Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:39830777

Development of an AI model for predicting hypoxia status and prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer using multi-modal data.

Lina Zhou · Chenkai Mao · Tingting Fu · Xiao Ding · Luca Bertolaccini · Ao Liu · Junjun Zhang · Shicheng Li

Translational lung cancer research · 2024 doi:10.21037/tlcr-24-982

Paper

complete

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

partial

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:39830777
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:4038d4b46f84f44f5c51163223b48a72dff87fa0ce8f58c84bac22d2df158dbb
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T20:30:07Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:13:32Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Development of an AI model for predicting hypoxia status and prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer using multi-modal data.
doi
10.21037/tlcr-24-982
pmid
39830777
authors array · 8 items
[0]
Lina Zhou
[1]
Chenkai Mao
[2]
Tingting Fu
[3]
Xiao Ding
[4]
Luca Bertolaccini
[5]
Ao Liu
[6]
Junjun Zhang
[7]
Shicheng Li
journal
Translational lung cancer research
year
2024
abstract
Background: Prognosis prediction is crucial for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment planning. While tumor hypoxia significantly impacts patient outcomes, identifying hypoxic genomic markers remains challenging. This study sought to identify hypoxic computed tomography (CT) radiomic features and create an artificial intelligence (AI) model for NSCLC through the integration of multi-modal data. Methods: In total, 452 NSCLC patients were enrolled in this study, including patients from The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (SC, n=112), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-NSCLC dataset (n=74), the radiogenomics dataset (n=130), and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets (GSE19188: n=82, and GSE87340: n=54). Hypoxia status was classified using optimized cut-off values of hypoxia enrichment scores, which were calculated through single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) of hypoxic genes. Radiomic features were extracted using three-dimensional (3D)-Slicer software. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm was used to identify hypoxic CT radiomic features. A model named ssuBERT (semantic structured unit embedded in Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) was developed to analyze electronic health records (EHRs). An AI model for overall survival prediction was constructed by integrating CT radiomic features, ssuBERT features, and clinical data, and evaluated using five-fold cross-validation. Results: Higher hypoxia levels were correlated with worse survival outcomes. Twenty-eight radiomic features showed significant discriminatory power in detecting hypoxia status with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8295. The ssuBERT model achieved a weighted accuracy of 0.945 in recognizing semantic structured units in EHRs. The EHR model exhibited superior predictive performance among the single-modal models with an AUC of 0.7662. However, the multi-modal AI model had the highest average AUC of 0.8449 and an F1 score of 0.7557. Conclusions: The AI model demonstrated potential in predicting NSCLC patient prognosis through multi-modal data integration, warranting further validation.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
The models underwent five-fold cross-validation to assess their performance, which was evaluated using ROC curves with AUC, accuracy, F1 score, precision-recall AUC, and recall.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:39830777
locator
sections[13] "Model structure" paragraph 2
quote
The models underwent five-fold cross-validation to assess their performance, which was evaluated using ROC curves with AUC, accuracy, F1 score, precision-recall AUC, and recall.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
Available at https://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tlcr-24-982/dss
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:39830777
locator
sections[27] "Data Sharing Statement" paragraph 2
quote
Available at https://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tlcr-24-982/dss
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
The multi-modal AI model had the highest average AUC of 0.8449 and an F1 score of 0.7557.
kind
quantitative
target object · 4 fields
value
0.8449
unit
auc
tolerance
null
source
However, the multi-modal AI model had the highest average AUC of 0.8449 and an F1 score of 0.7557.
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:39830777
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 3
quote
However, the multi-modal AI model had the highest average AUC of 0.8449 and an F1 score of 0.7557.
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
The multi-modal AI model had the highest average AUC of 0.8449 and an F1 score of 0.7557.
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:39830777
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
blocked
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 1 item
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:39830777
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-24-982
sha256
sha256:e70a57f017e2d090d37581d482b227db5a83ec336bd253c884c1959b4a790213
bytes
38510
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.21037/tlcr-24-982
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC11736583
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
gaps array · 0 items
analysis object · 4 fields
state
partial
methods array · 2 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
machine_learning
specific
support_vector_machine
label
Machine learning
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
train_classifier
[1]
cross_validate
[2]
roc_auc
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
labelled_feature_matrix
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
support vector machine
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
null
specific
null
label
Five-fold cross-validation
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 0 items
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
The models underwent five-fold cross-validation to assess their performance, which was evaluated using ROC curves with AUC, accuracy, F1 score, precision-recall AUC, and recall.
targets array · 1 item
[0] object · 8 fields
id
target-published-estimate
claim_id
claim-target-result
operation
cross_validate
unit
auc
tolerance
null
state
complete
note
The published estimate as the reader quoted it from the paper. No tolerance is published because the paper states none.
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
method.reader_named_unmapped
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
blocked
tier
R4
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 3 items
[0]
train_classifier
[1]
cross_validate
[2]
roc_auc
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: support_vector_machine.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R4
reachable
false
accessions array · 0 items
resolved_accessions array · 0 items
statements array · 1 item
[0]
Available at https://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tlcr-24-982/dss
basis
The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
train_classifier
[1]
cross_validate
[2]
roc_auc
assets array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:39830777
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:accession_absent
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T19:44:51Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
10860
completion_tokens
1501
cached_tokens
128
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:39830777
type
paper
label
pmid:39830777
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:39830777
type
manuscript
label
PMID 39830777 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:39830777
type
paper
label
pmid:39830777
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:39830777
type
manuscript
label
PMID 39830777 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-39830777
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:39830777
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-None
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:39830777
parent_hash
sha256:f8b802e9ff032dee0300ac617157db3bc17a87b83b2d1f16f9d801b32c0cb51f
fork_of
null
gaps array · 6 items
[0]
execution.not_run
[1]
method.reader_named_unmapped
[2]
review.human_critique
[3]
review.independent_reader
[4]
review.machine_critique
[5]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
assays array · 1 item
[0] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
machine_learning
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 3 items
[0]
train_classifier
[1]
cross_validate
[2]
roc_auc
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
support vector machine
order_basis
analysis_only
id
assay:1
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:39830777", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 3, "content_hash": "sha256:4038d4b46f84f44f5c51163223b48a72dff87fa0ce8f58c84bac22d2df158dbb", "created_at": "2026-11-01T20:30:07Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:13:32Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Development of an AI model for predicting hypoxia status and prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer using multi-modal data.", "doi": "10.21037/tlcr-24-982", "pmid": "39830777", "authors": ["Lina Zhou", "Chenkai Mao", "Tingting Fu", "Xiao Ding", "Luca Bertolaccini", "Ao Liu", "Junjun Zhang", "Shicheng Li"], "journal": "Translational lung cancer research", "year": 2024, "abstract": "Background: Prognosis prediction is crucial for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment planning. While tumor hypoxia significantly impacts patient outcomes, identifying hypoxic genomic markers remains challenging. This study sought to identify hypoxic computed tomography (CT) radiomic features and create an artificial intelligence (AI) model for NSCLC through the integration of multi-modal data.\nMethods: In total, 452 NSCLC patients were enrolled in this study, including patients from The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (SC, n=112), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-NSCLC dataset (n=74), the radiogenomics dataset (n=130), and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets (GSE19188: n=82, and GSE87340: n=54). Hypoxia status was classified using optimized cut-off values of hypoxia enrichment scores, which were calculated through single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) of hypoxic genes. Radiomic features were extracted using three-dimensional (3D)-Slicer software. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm was used to identify hypoxic CT radiomic features. A model named ssuBERT (semantic structured unit embedded in Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) was developed to analyze electronic health records (EHRs). An AI model for overall survival prediction was constructed by integrating CT radiomic features, ssuBERT features, and clinical data, and evaluated using five-fold cross-validation.\nResults: Higher hypoxia levels were correlated with worse survival outcomes. Twenty-eight radiomic features showed significant discriminatory power in detecting hypoxia status with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8295. The ssuBERT model achieved a weighted accuracy of 0.945 in recognizing semantic structured units in EHRs. The EHR model exhibited superior predictive performance among the single-modal models with an AUC of 0.7662. However, the multi-modal AI model had the highest average AUC of 0.8449 and an F1 score of 0.7557.\nConclusions: The AI model demonstrated potential in predicting NSCLC patient prognosis through multi-modal data integration, warranting further validation.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "The models underwent five-fold cross-validation to assess their performance, which was evaluated using ROC curves with AUC, accuracy, F1 score, precision-recall AUC, and recall.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:39830777", "locator": "sections[13] \"Model structure\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The models underwent five-fold cross-validation to assess their performance, which was evaluated using ROC curves with AUC, accuracy, F1 score, precision-recall AUC, and recall."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "Available at https://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tlcr-24-982/dss", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:39830777", "locator": "sections[27] \"Data Sharing Statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Available at https://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tlcr-24-982/dss"}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "The multi-modal AI model had the highest average AUC of 0.8449 and an F1 score of 0.7557.", "kind": "quantitative", "target": {"value": 0.8449, "unit": "auc", "tolerance": null, "source": "However, the multi-modal AI model had the highest average AUC of 0.8449 and an F1 score of 0.7557."}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:39830777", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "However, the multi-modal AI model had the highest average AUC of 0.8449 and an F1 score of 0.7557."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "The multi-modal AI model had the highest average AUC of 0.8449 and an F1 score of 0.7557.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:39830777"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:39830777", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-24-982", "sha256": "sha256:e70a57f017e2d090d37581d482b227db5a83ec336bd253c884c1959b4a790213", "bytes": 38510, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.21037/tlcr-24-982", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC11736583", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}], "gaps": []}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "machine_learning", "specific": "support_vector_machine", "label": "Machine learning", "dsl_operations": ["train_classifier", "cross_validate", "roc_auc"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["labelled_feature_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "support vector machine"}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": null, "specific": null, "label": "Five-fold cross-validation", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": null, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": [], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "The models underwent five-fold cross-validation to assess their performance, which was evaluated using ROC curves with AUC, accuracy, F1 score, precision-recall AUC, and recall."}}], "targets": [{"id": "target-published-estimate", "claim_id": "claim-target-result", "operation": "cross_validate", "expected_value": 0.8449, "unit": "auc", "tolerance": null, "state": "complete", "note": "The published estimate as the reader quoted it from the paper. No tolerance is published because the paper states none."}], "gaps": ["method.reader_named_unmapped"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "data", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["train_classifier", "cross_validate", "roc_auc"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: support_vector_machine."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R4", "reachable": false, "accessions": [], "resolved_accessions": [], "statements": ["Available at https://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tlcr-24-982/dss"], "basis": "The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["train_classifier", "cross_validate", "roc_auc"], "assets": ["source:pmid:39830777"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:None"]}, "gaps": ["data:accession_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T19:44:51Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 10860, "completion_tokens": 1501, "cached_tokens": 128}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:39830777", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:39830777"}, {"id": "source:pmid:39830777", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 39830777 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:39830777", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:39830777"}, {"id": "source:pmid:39830777", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 39830777 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-39830777", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:39830777"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-None", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:None"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:39830777", "parent_hash": "sha256:f8b802e9ff032dee0300ac617157db3bc17a87b83b2d1f16f9d801b32c0cb51f", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["execution.not_run", "method.reader_named_unmapped", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"], "assays": [{"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "machine_learning", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["train_classifier", "cross_validate", "roc_auc"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 0.8, "evidence": ["support vector machine"], "order_basis": "analysis_only", "id": "assay:1"}]}