "GSM340722", "GSM340723", "GSM340724", "GSM340725", "GSM340726", "GSM340727", "GSM340728", "GSM340729", "GSM340730", "GSM340731", "GSM340732", "GSM340733", "GSM340734", "GSM340735", "GSM340736", "GSM340737", "GSM340738", "GSM340739", "GSM340740", "GSM340741", "GSM340742", "GSM340743", "GSM340744", "GSM340745", "GSM340746", "GSM340747", "GSM340748", "GSM340749", "GSM340750", "GSM340751", "GSM340752", "GSM340753", "GSM340754", "GSM340755", "GSM340756", "GSM340757", "GSM340758", "GSM340759", "GSM340760", "GSM340761", "GSM340762", "GSM340763", "GSM340764", "GSM340765", "GSM340766", "GSM340767", "GSM340768", "GSM340769", "GSM340770", "GSM340771", "GSM340772", "GSM340773", "GSM340774", "GSM340775", "GSM340776", "GSM340777", "GSM340778", "GSM340779", "GSM340780", "GSM340781", "GSM340782", "GSM340783", "GSM340784", "GSM340785", "GSM340786", "GSM340787", "GSM340788", "GSM340789", "GSM340790", "GSM340791", "GSM340792"], "sample_count": 256, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "6102", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Predective Value of Prognosis-Related Gene Expression Study in Primary Bladder Cancer", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE13507 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE13507 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "In order to eliminate the influence of overfitting, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis was performed, and the best prognostic genes were identified, which were CD109, TEAD4, FN1, TM4SF1, CDCA7L, ATOH8, and GZMA (Fig. 5D, E)."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "anova", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "ANOVA"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "kaplan_meier", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "Kaplan-Meier"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "differential_expression", "specific": "deseq2", "label": "Differential expression analysis", "dsl_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["count_matrix_with_condition"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "DESeq2"}}, {"id": "method-5", "family": "diagnostic_evaluation", "specific": "roc", "label": "Diagnostic test evaluation", "dsl_operations": ["confusion_counts", "roc_curve", "sensitivity_specificity", "solve_confusion_matrix", "classification_metrics", "published_precision_envelope"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["reference_standard_and_test"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "ROC curve"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_differs_from_extractor"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE13507"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE13507"], "statements": ["All figures adopted in this study to support the findings are included in the article."], "basis": "The paper names GSE13507 in Gene Expression Omnibus and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "assets": ["source:pmid:37968767", "data:geo:GSE13507"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE13507"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T18:59:10Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 12021, "completion_tokens": 1944, "cached_tokens": 264}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:37968767", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:37968767"}, {"id": "source:pmid:37968767", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 37968767 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE13507", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE13507"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:37968767", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:37968767"}, {"id": "source:pmid:37968767", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 37968767 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE13507", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE13507"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-37968767", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:37968767"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE13507", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE13507"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:37968767", "parent_hash": "sha256:b4c1bce8fa238d3d7ae5a7632a9f6052c53142fbb601d101067971c8421837cb", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE13507 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE13507 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.reader_differs_from_extractor", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "rna_seq", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.93, "evidence": ["c responsiveness of bladder cancer. METHODS: RNA-seq data, clinical information and genomic mutat"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:660", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["In order to eliminate the influence of overfitting, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis was performed, and the best prognostic genes were identified, which were CD109, TEAD4, FN1, TM4SF1, CDCA7L, ATOH8, and GZMA (Fig. 5D, E)."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:2"}]}