← All .science files
pmid:38989439
Identification and validation of Cystatin A as a novel promising therapeutic target for gastric cancer.
Qingyu Xu · Shuai Xue · Yaqiong Zhang · Jian Li · Peiyu Qian · Yanyan Zhang · Li Feng
Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024 doi:10.21037/jgo-23-941
Paper
complete
Experiment
partial
Data
partial
Analysis
partial
Execution
absent
Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
paper object · 10 fields
authors array · 7 items
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
[1] object · 6 fields
[2] object · 6 fields
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
outputs array · 1 item
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 1 item
data object · 3 fields
assets array · 1 item
[0] object · 15 fields
structure object · 4 fields
gaps array · 0 items
analysis object · 4 fields
methods array · 5 items
[0] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[1] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 1 item
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[2] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 4 items
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[3] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[4] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
capability object · 3 fields
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
assay_families array · 9 items
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
required_operations array · 1 item
missing_operations array · 0 items
capability object · 4 fields
data object · 6 fields
accessions array · 0 items
resolved_accessions array · 0 items
statements array · 1 item
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
assets array · 1 item
steps array · 1 item
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
gaps array · 1 item
review object · 5 fields
machine_critique object · 5 fields
reader object · 5 fields
evidence_check object · 2 fields
usage object · 3 fields
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
gaps array · 3 items
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
[1] object · 3 fields
[2] object · 3 fields
[1] object · 4 fields
agents array · 2 items
lineage object · 4 fields
gaps array · 6 items
assays array · 6 items
[0] object · 11 fields
required_operations array · 0 items
source_hashes object · 1 field
evidence array · 4 items
[1] object · 11 fields
required_operations array · 0 items
source_hashes object · 1 field
evidence array · 4 items
[2] object · 11 fields
required_operations array · 0 items
source_hashes object · 1 field
evidence array · 1 item
[3] object · 11 fields
required_operations array · 0 items
source_hashes object · 1 field
evidence array · 1 item
[4] object · 11 fields
required_operations array · 0 items
source_hashes object · 1 field
evidence array · 4 items
[5] object · 11 fields
required_operations array · 1 item
source_hashes object · 1 field
evidence array · 1 item
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:38989439", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 3, "content_hash": "sha256:fafcf5ea14ff92c171cce4a6a708d891ed4b91943a7b7050f0b931204bff8db1", "created_at": "2026-11-01T20:29:03Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:12:12Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Identification and validation of Cystatin A as a novel promising therapeutic target for gastric cancer.", "doi": "10.21037/jgo-23-941", "pmid": "38989439", "authors": ["Qingyu Xu", "Shuai Xue", "Yaqiong Zhang", "Jian Li", "Peiyu Qian", "Yanyan Zhang", "Li Feng"], "journal": "Journal of gastrointestinal oncology", "year": 2024, "abstract": "Background: The effect of pharmacological treatment of gastric cancer (GC) is limited, thus, it holds significant scientific importance to thoroughly investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying GC development and identify novel molecules capable of substantially extending patients' survival. This study utilized bioinformatics techniques to identify 11 genes associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) in GC patients and investigated the potential biological functions of these genes through single-cell transcriptomic analysis. Subsequently, a single gene Cystatin A (CSTA) was selected for further analysis to explore its impact on signaling pathways and treatment.\nMethods: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified and overlapped in the analysis of RFS to identify potential prognostic genes for GC patients, based on data from the Cancer Genome Atlas-stomach adenocarcinoma (TCGA-STAD) and GSE54129. Subsequently, a prognostic model based on RFS in GC patients was established. Single-cell sequencing data were employed to explore the potential functions of these model genes. CSTA, one of the RFS-related genes, was further investigated using immunohistochemistry (IHC), Cell Counting Kit 8 (CCK-8), transwell, scratch, colony formation assays, flow cytometry, and Western blotting methods.\nResults: Through bioinformatics analysis, we identified 23 RFS-related genes in GC. Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox method, an RFS prognostic model was developed which pinpointed 11 GC prognosis-related (GPR) genes as significant factors influencing RFS in GC patients. The single-cell analysis revealed their potential role in affecting differentiation and maturation of pre-fibroblasts thereby impacting RFS in GC patients. CSTA exhibited low expression levels in GC tissues. Overexpression of CSTA promoted apoptosis in GC cells through the caspase-dependent apoptotic pathway and enhanced their response to cisplatin via this same pathway.\nConclusions: The 11 GPR genes are primarily enriched within a specific type of stromal cell exhibiting heightened communication, metabolism, and differentiation levels. The gene signature of these stromal cells has implications for patient prognosis. Additionally, CSTA, a gene related to prognosis, has been shown to influence apoptosis levels in GC cells.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "To assess the prognostic value of the 23 overlapping genes, we then conducted a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox regression analysis to evaluate the association between each gene and survival status in TCGA cohort.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:38989439", "locator": "sections[6] \"Development of a prognostic risk-score model in TCGA cohort\" paragraph 2", "quote": "To assess the prognostic value of the 23 overlapping genes, we then conducted a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox regression analysis to evaluate the association between each gene and survival status in TCGA cohort."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "Data Sharing Statement: Available at https://jgo.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jgo-23-941/dss", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:38989439", "locator": "sections[29] \"Footnotes\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Data Sharing Statement: Available at https://jgo.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jgo-23-941/dss"}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "Through bioinformatics analysis, we identified 23 RFS-related genes in GC. Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox method, an RFS prognostic model was developed which pinpointed 11 GC prognosis-related (GPR) genes as significant factors influencing RFS in GC patients.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:38989439", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "Through bioinformatics analysis, we identified 23 RFS-related genes in GC. Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox method, an RFS prognostic model was developed which pinpointed 11 GC prognosis-related (GPR) genes as significant factors influencing RFS in GC patients."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "Through bioinformatics analysis, we identified 23 RFS-related genes in GC. Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox method, an RFS prognostic model was developed which pinpointed 11 GC prognosis-related (GPR) genes as significant factors influencing RFS in GC patients.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:38989439"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:38989439", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-23-941", "sha256": "sha256:8c5d98ade1a3172e1d3a7681a33c143f74fadc9a6366174417175b550dbda8a6", "bytes": 52822, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.21037/jgo-23-941", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC11231850", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}], "gaps": []}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "To assess the prognostic value of the 23 overlapping genes, we then conducted a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox regression analysis to evaluate the association between each gene and survival status in TCGA cohort."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "wilcoxon", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Wilcoxon"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "anova", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "analysis of variance"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "kaplan_meier", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Kaplan-Meier"}}, {"id": "method-5", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "log_rank_test", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["logrank_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Log-rank"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_differs_from_extractor"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "data", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R4", "reachable": false, "accessions": [], "resolved_accessions": [], "statements": ["Data Sharing Statement: Available at https://jgo.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jgo-23-941/dss"], "basis": "The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "assets": ["source:pmid:38989439"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:None"]}, "gaps": ["data:accession_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T19:23:36Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 14828, "completion_tokens": 1321, "cached_tokens": 264}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:38989439", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:38989439"}, {"id": "source:pmid:38989439", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 38989439 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:38989439", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:38989439"}, {"id": "source:pmid:38989439", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 38989439 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-38989439", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:38989439"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-None", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:None"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:38989439", "parent_hash": "sha256:2b90037d5c23b7d61d5a4d272041f174b0d0537ea706d9b382994dfe46cdef78", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["execution.not_run", "method.reader_differs_from_extractor", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "ihc", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["elated genes, was further investigated using immunohistochemistry (IHC), Cell Counting Kit 8 (CCK-8), transwel", "her investigated using immunohistochemistry (IHC), Cell Counting Kit 8 (CCK-8), transwell, sc", "Methods Human GC samples and immunohistochemistry (IHC) For the IHC analysis, human samples we", "s Human GC samples and immunohistochemistry (IHC) For the IHC analysis, human samples were ob"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1229", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "apoptosis_assay", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["GC tissues. Overexpression of CSTA promoted apoptosis in GC cells through the caspase-dependent ap", "ed to prognosis, has been shown to influence apoptosis levels in GC cells.", "nohistochemistry (IHC), Cell Counting Kit 8 (CCK-8), transwell, scratch, colony formation assay", "A promoted apoptosis in GC cells through the caspase-dependent apoptotic pathway and enhanced the"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1278", "id": "assay:2"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "flow_cytometry", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.93, "evidence": ["transwell, scratch, colony formation assays, flow cytometry, and Western blotting methods. Results: Thro"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1331", "id": "assay:3"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "western_blot", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.93, "evidence": ["colony formation assays, flow cytometry, and Western blotting methods. Results: Through bioinformatics ana"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1351", "id": "assay:4"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "cell_culture", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["re obtained from the CRL-1740 Lncap. The AGS cell line was cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM),", "ified Eagle Medium (DMEM), while the SGC7901 cell line was cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 16", "om the CRL-1740 Lncap. The AGS cell line was cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), whi", "dium (DMEM), while the SGC7901 cell line was cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640,"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:3547", "id": "assay:5"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["To assess the prognostic value of the 23 overlapping genes, we then conducted a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox regression analysis to evaluate the association between each gene and survival status in TCGA cohort."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:6"}]}