Investigating combined hypoxia and stemness indices for prognostic transcripts in gastric cancer: Machine learning and network analysis approaches.

{"sci_version": "1.0", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:39807391", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 2, "content_hash": "sha256:2bfd5db43271310d8f6fb09d4945284f613817570ce613c7ce11599e228cbd03", "created_at": "2026-11-01T10:25:49Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T14:01:33Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "converter": "sep_to_sci_v1", "source_package_schema": "urn:bntrg:sep:1.0.0"}, "paper": {"state": "partial", "title": "Investigating combined hypoxia and stemness indices for prognostic transcripts in gastric cancer: Machine learning and network analysis approaches.", "doi": "10.1016/j.bbrep.2024.101897", "pmid": "39807391", "authors": null, "journal": "Biochemistry and biophysics reports", "year": 2025, "abstract": null, "claims": [{"id": "claim-1", "statement": "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding", "kind": "quantitative", "state": "complete", "target": {"value": 0.81, "unit": "auc", "tolerance": null, "source": "chars 1621-1812 of source sha256 6aae6bf32ac7a55498786cde4d089d5b45eea1090011d68c0f086c6bb6b00d96"}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:39807391", "locator": "chars 1621-1812 of source sha256 6aae6bf32ac7a55498786cde4d089d5b45eea1090011d68c0f086c6bb6b00d96", "quote": "The decision tree, based on genes such as AKAP6, GLRB, and RUNX1T1, achieved an AUC of 0.81 (training) and 0.67 (test), demonstrating the utility of combined scores in patient stratification."}]}], "gaps": ["abstract", "authors"]}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate and its interval from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The number a replication must land on, and the sentence it came from.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:39807391"], "outputs": ["the published estimate, its unit and its interval"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data behind the published result", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:not_downloaded", "description": "The published result cannot be recomputed without the data the paper analysed.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the analysis programme", "kind": "analysis", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "description": "Re-run the paper's analysis on the source data and produce the registered result. | SEP input not carried into the asset list: materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:39807391", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the registered result"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded", "step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:39807391' does not resolve to a declared asset"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:39807391", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrep.2024.101897", "sha256": "sha256:6aae6bf32ac7a55498786cde4d089d5b45eea1090011d68c0f086c6bb6b00d96", "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1016/j.bbrep.2024.101897", "version": null, "note": "Source read by the package builder: full_text.", "structure": {"access_state": "full_text"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:39807391:1", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:3ac721b6c953c07d0b6ebaf3accfcdd41b35d7646285fa80808a5e5c2f9c2e9d", "bytes": 325, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[16]/table-wrap[1]#tbl1", "version": null, "note": "Decision tree model performance metrices", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC11729012", "section_index": 16, "section_title": "Survival analysis of the shared genes and construction of a decision tree", "row_count": 2, "column_count": 6}, "table": {"label": "Table 1", "caption": "Decision tree model performance metrices", "rows": [["AUCa", "Precision", "Recall", "F1 score", "Youden's index", "Maximum classification accuracy"], ["0.68", "0.73", "0.76", "0.75", "0.26", "0.32"]], "row_count": 2, "column_count": 6, "numeric_cells": 6, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[16]/table-wrap[1]#tbl1"}}], "gaps": ["asset:source:pmid:39807391 not verified"]}, "analysis": {"state": "absent", "methods": [], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method", "targets"]}, "capability": {"state": "absent", "requirements": [], "gaps": ["capability"]}, "readiness": {"state": "partial", "tier": null, "blocking_axis": null, "blocked_on": null, "axes": {}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:39807391", "asset:table:pmid:39807391:1"], "steps": ["read_published_estimate"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": ["xml"], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["source:pmid:39807391"]}, "gaps": ["corpus_record_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"status": "blocked", "providers": [{"provider": "minimax", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "full-text-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "57729dcb87c3dd0ddcddb39f84fe9f1401ac40be9b27c31aa84509f158c8d408", "source_hash": "6aae6bf32ac7a55498786cde4d089d5b45eea1090011d68c0f086c6bb6b00d96", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:bd3d03cbf9bf2ad912def3a5947d776efc7c40df231a3670ff2322a49d28bc39", "raw_response_chars": 3658}, {"provider": "minimax_alt", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "full-text-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "c82a6903e524c2c75479f7a46de6fba2c4d03d90bf89cd0774787b71b910620a", "source_hash": "6aae6bf32ac7a55498786cde4d089d5b45eea1090011d68c0f086c6bb6b00d96", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:d649bd8623dfb8ab8ec03c6a8d31855687871a88ad65880b75dfe1afbe01c5e0", "raw_response_chars": 76721}], "target_providers": [{"provider": "minimax", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "9c1c1c5a61d7defc1fbd414d14b63150a20fb51e9cac24d655e359afa8e8ee7d", "source_hash": "6aae6bf32ac7a55498786cde4d089d5b45eea1090011d68c0f086c6bb6b00d96", "raw_response": "{\"parent_value\":0.81,\"unit\":\"AUC\",\"evidence\":\"The decision tree, based on genes such as AKAP6, GLRB, and RUNX1T1, achieved an AUC of 0.81 (training) and 0.67 (test), demonstrating the utility of combined scores in patient stratification.\",\"target_result\":\"The prognostic decision tree achieved an AUC of 0.81 in the training set.\",\"number_stated\":true}", "reading": {"parent_value": 0.81, "unit": "AUC", "evidence": "The decision tree, based on genes such as AKAP6, GLRB, and RUNX1T1, achieved an AUC of 0.81 (training) and 0.67 (test), demonstrating the utility of combined scores in patient stratification.", "target_result": "The prognostic decision tree achieved an AUC of 0.81 in the training set.", "number_stated": true, "source_locator": "chars 1621-1812 of source sha256 6aae6bf32ac7a55498786cde4d089d5b45eea1090011d68c0f086c6bb6b00d96"}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T15:21:03.165673+00:00"}, {"provider": "minimax_alt", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "392a09d339f0fc3e27e98f32e7bd11deffe48c6f140b88aa8631dd92bf7fcc9f", "source_hash": "6aae6bf32ac7a55498786cde4d089d5b45eea1090011d68c0f086c6bb6b00d96", "raw_response": "<think>We need answer JSON only per developer and user. Need determine single numerical headline result paper main finding registered target \"the headline numerical result the paper itself states for its main finding\". Source abstract results says decision tree achieved AUC 0.81 (training) and 0.67 (test). They request single numerical result. Need decide which one registered target means likely headline AUC perhaps 0.81? Need carefully parse. We must extract claims only source. Report headline number only value paper states registered target, not calculate etc. Unit paper prints. Evidence exact contiguous quote contains number, attribution whole clause if attached via list/respectively. Need likely parent_value 0.81, unit \"AUC\", evidence full sentence/clause \"The decision tree, based on genes such as AKAP6, GLRB, and RUNX1T1, achieved an AUC of 0.81 (training) and 0.67 (test), demonstrating the utility of combined scores in patient stratification.\" Target result perhaps \"The prognostic decision tree achieved an AUC of 0.81 in the training set.\" number_stated true. But is headline target one value or two? User asks \"single numerical result that a replication of the registered target has to reproduce. Report the headline number only\". There are two AUCs, but headline maybe training AUC 0.81 (main result) and test 0.67 external. They may expect 0.81 AUC. Need infer task convention. They stress \"single numerical result ... registered target: headline numerical result ... main finding\". In source abstract \"The decision tree ... achieved an AUC of 0.81 (training) and 0.67 (test)\" headline numerical result. Usually extraction target might be AUC of decision tree, multiple values complicate. Could be target result includes two? But required parent_value number only. Need choose 0.81 likely as headline (training performance) and 0.67 validation. Need no conversion. Unit \"AUC\" not percentage. Evidence exact contiguous quote whole clause includes both if attribution list. They explicitly \"When that is how the text links them, quote the whole clause so a reader can check the attribution for themselves.\" So evidence should full clause sentence \"The decision tree, based on genes such as AKAP6, GLRB, and RUNX1T1, achieved an AUC of 0.81 (training) and 0.67 (test), demonstrating the utility of combined scores in patient stratification.\" Could choose exact from results detailed \"The efficiency of the model was evaluated using the ROC curves, according to which the AUC of the training and the test sets were 0.81 and 0.67, respectively (Fig. 7b and c).\" Whole clause necessary to map. That is clear respectively. If parent 0.81, evidence quote entire sentence to link respectively. Unit AUC. Target_result concise \"AUC of 0.81 in the training set.\" They ask \"Report headline number only\" likely target_result shouldn't include other number. We can provide 0.81 only in target_result? Schema field target_result string. Could say \"The decision tree achieved a training-set AUC of 0.81.\" Good.\n\nNeed think if headline number maybe six clusters among 375? No main finding is prognostic decision tree AUC 0.81. Source has abstract results concluding AUC 0.81 training and 0.67 test. We choose 0.81. But possible task expects the single numerical result as e.g. \"AUC 0.81\". Need cite full sentence in abstract, no paraphrase in evidence. JSON valid unicode quotes not necessary.\n\nWe should not include analysis etc final just JSON. Need respect \"Report headline number only\" maybe target_result = \"AUC = 0.81 (training set).\" It says evidence exact contiguous. Full sentence works. Parent_value 0.81 unit \"AUC\". number_stated true. target_result \"The decision tree achieved an AUC of 0.81 in the training set.\" This contains number. They might mean target_result explains target only, number no extra. Fine.\n\nLet's consider alternative detailed sentence \"the AUC of the training and the test sets were 0.81 and 0.67, respectively (Fig. 7b and c).\" It explicitly maps. Better quote exactly whole clause (and maybe full sentence) because attribution respectively. \"The efficiency of the model was evaluated using the ROC curves, according to which the AUC of the training and the test sets were 0.81 and 0.67, respectively (Fig. 7b and c).\" Exact contiguous from source. That's sufficient, no paraphrase. It contains 0.81 and 0.67 but they require quote whole clause when linked. We cannot remove 0.67 because respectively ties both. They request headline number only but evidence needs include other number. Fine target_result mentions only 0.81. Using abstract sentence parentheses likewise. Which is stronger? Detailed sentence explicitly respective train/test. Full sentence quote. Unit AUC, no conversion. Good.\n\nNeed ensure \"single numerical result that a replication of the registered target has to reproduce\" maybe they want 0.67 since \"target\" from abstract final? Let's deeply consider wording maybe benchmark style. They give REGISTERED TARGET \"the headline numerical result the paper itself states for its main finding\". Many such tasks user asks source claims for \"parent study\" etc; they want value not calculated. Here ambiguous. We need choose what paper itself states headline. They highlight main finding. AUC 0.81 training and 0.67 test both in one headline. But singular suggests prioritize headline. Could interpret target as \"AUC of 0.81\" main finding and test 0.67 is validation. We should not overthink. Need perhaps evidence quote abstract sentence because headline numerical result located there. It explicitly says achieved AUC 0.81 (training) and 0.67 (test). Headline is 0.81. Detailed same.\n\nMaybe they expect \"0.81\" and \"AUC\" evidence exact full clause. Good.\n\nWe can finish.</think>\n\n{\"parent_value\":0.81,\"unit\":\"AUC\",\"evidence\":\"The efficiency of the model was evaluated using the ROC curves, according to which the AUC of the training and the test sets were 0.81 and 0.67, respectively (Fig. 7b and c).\",\"target_result\":\"The prognostic decision tree achieved a training-set AUC of 0.81.\",\"number_stated\":true}", "reading": {"parent_value": 0.81, "unit": "AUC", "evidence": "The efficiency of the model was evaluated using the ROC curves, according to which the AUC of the training and the test sets were 0.81 and 0.67, respectively (Fig. 7b and c).", "target_result": "The prognostic decision tree achieved a training-set AUC of 0.81.", "number_stated": true, "source_locator": "chars 9878-10052 of source sha256 6aae6bf32ac7a55498786cde4d089d5b45eea1090011d68c0f086c6bb6b00d96"}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T15:21:21.307707+00:00"}], "agreement": false, "disagreements": {"target_result": {"minimax": "The prognostic decision tree achieved an AUC of 0.81 in the training set and 0.67 in the test set.", "minimax_alt": "The decision tree, based on genes such as AKAP6, GLRB, and RUNX1T1, achieved an AUC of 0.81 (training) and 0.67 (test), demonstrating the utility of combined scores in patient stratification.", "decisive": false}, "analysis_methods": {"minimax": ["Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA)", "mRNA expression-based stemness index (mRNAsi)", "one-class logistic regression (OCLR)", "hierarchical clustering", "Kaplan-Meier survival analysis", "log-rank test", "edgeR differential expression analysis", "Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA)", "survival analysis of shared genes", "Recursive Partitioning", "receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis"], "minimax_alt": ["Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA)", "mRNA expression-based stemness index (mRNAsi) using Spearman's method", "Hierarchical clustering", "Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test", "edgeR differential-expression analysis", "Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA)", "GO and KEGG functional enrichment analysis", "Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis", "Recursive Partitioning", "ROC curve analysis with AUC"], "decisive": false}, "statistical_method": {"minimax": "Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis", "minimax_alt": "ROC curve analysis with area under the curve (AUC)", "decisive": true}}, "agreement_basis": {"policy": "decisive_fields", "decisive_fields": ["work_type", "number_stated", "parent_value", "unit"]}, "blinded": true}, "human_critique": {"status": "not_run", "reviewer": null, "signed_at": null, "conflict_checked": false, "commentary": null}, "stages": [{"key": "target_materials", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "independent_readings", "status": "blocked", "reason": "The independent readings are incomplete or disagree; the source evidence must resolve the difference.", "evidence": {"provider_errors": []}}, {"key": "source_resolution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "protocol_reconstruction", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_execution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_comparison", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "publication", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}], "gaps": ["review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.blocked"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "package:50ce53f9d7f6cc1087a874122c1409fb28200096a00669063f1dc8aa12d2394c", "type": "sep_package", "label": "SEP v1 package for pmid:39807391"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity:conversion:pmid:39807391", "type": "conversion", "used": ["package:50ce53f9d7f6cc1087a874122c1409fb28200096a00669063f1dc8aa12d2394c"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:minimax", "type": "model", "label": "minimax"}, {"id": "agent:minimax_alt", "type": "model", "label": "minimax_alt"}, {"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}], "source_run_id": "run-20261023T122449232913", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:39807391", "parent_hash": "sha256:002f93c168e886cbf71233872ebaf2d1597c2481fc357ce5420069956d820ea3", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["abstract", "asset:source:pmid:39807391 not verified", "authors", "capability", "corpus_record_absent", "execution.not_run", "method", "review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.blocked", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded", "step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:39807391' does not resolve to a declared asset", "targets"]}