← All .science files
pmid:40297163
Identification of signature genes and subtypes for heart failure diagnosis based on machine learning.
Yanlong Zhang · Yanming Fan · Fei Cheng · Dan Chen · Hualong Zhang
Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025 doi:10.3389/fcvm.2025.1492192
Paper
complete
Experiment
partial
Data
partial
Analysis
partial
Execution
absent
Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
paper object · 10 fields
authors array · 5 items
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
[1] object · 6 fields
[2] object · 6 fields
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
outputs array · 1 item
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 2 items
data object · 3 fields
assets array · 1 item
[0] object · 15 fields
structure object · 4 fields
gaps array · 0 items
analysis object · 4 fields
methods array · 11 items
[0] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 1 item
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[1] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[2] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[3] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 3 items
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[4] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 1 item
parameters object · 1 field
data_shapes array · 1 item
[5] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 3 items
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 1 field
data_shapes array · 1 item
[6] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[7] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[8] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[9] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[10] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 0 items
evidence object · 3 fields
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 2 items
capability object · 3 fields
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
assay_families array · 9 items
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
required_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 1 item
capability object · 4 fields
data object · 6 fields
accessions array · 0 items
resolved_accessions array · 0 items
statements array · 1 item
can_run object · 3 fields
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
gaps array · 1 item
review object · 5 fields
machine_critique object · 5 fields
reader object · 5 fields
evidence_check object · 2 fields
usage object · 3 fields
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
gaps array · 3 items
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
[1] object · 3 fields
[2] object · 3 fields
[1] object · 4 fields
agents array · 2 items
lineage object · 4 fields
gaps array · 8 items
assays array · 1 item
[0] object · 11 fields
required_operations array · 0 items
source_hashes object · 1 field
evidence array · 1 item
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:40297163", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 3, "content_hash": "sha256:233907da709ee329aa7189576d1e10db2478eab91bc95c9e39a5b178a37ae635", "created_at": "2026-11-01T20:30:27Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:13:58Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Identification of signature genes and subtypes for heart failure diagnosis based on machine learning.", "doi": "10.3389/fcvm.2025.1492192", "pmid": "40297163", "authors": ["Yanlong Zhang", "Yanming Fan", "Fei Cheng", "Dan Chen", "Hualong Zhang"], "journal": "Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine", "year": 2025, "abstract": "Background: Heart failure (HF) is a multifaceted clinical condition, and our comprehension of its genetic pathogenesis continues to be significantly limited. Consequently, identifying specific genes for HF at the transcriptomic level may enhance early detection and allow for more targeted therapies for these individuals.\nMethods: HF datasets were acquired from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (GSE57338), and through the application of bioinformatics and machine-learning algorithms. We identified four candidate genes (FCN3, MNS1, SMOC2, and FREM1) that may serve as potential diagnostics for HF. Furthermore, we validated the diagnostic value of these genes on additional GEO datasets (GSE21610 and GSE76701). In addition, we assessed the different subtypes of heart failure through unsupervised clustering, and investigations were conducted on the differences in the immunological microenvironment, improved functions, and pathways among these subtypes. Finally, a comprehensive analysis of the expression profile, prognostic value, and genetic and epigenetic alterations of four potential diagnostic candidate genes was performed based on The Cancer Genome Atlas pan-cancer database.\nResults: A total of 295 differential genes were identified in the HF dataset, and intersected with the blue module gene with the highest correlation to HF identified by weighted correlation network analysis (r = 0.72, p = 1.3 × 10-43), resulting in a total of 114 key HF genes. Furthermore, based on random forest, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and support vector machine algorithms, we finally identified four hub genes (FCN3, FREM1, MNS1, and SMOC2) that had good potential for diagnosis in HF (area under the curve > 0.7). Meanwhile, three subgroups for patients with HF were identified (C1, C2, and C3). Compared with the C1 and C2 groups, we eventually identified C3 as an immune subtype. Moreover, the pan-cancer study revealed that these four genes are closely associated with tumor development.\nConclusions: Our research identified four unique genes (FCN3, FREM1, MNS1, and SMOC2), enhancing our comprehension of the causes of HF. This provides new diagnostic insights and potentially establishes a tailored approach for individualized HF treatment.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine the diagnostic value of the candidate genes. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to quantify their value, with an AUC value greater than 0.7 being considered the ideal diagnostic threshold.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40297163", "locator": "sections[8] \"Validation of diagnostic model\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine the diagnostic value of the candidate genes. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to quantify their value, with an AUC value greater than 0.7 being considered the ideal diagnostic threshold."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40297163", "locator": "sections[26] \"Data availability statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "Nevertheless, when the four genes were integrated into a single diagnostic model, the AUC values for both the training and test datasets were 0.980 and 0.921, respectively (Figures 3G,H).", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40297163", "locator": "sections[20] \"Diagnostic value assessment\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Nevertheless, when the four genes were integrated into a single diagnostic model, the AUC values for both the training and test datasets were 0.980 and 0.921, respectively (Figures 3G,H)."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "Nevertheless, when the four genes were integrated into a single diagnostic model, the AUC values for both the training and test datasets were 0.980 and 0.921, respectively (Figures 3G,H).", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:40297163"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "method:group_comparison_wilcoxon", "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:run_analysis blocked on method:group_comparison_wilcoxon", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:40297163", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1492192", "sha256": "sha256:fd3359d44d7d08acfc85504ba7676891ab8501ca4506d9a995b04c9d3d48478d", "bytes": 40135, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3389/fcvm.2025.1492192", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC12034685", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}], "gaps": []}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "wilcoxon", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Wilcoxon"}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Cox regression"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "log_rank_test", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["logrank_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "log-rank"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "differential_expression", "specific": "limma_voom", "label": "Differential expression analysis", "dsl_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["count_matrix_with_condition"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "limma"}}, {"id": "method-5", "family": "machine_learning", "specific": "random_forest", "label": "Machine learning", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["machine_learning_random_forest"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {"auc": "al for diagnosis in HF (area under the curve > 0"}, "data_shapes": ["labelled_feature_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "random forest"}}, {"id": "method-6", "family": "machine_learning", "specific": "support_vector_machine", "label": "Machine learning", "dsl_operations": ["train_classifier", "cross_validate", "roc_auc"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {"auc": "al for diagnosis in HF (area under the curve > 0"}, "data_shapes": ["labelled_feature_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "support vector machine"}}, {"id": "method-7", "family": "correlation_analysis", "specific": "pearson", "label": "Correlation analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pearson_r"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["paired_numeric_columns"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Pearson's correlation"}}, {"id": "method-8", "family": "correlation_analysis", "specific": "spearman", "label": "Correlation analysis", "dsl_operations": ["spearman_rho"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["paired_numeric_columns"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Spearman's correlation"}}, {"id": "method-9", "family": "clustering", "specific": "kmeans", "label": "Clustering", "dsl_operations": ["kmeans_fit"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["feature_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "K-means"}}, {"id": "method-10", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "pathway_enrichment", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "GO enrichment"}}, {"id": "method-11", "family": null, "specific": null, "label": "Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with area under the curve (AUC)", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": null, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": [], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine the diagnostic value of the candidate genes. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to quantify their value, with an AUC value greater than 0.7 being considered the ideal diagnostic threshold."}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_named_unmapped", "method.group_comparison_wilcoxon"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "data", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": false, "required_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: wilcoxon."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R4", "reachable": false, "accessions": [], "resolved_accessions": [], "statements": ["The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author."], "basis": "The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:40297163"], "steps": []}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [{"operation": "group_comparison_wilcoxon", "unlocks_papers": null, "priority": null}], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:None"]}, "gaps": ["data:accession_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T19:51:15Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 10179, "completion_tokens": 1858, "cached_tokens": 256}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:40297163", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:40297163"}, {"id": "source:pmid:40297163", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 40297163 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:40297163", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:40297163"}, {"id": "source:pmid:40297163", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 40297163 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-40297163", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:40297163"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-None", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:None"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:40297163", "parent_hash": "sha256:32ce890e79da1394f430eeb7f1bc6b9314d18a23330eb56958aa020034f6fee1", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["execution.not_run", "method.group_comparison_wilcoxon", "method.reader_named_unmapped", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent", "step:run_analysis blocked on method:group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "assays": [{"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "group_comparison", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 0.8, "evidence": ["Wilcoxon"], "order_basis": "analysis_only", "id": "assay:1"}]}