Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:39428564

Integrative transcriptome analysis identifies a crotonylation gene signature for predicting prognosis and drug sensitivity in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Bailu Yang · Fukai Wen · Yifeng Cui

Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024 doi:10.1111/jcmm.70083

Paper

complete

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

absent

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:39428564
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:244a9025e4a2228c1f33ce08f43b407499a020e51fbeb5c13a0b7f81379c277f
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T20:29:40Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T20:29:40Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Integrative transcriptome analysis identifies a crotonylation gene signature for predicting prognosis and drug sensitivity in hepatocellular carcinoma.
doi
10.1111/jcmm.70083
pmid
39428564
authors array · 3 items
[0]
Bailu Yang
[1]
Fukai Wen
[2]
Yifeng Cui
journal
Journal of cellular and molecular medicine
year
2024
abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) stands as the most prevalent and treatment-resistant malignant tumour, characterized by a dismal prognosis. Croton acylation (CA) has recently gained attention as a critical factor in cancer pathogenesis. This study sought to rapidly identify prognostic features of HCC linked to CA. Differential analysis was conducted between tumour tissues and adjacent non-tumour tissues in the TCGA-LIHC and GSE76427 datasets to uncover differentially expressed genes (DEG1 and DEG2). The intersection of DEG1 and DEG2 highlighted DEGs with consistent expression patterns. Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis scores were calculated for 18 lysine crotonylation-related genes (LCRGs) identified in prior research, showing significant differences between tumour and normal groups. Subsequently, weighted gene co-expression network analysis was employed to identify key module genes correlated with the LCRG score. Candidate genes were identified by overlapping consistently expressed DEGs with key module genes. Prognostic features were identified, and risk scores were determined via regression analysis. Patients were categorized into risk groups based on the optimal cutoff value. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and immunoassays were also performed. The prognostic features were further validated using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). A total of 88 candidate genes were identified from 1179 consistently expressed DEGs and 4200 key module genes. Seven prognostic features were subsequently identified: TMCO3, RAP2A, ITGAV, ZFYVE26, CHST9, HMGN4, and KLHL21. GSEA revealed that DEGs between risk groups were primarily associated with chylomicron metabolism, among other pathways. Additionally, activated CD4+ T cells demonstrated the strongest positive correlation with risk scores, and most immune checkpoints showed significant differences between risk groups, with ASXL1 exhibiting the strongest correlation with risk scores. The Tumour Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion score was notably higher in the high-risk group. Moreover, in both the TCGA-LIHC and ICGC-LIRI-JP datasets, the expression of other prognostic features was elevated in tumour tissues, with the exception of CHST9. RT-qPCR confirmed the increased expression of TMCO3, RAP2A, ITGAV, ZFYVE26, and HMGN4. This study establishes a risk model for HCC based on seven crotonylation-associated prognostic features, offering a theoretical framework for the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.
claims array · 2 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
The data utilized in this study are accessible through the UCSC Xena (http://xena.ucsc.edu/), TCGA (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/, TCGA‐LIHC), GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/, GSE76427), and ICGC (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/, ICGC‐LIRI‐JP) databases.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:39428564
locator
sections[34] "DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT" paragraph 2
quote
The data utilized in this study are accessible through the UCSC Xena (http://xena.ucsc.edu/), TCGA (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/, TCGA‐LIHC), GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/, GSE76427), and ICGC (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/, ICGC‐LIRI‐JP) databases.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
Seven prognostic characteristics—TMCO3, RAP2A, ITGAV, ZFYVE26, CHST9, HMGN4, and KLHL21—were selected through 10-fold cross-validation to construct an HCC risk model.
kind
qualitative
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:39428564
locator
sections[19] "Construction of a risk model based on seven prognostic characteristics" paragraph 2
quote
Subsequently, seven prognostic markers—transmembrane and coiled‐coil domain 3 (TMCO3), RAP2A, integrin subunit alpha‐V (ITGAV), ZFYVE26, CHST9, HMGN4, and Kelch‐like protein 21 (KLHL21)—were selected through 10‐fold cross‐validation using the optimal model parameter λ = 0.01201314, and a risk model was developed (Figure 4B).
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
Seven prognostic characteristics—TMCO3, RAP2A, ITGAV, ZFYVE26, CHST9, HMGN4, and KLHL21—were selected through 10-fold cross-validation to construct an HCC risk model.
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:39428564
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
blocked
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 1 item
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:39428564
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.70083
sha256
sha256:280d4ecf68ef172fc232332ad9c642c55ca39c6629cf5e202dc2a33b2d47edab
bytes
67685
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.1111/jcmm.70083
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC11491312
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
gaps array · 0 items
analysis object · 4 fields
state
absent
methods array · 0 items
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
method
[1]
operations
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
blocked
tier
R4
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R4
expressible
false
required_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The reader quoted the method the paper names (not named), but the corpus's method extractor could not map it onto a DSL operation, so the method is published but not expressible.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R4
reachable
false
accessions array · 0 items
resolved_accessions array · 0 items
statements array · 1 item
[0]
The data utilized in this study are accessible through the UCSC Xena (http://xena.ucsc.edu/), TCGA (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/, TCGA‐LIHC), GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/, GSE76427), and ICGC (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/, ICGC‐LIRI‐JP) databases.
basis
The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
assets array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:39428564
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:accession_absent
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T19:35:48Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
null
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
17162
completion_tokens
2299
cached_tokens
128
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:39428564
type
paper
label
pmid:39428564
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:39428564
type
manuscript
label
PMID 39428564 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:39428564
type
paper
label
pmid:39428564
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:39428564
type
manuscript
label
PMID 39428564 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-39428564
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:39428564
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-None
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
gaps array · 7 items
[0]
execution.not_run
[1]
method
[2]
operations
[3]
review.human_critique
[4]
review.independent_reader
[5]
review.machine_critique
[6]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
assays array · 1 item
[0] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.99
evidence array · 4 items
[0]
tion-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). A total of 88 candidate genes were identif
[1]
tumour tissues, with the exception of CHST9. RT-qPCR confirmed the increased expression of TMCO3,
[2]
n-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). A total of 88 candidate genes were identif
[3]
our tissues, with the exception of CHST9. RT-qPCR confirmed the increased expression of TMCO3,
order_basis
paper_text_order:1503
id
assay:1
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:39428564", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 1, "content_hash": "sha256:244a9025e4a2228c1f33ce08f43b407499a020e51fbeb5c13a0b7f81379c277f", "created_at": "2026-11-01T20:29:40Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T20:29:40Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Integrative transcriptome analysis identifies a crotonylation gene signature for predicting prognosis and drug sensitivity in hepatocellular carcinoma.", "doi": "10.1111/jcmm.70083", "pmid": "39428564", "authors": ["Bailu Yang", "Fukai Wen", "Yifeng Cui"], "journal": "Journal of cellular and molecular medicine", "year": 2024, "abstract": "Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) stands as the most prevalent and treatment-resistant malignant tumour, characterized by a dismal prognosis. Croton acylation (CA) has recently gained attention as a critical factor in cancer pathogenesis. This study sought to rapidly identify prognostic features of HCC linked to CA. Differential analysis was conducted between tumour tissues and adjacent non-tumour tissues in the TCGA-LIHC and GSE76427 datasets to uncover differentially expressed genes (DEG1 and DEG2). The intersection of DEG1 and DEG2 highlighted DEGs with consistent expression patterns. Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis scores were calculated for 18 lysine crotonylation-related genes (LCRGs) identified in prior research, showing significant differences between tumour and normal groups. Subsequently, weighted gene co-expression network analysis was employed to identify key module genes correlated with the LCRG score. Candidate genes were identified by overlapping consistently expressed DEGs with key module genes. Prognostic features were identified, and risk scores were determined via regression analysis. Patients were categorized into risk groups based on the optimal cutoff value. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and immunoassays were also performed. The prognostic features were further validated using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). A total of 88 candidate genes were identified from 1179 consistently expressed DEGs and 4200 key module genes. Seven prognostic features were subsequently identified: TMCO3, RAP2A, ITGAV, ZFYVE26, CHST9, HMGN4, and KLHL21. GSEA revealed that DEGs between risk groups were primarily associated with chylomicron metabolism, among other pathways. Additionally, activated CD4+ T cells demonstrated the strongest positive correlation with risk scores, and most immune checkpoints showed significant differences between risk groups, with ASXL1 exhibiting the strongest correlation with risk scores. The Tumour Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion score was notably higher in the high-risk group. Moreover, in both the TCGA-LIHC and ICGC-LIRI-JP datasets, the expression of other prognostic features was elevated in tumour tissues, with the exception of CHST9. RT-qPCR confirmed the increased expression of TMCO3, RAP2A, ITGAV, ZFYVE26, and HMGN4. This study establishes a risk model for HCC based on seven crotonylation-associated prognostic features, offering a theoretical framework for the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The data utilized in this study are accessible through the UCSC Xena (http://xena.ucsc.edu/), TCGA (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/, TCGA‐LIHC), GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/, GSE76427), and ICGC (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/, ICGC‐LIRI‐JP) databases.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:39428564", "locator": "sections[34] \"DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The data utilized in this study are accessible through the UCSC Xena (http://xena.ucsc.edu/), TCGA (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/, TCGA‐LIHC), GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/, GSE76427), and ICGC (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/, ICGC‐LIRI‐JP) databases."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "Seven prognostic characteristics—TMCO3, RAP2A, ITGAV, ZFYVE26, CHST9, HMGN4, and KLHL21—were selected through 10-fold cross-validation to construct an HCC risk model.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:39428564", "locator": "sections[19] \"Construction of a risk model based on seven prognostic characteristics\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Subsequently, seven prognostic markers—transmembrane and coiled‐coil domain 3 (TMCO3), RAP2A, integrin subunit alpha‐V (ITGAV), ZFYVE26, CHST9, HMGN4, and Kelch‐like protein 21 (KLHL21)—were selected through 10‐fold cross‐validation using the optimal model parameter λ = 0.01201314, and a risk model was developed (Figure 4B)."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "Seven prognostic characteristics—TMCO3, RAP2A, ITGAV, ZFYVE26, CHST9, HMGN4, and KLHL21—were selected through 10-fold cross-validation to construct an HCC risk model.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:39428564"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:39428564", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.70083", "sha256": "sha256:280d4ecf68ef172fc232332ad9c642c55ca39c6629cf5e202dc2a33b2d47edab", "bytes": 67685, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1111/jcmm.70083", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC11491312", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}], "gaps": []}, "analysis": {"state": "absent", "methods": [], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method", "operations"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "data", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R4", "expressible": false, "required_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The reader quoted the method the paper names (not named), but the corpus's method extractor could not map it onto a DSL operation, so the method is published but not expressible."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R4", "reachable": false, "accessions": [], "resolved_accessions": [], "statements": ["The data utilized in this study are accessible through the UCSC Xena (http://xena.ucsc.edu/), TCGA (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/, TCGA‐LIHC), GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/, GSE76427), and ICGC (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/, ICGC‐LIRI‐JP) databases."], "basis": "The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:39428564"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:None"]}, "gaps": ["data:accession_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T19:35:48Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": null, "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 17162, "completion_tokens": 2299, "cached_tokens": 128}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:39428564", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:39428564"}, {"id": "source:pmid:39428564", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 39428564 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:39428564", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:39428564"}, {"id": "source:pmid:39428564", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 39428564 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-39428564", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:39428564"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-None", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:None"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": null, "parent_hash": null, "fork_of": null, "generation": 0}, "gaps": ["execution.not_run", "method", "operations", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "qpcr", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["tion-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). A total of 88 candidate genes were identif", "tumour tissues, with the exception of CHST9. RT-qPCR confirmed the increased expression of TMCO3,", "n-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). A total of 88 candidate genes were identif", "our tissues, with the exception of CHST9. RT-qPCR confirmed the increased expression of TMCO3,"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1503", "id": "assay:1"}]}