Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:40297163

Identification of signature genes and subtypes for heart failure diagnosis based on machine learning.

Yanlong Zhang · Yanming Fan · Fei Cheng · Dan Chen · Hualong Zhang

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025 doi:10.3389/fcvm.2025.1492192

Paper

complete

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

partial

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:40297163
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:233907da709ee329aa7189576d1e10db2478eab91bc95c9e39a5b178a37ae635
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T20:30:27Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:13:58Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Identification of signature genes and subtypes for heart failure diagnosis based on machine learning.
doi
10.3389/fcvm.2025.1492192
pmid
40297163
authors array · 5 items
[0]
Yanlong Zhang
[1]
Yanming Fan
[2]
Fei Cheng
[3]
Dan Chen
[4]
Hualong Zhang
journal
Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine
year
2025
abstract
Background: Heart failure (HF) is a multifaceted clinical condition, and our comprehension of its genetic pathogenesis continues to be significantly limited. Consequently, identifying specific genes for HF at the transcriptomic level may enhance early detection and allow for more targeted therapies for these individuals. Methods: HF datasets were acquired from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (GSE57338), and through the application of bioinformatics and machine-learning algorithms. We identified four candidate genes (FCN3, MNS1, SMOC2, and FREM1) that may serve as potential diagnostics for HF. Furthermore, we validated the diagnostic value of these genes on additional GEO datasets (GSE21610 and GSE76701). In addition, we assessed the different subtypes of heart failure through unsupervised clustering, and investigations were conducted on the differences in the immunological microenvironment, improved functions, and pathways among these subtypes. Finally, a comprehensive analysis of the expression profile, prognostic value, and genetic and epigenetic alterations of four potential diagnostic candidate genes was performed based on The Cancer Genome Atlas pan-cancer database. Results: A total of 295 differential genes were identified in the HF dataset, and intersected with the blue module gene with the highest correlation to HF identified by weighted correlation network analysis (r = 0.72, p = 1.3 × 10-43), resulting in a total of 114 key HF genes. Furthermore, based on random forest, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and support vector machine algorithms, we finally identified four hub genes (FCN3, FREM1, MNS1, and SMOC2) that had good potential for diagnosis in HF (area under the curve > 0.7). Meanwhile, three subgroups for patients with HF were identified (C1, C2, and C3). Compared with the C1 and C2 groups, we eventually identified C3 as an immune subtype. Moreover, the pan-cancer study revealed that these four genes are closely associated with tumor development. Conclusions: Our research identified four unique genes (FCN3, FREM1, MNS1, and SMOC2), enhancing our comprehension of the causes of HF. This provides new diagnostic insights and potentially establishes a tailored approach for individualized HF treatment.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine the diagnostic value of the candidate genes. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to quantify their value, with an AUC value greater than 0.7 being considered the ideal diagnostic threshold.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:40297163
locator
sections[8] "Validation of diagnostic model" paragraph 2
quote
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine the diagnostic value of the candidate genes. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to quantify their value, with an AUC value greater than 0.7 being considered the ideal diagnostic threshold.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:40297163
locator
sections[26] "Data availability statement" paragraph 2
quote
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
Nevertheless, when the four genes were integrated into a single diagnostic model, the AUC values for both the training and test datasets were 0.980 and 0.921, respectively (Figures 3G,H).
kind
qualitative
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:40297163
locator
sections[20] "Diagnostic value assessment" paragraph 2
quote
Nevertheless, when the four genes were integrated into a single diagnostic model, the AUC values for both the training and test datasets were 0.980 and 0.921, respectively (Figures 3G,H).
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
Nevertheless, when the four genes were integrated into a single diagnostic model, the AUC values for both the training and test datasets were 0.980 and 0.921, respectively (Figures 3G,H).
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:40297163
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
blocked
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
blocked
blocked_on
method:group_comparison_wilcoxon
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
step:run_analysis blocked on method:group_comparison_wilcoxon
[1]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 1 item
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:40297163
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1492192
sha256
sha256:fd3359d44d7d08acfc85504ba7676891ab8501ca4506d9a995b04c9d3d48478d
bytes
40135
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.3389/fcvm.2025.1492192
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC12034685
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body_without_references
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
gaps array · 0 items
analysis object · 4 fields
state
partial
methods array · 11 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
group_comparison
specific
wilcoxon
label
Group comparison
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 1 item
[0]
group_comparison_wilcoxon
expressible
false
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
two_or_more_groups_continuous
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Wilcoxon
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
survival_analysis
specific
cox_proportional_hazards
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Cox regression
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
survival_analysis
specific
log_rank_test
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
logrank_test
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
log-rank
[3] object · 10 fields
id
method-4
family
differential_expression
specific
limma_voom
label
Differential expression analysis
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
normalise_counts
[1]
differential_expression_fit
[2]
fdr_bh
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
count_matrix_with_condition
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
limma
[4] object · 10 fields
id
method-5
family
machine_learning
specific
random_forest
label
Machine learning
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 1 item
[0]
machine_learning_random_forest
expressible
false
parameters object · 1 field
auc
al for diagnosis in HF (area under the curve > 0
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
labelled_feature_matrix
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
random forest
[5] object · 10 fields
id
method-6
family
machine_learning
specific
support_vector_machine
label
Machine learning
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
train_classifier
[1]
cross_validate
[2]
roc_auc
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 1 field
auc
al for diagnosis in HF (area under the curve > 0
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
labelled_feature_matrix
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
support vector machine
[6] object · 10 fields
id
method-7
family
correlation_analysis
specific
pearson
label
Correlation analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
pearson_r
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
paired_numeric_columns
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Pearson's correlation
[7] object · 10 fields
id
method-8
family
correlation_analysis
specific
spearman
label
Correlation analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
spearman_rho
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
paired_numeric_columns
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Spearman's correlation
[8] object · 10 fields
id
method-9
family
clustering
specific
kmeans
label
Clustering
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
kmeans_fit
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
feature_matrix
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
K-means
[9] object · 10 fields
id
method-10
family
network_analysis
specific
pathway_enrichment
label
Network / pathway analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
pathway_enrich
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
edge_list
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
GO enrichment
[10] object · 10 fields
id
method-11
family
null
specific
null
label
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with area under the curve (AUC)
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 0 items
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine the diagnostic value of the candidate genes. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to quantify their value, with an AUC value greater than 0.7 being considered the ideal diagnostic threshold.
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
method.reader_named_unmapped
[1]
method.group_comparison_wilcoxon
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
blocked
tier
R4
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
false
required_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 1 item
[0]
group_comparison_wilcoxon
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: wilcoxon.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R4
reachable
false
accessions array · 0 items
resolved_accessions array · 0 items
statements array · 1 item
[0]
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
basis
The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
assets array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:40297163
steps array · 0 items
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
operation
group_comparison_wilcoxon
priority
null
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:accession_absent
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T19:51:15Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
10179
completion_tokens
1858
cached_tokens
256
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:40297163
type
paper
label
pmid:40297163
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:40297163
type
manuscript
label
PMID 40297163 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:40297163
type
paper
label
pmid:40297163
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:40297163
type
manuscript
label
PMID 40297163 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-40297163
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:40297163
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-None
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:40297163
parent_hash
sha256:32ce890e79da1394f430eeb7f1bc6b9314d18a23330eb56958aa020034f6fee1
fork_of
null
gaps array · 8 items
[0]
execution.not_run
[1]
method.group_comparison_wilcoxon
[2]
method.reader_named_unmapped
[3]
review.human_critique
[4]
review.independent_reader
[5]
review.machine_critique
[6]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
[7]
step:run_analysis blocked on method:group_comparison_wilcoxon
assays array · 1 item
[0] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
group_comparison
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
Wilcoxon
order_basis
analysis_only
id
assay:1
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:40297163", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 3, "content_hash": "sha256:233907da709ee329aa7189576d1e10db2478eab91bc95c9e39a5b178a37ae635", "created_at": "2026-11-01T20:30:27Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:13:58Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Identification of signature genes and subtypes for heart failure diagnosis based on machine learning.", "doi": "10.3389/fcvm.2025.1492192", "pmid": "40297163", "authors": ["Yanlong Zhang", "Yanming Fan", "Fei Cheng", "Dan Chen", "Hualong Zhang"], "journal": "Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine", "year": 2025, "abstract": "Background: Heart failure (HF) is a multifaceted clinical condition, and our comprehension of its genetic pathogenesis continues to be significantly limited. Consequently, identifying specific genes for HF at the transcriptomic level may enhance early detection and allow for more targeted therapies for these individuals.\nMethods: HF datasets were acquired from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (GSE57338), and through the application of bioinformatics and machine-learning algorithms. We identified four candidate genes (FCN3, MNS1, SMOC2, and FREM1) that may serve as potential diagnostics for HF. Furthermore, we validated the diagnostic value of these genes on additional GEO datasets (GSE21610 and GSE76701). In addition, we assessed the different subtypes of heart failure through unsupervised clustering, and investigations were conducted on the differences in the immunological microenvironment, improved functions, and pathways among these subtypes. Finally, a comprehensive analysis of the expression profile, prognostic value, and genetic and epigenetic alterations of four potential diagnostic candidate genes was performed based on The Cancer Genome Atlas pan-cancer database.\nResults: A total of 295 differential genes were identified in the HF dataset, and intersected with the blue module gene with the highest correlation to HF identified by weighted correlation network analysis (r = 0.72, p = 1.3 × 10-43), resulting in a total of 114 key HF genes. Furthermore, based on random forest, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and support vector machine algorithms, we finally identified four hub genes (FCN3, FREM1, MNS1, and SMOC2) that had good potential for diagnosis in HF (area under the curve > 0.7). Meanwhile, three subgroups for patients with HF were identified (C1, C2, and C3). Compared with the C1 and C2 groups, we eventually identified C3 as an immune subtype. Moreover, the pan-cancer study revealed that these four genes are closely associated with tumor development.\nConclusions: Our research identified four unique genes (FCN3, FREM1, MNS1, and SMOC2), enhancing our comprehension of the causes of HF. This provides new diagnostic insights and potentially establishes a tailored approach for individualized HF treatment.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine the diagnostic value of the candidate genes. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to quantify their value, with an AUC value greater than 0.7 being considered the ideal diagnostic threshold.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40297163", "locator": "sections[8] \"Validation of diagnostic model\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine the diagnostic value of the candidate genes. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to quantify their value, with an AUC value greater than 0.7 being considered the ideal diagnostic threshold."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40297163", "locator": "sections[26] \"Data availability statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "Nevertheless, when the four genes were integrated into a single diagnostic model, the AUC values for both the training and test datasets were 0.980 and 0.921, respectively (Figures 3G,H).", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40297163", "locator": "sections[20] \"Diagnostic value assessment\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Nevertheless, when the four genes were integrated into a single diagnostic model, the AUC values for both the training and test datasets were 0.980 and 0.921, respectively (Figures 3G,H)."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "Nevertheless, when the four genes were integrated into a single diagnostic model, the AUC values for both the training and test datasets were 0.980 and 0.921, respectively (Figures 3G,H).", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:40297163"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "method:group_comparison_wilcoxon", "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:run_analysis blocked on method:group_comparison_wilcoxon", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:40297163", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1492192", "sha256": "sha256:fd3359d44d7d08acfc85504ba7676891ab8501ca4506d9a995b04c9d3d48478d", "bytes": 40135, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3389/fcvm.2025.1492192", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC12034685", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}], "gaps": []}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "wilcoxon", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Wilcoxon"}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Cox regression"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "log_rank_test", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["logrank_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "log-rank"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "differential_expression", "specific": "limma_voom", "label": "Differential expression analysis", "dsl_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["count_matrix_with_condition"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "limma"}}, {"id": "method-5", "family": "machine_learning", "specific": "random_forest", "label": "Machine learning", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["machine_learning_random_forest"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {"auc": "al for diagnosis in HF (area under the curve > 0"}, "data_shapes": ["labelled_feature_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "random forest"}}, {"id": "method-6", "family": "machine_learning", "specific": "support_vector_machine", "label": "Machine learning", "dsl_operations": ["train_classifier", "cross_validate", "roc_auc"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {"auc": "al for diagnosis in HF (area under the curve > 0"}, "data_shapes": ["labelled_feature_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "support vector machine"}}, {"id": "method-7", "family": "correlation_analysis", "specific": "pearson", "label": "Correlation analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pearson_r"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["paired_numeric_columns"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Pearson's correlation"}}, {"id": "method-8", "family": "correlation_analysis", "specific": "spearman", "label": "Correlation analysis", "dsl_operations": ["spearman_rho"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["paired_numeric_columns"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Spearman's correlation"}}, {"id": "method-9", "family": "clustering", "specific": "kmeans", "label": "Clustering", "dsl_operations": ["kmeans_fit"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["feature_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "K-means"}}, {"id": "method-10", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "pathway_enrichment", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "GO enrichment"}}, {"id": "method-11", "family": null, "specific": null, "label": "Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with area under the curve (AUC)", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": null, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": [], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine the diagnostic value of the candidate genes. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to quantify their value, with an AUC value greater than 0.7 being considered the ideal diagnostic threshold."}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_named_unmapped", "method.group_comparison_wilcoxon"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "data", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": false, "required_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: wilcoxon."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R4", "reachable": false, "accessions": [], "resolved_accessions": [], "statements": ["The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author."], "basis": "The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:40297163"], "steps": []}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [{"operation": "group_comparison_wilcoxon", "unlocks_papers": null, "priority": null}], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:None"]}, "gaps": ["data:accession_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T19:51:15Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 10179, "completion_tokens": 1858, "cached_tokens": 256}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:40297163", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:40297163"}, {"id": "source:pmid:40297163", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 40297163 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:40297163", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:40297163"}, {"id": "source:pmid:40297163", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 40297163 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-40297163", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:40297163"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-None", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:None"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:40297163", "parent_hash": "sha256:32ce890e79da1394f430eeb7f1bc6b9314d18a23330eb56958aa020034f6fee1", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["execution.not_run", "method.group_comparison_wilcoxon", "method.reader_named_unmapped", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent", "step:run_analysis blocked on method:group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "assays": [{"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "group_comparison", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 0.8, "evidence": ["Wilcoxon"], "order_basis": "analysis_only", "id": "assay:1"}]}