Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:39876932

A Vessel Bifurcation Landmark Pair Dataset for Abdominal CT Deformable Image Registration (DIR) Validation.

Edward R Criscuolo · Yao Hao · Zhendong Zhang · Trevor McKeown · Deshan Yang

ArXiv · 2025

Paper

partial

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

partial

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:39876932
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:ca78ae6129c1eee7272c0bfbf90b7cfb6e4351dba0d88c16816925eb3b9454d4
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T20:30:09Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T21:34:44Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
partial
title
A Vessel Bifurcation Landmark Pair Dataset for Abdominal CT Deformable Image Registration (DIR) Validation.
doi
null
pmid
39876932
authors array · 5 items
[0]
Edward R Criscuolo
[1]
Yao Hao
[2]
Zhendong Zhang
[3]
Trevor McKeown
[4]
Deshan Yang
journal
ArXiv
year
2025
abstract
Purpose: Deformable image registration (DIR) is an enabling technology in many diagnostic and therapeutic tasks. Despite this, DIR algorithms have limited clinical use, largely due to a lack of benchmark datasets for quality assurance during development. DIRs of intra-patient abdominal CTs are among the most challenging registration scenarios due to significant organ deformations and inconsistent image content. To support future algorithm development, here we introduce our first-of-its-kind abdominal CT DIR benchmark dataset, comprising large numbers of highly accurate landmark pairs on matching blood vessel bifurcations. Acquisition and Validation Methods: Abdominal CT image pairs of 30 patients were acquired from several publicly available repositories as well as the authors' institution with IRB approval. The two CTs of each pair were originally acquired for the same patient but on different days. An image processing workflow was developed and applied to each CT image pair: 1) Abdominal organs were segmented with a deep learning model, and image intensity within organ masks was overwritten. 2) Matching image patches were manually identified between two CTs of each image pair. 3) Vessel bifurcation landmarks were labeled on one image of each image patch pair. 4) Image patches were deformably registered, and landmarks were projected onto the second image 5) Landmark pair locations were refined manually or with an automated process. This workflow resulted in 1895 total landmark pairs, or 63 per case on average. Estimates of the landmark pair accuracy using digital phantoms were 0.7mm +/- 1.2 mm. Data Format and Usage Notes: The data is published in Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14362785. Instructions for use can be found at https://github.com/deshanyang/Abdominal-DIR-QA. Potential Applications: This dataset is a first-of-its-kind for abdominal DIR validation. The number, accuracy, and distribution of landmark pairs will allow for robust validation of DIR algorithms with precision beyond what is currently available.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
Running a paired t-test on this data, we get a strongly significant p value of 1.7e-6.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:39876932
locator
sections[11] "Landmark Positions Refined Using Sphere Growing" paragraph 6
quote
Running a paired t-test on this data, we get a strongly significant p value of 1.7e-6.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
The data is published in Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14362785.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:39876932
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 3
quote
The data is published in Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14362785.
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
The workflow resulted in 1895 total landmark pairs, or 63 per case on average, with estimated landmark pair accuracy of 0.7mm +/− 1.2 mm.
kind
quantitative
target object · 4 fields
value
63
unit
odds ratio
tolerance
null
source
This workflow resulted in 1895 total landmark pairs, or 63 per case on average.
evidence array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:39876932
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 2
quote
This workflow resulted in 1895 total landmark pairs, or 63 per case on average.
[1] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:39876932
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 2
quote
Estimates of the landmark pair accuracy using digital phantoms were 0.7mm +/− 1.2 mm.
state
complete
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
doi
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
The workflow resulted in 1895 total landmark pairs, or 63 per case on average, with estimated landmark pair accuracy of 0.7mm +/− 1.2 mm.
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:39876932
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
blocked
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 1 item
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:39876932
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
null
sha256
sha256:1d0b0764adca3b0e1ebd2556561b80ecc69303af89709d4816661e633816feb1
bytes
45222
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
39876932
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC11774459
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
gaps array · 0 items
analysis object · 4 fields
state
partial
methods array · 1 item
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
null
specific
null
label
paired t-test
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 0 items
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
Running a paired t-test on this data, we get a strongly significant p value of 1.7e-6.
targets array · 1 item
[0] object · 8 fields
id
target-published-estimate
claim_id
claim-target-result
operation
null
unit
odds ratio
tolerance
null
state
complete
note
The published estimate as the reader quoted it from the paper. No tolerance is published because the paper states none.
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
method.reader_named_unmapped
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
blocked
tier
R4
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R4
expressible
false
required_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The reader quoted the method the paper names (paired t-test), but the corpus's method extractor could not map it onto a DSL operation, so the method is published but not expressible.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R4
reachable
false
accessions array · 0 items
resolved_accessions array · 0 items
statements array · 1 item
[0]
The data is published in Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14362785.
basis
The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
assets array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:39876932
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:accession_absent
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T19:45:20Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
12126
completion_tokens
995
cached_tokens
256
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:39876932
type
paper
label
pmid:39876932
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:39876932
type
manuscript
label
PMID 39876932 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:39876932
type
paper
label
pmid:39876932
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:39876932
type
manuscript
label
PMID 39876932 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-39876932
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:39876932
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-None
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:39876932
parent_hash
sha256:597b829b760ad8f2a7ef2cd20c1225e72dce1d284f1658f2c93c7f12719b1737
fork_of
null
gaps array · 7 items
[0]
doi
[1]
execution.not_run
[2]
method.reader_named_unmapped
[3]
review.human_critique
[4]
review.independent_reader
[5]
review.machine_critique
[6]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.0", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:39876932", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 2, "content_hash": "sha256:ca78ae6129c1eee7272c0bfbf90b7cfb6e4351dba0d88c16816925eb3b9454d4", "created_at": "2026-11-01T20:30:09Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T21:34:44Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "partial", "title": "A Vessel Bifurcation Landmark Pair Dataset for Abdominal CT Deformable Image Registration (DIR) Validation.", "doi": null, "pmid": "39876932", "authors": ["Edward R Criscuolo", "Yao Hao", "Zhendong Zhang", "Trevor McKeown", "Deshan Yang"], "journal": "ArXiv", "year": 2025, "abstract": "Purpose: Deformable image registration (DIR) is an enabling technology in many diagnostic and therapeutic tasks. Despite this, DIR algorithms have limited clinical use, largely due to a lack of benchmark datasets for quality assurance during development. DIRs of intra-patient abdominal CTs are among the most challenging registration scenarios due to significant organ deformations and inconsistent image content. To support future algorithm development, here we introduce our first-of-its-kind abdominal CT DIR benchmark dataset, comprising large numbers of highly accurate landmark pairs on matching blood vessel bifurcations.\nAcquisition and Validation Methods: Abdominal CT image pairs of 30 patients were acquired from several publicly available repositories as well as the authors' institution with IRB approval. The two CTs of each pair were originally acquired for the same patient but on different days. An image processing workflow was developed and applied to each CT image pair: 1) Abdominal organs were segmented with a deep learning model, and image intensity within organ masks was overwritten. 2) Matching image patches were manually identified between two CTs of each image pair. 3) Vessel bifurcation landmarks were labeled on one image of each image patch pair. 4) Image patches were deformably registered, and landmarks were projected onto the second image 5) Landmark pair locations were refined manually or with an automated process. This workflow resulted in 1895 total landmark pairs, or 63 per case on average. Estimates of the landmark pair accuracy using digital phantoms were 0.7mm +/- 1.2 mm.\nData Format and Usage Notes: The data is published in Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14362785. Instructions for use can be found at https://github.com/deshanyang/Abdominal-DIR-QA.\nPotential Applications: This dataset is a first-of-its-kind for abdominal DIR validation. The number, accuracy, and distribution of landmark pairs will allow for robust validation of DIR algorithms with precision beyond what is currently available.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "Running a paired t-test on this data, we get a strongly significant p value of 1.7e-6.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:39876932", "locator": "sections[11] \"Landmark Positions Refined Using Sphere Growing\" paragraph 6", "quote": "Running a paired t-test on this data, we get a strongly significant p value of 1.7e-6."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The data is published in Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14362785.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:39876932", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "The data is published in Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14362785."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "The workflow resulted in 1895 total landmark pairs, or 63 per case on average, with estimated landmark pair accuracy of 0.7mm +/− 1.2 mm.", "kind": "quantitative", "target": {"value": 63.0, "unit": "odds ratio", "tolerance": null, "source": "This workflow resulted in 1895 total landmark pairs, or 63 per case on average."}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:39876932", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 2", "quote": "This workflow resulted in 1895 total landmark pairs, or 63 per case on average."}, {"asset": "source:pmid:39876932", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Estimates of the landmark pair accuracy using digital phantoms were 0.7mm +/− 1.2 mm."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": ["doi"]}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "The workflow resulted in 1895 total landmark pairs, or 63 per case on average, with estimated landmark pair accuracy of 0.7mm +/− 1.2 mm.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:39876932"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:39876932", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:1d0b0764adca3b0e1ebd2556561b80ecc69303af89709d4816661e633816feb1", "bytes": 45222, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "39876932", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC11774459", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}], "gaps": []}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": null, "specific": null, "label": "paired t-test", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": null, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": [], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "Running a paired t-test on this data, we get a strongly significant p value of 1.7e-6."}}], "targets": [{"id": "target-published-estimate", "claim_id": "claim-target-result", "operation": null, "expected_value": 63.0, "unit": "odds ratio", "tolerance": null, "state": "complete", "note": "The published estimate as the reader quoted it from the paper. No tolerance is published because the paper states none."}], "gaps": ["method.reader_named_unmapped"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "data", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R4", "expressible": false, "required_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The reader quoted the method the paper names (paired t-test), but the corpus's method extractor could not map it onto a DSL operation, so the method is published but not expressible."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R4", "reachable": false, "accessions": [], "resolved_accessions": [], "statements": ["The data is published in Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14362785."], "basis": "The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:39876932"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:None"]}, "gaps": ["data:accession_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T19:45:20Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 12126, "completion_tokens": 995, "cached_tokens": 256}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:39876932", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:39876932"}, {"id": "source:pmid:39876932", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 39876932 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:39876932", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:39876932"}, {"id": "source:pmid:39876932", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 39876932 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-39876932", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:39876932"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-None", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:None"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:39876932", "parent_hash": "sha256:597b829b760ad8f2a7ef2cd20c1225e72dce1d284f1658f2c93c7f12719b1737", "fork_of": null, "generation": 1}, "gaps": ["doi", "execution.not_run", "method.reader_named_unmapped", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}