Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:40150786

Kolmogorov-Arnold Network Model Integrated with Hypoxia Risk for Predicting PD-L1 Inhibitor Responses in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025 doi:10.3390/bioengineering12030322

Paper

partial

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

absent

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:40150786
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:f6753032c9938938497288a1b9fb35b36690a95c7d0ac2909e6d5c2f6e87a98d
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T10:25:50Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T14:01:38Z
generator object · 3 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
converter
sep_to_sci_v1
source_package_schema
urn:bntrg:sep:1.0.0
paper object · 10 fields
state
partial
title
Kolmogorov-Arnold Network Model Integrated with Hypoxia Risk for Predicting PD-L1 Inhibitor Responses in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
doi
10.3390/bioengineering12030322
pmid
40150786
authors
null
journal
Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)
year
2025
abstract
null
claims array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-1
statement
the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding
kind
quantitative
state
complete
target object · 4 fields
value
0.725
unit
test accuracy
tolerance
null
source
chars 1363-1444 of source sha256 09c9fff11f795014b7c207b3f8802330ced1999811ab23ee9ea3e22835a50b09
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:40150786
locator
chars 1363-1444 of source sha256 09c9fff11f795014b7c207b3f8802330ced1999811ab23ee9ea3e22835a50b09
quote
The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
abstract
[1]
authors
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate and its interval from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The number a replication must land on, and the sentence it came from.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:40150786
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate, its unit and its interval
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data behind the published result
kind
data-preparation
state
blocked
blocked_on
data:not_downloaded
description
The published result cannot be recomputed without the data the paper analysed.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the analysis programme
kind
analysis
state
blocked
blocked_on
no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment
description
Re-run the paper's analysis on the source data and produce the registered result. | SEP input not carried into the asset list: materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40150786
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the registered result
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded
[1]
step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment
[2]
step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40150786' does not resolve to a declared asset
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 3 items
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:40150786
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12030322
sha256
sha256:09c9fff11f795014b7c207b3f8802330ced1999811ab23ee9ea3e22835a50b09
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.3390/bioengineering12030322
version
null
note
Source read by the package builder: full_text.
structure object · 1 field
access_state
full_text
[1] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:40150786:1
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:dbd8c7eb5136de49cd684003b94e0d23ec20541e6ca0a25ea9996ce38fe5c226
bytes
1089
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[19]/table-wrap[1]#bioengineering-12-00322-t001
version
null
note
Cox regression analysis for the hypoxia risk scoring model related to drug response prediction.
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC11939538
section_index
19
section_title
3.2. Hypoxia Scoring Model
row_count
11
column_count
8
table object · 8 fields
label
Table 1
caption
Cox regression analysis for the hypoxia risk scoring model related to drug response prediction.
rows array · 11 items
[0] array · 8 items
[0]
Gene
[1]
log HR
[2]
log HR SE
[3]
HR
[4]
t
[5]
p
[6]
95% CI Lower
[7]
95%CI Upper
[1] array · 8 items
[0]
PHLDA2
[1]
0.1497
[2]
0.0753
[3]
1.1615
[4]
1.9887
[5]
0.0467
[6]
1.0022
[7]
1.3462
[2] array · 8 items
[0]
DLGAP5
[1]
0.0757
[2]
0.2695
[3]
1.0787
[4]
0.281
[5]
0.7787
[6]
0.636
[7]
1.8293
[3] array · 8 items
[0]
N4BP2L1
[1]
−0.2318
[2]
0.1636
[3]
0.7931
[4]
−1.4163
[5]
0.1567
[6]
0.5755
[7]
1.093
[4] array · 8 items
[0]
CENPA
[1]
0.099
[2]
0.227
[3]
1.104
[4]
0.4361
[5]
0.6628
[6]
0.7076
[7]
1.7226
[5] array · 8 items
[0]
UPB1
[1]
−0.0584
[2]
0.0725
[3]
0.9433
[4]
−0.8061
[5]
0.4202
[6]
0.8184
[7]
1.0872
[6] array · 8 items
[0]
CABYR
[1]
0.1509
[2]
0.0752
[3]
1.1629
[4]
2.0063
[5]
0.0448
[6]
1.0035
[7]
1.3476
[7] array · 8 items
[0]
AFM
[1]
−0.0022
[2]
0.0609
[3]
0.9978
[4]
−0.0368
[5]
0.9707
[6]
0.8856
[7]
1.1242
[8] array · 8 items
[0]
HMMR
[1]
0.3139
[2]
0.1889
[3]
1.3687
[4]
1.6618
[5]
0.0965
[6]
0.9452
[7]
1.982
[9] array · 8 items
[0]
KIF20A
[1]
0.0587
[2]
0.2379
[3]
1.0604
[4]
0.2465
[5]
0.8053
[6]
0.6652
[7]
1.6904
[10] array · 8 items
[0]
PMAIP1
[1]
−0.1203
[2]
0.1857
[3]
0.8866
[4]
−0.648
[5]
0.517
[6]
0.6162
[7]
1.2758
locator
section[19]/table-wrap[1]#bioengineering-12-00322-t001
[2] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:40150786:2
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:22d12d8e87a9931cf3f1fca2306f6ba2a686f616e544ee3979dfe9b4f01503f5
bytes
647
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[20]/table-wrap[1]#bioengineering-12-00322-t002
version
null
note
Hyperparameters and optimization settings for KAN training.
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC11939538
section_index
20
section_title
3.3. Feature Selection and KAN Model
row_count
9
column_count
2
table object · 8 fields
label
Table 2
caption
Hyperparameters and optimization settings for KAN training.
rows array · 9 items
[0] array · 2 items
[0]
Parameter
[1]
Value
[1] array · 2 items
[0]
Number of training processes (batches)
[1]
6
[2] array · 2 items
[0]
Number of grid intervals
[1]
3–8
[3] array · 2 items
[0]
Optimizer
[1]
L-BFGS algorithm
[4] array · 2 items
[0]
Learning rate
[1]
1
[5] array · 2 items
[0]
Maximum number of iterations per optimization process
[1]
20
[6] array · 2 items
[0]
Maximal number of function evaluations per optimization process
[1]
25
[7] array · 2 items
[0]
Termination tolerance on first-order optimality
[1]
1 × 10−7
[8] array · 2 items
[0]
Termination tolerance on function
[1]
1 × 10−9
locator
section[20]/table-wrap[1]#bioengineering-12-00322-t002
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
asset:source:pmid:40150786 not verified
analysis object · 4 fields
state
absent
methods array · 0 items
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
method
[1]
targets
capability object · 3 fields
state
absent
requirements array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
capability
readiness object · 8 fields
state
partial
tier
null
blocked_on
null
axes object · 0 fields
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
assets array · 3 items
[0]
source:pmid:40150786
[1]
asset:table:pmid:40150786:1
[2]
asset:table:pmid:40150786:2
steps array · 1 item
[0]
read_published_estimate
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 1 item
[0]
xml
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:40150786
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
corpus_record_absent
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 7 fields
status
blocked
providers array · 1 item
[0] object · 7 fields
provider
minimax_alt
model
MiniMax-M3
prompt_version
full-text-reading-v1
prompt_hash
d1f623687ee85d23ee2f76abab232d4358d9aaecc9601936a20c142d89f443a5
source_hash
09c9fff11f795014b7c207b3f8802330ced1999811ab23ee9ea3e22835a50b09
raw_response_sha256
sha256:0be1d2781f587159de526076842edf4929bf46f5b76d0670048bae8c1040c49d
raw_response_chars
58291
target_providers array · 2 items
[0] object · 8 fields
provider
minimax
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
prompt_version
replication-target-v2
prompt_hash
88911b9c9ce13943063c518dfbc62c72b82c8fda5d8c150f6a303197d09ec54c
source_hash
09c9fff11f795014b7c207b3f8802330ced1999811ab23ee9ea3e22835a50b09
raw_response
{"parent_value":0.725,"unit":"test accuracy","evidence":"The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.","target_result":"The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.","number_stated":true}
reading object · 6 fields
parent_value
0.725
unit
test accuracy
evidence
The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.
target_result
The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.
number_stated
true
source_locator
chars 1363-1444 of source sha256 09c9fff11f795014b7c207b3f8802330ced1999811ab23ee9ea3e22835a50b09
recorded_at
2026-10-31T15:36:12.184684+00:00
[1] object · 8 fields
provider
minimax_alt
model
MiniMax-M3
prompt_version
replication-target-v2
prompt_hash
68df63bd0bf73f2d07654e291fdd2b4c8bdb8a416676ac9aae7d2d9085936b37
source_hash
09c9fff11f795014b7c207b3f8802330ced1999811ab23ee9ea3e22835a50b09
raw_response
<think>We need solve extraction carefully. Need follow user output JSON only. Need identify "single numerical result that a replication of the registered target has to reproduce" "headline number only: the value the paper itself states for the registered target, not a value you calculated, converted, averaged or reconstructed. The unit must be the unit the paper prints. ... REGISTERED TARGET: the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding". Source abstract several numbers: training test 290 patients, hypoxia model 10 genes, KAN 11 genes test accuracy 0.7, SVM integrated model test accuracy 0.725. Need choose headline main finding SVM integrating hypoxia and KAN models test accuracy 0.725 likely. Need parse. Title KAN Model Integrated with Hypoxia Risk for Predicting PD-L1 Inhibitor Responses in HCC. Main final integrated SVM achieves test accuracy 0.725. Target likely "headline numerical result" main finding. Evidence exact contiguous quotation "The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725." Unit "test accuracy" or "accuracy"? User unit must unit paper prints. Since accuracy 0.725 dimensionless, unit maybe "test accuracy". Need decide exact JSON parent_value 0.725, unit "test accuracy", evidence full sentence, target_result maybe "The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725." number_stated true. Or unit "" because no unit? User says unit must be unit paper prints. Paper prints "test accuracy" as metric. Often tasks extraction output units e.g. "accuracy". Need evaluate carefully, perhaps intended 0.725 and unit "test accuracy". We should not output another. Need consider if 290 is headline numerical result? No, main finding model accuracy. Abstract final main result test accuracy 0.725 vs KAN 0.7. Integrated SVM headline. Good. Need think unit wording in JSON schema likely use "test accuracy" vs "accuracy". Could set unit: "test accuracy" directly printed. Value 0.725. Evidence exact clause, full sentence. target_result optional but required: say "The integrated SVM model's test accuracy was 0.725." This paraphrases but target_result okay; requirement evidence exact only. Could target_result "Test accuracy of the SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models: 0.725." Good. We should not include "0.725" number stated extra concerns? Fine. Should unit be "" as dimensionless? User unit must unit paper prints. They might expect unit "accuracy". We can choose "test accuracy". Need not invent "%". Clearly paper prints 0.725 not 72.5%, so unit not "%". "test accuracy" accurate metric. Output straightforward. We have 30k tokens but no need. Could quote exact source "The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725." Full contiguous sentence. target_result mention integrated SVM test accuracy 0.725. No claim of computed. JSON only. Final no markdown.</think> {"parent_value":0.725,"unit":"test accuracy","evidence":"The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.","target_result":"The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.","number_stated":true}
reading object · 6 fields
parent_value
0.725
unit
test accuracy
evidence
The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.
target_result
The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.
number_stated
true
source_locator
chars 1363-1444 of source sha256 09c9fff11f795014b7c207b3f8802330ced1999811ab23ee9ea3e22835a50b09
recorded_at
2026-10-31T15:36:29.164705+00:00
agreement
false
disagreements array · 0 items
agreement_basis object · 2 fields
policy
decisive_fields
decisive_fields array · 4 items
[0]
work_type
[1]
number_stated
[2]
parent_value
[3]
unit
blinded
true
human_critique object · 5 fields
status
not_run
reviewer
null
signed_at
null
conflict_checked
false
commentary
null
stages array · 7 items
[0] object · 4 fields
key
target_materials
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[1] object · 4 fields
key
independent_readings
status
blocked
reason
The independent readings are incomplete or disagree; the source evidence must resolve the difference.
evidence object · 1 field
provider_errors array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
provider
minimax
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
reason
a repository quotation is absent from the supplied text
raw_response
{"target_result":"The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.","work_type":"analysis_only_for_target","physical_methods":[],"analysis_methods":["Differential expression analysis","Enrichment analysis","minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance","stepwise forward selection","Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique","Kolmogorov–Arnold Network","Support Vector Machine"],"statistical_method":"test accuracy","method_evidence":"The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.","repositories":[{"repository":"European Genome-Phenome Archive","accession":"EGAD00001008128","data_description":"RNA sequencing data used for differential expression analysis and for assembling the training and test sets of 290 HCC patients.","evidence":"Differential expression analysis (DEA) was performed on the EGAD00001008128, GSE41666, and GSE14520 datasets based on t-test q-values and fold change (FC) criteria. The training and test sets were assembled from the EGAD00001008128 dataset of 290 HCC patients","publicly_downloadable":true},{"repository":"National Center for Biotechnology Information","accession":"GSE233802","data_description":"Dataset used to validate the hypoxia model.","evidence":"Based on the HCC-Hypoxia Overlap (HHO) and immunotherapy response to hypoxia (IRH) genes selected by differential expression and enrichment analyses, a hypoxia model was built and validated on the TCGA-LIHC and GSE233802 datasets, respectively.","publicly_downloadable":true},{"repository":"The Cancer Genome Atlas","accession":"TCGA-LIHC","data_description":"Dataset used to validate the hypoxia model.","evidence":"Based on the HCC-Hypoxia Overlap (HHO) and immunotherapy response to hypoxia (IRH) genes selected by differential expression and enrichment analyses, a hypoxia model was built and validated on the TCGA-LIHC and GSE233802 datasets, respectively.","publicly_downloadable":true},{"repository":"National Center for Biotechnology Information","accession":"GSE41666","data_description":"Microarray dataset used for differential expression analysis and identification of overlapping hypoxia-related genes.","evidence":"Differential expression analysis (DEA) was performed on the EGAD00001008128, GSE41666, and GSE14520 datasets based on t-test q-values and fold change (FC) criteria.","publicly_downloadable":true},{"repository":"National Center for Biotechnology Information","accession":"GSE14520","data_description":"Microarray dataset used for differential expression analysis and identification of overlapping hypoxia-related genes.","evidence":"Differential expression analysis (DEA) was performed on the EGAD00001008128, GSE41666, and GSE14520 datasets based on t-test q-values and fold change (FC) criteria.","publicly_downloadable":true}],"availability_statement":"The data presented in this study are openly available in European Genome-Phenome Archive (https://ega-archive.org/datasets/, accessed on 25 May 2024), National Center for Biotechnology Information database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 25 May 2024), and The Cancer Genome Atlas (https://www.cancerimagingarchive.net/, accessed on 25 May 2024).","data_on_request":false,"source_claims":["The KAN model with 11 genes achieved a test accuracy of 0.7.","The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.","The hypoxia model was constructed using 10 genes (IRH and HHO).","The training and test sets were assembled from the EGAD00001008128 dataset of 290 HCC patients, and the response and non-response classes were balanced using the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique.","With the genes selected via the minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance and stepwise forward methods, a Kolmogorov–Arnold Network (KAN) model was trained.","The data presented in this study are openly available in European Genome-Phenome Archive (https://ega-archive.org/datasets/, accessed on 25 May 2024), National Center for Biotechnology Information database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 25 May 2024), and The Cancer Genome Atlas (https://www.cancerimagingarchive.net/, accessed on 25 May 2024)."],"missing_information":["The paper does not report an inferential statistical test for the headline test-accuracy result; it reports the result using test accuracy.","The supplied text does not provide accession-specific download instructions or explicitly state that each listed accession requires no application, embargo, or request; it states collectively that the data are openly available."],"evidence_spans":["The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.","The KAN model with 11 genes achieved a test accuracy of 0.7.","Based on the HCC-Hypoxia Overlap (HHO) and immunotherapy response to hypoxia (IRH) genes selected by differential expression and enrichment analyses, a hypoxia model was built and validated on the TCGA-LIHC and GSE233802 datasets, respectively.","The training and test sets were assembled from the EGAD00001008128 dataset of 290 HCC patients, and the response and non-response classes were balanced using the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique.","Differential expression analysis (DEA) was performed on the EGAD00001008128, GSE41666, and GSE14520 datasets based on t-test q-values and fold change (FC) criteria.","With the genes selected via the minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance and stepwise forward methods, a Kolmogorov–Arnold Network (KAN) model was trained.","The data presented in this study are openly available in European Genome-Phenome Archive (https://ega-archive.org/datasets/, accessed on 25 May 2024), National Center for Biotechnology Information database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 25 May 2024), and The Cancer Genome Atlas (https://www.cancerimagingarchive.net/, accessed on 25 May 2024)."]}
[2] object · 4 fields
key
source_resolution
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[3] object · 4 fields
key
protocol_reconstruction
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[4] object · 4 fields
key
control_execution
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[5] object · 4 fields
key
control_comparison
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[6] object · 4 fields
key
publication
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
review.human_critique
[1]
review.machine_critique.blocked
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
id
package:e3f843db22382490bf8094bcaae0d57b3dcd18632b5112f6babd36741fb95654
type
sep_package
label
SEP v1 package for pmid:40150786
activities array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity:conversion:pmid:40150786
type
conversion
used array · 1 item
[0]
package:e3f843db22382490bf8094bcaae0d57b3dcd18632b5112f6babd36741fb95654
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax
type
model
label
minimax
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax_alt
type
model
label
minimax_alt
[2] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
source_run_id
run-20261023T122449232913
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:40150786
parent_hash
sha256:b231628ac13e08ad3d4e90c04e1b34610b57887e7789c10bc6d37a8b7b065486
fork_of
null
gaps array · 13 items
[0]
abstract
[1]
asset:source:pmid:40150786 not verified
[2]
authors
[3]
capability
[4]
corpus_record_absent
[5]
execution.not_run
[6]
method
[7]
review.human_critique
[8]
review.machine_critique.blocked
[9]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded
[10]
step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment
[11]
step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40150786' does not resolve to a declared asset
[12]
targets
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.0", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:40150786", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 2, "content_hash": "sha256:f6753032c9938938497288a1b9fb35b36690a95c7d0ac2909e6d5c2f6e87a98d", "created_at": "2026-11-01T10:25:50Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T14:01:38Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "converter": "sep_to_sci_v1", "source_package_schema": "urn:bntrg:sep:1.0.0"}, "paper": {"state": "partial", "title": "Kolmogorov-Arnold Network Model Integrated with Hypoxia Risk for Predicting PD-L1 Inhibitor Responses in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.", "doi": "10.3390/bioengineering12030322", "pmid": "40150786", "authors": null, "journal": "Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)", "year": 2025, "abstract": null, "claims": [{"id": "claim-1", "statement": "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding", "kind": "quantitative", "state": "complete", "target": {"value": 0.725, "unit": "test accuracy", "tolerance": null, "source": "chars 1363-1444 of source sha256 09c9fff11f795014b7c207b3f8802330ced1999811ab23ee9ea3e22835a50b09"}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40150786", "locator": "chars 1363-1444 of source sha256 09c9fff11f795014b7c207b3f8802330ced1999811ab23ee9ea3e22835a50b09", "quote": "The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725."}]}], "gaps": ["abstract", "authors"]}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate and its interval from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The number a replication must land on, and the sentence it came from.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:40150786"], "outputs": ["the published estimate, its unit and its interval"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data behind the published result", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:not_downloaded", "description": "The published result cannot be recomputed without the data the paper analysed.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the analysis programme", "kind": "analysis", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "description": "Re-run the paper's analysis on the source data and produce the registered result. | SEP input not carried into the asset list: materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40150786", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the registered result"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded", "step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40150786' does not resolve to a declared asset"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:40150786", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12030322", "sha256": "sha256:09c9fff11f795014b7c207b3f8802330ced1999811ab23ee9ea3e22835a50b09", "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3390/bioengineering12030322", "version": null, "note": "Source read by the package builder: full_text.", "structure": {"access_state": "full_text"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:40150786:1", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:dbd8c7eb5136de49cd684003b94e0d23ec20541e6ca0a25ea9996ce38fe5c226", "bytes": 1089, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[19]/table-wrap[1]#bioengineering-12-00322-t001", "version": null, "note": "Cox regression analysis for the hypoxia risk scoring model related to drug response prediction.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC11939538", "section_index": 19, "section_title": "3.2. Hypoxia Scoring Model", "row_count": 11, "column_count": 8}, "table": {"label": "Table 1", "caption": "Cox regression analysis for the hypoxia risk scoring model related to drug response prediction.", "rows": [["Gene", "log HR", "log HR SE", "HR", "t", "p", "95% CI Lower", "95%CI Upper"], ["PHLDA2", "0.1497", "0.0753", "1.1615", "1.9887", "0.0467", "1.0022", "1.3462"], ["DLGAP5", "0.0757", "0.2695", "1.0787", "0.281", "0.7787", "0.636", "1.8293"], ["N4BP2L1", "−0.2318", "0.1636", "0.7931", "−1.4163", "0.1567", "0.5755", "1.093"], ["CENPA", "0.099", "0.227", "1.104", "0.4361", "0.6628", "0.7076", "1.7226"], ["UPB1", "−0.0584", "0.0725", "0.9433", "−0.8061", "0.4202", "0.8184", "1.0872"], ["CABYR", "0.1509", "0.0752", "1.1629", "2.0063", "0.0448", "1.0035", "1.3476"], ["AFM", "−0.0022", "0.0609", "0.9978", "−0.0368", "0.9707", "0.8856", "1.1242"], ["HMMR", "0.3139", "0.1889", "1.3687", "1.6618", "0.0965", "0.9452", "1.982"], ["KIF20A", "0.0587", "0.2379", "1.0604", "0.2465", "0.8053", "0.6652", "1.6904"], ["PMAIP1", "−0.1203", "0.1857", "0.8866", "−0.648", "0.517", "0.6162", "1.2758"]], "row_count": 11, "column_count": 8, "numeric_cells": 73, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[19]/table-wrap[1]#bioengineering-12-00322-t001"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:40150786:2", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:22d12d8e87a9931cf3f1fca2306f6ba2a686f616e544ee3979dfe9b4f01503f5", "bytes": 647, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[20]/table-wrap[1]#bioengineering-12-00322-t002", "version": null, "note": "Hyperparameters and optimization settings for KAN training.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC11939538", "section_index": 20, "section_title": "3.3. Feature Selection and KAN Model", "row_count": 9, "column_count": 2}, "table": {"label": "Table 2", "caption": "Hyperparameters and optimization settings for KAN training.", "rows": [["Parameter", "Value"], ["Number of training processes (batches)", "6"], ["Number of grid intervals", "3–8"], ["Optimizer", "L-BFGS algorithm"], ["Learning rate", "1"], ["Maximum number of iterations per optimization process", "20"], ["Maximal number of function evaluations per optimization process", "25"], ["Termination tolerance on first-order optimality", "1 × 10−7"], ["Termination tolerance on function", "1 × 10−9"]], "row_count": 9, "column_count": 2, "numeric_cells": 7, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[20]/table-wrap[1]#bioengineering-12-00322-t002"}}], "gaps": ["asset:source:pmid:40150786 not verified"]}, "analysis": {"state": "absent", "methods": [], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method", "targets"]}, "capability": {"state": "absent", "requirements": [], "gaps": ["capability"]}, "readiness": {"state": "partial", "tier": null, "blocking_axis": null, "blocked_on": null, "axes": {}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:40150786", "asset:table:pmid:40150786:1", "asset:table:pmid:40150786:2"], "steps": ["read_published_estimate"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": ["xml"], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["source:pmid:40150786"]}, "gaps": ["corpus_record_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"status": "blocked", "providers": [{"provider": "minimax_alt", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "full-text-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "d1f623687ee85d23ee2f76abab232d4358d9aaecc9601936a20c142d89f443a5", "source_hash": "09c9fff11f795014b7c207b3f8802330ced1999811ab23ee9ea3e22835a50b09", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:0be1d2781f587159de526076842edf4929bf46f5b76d0670048bae8c1040c49d", "raw_response_chars": 58291}], "target_providers": [{"provider": "minimax", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "88911b9c9ce13943063c518dfbc62c72b82c8fda5d8c150f6a303197d09ec54c", "source_hash": "09c9fff11f795014b7c207b3f8802330ced1999811ab23ee9ea3e22835a50b09", "raw_response": "{\"parent_value\":0.725,\"unit\":\"test accuracy\",\"evidence\":\"The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.\",\"target_result\":\"The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.\",\"number_stated\":true}", "reading": {"parent_value": 0.725, "unit": "test accuracy", "evidence": "The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.", "target_result": "The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.", "number_stated": true, "source_locator": "chars 1363-1444 of source sha256 09c9fff11f795014b7c207b3f8802330ced1999811ab23ee9ea3e22835a50b09"}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T15:36:12.184684+00:00"}, {"provider": "minimax_alt", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "68df63bd0bf73f2d07654e291fdd2b4c8bdb8a416676ac9aae7d2d9085936b37", "source_hash": "09c9fff11f795014b7c207b3f8802330ced1999811ab23ee9ea3e22835a50b09", "raw_response": "<think>We need solve extraction carefully. Need follow user output JSON only. Need identify \"single numerical result that a replication of the registered target has to reproduce\" \"headline number only: the value the paper itself states for the registered target, not a value you calculated, converted, averaged or reconstructed. The unit must be the unit the paper prints. ... REGISTERED TARGET: the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding\". Source abstract several numbers: training test 290 patients, hypoxia model 10 genes, KAN 11 genes test accuracy 0.7, SVM integrated model test accuracy 0.725. Need choose headline main finding SVM integrating hypoxia and KAN models test accuracy 0.725 likely. Need parse. Title KAN Model Integrated with Hypoxia Risk for Predicting PD-L1 Inhibitor Responses in HCC. Main final integrated SVM achieves test accuracy 0.725. Target likely \"headline numerical result\" main finding. Evidence exact contiguous quotation \"The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.\" Unit \"test accuracy\" or \"accuracy\"? User unit must unit paper prints. Since accuracy 0.725 dimensionless, unit maybe \"test accuracy\". Need decide exact JSON parent_value 0.725, unit \"test accuracy\", evidence full sentence, target_result maybe \"The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.\" number_stated true. Or unit \"\" because no unit? User says unit must be unit paper prints. Paper prints \"test accuracy\" as metric. Often tasks extraction output units e.g. \"accuracy\". Need evaluate carefully, perhaps intended 0.725 and unit \"test accuracy\". We should not output another. Need consider if 290 is headline numerical result? No, main finding model accuracy. Abstract final main result test accuracy 0.725 vs KAN 0.7. Integrated SVM headline. Good.\n\nNeed think unit wording in JSON schema likely use \"test accuracy\" vs \"accuracy\". Could set unit: \"test accuracy\" directly printed. Value 0.725. Evidence exact clause, full sentence. target_result optional but required: say \"The integrated SVM model's test accuracy was 0.725.\" This paraphrases but target_result okay; requirement evidence exact only. Could target_result \"Test accuracy of the SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models: 0.725.\" Good. We should not include \"0.725\" number stated extra concerns? Fine.\n\nShould unit be \"\" as dimensionless? User unit must unit paper prints. They might expect unit \"accuracy\". We can choose \"test accuracy\". Need not invent \"%\". Clearly paper prints 0.725 not 72.5%, so unit not \"%\". \"test accuracy\" accurate metric. Output straightforward.\n\nWe have 30k tokens but no need. Could quote exact source \"The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.\" Full contiguous sentence. target_result mention integrated SVM test accuracy 0.725. No claim of computed. JSON only.\n\nFinal no markdown.</think>\n\n{\"parent_value\":0.725,\"unit\":\"test accuracy\",\"evidence\":\"The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.\",\"target_result\":\"The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.\",\"number_stated\":true}", "reading": {"parent_value": 0.725, "unit": "test accuracy", "evidence": "The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.", "target_result": "The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.", "number_stated": true, "source_locator": "chars 1363-1444 of source sha256 09c9fff11f795014b7c207b3f8802330ced1999811ab23ee9ea3e22835a50b09"}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T15:36:29.164705+00:00"}], "agreement": false, "disagreements": [], "agreement_basis": {"policy": "decisive_fields", "decisive_fields": ["work_type", "number_stated", "parent_value", "unit"]}, "blinded": true}, "human_critique": {"status": "not_run", "reviewer": null, "signed_at": null, "conflict_checked": false, "commentary": null}, "stages": [{"key": "target_materials", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "independent_readings", "status": "blocked", "reason": "The independent readings are incomplete or disagree; the source evidence must resolve the difference.", "evidence": {"provider_errors": [{"provider": "minimax", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "reason": "a repository quotation is absent from the supplied text", "raw_response": "{\"target_result\":\"The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.\",\"work_type\":\"analysis_only_for_target\",\"physical_methods\":[],\"analysis_methods\":[\"Differential expression analysis\",\"Enrichment analysis\",\"minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance\",\"stepwise forward selection\",\"Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique\",\"Kolmogorov–Arnold Network\",\"Support Vector Machine\"],\"statistical_method\":\"test accuracy\",\"method_evidence\":\"The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.\",\"repositories\":[{\"repository\":\"European Genome-Phenome Archive\",\"accession\":\"EGAD00001008128\",\"data_description\":\"RNA sequencing data used for differential expression analysis and for assembling the training and test sets of 290 HCC patients.\",\"evidence\":\"Differential expression analysis (DEA) was performed on the EGAD00001008128, GSE41666, and GSE14520 datasets based on t-test q-values and fold change (FC) criteria. The training and test sets were assembled from the EGAD00001008128 dataset of 290 HCC patients\",\"publicly_downloadable\":true},{\"repository\":\"National Center for Biotechnology Information\",\"accession\":\"GSE233802\",\"data_description\":\"Dataset used to validate the hypoxia model.\",\"evidence\":\"Based on the HCC-Hypoxia Overlap (HHO) and immunotherapy response to hypoxia (IRH) genes selected by differential expression and enrichment analyses, a hypoxia model was built and validated on the TCGA-LIHC and GSE233802 datasets, respectively.\",\"publicly_downloadable\":true},{\"repository\":\"The Cancer Genome Atlas\",\"accession\":\"TCGA-LIHC\",\"data_description\":\"Dataset used to validate the hypoxia model.\",\"evidence\":\"Based on the HCC-Hypoxia Overlap (HHO) and immunotherapy response to hypoxia (IRH) genes selected by differential expression and enrichment analyses, a hypoxia model was built and validated on the TCGA-LIHC and GSE233802 datasets, respectively.\",\"publicly_downloadable\":true},{\"repository\":\"National Center for Biotechnology Information\",\"accession\":\"GSE41666\",\"data_description\":\"Microarray dataset used for differential expression analysis and identification of overlapping hypoxia-related genes.\",\"evidence\":\"Differential expression analysis (DEA) was performed on the EGAD00001008128, GSE41666, and GSE14520 datasets based on t-test q-values and fold change (FC) criteria.\",\"publicly_downloadable\":true},{\"repository\":\"National Center for Biotechnology Information\",\"accession\":\"GSE14520\",\"data_description\":\"Microarray dataset used for differential expression analysis and identification of overlapping hypoxia-related genes.\",\"evidence\":\"Differential expression analysis (DEA) was performed on the EGAD00001008128, GSE41666, and GSE14520 datasets based on t-test q-values and fold change (FC) criteria.\",\"publicly_downloadable\":true}],\"availability_statement\":\"The data presented in this study are openly available in European Genome-Phenome Archive (https://ega-archive.org/datasets/, accessed on 25 May 2024), National Center for Biotechnology Information database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 25 May 2024), and The Cancer Genome Atlas (https://www.cancerimagingarchive.net/, accessed on 25 May 2024).\",\"data_on_request\":false,\"source_claims\":[\"The KAN model with 11 genes achieved a test accuracy of 0.7.\",\"The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.\",\"The hypoxia model was constructed using 10 genes (IRH and HHO).\",\"The training and test sets were assembled from the EGAD00001008128 dataset of 290 HCC patients, and the response and non-response classes were balanced using the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique.\",\"With the genes selected via the minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance and stepwise forward methods, a Kolmogorov–Arnold Network (KAN) model was trained.\",\"The data presented in this study are openly available in European Genome-Phenome Archive (https://ega-archive.org/datasets/, accessed on 25 May 2024), National Center for Biotechnology Information database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 25 May 2024), and The Cancer Genome Atlas (https://www.cancerimagingarchive.net/, accessed on 25 May 2024).\"],\"missing_information\":[\"The paper does not report an inferential statistical test for the headline test-accuracy result; it reports the result using test accuracy.\",\"The supplied text does not provide accession-specific download instructions or explicitly state that each listed accession requires no application, embargo, or request; it states collectively that the data are openly available.\"],\"evidence_spans\":[\"The SVM integrating the hypoxia and KAN models achieved a test accuracy of 0.725.\",\"The KAN model with 11 genes achieved a test accuracy of 0.7.\",\"Based on the HCC-Hypoxia Overlap (HHO) and immunotherapy response to hypoxia (IRH) genes selected by differential expression and enrichment analyses, a hypoxia model was built and validated on the TCGA-LIHC and GSE233802 datasets, respectively.\",\"The training and test sets were assembled from the EGAD00001008128 dataset of 290 HCC patients, and the response and non-response classes were balanced using the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique.\",\"Differential expression analysis (DEA) was performed on the EGAD00001008128, GSE41666, and GSE14520 datasets based on t-test q-values and fold change (FC) criteria.\",\"With the genes selected via the minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance and stepwise forward methods, a Kolmogorov–Arnold Network (KAN) model was trained.\",\"The data presented in this study are openly available in European Genome-Phenome Archive (https://ega-archive.org/datasets/, accessed on 25 May 2024), National Center for Biotechnology Information database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 25 May 2024), and The Cancer Genome Atlas (https://www.cancerimagingarchive.net/, accessed on 25 May 2024).\"]}"}]}}, {"key": "source_resolution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "protocol_reconstruction", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_execution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_comparison", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "publication", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}], "gaps": ["review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.blocked"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "package:e3f843db22382490bf8094bcaae0d57b3dcd18632b5112f6babd36741fb95654", "type": "sep_package", "label": "SEP v1 package for pmid:40150786"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity:conversion:pmid:40150786", "type": "conversion", "used": ["package:e3f843db22382490bf8094bcaae0d57b3dcd18632b5112f6babd36741fb95654"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:minimax", "type": "model", "label": "minimax"}, {"id": "agent:minimax_alt", "type": "model", "label": "minimax_alt"}, {"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}], "source_run_id": "run-20261023T122449232913", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:40150786", "parent_hash": "sha256:b231628ac13e08ad3d4e90c04e1b34610b57887e7789c10bc6d37a8b7b065486", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["abstract", "asset:source:pmid:40150786 not verified", "authors", "capability", "corpus_record_absent", "execution.not_run", "method", "review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.blocked", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded", "step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40150786' does not resolve to a declared asset", "targets"]}