Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:39958209

MS4A15 gene expression as a prognostic marker for clinical outcomes in lung adenocarcinoma.

Translational lung cancer research · 2025 doi:10.21037/tlcr-24-623

Paper

partial

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

absent

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:39958209
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:c5e2dba34c412fddc9c6a2ece32cc6afbbd0cf0a0121979bc2efc32b2d3d9a5a
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T10:25:49Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T14:01:34Z
generator object · 3 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
converter
sep_to_sci_v1
source_package_schema
urn:bntrg:sep:1.0.0
paper object · 10 fields
state
partial
title
MS4A15 gene expression as a prognostic marker for clinical outcomes in lung adenocarcinoma.
doi
10.21037/tlcr-24-623
pmid
39958209
authors
null
journal
Translational lung cancer research
year
2025
abstract
null
claims array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-1
statement
the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding
kind
qualitative
state
blocked
target object · 4 fields
value
null
unit
null
tolerance
null
source
null
evidence array · 0 items
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
abstract
[1]
authors
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate and its interval from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The number a replication must land on, and the sentence it came from.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:39958209
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate, its unit and its interval
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data behind the published result
kind
data-preparation
state
blocked
blocked_on
data:not_downloaded
description
The published result cannot be recomputed without the data the paper analysed.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the analysis programme
kind
analysis
state
blocked
blocked_on
no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment
description
Re-run the paper's analysis on the source data and produce the registered result. | SEP input not carried into the asset list: materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:39958209
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the registered result
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded
[1]
step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment
[2]
step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:39958209' does not resolve to a declared asset
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 3 items
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:39958209
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-24-623
sha256
sha256:284b4434737b226836152a23f657b8837623bae555a18bfcdce7be06e7522af4
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.21037/tlcr-24-623
version
null
note
Source read by the package builder: full_text.
structure object · 1 field
access_state
full_text
[1] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:39958209:1
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:ff5a1fb184ba343a61e2a0651d4daead9af8022e68485f449e58e74010a1e371
bytes
1528
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[17]/table-wrap[1]#t1
version
null
note
Association between MS4A15 expression and the clinicopathologic features of LUAD patients
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC11826265
section_index
17
section_title
Association between MS4A15 expression and clinical features
row_count
34
column_count
4
table object · 8 fields
label
Table 1
caption
Association between MS4A15 expression and the clinicopathologic features of LUAD patients
rows array · 34 items
[0] array · 4 items
[0]
Characteristic
[1]
Low expression of MS4A15 (n=267)
[2]
High expression of MS4A15 (n=268)
[3]
P
[1] array · 4 items
[0]
Gender, n (%)
[1]
[2]
[3]
0.002
[2] array · 4 items
[0]
Female
[1]
124 (23.2)
[2]
162 (30.3)
[3]
[3] array · 4 items
[0]
Male
[1]
143 (26.7)
[2]
106 (19.8)
[3]
[4] array · 4 items
[0]
Age, n (%)
[1]
[2]
[3]
0.02
[5] array · 4 items
[0]
≤65 years
[1]
142 (27.5)
[2]
113 (21.9)
[3]
[6] array · 4 items
[0]
>65 years
[1]
118 (22.9)
[2]
143 (27.7)
[3]
[7] array · 4 items
[0]
Age, years, median [IQR]
[1]
64 [58.75, 72]
[2]
67 [59, 73]
[3]
0.06
[8] array · 4 items
[0]
Smoker, n (%)
[1]
[2]
[3]
0.008
[9] array · 4 items
[0]
No
[1]
26 (5.0)
[2]
49 (9.4)
[3]
[10] array · 4 items
[0]
Yes
[1]
232 (44.5)
[2]
214 (41.1)
[3]
[11] array · 4 items
[0]
T stage, n (%)
[1]
[2]
[3]
0.005
[12] array · 4 items
[0]
T1
[1]
68 (12.8)
[2]
107 (20.1)
[3]
[13] array · 4 items
[0]
T2
[1]
160 (30.1)
[2]
129 (24.2)
[3]
[14] array · 4 items
[0]
T3
[1]
26 (4.9)
[2]
23 (4.3)
[3]
[15] array · 4 items
[0]
T4
[1]
11 (2.1)
[2]
8 (1.5)
[3]
[16] array · 4 items
[0]
N stage, n (%)
[1]
[2]
[3]
0.09
[17] array · 4 items
[0]
N0
[1]
166 (32.0)
[2]
182 (35.1)
[3]
[18] array · 4 items
[0]
N1
[1]
48 (9.2)
[2]
47 (9.1)
[3]
[19] array · 4 items
[0]
N2
[1]
45 (8.7)
[2]
29 (5.6)
[3]
[20] array · 4 items
[0]
N3
[1]
2 (0.4)
[2]
0
[3]
[21] array · 4 items
[0]
M stage, n (%)
[1]
[2]
[3]
0.61
[22] array · 4 items
[0]
M0
[1]
190 (49.2)
[2]
171 (44.3)
[3]
[23] array · 4 items
[0]
M1
[1]
15 (3.9)
[2]
10 (2.6)
[3]
[24] array · 4 items
[0]
Pathologic stage, n (%)
[1]
[2]
[3]
0.04
[25] array · 4 items
[0]
Stage I
[1]
137 (26.0)
[2]
157 (29.8)
[3]
[26] array · 4 items
[0]
Stage II
[1]
58 (11.0)
[2]
65 (12.3)
[3]
[27] array · 4 items
[0]
Stage III
[1]
52 (9.9)
[2]
32 (6.1)
[3]
[28] array · 4 items
[0]
Stage IV
[1]
16 (3.0)
[2]
10 (1.9)
[3]
[29] array · 4 items
[0]
Primary therapy outcome, n (%)
[1]
[2]
[3]
0.005
[30] array · 4 items
[0]
PD
[1]
47 (10.5)
[2]
24 (5.4)
[3]
[31] array · 4 items
[0]
SD
[1]
15 (3.4)
[2]
22 (4.9)
[3]
[32] array · 4 items
[0]
PR
[1]
1 (0.2)
[2]
5 (1.1)
[3]
[33] array · 4 items
[0]
CR
[1]
156 (35.0)
[2]
176 (39.5)
[3]
locator
section[17]/table-wrap[1]#t1
[2] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:39958209:2
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:a5512366bab8b2da672e75f9d9a4c5f12b7be4e165d1d2850d06a80a399ecd24
bytes
989
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[17]/table-wrap[2]#t2
version
null
note
The relationship between the clinicopathological factors of LUAD patients and MS4A15 expression using a logistic analysis
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC11826265
section_index
17
section_title
Association between MS4A15 expression and clinical features
row_count
10
column_count
4
table object · 8 fields
label
Table 2
caption
The relationship between the clinicopathological factors of LUAD patients and MS4A15 expression using a logistic analysis
rows array · 10 items
[0] array · 4 items
[0]
Characteristics
[1]
Total (N)
[2]
Odds ratio (95% CI)
[3]
P value
[1] array · 4 items
[0]
Gender (male vs. female)
[1]
535
[2]
0.567 (0.402–0.799)
[3]
0.001
[2] array · 4 items
[0]
Age (>65 vs. ≤65 years)
[1]
516
[2]
1.523 (1.077–2.158)
[3]
0.02
[3] array · 4 items
[0]
Smoker (no vs. yes)
[1]
521
[2]
2.043 (1.236–3.446)
[3]
0.006
[4] array · 4 items
[0]
Race (Black or African American vs. White)
[1]
461
[2]
0.809 (0.457–1.422)
[3]
0.46
[5] array · 4 items
[0]
Pathologic stage (stage III–IV vs. stage I–II)
[1]
527
[2]
0.543 (0.351–0.831)
[3]
0.005
[6] array · 4 items
[0]
T stage (T3–4 vs. T1–2)
[1]
532
[2]
0.809 (0.483–1.347)
[3]
0.42
[7] array · 4 items
[0]
N stage (N2–3 vs. N0–1)
[1]
519
[2]
0.577 (0.347–0.944)
[3]
0.03
[8] array · 4 items
[0]
M stage (M1 vs. M0)
[1]
386
[2]
0.741 (0.314–1.675)
[3]
0.48
[9] array · 4 items
[0]
Primary therapy outcome (PD vs. PR & CR)
[1]
409
[2]
0.443 (0.256–0.750)
[3]
0.003
locator
section[17]/table-wrap[2]#t2
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
asset:source:pmid:39958209 not verified
analysis object · 4 fields
state
absent
methods array · 0 items
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
method
[1]
targets
capability object · 3 fields
state
absent
requirements array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
capability
readiness object · 8 fields
state
partial
tier
null
blocked_on
null
axes object · 0 fields
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
assets array · 3 items
[0]
source:pmid:39958209
[1]
asset:table:pmid:39958209:1
[2]
asset:table:pmid:39958209:2
steps array · 1 item
[0]
read_published_estimate
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 1 item
[0]
xml
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:39958209
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
corpus_record_absent
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 7 fields
status
blocked
providers array · 2 items
[0] object · 7 fields
provider
minimax
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
prompt_version
full-text-reading-v1
prompt_hash
67ea4a752f7c9717331266efa921cda58e0e1366ffa0043b71dcec2deb0d0719
source_hash
284b4434737b226836152a23f657b8837623bae555a18bfcdce7be06e7522af4
raw_response_sha256
sha256:0be345ef36b38e5479d83ef1e6ea3aa1d7f0adb76cb246f7b1a067c1656e61b9
raw_response_chars
4270
[1] object · 7 fields
provider
minimax_alt
model
MiniMax-M3
prompt_version
full-text-reading-v1
prompt_hash
d9683f4534b8befcc6528ccd67263e9b674b0a13a0119247980007722da20930
source_hash
284b4434737b226836152a23f657b8837623bae555a18bfcdce7be06e7522af4
raw_response_sha256
sha256:83a55e337805b337bab98b783bd13a11ff18cd7132becb25e3240484e3dfe06d
raw_response_chars
57368
target_providers array · 2 items
[0] object · 8 fields
provider
minimax
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
prompt_version
replication-target-v2
prompt_hash
4ed35c5c76744787538a0486af5019f82f16054c8fe8ef08b8836a58fa0cba9a
source_hash
284b4434737b226836152a23f657b8837623bae555a18bfcdce7be06e7522af4
raw_response
{"parent_value":0.863,"unit":"area under the curve","evidence":"The area under the curve of the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863.","target_result":"The area under the curve of the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863.","number_stated":true}
reading object · 6 fields
parent_value
0.863
unit
area under the curve
evidence
The area under the curve of the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863.
target_result
The area under the curve of the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863.
number_stated
true
source_locator
chars 2539-2616 of source sha256 284b4434737b226836152a23f657b8837623bae555a18bfcdce7be06e7522af4
recorded_at
2026-10-31T15:24:39.083384+00:00
[1] object · 8 fields
provider
minimax_alt
model
MiniMax-M3
prompt_version
replication-target-v2
prompt_hash
08ac05d2e0337129330180d03f7124616e3fce1c333bf117936931b8c7b3f01c
source_hash
284b4434737b226836152a23f657b8837623bae555a18bfcdce7be06e7522af4
raw_response
<think>We need answer JSON only. Need identify single numerical result replication registered target headline numerical result paper states for main finding. Need exact contiguous quote with number, unit printed. Candidates AUC 0.863, perhaps main finding prognostic marker no numeric hazard ratio. Headline numerical result likely 0.863, area under curve. Need unit as paper prints. "The area under the curve of the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863." Unit perhaps "area under the curve" dimensionless. Required unit string. They say unit must be unit paper prints. It prints "The area under the curve ... was 0.863." Could unit be empty? But number stated true likely unit perhaps "area under the curve" or "AUC"? Need infer desired extraction style. Target is generic: headline numerical result paper states for main finding. Source abstract's only headline numerical result is AUC 0.863. Evidence exact contiguous quote. parent_value 0.863. Unit could be "area under the curve" perhaps the measured metric, though no physical unit. Maybe "AUC" is common unit? Paper doesn't literally use abbreviation AUC in quoted sentence, though earlier "receiver operating characteristic (ROC)". It says "The area under the curve of the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863." The unit perhaps "area under the curve" (dimensionless). target_result can say "The area under the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863." They demand headline number only perhaps means JSON fields, but target_result likely concise textual result. Need exact quotation evidence whole clause. Could quote sentence exactly. Ensure no paraphrase. Unit must be paper prints. "area under the curve of the ROC curve" maybe awkward. We can set unit "area under the curve of the ROC curve" but unit is not really unit. Maybe unit string "AUC" despite source doesn't print acronym. User says unit must be unit paper prints, likely numerical results tasks expect units like years, months, etc. For AUC, dimensionless and no unit. But schema demands string; can use "". Yet instruction only says if no number, leave unit and evidence empty. Thus if number stated likely expect unit nonempty? Not necessarily schema only. They say "unit must be the unit the paper prints." If dimensionless metric, perhaps unit "area under the curve" as paper wording. Need determine likely benchmark expects unit "AUC" perhaps extraction convention. Let's parse task framing. "Read supplied paper text and find the single numerical result that a replication of the registered target has to reproduce. Report the headline number only: the value the paper itself states for the registered target, not a value you calculated, converted, averaged or reconstructed. The unit must be the unit the paper prints. The evidence must be an exact, contiguous quotation from SOURCE TEXT that contains the number; do not shorten it, do not add an ellipsis and do not paraphrase it. Attribution may be carried by the text's own wording: a number may be attached to the target by a parenthetical list, by the word 'respectively', or by words that name the target directly. When that is how the text links them, quote the whole clause so a reader can check the attribution for themselves. If the text states no number for the registered target, set number_stated to false, leave parent_value at 0, leave unit and evidence empty, and say in target_result what the text does state instead." This seems general extraction benchmark where target registered perhaps verbal, source may or may not numeric. Here target: headline numerical result paper states for its main finding. Need pick single number. The main numerical finding could 0.863 AUC. Other numbers: 1605 DEGs, 82 pathways, 24 immune cell types, cutoff 50%, thresholds, versions, datasets. Clearly headline result in abstract = AUC 0.863. Unit? The paper prints metric "area under the curve of the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness". Could represent unit as "area under the curve of the ROC curve". But "unit" likely "AUC" because that's the measure. Yet paper prints ROC and area under curve, though not acronym AUC. They insist unit must be unit paper prints perhaps don't transform 0.863 to 86.3%. So "area under the curve of the ROC curve" or perhaps empty string. We need provide exact unit as source's printed wording maybe "area under the curve". Let's think expected schema likely evaluated by LLM or exact fields? parent_value 0.863. unit probably "area under the curve of the ROC curve" or "AUC". Evidence exact sentence. target_result perhaps "Area under the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness: 0.863." Could they expect no unit since AUC is dimensionless? They ask unit must be unit paper prints. There is no conventional physical unit. In similar tasks, for AUC likely unit "AUC" accepted. Need ensure no invented source. "AUC" acronym does not appear in source at all? Search source: receiver operating characteristic (ROC), area under curve. No "AUC". So if unit must be as paper prints, avoid AUC. Could set unit "area under the curve of the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness" exactly as printed. But that's metric descriptor, not unit. Perhaps unit could be "" because dimensionless. Yet they specifically require unit field and only tell empty if no number stated, implying for stated number unit should be populated. So likely they consider measurement unit to be "area under the curve". Could put "area under the curve of the ROC curve". Better exact printed phrase. Need "headline number only" perhaps target_result should just "0.863" and unit separate. But they ask target_result when no number say what text states instead. For stated case, likely target_result textual description. Maybe "0.863 (area under the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness)." Yet evidence does attribution. We can make target_result "Area under the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863." This repeats. Exact quote: "The area under the curve of the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863." Yes. JSON valid. Unit string maybe "area under the curve of the ROC curve". Is capitalization relevant? Unit perhaps "area under the curve of the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness" exact. Let's formulate. Could there be concern headline main finding is expression differential but no numeric result, whereas AUC is a secondary metric and not headline? The registered target phrasing explicitly asks "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding", perhaps the source's abstract has one numerical result. likely 0.863. Maybe the headline result in paper title/main claim is MS4A15 downregulated, and no exact number stated for expression change. But instruction asks single numerical result replication target has to reproduce. They might expect AUC because only reported headline metric. The text says "The area under the curve ... 0.863." likely selected target. Yes. Unit: AUC dimensionless. Could label "area under the curve (AUC)" but AUC not printed, though expansion printed. They say "unit must be the unit the paper prints", likely okay to use phrase exactly. Let's use "area under the curve of the ROC curve" exact contiguous phrase. target_result perhaps "The ROC area under the curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863." No need exact quote there. Need output only JSON.</think> {"parent_value":0.863,"unit":"area under the curve of the ROC curve","evidence":"The area under the curve of the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863.","target_result":"The area under the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863.","number_stated":true}
reading object · 6 fields
parent_value
0.863
unit
area under the curve of the ROC curve
evidence
The area under the curve of the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863.
target_result
The area under the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863.
number_stated
true
source_locator
chars 2539-2616 of source sha256 284b4434737b226836152a23f657b8837623bae555a18bfcdce7be06e7522af4
recorded_at
2026-10-31T15:24:58.167781+00:00
agreement
false
disagreements object · 3 fields
physical_methods object · 3 fields
minimax array · 1 item
[0]
Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed to validate the messenger RNA transcription level in vitro.
minimax_alt array · 2 items
[0]
Cell culture of A549 and NHBE cells
[1]
Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
decisive
false
analysis_methods object · 3 fields
minimax array · 9 items
[0]
Differential Expression analysis of Sequencing data version 2 (DESeq2)
[1]
ClusteProfiler package for Gene Ontology, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, and gene set enrichment analyses
[2]
Gene set variation analysis (GSVA)
[3]
Wilcoxon rank-sum test
[4]
Logistic regression analysis
[5]
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis
[6]
Kaplan-Meier analysis
[7]
Spearman correlation analysis
[8]
Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
minimax_alt array · 9 items
[0]
Differential Expression analysis of Sequencing data version 2 (DESeq2)
[1]
Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes enrichment analyses using ClusteProfiler
[2]
Gene set enrichment analysis using ClusteProfiler
[3]
Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) using single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA)
[4]
Spearman correlation
[5]
Wilcoxon rank-sum test
[6]
Logistic regression
[7]
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis
[8]
Kaplan-Meier analysis
decisive
false
unit object · 3 fields
minimax
area under the curve
minimax_alt
area under the curve of the ROC curve
decisive
true
agreement_basis object · 2 fields
policy
decisive_fields
decisive_fields array · 4 items
[0]
work_type
[1]
number_stated
[2]
parent_value
[3]
unit
blinded
true
human_critique object · 5 fields
status
not_run
reviewer
null
signed_at
null
conflict_checked
false
commentary
null
stages array · 7 items
[0] object · 4 fields
key
target_materials
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[1] object · 4 fields
key
independent_readings
status
blocked
reason
The independent readings are incomplete or disagree; the source evidence must resolve the difference.
evidence object · 1 field
provider_errors array · 0 items
[2] object · 4 fields
key
source_resolution
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[3] object · 4 fields
key
protocol_reconstruction
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[4] object · 4 fields
key
control_execution
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[5] object · 4 fields
key
control_comparison
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[6] object · 4 fields
key
publication
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
review.human_critique
[1]
review.machine_critique.blocked
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
id
package:05ef46f68ee8df57e10912dbf40911ef8eb04cb9425a81e199ee07a623b12a90
type
sep_package
label
SEP v1 package for pmid:39958209
activities array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity:conversion:pmid:39958209
type
conversion
used array · 1 item
[0]
package:05ef46f68ee8df57e10912dbf40911ef8eb04cb9425a81e199ee07a623b12a90
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax
type
model
label
minimax
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax_alt
type
model
label
minimax_alt
[2] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
source_run_id
run-20261023T122449232913
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:39958209
parent_hash
sha256:23c78823e4ee50b535e567d0d851af1fb95e708768a60bf0fc1ab3c281e4a492
fork_of
null
gaps array · 13 items
[0]
abstract
[1]
asset:source:pmid:39958209 not verified
[2]
authors
[3]
capability
[4]
corpus_record_absent
[5]
execution.not_run
[6]
method
[7]
review.human_critique
[8]
review.machine_critique.blocked
[9]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded
[10]
step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment
[11]
step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:39958209' does not resolve to a declared asset
[12]
targets
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.0", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:39958209", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 2, "content_hash": "sha256:c5e2dba34c412fddc9c6a2ece32cc6afbbd0cf0a0121979bc2efc32b2d3d9a5a", "created_at": "2026-11-01T10:25:49Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T14:01:34Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "converter": "sep_to_sci_v1", "source_package_schema": "urn:bntrg:sep:1.0.0"}, "paper": {"state": "partial", "title": "MS4A15 gene expression as a prognostic marker for clinical outcomes in lung adenocarcinoma.", "doi": "10.21037/tlcr-24-623", "pmid": "39958209", "authors": null, "journal": "Translational lung cancer research", "year": 2025, "abstract": null, "claims": [{"id": "claim-1", "statement": "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding", "kind": "qualitative", "state": "blocked", "target": {"value": null, "unit": null, "tolerance": null, "source": null}, "evidence": []}], "gaps": ["abstract", "authors"]}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate and its interval from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The number a replication must land on, and the sentence it came from.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:39958209"], "outputs": ["the published estimate, its unit and its interval"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data behind the published result", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:not_downloaded", "description": "The published result cannot be recomputed without the data the paper analysed.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the analysis programme", "kind": "analysis", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "description": "Re-run the paper's analysis on the source data and produce the registered result. | SEP input not carried into the asset list: materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:39958209", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the registered result"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded", "step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:39958209' does not resolve to a declared asset"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:39958209", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-24-623", "sha256": "sha256:284b4434737b226836152a23f657b8837623bae555a18bfcdce7be06e7522af4", "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.21037/tlcr-24-623", "version": null, "note": "Source read by the package builder: full_text.", "structure": {"access_state": "full_text"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:39958209:1", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:ff5a1fb184ba343a61e2a0651d4daead9af8022e68485f449e58e74010a1e371", "bytes": 1528, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[17]/table-wrap[1]#t1", "version": null, "note": "Association between MS4A15 expression and the clinicopathologic features of LUAD patients", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC11826265", "section_index": 17, "section_title": "Association between MS4A15 expression and clinical features", "row_count": 34, "column_count": 4}, "table": {"label": "Table 1", "caption": "Association between MS4A15 expression and the clinicopathologic features of LUAD patients", "rows": [["Characteristic", "Low expression of MS4A15 (n=267)", "High expression of MS4A15 (n=268)", "P"], ["Gender, n (%)", "", "", "0.002"], ["Female", "124 (23.2)", "162 (30.3)", ""], ["Male", "143 (26.7)", "106 (19.8)", ""], ["Age, n (%)", "", "", "0.02"], ["≤65 years", "142 (27.5)", "113 (21.9)", ""], [">65 years", "118 (22.9)", "143 (27.7)", ""], ["Age, years, median [IQR]", "64 [58.75, 72]", "67 [59, 73]", "0.06"], ["Smoker, n (%)", "", "", "0.008"], ["No", "26 (5.0)", "49 (9.4)", ""], ["Yes", "232 (44.5)", "214 (41.1)", ""], ["T stage, n (%)", "", "", "0.005"], ["T1", "68 (12.8)", "107 (20.1)", ""], ["T2", "160 (30.1)", "129 (24.2)", ""], ["T3", "26 (4.9)", "23 (4.3)", ""], ["T4", "11 (2.1)", "8 (1.5)", ""], ["N stage, n (%)", "", "", "0.09"], ["N0", "166 (32.0)", "182 (35.1)", ""], ["N1", "48 (9.2)", "47 (9.1)", ""], ["N2", "45 (8.7)", "29 (5.6)", ""], ["N3", "2 (0.4)", "0", ""], ["M stage, n (%)", "", "", "0.61"], ["M0", "190 (49.2)", "171 (44.3)", ""], ["M1", "15 (3.9)", "10 (2.6)", ""], ["Pathologic stage, n (%)", "", "", "0.04"], ["Stage I", "137 (26.0)", "157 (29.8)", ""], ["Stage II", "58 (11.0)", "65 (12.3)", ""], ["Stage III", "52 (9.9)", "32 (6.1)", ""], ["Stage IV", "16 (3.0)", "10 (1.9)", ""], ["Primary therapy outcome, n (%)", "", "", "0.005"], ["PD", "47 (10.5)", "24 (5.4)", ""], ["SD", "15 (3.4)", "22 (4.9)", ""], ["PR", "1 (0.2)", "5 (1.1)", ""], ["CR", "156 (35.0)", "176 (39.5)", ""]], "row_count": 34, "column_count": 4, "numeric_cells": 63, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[17]/table-wrap[1]#t1"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:39958209:2", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:a5512366bab8b2da672e75f9d9a4c5f12b7be4e165d1d2850d06a80a399ecd24", "bytes": 989, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[17]/table-wrap[2]#t2", "version": null, "note": "The relationship between the clinicopathological factors of LUAD patients and MS4A15 expression using a logistic analysis", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC11826265", "section_index": 17, "section_title": "Association between MS4A15 expression and clinical features", "row_count": 10, "column_count": 4}, "table": {"label": "Table 2", "caption": "The relationship between the clinicopathological factors of LUAD patients and MS4A15 expression using a logistic analysis", "rows": [["Characteristics", "Total (N)", "Odds ratio (95% CI)", "P value"], ["Gender (male vs. female)", "535", "0.567 (0.402–0.799)", "0.001"], ["Age (>65 vs. ≤65 years)", "516", "1.523 (1.077–2.158)", "0.02"], ["Smoker (no vs. yes)", "521", "2.043 (1.236–3.446)", "0.006"], ["Race (Black or African American vs. White)", "461", "0.809 (0.457–1.422)", "0.46"], ["Pathologic stage (stage III–IV vs. stage I–II)", "527", "0.543 (0.351–0.831)", "0.005"], ["T stage (T3–4 vs. T1–2)", "532", "0.809 (0.483–1.347)", "0.42"], ["N stage (N2–3 vs. N0–1)", "519", "0.577 (0.347–0.944)", "0.03"], ["M stage (M1 vs. M0)", "386", "0.741 (0.314–1.675)", "0.48"], ["Primary therapy outcome (PD vs. PR & CR)", "409", "0.443 (0.256–0.750)", "0.003"]], "row_count": 10, "column_count": 4, "numeric_cells": 31, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[17]/table-wrap[2]#t2"}}], "gaps": ["asset:source:pmid:39958209 not verified"]}, "analysis": {"state": "absent", "methods": [], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method", "targets"]}, "capability": {"state": "absent", "requirements": [], "gaps": ["capability"]}, "readiness": {"state": "partial", "tier": null, "blocking_axis": null, "blocked_on": null, "axes": {}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:39958209", "asset:table:pmid:39958209:1", "asset:table:pmid:39958209:2"], "steps": ["read_published_estimate"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": ["xml"], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["source:pmid:39958209"]}, "gaps": ["corpus_record_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"status": "blocked", "providers": [{"provider": "minimax", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "full-text-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "67ea4a752f7c9717331266efa921cda58e0e1366ffa0043b71dcec2deb0d0719", "source_hash": "284b4434737b226836152a23f657b8837623bae555a18bfcdce7be06e7522af4", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:0be345ef36b38e5479d83ef1e6ea3aa1d7f0adb76cb246f7b1a067c1656e61b9", "raw_response_chars": 4270}, {"provider": "minimax_alt", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "full-text-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "d9683f4534b8befcc6528ccd67263e9b674b0a13a0119247980007722da20930", "source_hash": "284b4434737b226836152a23f657b8837623bae555a18bfcdce7be06e7522af4", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:83a55e337805b337bab98b783bd13a11ff18cd7132becb25e3240484e3dfe06d", "raw_response_chars": 57368}], "target_providers": [{"provider": "minimax", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "4ed35c5c76744787538a0486af5019f82f16054c8fe8ef08b8836a58fa0cba9a", "source_hash": "284b4434737b226836152a23f657b8837623bae555a18bfcdce7be06e7522af4", "raw_response": "{\"parent_value\":0.863,\"unit\":\"area under the curve\",\"evidence\":\"The area under the curve of the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863.\",\"target_result\":\"The area under the curve of the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863.\",\"number_stated\":true}", "reading": {"parent_value": 0.863, "unit": "area under the curve", "evidence": "The area under the curve of the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863.", "target_result": "The area under the curve of the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863.", "number_stated": true, "source_locator": "chars 2539-2616 of source sha256 284b4434737b226836152a23f657b8837623bae555a18bfcdce7be06e7522af4"}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T15:24:39.083384+00:00"}, {"provider": "minimax_alt", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "08ac05d2e0337129330180d03f7124616e3fce1c333bf117936931b8c7b3f01c", "source_hash": "284b4434737b226836152a23f657b8837623bae555a18bfcdce7be06e7522af4", "raw_response": "<think>We need answer JSON only. Need identify single numerical result replication registered target headline numerical result paper states for main finding. Need exact contiguous quote with number, unit printed. Candidates AUC 0.863, perhaps main finding prognostic marker no numeric hazard ratio. Headline numerical result likely 0.863, area under curve. Need unit as paper prints. \"The area under the curve of the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863.\" Unit perhaps \"area under the curve\" dimensionless. Required unit string. They say unit must be unit paper prints. It prints \"The area under the curve ... was 0.863.\" Could unit be empty? But number stated true likely unit perhaps \"area under the curve\" or \"AUC\"? Need infer desired extraction style.\n\nTarget is generic: headline numerical result paper states for main finding. Source abstract's only headline numerical result is AUC 0.863. Evidence exact contiguous quote. parent_value 0.863. Unit could be \"area under the curve\" perhaps the measured metric, though no physical unit. Maybe \"AUC\" is common unit? Paper doesn't literally use abbreviation AUC in quoted sentence, though earlier \"receiver operating characteristic (ROC)\". It says \"The area under the curve of the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863.\" The unit perhaps \"area under the curve\" (dimensionless). target_result can say \"The area under the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863.\" They demand headline number only perhaps means JSON fields, but target_result likely concise textual result.\n\nNeed exact quotation evidence whole clause. Could quote sentence exactly. Ensure no paraphrase. Unit must be paper prints. \"area under the curve of the ROC curve\" maybe awkward. We can set unit \"area under the curve of the ROC curve\" but unit is not really unit. Maybe unit string \"AUC\" despite source doesn't print acronym. User says unit must be unit paper prints, likely numerical results tasks expect units like years, months, etc. For AUC, dimensionless and no unit. But schema demands string; can use \"\". Yet instruction only says if no number, leave unit and evidence empty. Thus if number stated likely expect unit nonempty? Not necessarily schema only. They say \"unit must be the unit the paper prints.\" If dimensionless metric, perhaps unit \"area under the curve\" as paper wording. Need determine likely benchmark expects unit \"AUC\" perhaps extraction convention.\n\nLet's parse task framing. \"Read supplied paper text and find the single numerical result that a replication of the registered target has to reproduce. Report the headline number only: the value the paper itself states for the registered target, not a value you calculated, converted, averaged or reconstructed. The unit must be the unit the paper prints. The evidence must be an exact, contiguous quotation from SOURCE TEXT that contains the number; do not shorten it, do not add an ellipsis and do not paraphrase it. Attribution may be carried by the text's own wording: a number may be attached to the target by a parenthetical list, by the word 'respectively', or by words that name the target directly. When that is how the text links them, quote the whole clause so a reader can check the attribution for themselves. If the text states no number for the registered target, set number_stated to false, leave parent_value at 0, leave unit and evidence empty, and say in target_result what the text does state instead.\"\n\nThis seems general extraction benchmark where target registered perhaps verbal, source may or may not numeric. Here target: headline numerical result paper states for its main finding. Need pick single number. The main numerical finding could 0.863 AUC. Other numbers: 1605 DEGs, 82 pathways, 24 immune cell types, cutoff 50%, thresholds, versions, datasets. Clearly headline result in abstract = AUC 0.863. Unit? The paper prints metric \"area under the curve of the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness\". Could represent unit as \"area under the curve of the ROC curve\". But \"unit\" likely \"AUC\" because that's the measure. Yet paper prints ROC and area under curve, though not acronym AUC. They insist unit must be unit paper prints perhaps don't transform 0.863 to 86.3%. So \"area under the curve of the ROC curve\" or perhaps empty string. We need provide exact unit as source's printed wording maybe \"area under the curve\". Let's think expected schema likely evaluated by LLM or exact fields? parent_value 0.863. unit probably \"area under the curve of the ROC curve\" or \"AUC\". Evidence exact sentence. target_result perhaps \"Area under the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness: 0.863.\" Could they expect no unit since AUC is dimensionless? They ask unit must be unit paper prints. There is no conventional physical unit. In similar tasks, for AUC likely unit \"AUC\" accepted. Need ensure no invented source. \"AUC\" acronym does not appear in source at all? Search source: receiver operating characteristic (ROC), area under curve. No \"AUC\". So if unit must be as paper prints, avoid AUC. Could set unit \"area under the curve of the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness\" exactly as printed. But that's metric descriptor, not unit. Perhaps unit could be \"\" because dimensionless. Yet they specifically require unit field and only tell empty if no number stated, implying for stated number unit should be populated. So likely they consider measurement unit to be \"area under the curve\". Could put \"area under the curve of the ROC curve\". Better exact printed phrase.\n\nNeed \"headline number only\" perhaps target_result should just \"0.863\" and unit separate. But they ask target_result when no number say what text states instead. For stated case, likely target_result textual description. Maybe \"0.863 (area under the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness).\" Yet evidence does attribution. We can make target_result \"Area under the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863.\" This repeats.\n\nExact quote:\n\"The area under the curve of the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863.\"\nYes.\n\nJSON valid. Unit string maybe \"area under the curve of the ROC curve\". Is capitalization relevant? Unit perhaps \"area under the curve of the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness\" exact. Let's formulate.\n\nCould there be concern headline main finding is expression differential but no numeric result, whereas AUC is a secondary metric and not headline? The registered target phrasing explicitly asks \"the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding\", perhaps the source's abstract has one numerical result. likely 0.863.\n\nMaybe the headline result in paper title/main claim is MS4A15 downregulated, and no exact number stated for expression change. But instruction asks single numerical result replication target has to reproduce. They might expect AUC because only reported headline metric. The text says \"The area under the curve ... 0.863.\" likely selected target. Yes.\n\nUnit: AUC dimensionless. Could label \"area under the curve (AUC)\" but AUC not printed, though expansion printed. They say \"unit must be the unit the paper prints\", likely okay to use phrase exactly. Let's use \"area under the curve of the ROC curve\" exact contiguous phrase. target_result perhaps \"The ROC area under the curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863.\" No need exact quote there.\n\nNeed output only JSON.</think>\n\n{\"parent_value\":0.863,\"unit\":\"area under the curve of the ROC curve\",\"evidence\":\"The area under the curve of the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863.\",\"target_result\":\"The area under the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863.\",\"number_stated\":true}", "reading": {"parent_value": 0.863, "unit": "area under the curve of the ROC curve", "evidence": "The area under the curve of the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863.", "target_result": "The area under the ROC curve for MS4A15 effectiveness was 0.863.", "number_stated": true, "source_locator": "chars 2539-2616 of source sha256 284b4434737b226836152a23f657b8837623bae555a18bfcdce7be06e7522af4"}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T15:24:58.167781+00:00"}], "agreement": false, "disagreements": {"physical_methods": {"minimax": ["Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed to validate the messenger RNA transcription level in vitro."], "minimax_alt": ["Cell culture of A549 and NHBE cells", "Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)"], "decisive": false}, "analysis_methods": {"minimax": ["Differential Expression analysis of Sequencing data version 2 (DESeq2)", "ClusteProfiler package for Gene Ontology, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, and gene set enrichment analyses", "Gene set variation analysis (GSVA)", "Wilcoxon rank-sum test", "Logistic regression analysis", "Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis", "Kaplan-Meier analysis", "Spearman correlation analysis", "Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)"], "minimax_alt": ["Differential Expression analysis of Sequencing data version 2 (DESeq2)", "Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes enrichment analyses using ClusteProfiler", "Gene set enrichment analysis using ClusteProfiler", "Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) using single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA)", "Spearman correlation", "Wilcoxon rank-sum test", "Logistic regression", "Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis", "Kaplan-Meier analysis"], "decisive": false}, "unit": {"minimax": "area under the curve", "minimax_alt": "area under the curve of the ROC curve", "decisive": true}}, "agreement_basis": {"policy": "decisive_fields", "decisive_fields": ["work_type", "number_stated", "parent_value", "unit"]}, "blinded": true}, "human_critique": {"status": "not_run", "reviewer": null, "signed_at": null, "conflict_checked": false, "commentary": null}, "stages": [{"key": "target_materials", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "independent_readings", "status": "blocked", "reason": "The independent readings are incomplete or disagree; the source evidence must resolve the difference.", "evidence": {"provider_errors": []}}, {"key": "source_resolution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "protocol_reconstruction", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_execution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_comparison", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "publication", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}], "gaps": ["review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.blocked"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "package:05ef46f68ee8df57e10912dbf40911ef8eb04cb9425a81e199ee07a623b12a90", "type": "sep_package", "label": "SEP v1 package for pmid:39958209"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity:conversion:pmid:39958209", "type": "conversion", "used": ["package:05ef46f68ee8df57e10912dbf40911ef8eb04cb9425a81e199ee07a623b12a90"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:minimax", "type": "model", "label": "minimax"}, {"id": "agent:minimax_alt", "type": "model", "label": "minimax_alt"}, {"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}], "source_run_id": "run-20261023T122449232913", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:39958209", "parent_hash": "sha256:23c78823e4ee50b535e567d0d851af1fb95e708768a60bf0fc1ab3c281e4a492", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["abstract", "asset:source:pmid:39958209 not verified", "authors", "capability", "corpus_record_absent", "execution.not_run", "method", "review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.blocked", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded", "step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:39958209' does not resolve to a declared asset", "targets"]}