Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:38989439

Identification and validation of Cystatin A as a novel promising therapeutic target for gastric cancer.

Qingyu Xu · Shuai Xue · Yaqiong Zhang · Jian Li · Peiyu Qian · Yanyan Zhang · Li Feng

Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024 doi:10.21037/jgo-23-941

Paper

complete

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

partial

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:38989439
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:fafcf5ea14ff92c171cce4a6a708d891ed4b91943a7b7050f0b931204bff8db1
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T20:29:03Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:12:12Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Identification and validation of Cystatin A as a novel promising therapeutic target for gastric cancer.
doi
10.21037/jgo-23-941
pmid
38989439
authors array · 7 items
[0]
Qingyu Xu
[1]
Shuai Xue
[2]
Yaqiong Zhang
[3]
Jian Li
[4]
Peiyu Qian
[5]
Yanyan Zhang
[6]
Li Feng
journal
Journal of gastrointestinal oncology
year
2024
abstract
Background: The effect of pharmacological treatment of gastric cancer (GC) is limited, thus, it holds significant scientific importance to thoroughly investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying GC development and identify novel molecules capable of substantially extending patients' survival. This study utilized bioinformatics techniques to identify 11 genes associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) in GC patients and investigated the potential biological functions of these genes through single-cell transcriptomic analysis. Subsequently, a single gene Cystatin A (CSTA) was selected for further analysis to explore its impact on signaling pathways and treatment. Methods: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified and overlapped in the analysis of RFS to identify potential prognostic genes for GC patients, based on data from the Cancer Genome Atlas-stomach adenocarcinoma (TCGA-STAD) and GSE54129. Subsequently, a prognostic model based on RFS in GC patients was established. Single-cell sequencing data were employed to explore the potential functions of these model genes. CSTA, one of the RFS-related genes, was further investigated using immunohistochemistry (IHC), Cell Counting Kit 8 (CCK-8), transwell, scratch, colony formation assays, flow cytometry, and Western blotting methods. Results: Through bioinformatics analysis, we identified 23 RFS-related genes in GC. Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox method, an RFS prognostic model was developed which pinpointed 11 GC prognosis-related (GPR) genes as significant factors influencing RFS in GC patients. The single-cell analysis revealed their potential role in affecting differentiation and maturation of pre-fibroblasts thereby impacting RFS in GC patients. CSTA exhibited low expression levels in GC tissues. Overexpression of CSTA promoted apoptosis in GC cells through the caspase-dependent apoptotic pathway and enhanced their response to cisplatin via this same pathway. Conclusions: The 11 GPR genes are primarily enriched within a specific type of stromal cell exhibiting heightened communication, metabolism, and differentiation levels. The gene signature of these stromal cells has implications for patient prognosis. Additionally, CSTA, a gene related to prognosis, has been shown to influence apoptosis levels in GC cells.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
To assess the prognostic value of the 23 overlapping genes, we then conducted a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox regression analysis to evaluate the association between each gene and survival status in TCGA cohort.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:38989439
locator
sections[6] "Development of a prognostic risk-score model in TCGA cohort" paragraph 2
quote
To assess the prognostic value of the 23 overlapping genes, we then conducted a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox regression analysis to evaluate the association between each gene and survival status in TCGA cohort.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
Data Sharing Statement: Available at https://jgo.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jgo-23-941/dss
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:38989439
locator
sections[29] "Footnotes" paragraph 2
quote
Data Sharing Statement: Available at https://jgo.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jgo-23-941/dss
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
Through bioinformatics analysis, we identified 23 RFS-related genes in GC. Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox method, an RFS prognostic model was developed which pinpointed 11 GC prognosis-related (GPR) genes as significant factors influencing RFS in GC patients.
kind
qualitative
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:38989439
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 3
quote
Through bioinformatics analysis, we identified 23 RFS-related genes in GC. Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox method, an RFS prognostic model was developed which pinpointed 11 GC prognosis-related (GPR) genes as significant factors influencing RFS in GC patients.
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
Through bioinformatics analysis, we identified 23 RFS-related genes in GC. Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox method, an RFS prognostic model was developed which pinpointed 11 GC prognosis-related (GPR) genes as significant factors influencing RFS in GC patients.
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:38989439
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
blocked
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 1 item
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:38989439
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-23-941
sha256
sha256:8c5d98ade1a3172e1d3a7681a33c143f74fadc9a6366174417175b550dbda8a6
bytes
52822
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.21037/jgo-23-941
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC11231850
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
gaps array · 0 items
analysis object · 4 fields
state
partial
methods array · 5 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
survival_analysis
specific
cox_proportional_hazards
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
To assess the prognostic value of the 23 overlapping genes, we then conducted a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox regression analysis to evaluate the association between each gene and survival status in TCGA cohort.
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
group_comparison
specific
wilcoxon
label
Group comparison
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 1 item
[0]
group_comparison_wilcoxon
expressible
false
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
two_or_more_groups_continuous
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Wilcoxon
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
group_comparison
specific
anova
label
Group comparison
dsl_operations array · 4 items
[0]
group_summary
[1]
welch_t
[2]
bootstrap_mean_difference
[3]
group_comparison_anova
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
two_or_more_groups_continuous
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
analysis of variance
[3] object · 10 fields
id
method-4
family
survival_analysis
specific
kaplan_meier
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
survival_km
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Kaplan-Meier
[4] object · 10 fields
id
method-5
family
survival_analysis
specific
log_rank_test
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
logrank_test
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Log-rank
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
method.reader_differs_from_extractor
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
blocked
tier
R4
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R4
reachable
false
accessions array · 0 items
resolved_accessions array · 0 items
statements array · 1 item
[0]
Data Sharing Statement: Available at https://jgo.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jgo-23-941/dss
basis
The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
assets array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:38989439
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:accession_absent
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T19:23:36Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
14828
completion_tokens
1321
cached_tokens
264
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:38989439
type
paper
label
pmid:38989439
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:38989439
type
manuscript
label
PMID 38989439 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:38989439
type
paper
label
pmid:38989439
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:38989439
type
manuscript
label
PMID 38989439 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-38989439
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:38989439
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-None
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:38989439
parent_hash
sha256:2b90037d5c23b7d61d5a4d272041f174b0d0537ea706d9b382994dfe46cdef78
fork_of
null
gaps array · 6 items
[0]
execution.not_run
[1]
method.reader_differs_from_extractor
[2]
review.human_critique
[3]
review.independent_reader
[4]
review.machine_critique
[5]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
assays array · 6 items
[0] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.99
evidence array · 4 items
[0]
elated genes, was further investigated using immunohistochemistry (IHC), Cell Counting Kit 8 (CCK-8), transwel
[1]
her investigated using immunohistochemistry (IHC), Cell Counting Kit 8 (CCK-8), transwell, sc
[2]
Methods Human GC samples and immunohistochemistry (IHC) For the IHC analysis, human samples we
[3]
s Human GC samples and immunohistochemistry (IHC) For the IHC analysis, human samples were ob
order_basis
paper_text_order:1229
id
assay:1
[1] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_id
apoptosis_assay
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.99
evidence array · 4 items
[0]
GC tissues. Overexpression of CSTA promoted apoptosis in GC cells through the caspase-dependent ap
[1]
ed to prognosis, has been shown to influence apoptosis levels in GC cells.
[2]
nohistochemistry (IHC), Cell Counting Kit 8 (CCK-8), transwell, scratch, colony formation assay
[3]
A promoted apoptosis in GC cells through the caspase-dependent apoptotic pathway and enhanced the
order_basis
paper_text_order:1278
id
assay:2
[2] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_id
flow_cytometry
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.93
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
transwell, scratch, colony formation assays, flow cytometry, and Western blotting methods. Results: Thro
order_basis
paper_text_order:1331
id
assay:3
[3] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_id
western_blot
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.93
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
colony formation assays, flow cytometry, and Western blotting methods. Results: Through bioinformatics ana
order_basis
paper_text_order:1351
id
assay:4
[4] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_id
cell_culture
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.99
evidence array · 4 items
[0]
re obtained from the CRL-1740 Lncap. The AGS cell line was cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM),
[1]
ified Eagle Medium (DMEM), while the SGC7901 cell line was cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 16
[2]
om the CRL-1740 Lncap. The AGS cell line was cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), whi
[3]
dium (DMEM), while the SGC7901 cell line was cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640,
order_basis
paper_text_order:3547
id
assay:5
[5] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
survival_analysis
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
To assess the prognostic value of the 23 overlapping genes, we then conducted a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox regression analysis to evaluate the association between each gene and survival status in TCGA cohort.
order_basis
consumes_earlier_output
id
assay:6
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:38989439", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 3, "content_hash": "sha256:fafcf5ea14ff92c171cce4a6a708d891ed4b91943a7b7050f0b931204bff8db1", "created_at": "2026-11-01T20:29:03Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:12:12Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Identification and validation of Cystatin A as a novel promising therapeutic target for gastric cancer.", "doi": "10.21037/jgo-23-941", "pmid": "38989439", "authors": ["Qingyu Xu", "Shuai Xue", "Yaqiong Zhang", "Jian Li", "Peiyu Qian", "Yanyan Zhang", "Li Feng"], "journal": "Journal of gastrointestinal oncology", "year": 2024, "abstract": "Background: The effect of pharmacological treatment of gastric cancer (GC) is limited, thus, it holds significant scientific importance to thoroughly investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying GC development and identify novel molecules capable of substantially extending patients' survival. This study utilized bioinformatics techniques to identify 11 genes associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) in GC patients and investigated the potential biological functions of these genes through single-cell transcriptomic analysis. Subsequently, a single gene Cystatin A (CSTA) was selected for further analysis to explore its impact on signaling pathways and treatment.\nMethods: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified and overlapped in the analysis of RFS to identify potential prognostic genes for GC patients, based on data from the Cancer Genome Atlas-stomach adenocarcinoma (TCGA-STAD) and GSE54129. Subsequently, a prognostic model based on RFS in GC patients was established. Single-cell sequencing data were employed to explore the potential functions of these model genes. CSTA, one of the RFS-related genes, was further investigated using immunohistochemistry (IHC), Cell Counting Kit 8 (CCK-8), transwell, scratch, colony formation assays, flow cytometry, and Western blotting methods.\nResults: Through bioinformatics analysis, we identified 23 RFS-related genes in GC. Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox method, an RFS prognostic model was developed which pinpointed 11 GC prognosis-related (GPR) genes as significant factors influencing RFS in GC patients. The single-cell analysis revealed their potential role in affecting differentiation and maturation of pre-fibroblasts thereby impacting RFS in GC patients. CSTA exhibited low expression levels in GC tissues. Overexpression of CSTA promoted apoptosis in GC cells through the caspase-dependent apoptotic pathway and enhanced their response to cisplatin via this same pathway.\nConclusions: The 11 GPR genes are primarily enriched within a specific type of stromal cell exhibiting heightened communication, metabolism, and differentiation levels. The gene signature of these stromal cells has implications for patient prognosis. Additionally, CSTA, a gene related to prognosis, has been shown to influence apoptosis levels in GC cells.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "To assess the prognostic value of the 23 overlapping genes, we then conducted a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox regression analysis to evaluate the association between each gene and survival status in TCGA cohort.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:38989439", "locator": "sections[6] \"Development of a prognostic risk-score model in TCGA cohort\" paragraph 2", "quote": "To assess the prognostic value of the 23 overlapping genes, we then conducted a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox regression analysis to evaluate the association between each gene and survival status in TCGA cohort."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "Data Sharing Statement: Available at https://jgo.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jgo-23-941/dss", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:38989439", "locator": "sections[29] \"Footnotes\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Data Sharing Statement: Available at https://jgo.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jgo-23-941/dss"}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "Through bioinformatics analysis, we identified 23 RFS-related genes in GC. Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox method, an RFS prognostic model was developed which pinpointed 11 GC prognosis-related (GPR) genes as significant factors influencing RFS in GC patients.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:38989439", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "Through bioinformatics analysis, we identified 23 RFS-related genes in GC. Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox method, an RFS prognostic model was developed which pinpointed 11 GC prognosis-related (GPR) genes as significant factors influencing RFS in GC patients."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "Through bioinformatics analysis, we identified 23 RFS-related genes in GC. Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox method, an RFS prognostic model was developed which pinpointed 11 GC prognosis-related (GPR) genes as significant factors influencing RFS in GC patients.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:38989439"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:38989439", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-23-941", "sha256": "sha256:8c5d98ade1a3172e1d3a7681a33c143f74fadc9a6366174417175b550dbda8a6", "bytes": 52822, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.21037/jgo-23-941", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC11231850", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}], "gaps": []}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "To assess the prognostic value of the 23 overlapping genes, we then conducted a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox regression analysis to evaluate the association between each gene and survival status in TCGA cohort."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "wilcoxon", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Wilcoxon"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "anova", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "analysis of variance"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "kaplan_meier", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Kaplan-Meier"}}, {"id": "method-5", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "log_rank_test", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["logrank_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Log-rank"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_differs_from_extractor"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "data", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R4", "reachable": false, "accessions": [], "resolved_accessions": [], "statements": ["Data Sharing Statement: Available at https://jgo.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jgo-23-941/dss"], "basis": "The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "assets": ["source:pmid:38989439"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:None"]}, "gaps": ["data:accession_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T19:23:36Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 14828, "completion_tokens": 1321, "cached_tokens": 264}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:38989439", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:38989439"}, {"id": "source:pmid:38989439", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 38989439 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:38989439", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:38989439"}, {"id": "source:pmid:38989439", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 38989439 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-38989439", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:38989439"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-None", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:None"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:38989439", "parent_hash": "sha256:2b90037d5c23b7d61d5a4d272041f174b0d0537ea706d9b382994dfe46cdef78", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["execution.not_run", "method.reader_differs_from_extractor", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "ihc", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["elated genes, was further investigated using immunohistochemistry (IHC), Cell Counting Kit 8 (CCK-8), transwel", "her investigated using immunohistochemistry (IHC), Cell Counting Kit 8 (CCK-8), transwell, sc", "Methods Human GC samples and immunohistochemistry (IHC) For the IHC analysis, human samples we", "s Human GC samples and immunohistochemistry (IHC) For the IHC analysis, human samples were ob"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1229", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "apoptosis_assay", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["GC tissues. Overexpression of CSTA promoted apoptosis in GC cells through the caspase-dependent ap", "ed to prognosis, has been shown to influence apoptosis levels in GC cells.", "nohistochemistry (IHC), Cell Counting Kit 8 (CCK-8), transwell, scratch, colony formation assay", "A promoted apoptosis in GC cells through the caspase-dependent apoptotic pathway and enhanced the"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1278", "id": "assay:2"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "flow_cytometry", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.93, "evidence": ["transwell, scratch, colony formation assays, flow cytometry, and Western blotting methods. Results: Thro"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1331", "id": "assay:3"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "western_blot", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.93, "evidence": ["colony formation assays, flow cytometry, and Western blotting methods. Results: Through bioinformatics ana"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1351", "id": "assay:4"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "cell_culture", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["re obtained from the CRL-1740 Lncap. The AGS cell line was cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM),", "ified Eagle Medium (DMEM), while the SGC7901 cell line was cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 16", "om the CRL-1740 Lncap. The AGS cell line was cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), whi", "dium (DMEM), while the SGC7901 cell line was cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640,"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:3547", "id": "assay:5"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["To assess the prognostic value of the 23 overlapping genes, we then conducted a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox regression analysis to evaluate the association between each gene and survival status in TCGA cohort."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:6"}]}