Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:39612439

Establishment and validation of diagnostic model in immunoglobulin A nephropathy based on weighted gene co-expression network analysis.

Haibo Liu · Lingling Dai · Jie Liu · Kai Duan · Feng Yi · Zhuo Li

Medicine · 2024 doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000039930

Paper

complete

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

partial

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:39612439
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:72c79957f286abddbb5a17a7aca301dec0a68d281510c605de0adc4d4211c95b
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T20:29:53Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:13:13Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Establishment and validation of diagnostic model in immunoglobulin A nephropathy based on weighted gene co-expression network analysis.
doi
10.1097/MD.0000000000039930
pmid
39612439
authors array · 6 items
[0]
Haibo Liu
[1]
Lingling Dai
[2]
Jie Liu
[3]
Kai Duan
[4]
Feng Yi
[5]
Zhuo Li
journal
Medicine
year
2024
abstract
Bioinformatics analysis helps to understand the underlying mechanisms and adjust diagnostic and treatment strategies for immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) by screening gene expression datasets. We explored the biological function of IgAN, and established and validated a diagnostic model for IgAN using weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Using the GSE93798 and GSE37460 datasets, we performed differential expression analysis, Gene Oncology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis, constructed a protein-protein network, and identified hub genes. A diagnostic model was built using a receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration plot, and decision curve analysis. Two Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets were integrated to screen 38 differentially expressed genes between patients with IgAN and normal kidney donors in glomerular samples. KEGG enrichment analysis showed that the differentially expressed genes were mainly enriched in the IL-17 and relaxin signaling pathways. We constructed a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of differentially expressed genes using the STRING database and cross-compared it with the results of weighted gene correlation network analysis to screen out the top 10 key genes: FOS, EGR2, FOSB, NR4A1, BR4A3, FOSL1, NR4A2, ALB, CD53, C3AR1.We also found that the immune infiltration level was remarkably increased in IgAN tissues. We established a 5-gene panel diagnostic model (ACTA2, ALB, AFM, ALDH1L1, and ALDH6A1). The combined diagnostic ability was high, with the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.964. Based on these 5 genes, we also developed a risk-scoring evaluation system for individuals. The calibration plot indicated that the nomogram-predicted probability of nonadherence was highly correlated with actual diagnosed nonadherence, and the decision curve analysis indicated that patients had a relatively good net benefit. The model and gene expression were also validated using an external dataset. Our study provides directions for exploring the potential molecular mechanisms of IgAN as well as diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
LASSO regression was performed to identify the model genes, and the optimal number of genes was 5.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:39612439
locator
sections[17] "3.5. Establishment and assessment of diagnostic model" paragraph 2
quote
LASSO regression was performed to identify the model genes, and the optimal number of genes was 5.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:39612439
locator
sections[24] "fn-group" paragraph 1
quote
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
The combined diagnostic ability was high with an AUC of 0.964 (Fig. 5H).
kind
quantitative
target object · 4 fields
value
0.964
unit
auc
tolerance
null
source
The combined diagnostic ability was high with an AUC of 0.964 (Fig. 5H).
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:39612439
locator
sections[17] "3.5. Establishment and assessment of diagnostic model" paragraph 2
quote
The combined diagnostic ability was high with an AUC of 0.964 (Fig. 5H).
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
The combined diagnostic ability was high with an AUC of 0.964 (Fig. 5H).
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:39612439
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
blocked
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 1 item
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:39612439
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000039930
sha256
sha256:52cd42a20e48037b4965beedd6285b541c0fe0e6f59498501ad6296159dae1cf
bytes
27968
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.1097/MD.0000000000039930
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC11608691
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body_without_references
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
gaps array · 0 items
analysis object · 4 fields
state
partial
methods array · 3 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
regression_modelling
specific
logistic
label
Regression modelling
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
glm_logit_fit
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
predictors_and_outcome
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
LASSO regression was performed to identify the model genes, and the optimal number of genes was 5.
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
network_analysis
specific
ppi_network
label
Network / pathway analysis
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
build_graph
[1]
centrality_scores
[2]
pathway_enrich
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
edge_list
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
protein-protein interaction
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
model_calibration
specific
decision_curve
label
Model calibration / clinical utility
dsl_operations array · 2 items
[0]
calibration_bins
[1]
net_benefit
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
predictions_and_outcomes
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
decision curve analysis
targets array · 1 item
[0] object · 8 fields
id
target-published-estimate
claim_id
claim-target-result
operation
build_graph
unit
auc
tolerance
null
state
complete
note
The published estimate as the reader quoted it from the paper. No tolerance is published because the paper states none.
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
method.reader_differs_from_extractor
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
blocked
tier
R4
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
glm_logit_fit
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: logistic.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R4
reachable
false
accessions array · 0 items
resolved_accessions array · 0 items
statements array · 1 item
[0]
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
basis
The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
glm_logit_fit
assets array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:39612439
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:accession_absent
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T19:40:07Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
8685
completion_tokens
1556
cached_tokens
256
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:39612439
type
paper
label
pmid:39612439
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:39612439
type
manuscript
label
PMID 39612439 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:39612439
type
paper
label
pmid:39612439
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:39612439
type
manuscript
label
PMID 39612439 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-39612439
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:39612439
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-None
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:39612439
parent_hash
sha256:4a9cadc40e266c1f282160232d0813b70ca376857166466556389208a6f7efb9
fork_of
null
gaps array · 6 items
[0]
execution.not_run
[1]
method.reader_differs_from_extractor
[2]
review.human_critique
[3]
review.independent_reader
[4]
review.machine_critique
[5]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
assays array · 1 item
[0] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
regression_modelling
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
glm_logit_fit
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
LASSO regression was performed to identify the model genes, and the optimal number of genes was 5.
order_basis
analysis_only
id
assay:1
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:39612439", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 3, "content_hash": "sha256:72c79957f286abddbb5a17a7aca301dec0a68d281510c605de0adc4d4211c95b", "created_at": "2026-11-01T20:29:53Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:13:13Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Establishment and validation of diagnostic model in immunoglobulin A nephropathy based on weighted gene co-expression network analysis.", "doi": "10.1097/MD.0000000000039930", "pmid": "39612439", "authors": ["Haibo Liu", "Lingling Dai", "Jie Liu", "Kai Duan", "Feng Yi", "Zhuo Li"], "journal": "Medicine", "year": 2024, "abstract": "Bioinformatics analysis helps to understand the underlying mechanisms and adjust diagnostic and treatment strategies for immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) by screening gene expression datasets. We explored the biological function of IgAN, and established and validated a diagnostic model for IgAN using weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Using the GSE93798 and GSE37460 datasets, we performed differential expression analysis, Gene Oncology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis, constructed a protein-protein network, and identified hub genes. A diagnostic model was built using a receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration plot, and decision curve analysis. Two Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets were integrated to screen 38 differentially expressed genes between patients with IgAN and normal kidney donors in glomerular samples. KEGG enrichment analysis showed that the differentially expressed genes were mainly enriched in the IL-17 and relaxin signaling pathways. We constructed a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of differentially expressed genes using the STRING database and cross-compared it with the results of weighted gene correlation network analysis to screen out the top 10 key genes: FOS, EGR2, FOSB, NR4A1, BR4A3, FOSL1, NR4A2, ALB, CD53, C3AR1.We also found that the immune infiltration level was remarkably increased in IgAN tissues. We established a 5-gene panel diagnostic model (ACTA2, ALB, AFM, ALDH1L1, and ALDH6A1). The combined diagnostic ability was high, with the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.964. Based on these 5 genes, we also developed a risk-scoring evaluation system for individuals. The calibration plot indicated that the nomogram-predicted probability of nonadherence was highly correlated with actual diagnosed nonadherence, and the decision curve analysis indicated that patients had a relatively good net benefit. The model and gene expression were also validated using an external dataset. Our study provides directions for exploring the potential molecular mechanisms of IgAN as well as diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "LASSO regression was performed to identify the model genes, and the optimal number of genes was 5.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:39612439", "locator": "sections[17] \"3.5. Establishment and assessment of diagnostic model\" paragraph 2", "quote": "LASSO regression was performed to identify the model genes, and the optimal number of genes was 5."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:39612439", "locator": "sections[24] \"fn-group\" paragraph 1", "quote": "The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "The combined diagnostic ability was high with an AUC of 0.964 (Fig. 5H).", "kind": "quantitative", "target": {"value": 0.964, "unit": "auc", "tolerance": null, "source": "The combined diagnostic ability was high with an AUC of 0.964 (Fig. 5H)."}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:39612439", "locator": "sections[17] \"3.5. Establishment and assessment of diagnostic model\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The combined diagnostic ability was high with an AUC of 0.964 (Fig. 5H)."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "The combined diagnostic ability was high with an AUC of 0.964 (Fig. 5H).", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:39612439"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:39612439", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000039930", "sha256": "sha256:52cd42a20e48037b4965beedd6285b541c0fe0e6f59498501ad6296159dae1cf", "bytes": 27968, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1097/MD.0000000000039930", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC11608691", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}], "gaps": []}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "regression_modelling", "specific": "logistic", "label": "Regression modelling", "dsl_operations": ["glm_logit_fit"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["predictors_and_outcome"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "LASSO regression was performed to identify the model genes, and the optimal number of genes was 5."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "ppi_network", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["build_graph", "centrality_scores", "pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "protein-protein interaction"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "model_calibration", "specific": "decision_curve", "label": "Model calibration / clinical utility", "dsl_operations": ["calibration_bins", "net_benefit"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["predictions_and_outcomes"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "decision curve analysis"}}], "targets": [{"id": "target-published-estimate", "claim_id": "claim-target-result", "operation": "build_graph", "expected_value": 0.964, "unit": "auc", "tolerance": null, "state": "complete", "note": "The published estimate as the reader quoted it from the paper. No tolerance is published because the paper states none."}], "gaps": ["method.reader_differs_from_extractor"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "data", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["glm_logit_fit"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: logistic."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R4", "reachable": false, "accessions": [], "resolved_accessions": [], "statements": ["The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request."], "basis": "The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["glm_logit_fit"], "assets": ["source:pmid:39612439"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:None"]}, "gaps": ["data:accession_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T19:40:07Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 8685, "completion_tokens": 1556, "cached_tokens": 256}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:39612439", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:39612439"}, {"id": "source:pmid:39612439", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 39612439 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:39612439", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:39612439"}, {"id": "source:pmid:39612439", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 39612439 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-39612439", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:39612439"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-None", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:None"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:39612439", "parent_hash": "sha256:4a9cadc40e266c1f282160232d0813b70ca376857166466556389208a6f7efb9", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["execution.not_run", "method.reader_differs_from_extractor", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"], "assays": [{"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "regression_modelling", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["glm_logit_fit"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["LASSO regression was performed to identify the model genes, and the optimal number of genes was 5."], "order_basis": "analysis_only", "id": "assay:1"}]}