Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:40319430

Predicting the Risk of Lumbar Prolapsed Disc: A Gene Signature-Based Machine Learning Analysis.

Fengfeng Wang · Fei Meng · Stanley Sau Ching Wong

Pain and therapy · 2025 doi:10.1007/s40122-025-00744-4

Paper

complete

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

partial

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:40319430
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:d2e8c07f9dbb940cca31ecf58edf490e6a8cf428df16a4664f2874d84381b315
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T20:30:28Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:14:01Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Predicting the Risk of Lumbar Prolapsed Disc: A Gene Signature-Based Machine Learning Analysis.
doi
10.1007/s40122-025-00744-4
pmid
40319430
authors array · 3 items
[0]
Fengfeng Wang
[1]
Fei Meng
[2]
Stanley Sau Ching Wong
journal
Pain and therapy
year
2025
abstract
INTRODUCTION: Lumbar prolapsed disc (LPD) is a leading cause of low back pain, contributing significantly to global disability and healthcare burden. This study aimed to develop machine learning models to predict the risk of LPD by analysing gene expression profiles for early detection. METHODS: Transcriptomic data from peripheral blood samples were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, with dataset GSE150408 used for training and GSE124272 for testing. The training dataset included 17 patients with sciatica resulting from LPD, all of whom had magnetic resonance imaging confirmation of single-level LPD at either the L4/5 or L5/S1 levels. Data from 17 healthy volunteers were used as controls. Recursive feature elimination (RFE) was employed to identify the most relevant gene signatures among 23 pain-related genes. Machine learning models, including support vector machine (SVM), random forest, k-nearest neighbours (KNN), logistic regression, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), were trained and evaluated. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), F1 score, and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC). RESULTS: Eight key gene signatures were identified as significant predictors of LPD, with MMP9 exhibiting the highest importance score. Most of these genes were differentially expressed between patients with LPD and healthy controls (p < 0.05). Among the models, random forest demonstrated the highest accuracy (0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.85) and MCC (0.64, 95% CI 0.53-0.76), followed by KNN, XGBoost, and SVM. Overall, the random forest model exhibited the most robust performance in predicting the risk of LPD. CONCLUSION: The results of our study suggest that machine learning models based on pain-related gene signatures may identify patients at high risk of developing LPD with reasonably high accuracy. These prediction models could perhaps be integrated into clinical diagnostic tools to enhance early diagnosis and prevention.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
We used t test or Mann–Whitney U test to compare the expression levels of selected gene signatures between two groups, with significance determined by a p value less than 0.05.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:40319430
locator
sections[10] "Statistical Analysis" paragraph 2
quote
We used t test or Mann–Whitney U test to compare the expression levels of selected gene signatures between two groups, with significance determined by a p value less than 0.05.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
The datasets used and/or analysed in the current study were obtained from the publicly available Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE150408 and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE124272).
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:40319430
locator
sections[21] "notes" paragraph 1
quote
The datasets used and/or analysed in the current study were obtained from the publicly available Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE150408 and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE124272).
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
Among the models, random forest demonstrated the highest accuracy (0.80, 95% CI 0.73–0.85) and MCC (0.64, 95% CI 0.53–0.76), followed by KNN, XGBoost, and SVM.
kind
quantitative
target object · 4 fields
value
95
unit
per cent
tolerance
null
source
Among the models, random forest demonstrated the highest accuracy (0.80, 95% CI 0.73–0.85) and MCC (0.64, 95% CI 0.53–0.76), followed by KNN, XGBoost, and SVM.
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:40319430
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 3
quote
Among the models, random forest demonstrated the highest accuracy (0.80, 95% CI 0.73–0.85) and MCC (0.64, 95% CI 0.53–0.76), followed by KNN, XGBoost, and SVM.
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
Among the models, random forest demonstrated the highest accuracy (0.80, 95% CI 0.73–0.85) and MCC (0.64, 95% CI 0.53–0.76), followed by KNN, XGBoost, and SVM.
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:40319430
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE124272
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
blocked
blocked_on
method:machine_learning_random_forest
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE124272
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
step:run_analysis blocked on method:machine_learning_random_forest
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 3 items
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:40319430
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-025-00744-4
sha256
sha256:2717b409446d1ed76f3f0f5353ea608a740cb4786a4badf9b32549d56d4cacb9
bytes
31518
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.1007/s40122-025-00744-4
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC12085505
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body_without_references
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
[1] object · 15 fields
id
data:geo:GSE124272
role
raw
format
geo-series
media_type
application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json
uri
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE124272
sha256
null
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
GSE124272
version
null
note
The datasets used and/or analysed in the current study were obtained from the publicly available Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE150408 and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE124272).
structure object · 15 fields
repository
GEO
access_route
GEO accession URL
access_statement_verbatim
The datasets used and/or analysed in the current study were obtained from the publicly available Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE150408 and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE124272).
access_statement_kind
data_availability_statement
sample_accessions array · 16 items
[0]
GSM3526782
[1]
GSM3526783
[2]
GSM3526784
[3]
GSM3526785
[4]
GSM3526786
[5]
GSM3526787
[6]
GSM3526788
[7]
GSM3526789
[8]
GSM3526790
[9]
GSM3526791
[10]
GSM3526792
[11]
GSM3526793
[12]
GSM3526794
[13]
GSM3526795
[14]
GSM3526796
[15]
GSM3526797
sample_count
16
group_sizes
null
group_sizes_basis
null
platform
21185
taxon
Homo sapiens
title
Transcriptome signatures reveal candidate key genes in the whole blood of patients with lumbar disc prolapse
resolution_checked_at
2026-11-01T15:39:54Z
resolution_check
identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read
downloaded
false
licence_read
false
[2] object · 15 fields
id
data:geo:GSE150408
role
raw
format
geo-series
media_type
application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json
uri
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE150408
sha256
null
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
GSE150408
version
null
note
The datasets used and/or analysed in the current study were obtained from the publicly available Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE150408 and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE124272).
structure object · 15 fields
repository
GEO
access_route
GEO accession URL
access_statement_verbatim
The datasets used and/or analysed in the current study were obtained from the publicly available Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE150408 and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE124272).
access_statement_kind
data_availability_statement
sample_accessions array · 59 items
[0]
GSM4548691
[1]
GSM4548692
[2]
GSM4548693
[3]
GSM4548694
[4]
GSM4548695
[5]
GSM4548696
[6]
GSM4548697
[7]
GSM4548698
[8]
GSM4548699
[9]
GSM4548700
[10]
GSM4548701
[11]
GSM4548702
[12]
GSM4548703
[13]
GSM4548704
[14]
GSM4548705
[15]
GSM4548706
[16]
GSM4548707
[17]
GSM4548708
[18]
GSM4548709
[19]
GSM4548710
[20]
GSM4548711
[21]
GSM4548712
[22]
GSM4548713
[23]
GSM4548714
[24]
GSM4548715
[25]
GSM4548716
[26]
GSM4548717
[27]
GSM4548718
[28]
GSM4548719
[29]
GSM4548720
[30]
GSM4548721
[31]
GSM4548722
[32]
GSM4548723
[33]
GSM4548724
[34]
GSM4548725
[35]
GSM4548726
[36]
GSM4548727
[37]
GSM4548728
[38]
GSM4548729
[39]
GSM4548730
[40]
GSM4548731
[41]
GSM4548732
[42]
GSM4548733
[43]
GSM4548734
[44]
GSM4548735
[45]
GSM4548736
[46]
GSM4548737
[47]
GSM4548738
[48]
GSM4548739
[49]
GSM4548740
[50]
GSM4548741
[51]
GSM4548742
[52]
GSM4548743
[53]
GSM4548744
[54]
GSM4548745
[55]
GSM4548746
[56]
GSM4548747
[57]
GSM4548748
[58]
GSM4548749
sample_count
59
group_sizes
null
group_sizes_basis
null
platform
21185
taxon
Homo sapiens
title
Identification of key genes potentially related to intervertebral disc degeneration by microarray analysis
resolution_checked_at
2026-11-01T17:30:42Z
resolution_check
identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read
downloaded
false
licence_read
false
gaps array · 4 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE124272 not downloaded
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE124272 licence not read
[2]
asset:data:geo:GSE150408 not downloaded
[3]
asset:data:geo:GSE150408 licence not read
analysis object · 4 fields
state
partial
methods array · 5 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
machine_learning
specific
random_forest
label
Machine learning
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 1 item
[0]
machine_learning_random_forest
expressible
false
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
labelled_feature_matrix
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
random forest
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
machine_learning
specific
support_vector_machine
label
Machine learning
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
train_classifier
[1]
cross_validate
[2]
roc_auc
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
labelled_feature_matrix
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
support vector machine
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
machine_learning
specific
gradient_boosting
label
Machine learning
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
train_classifier
[1]
cross_validate
[2]
roc_auc
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
labelled_feature_matrix
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
Gradient Boosting
[3] object · 10 fields
id
method-4
family
regression_modelling
specific
logistic
label
Regression modelling
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
glm_logit_fit
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
predictors_and_outcome
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
logistic regression
[4] object · 10 fields
id
method-5
family
null
specific
null
label
t test or Mann–Whitney U test
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 0 items
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
We used t test or Mann–Whitney U test to compare the expression levels of selected gene signatures between two groups, with significance determined by a p value less than 0.05.
targets array · 1 item
[0] object · 8 fields
id
target-published-estimate
claim_id
claim-target-result
operation
cross_validate
unit
per cent
tolerance
null
state
complete
note
The published estimate as the reader quoted it from the paper. No tolerance is published because the paper states none.
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
method.reader_named_unmapped
[1]
method.machine_learning_random_forest
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
complete
tier
R1
blocked_on
nothing:replicable_now
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
false
required_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 1 item
[0]
machine_learning_random_forest
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: random_forest.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R1
reachable
true
accessions array · 2 items
[0]
GSE150408
[1]
GSE124272
resolved_accessions array · 2 items
[0]
GSE150408
[1]
GSE124272
statements array · 1 item
[0]
The datasets used and/or analysed in the current study were obtained from the publicly available Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE150408 and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE124272).
basis
The paper names GSE150408, GSE124272 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
assets array · 2 items
[0]
source:pmid:40319430
[1]
data:geo:GSE124272
steps array · 0 items
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
operation
machine_learning_random_forest
priority
null
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE124272
gaps array · 0 items
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T19:51:41Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
8991
completion_tokens
1733
cached_tokens
264
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:40319430
type
paper
label
pmid:40319430
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:40319430
type
manuscript
label
PMID 40319430 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE124272
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE124272
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:40319430
type
paper
label
pmid:40319430
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:40319430
type
manuscript
label
PMID 40319430 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE124272
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE124272
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-40319430
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:40319430
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-GSE124272
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE124272
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:40319430
parent_hash
sha256:4b785bc375104eaca96765e50aa698262975c1c2b269a0224d3f59aaa73fda55
fork_of
null
gaps array · 11 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE124272 licence not read
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE124272 not downloaded
[2]
asset:data:geo:GSE150408 licence not read
[3]
asset:data:geo:GSE150408 not downloaded
[4]
execution.not_run
[5]
method.machine_learning_random_forest
[6]
method.reader_named_unmapped
[7]
review.human_critique
[8]
review.independent_reader
[9]
review.machine_critique
[10]
step:run_analysis blocked on method:machine_learning_random_forest
assays array · 1 item
[0] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
machine_learning
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
random forest
order_basis
analysis_only
id
assay:1
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:40319430", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 3, "content_hash": "sha256:d2e8c07f9dbb940cca31ecf58edf490e6a8cf428df16a4664f2874d84381b315", "created_at": "2026-11-01T20:30:28Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:14:01Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Predicting the Risk of Lumbar Prolapsed Disc: A Gene Signature-Based Machine Learning Analysis.", "doi": "10.1007/s40122-025-00744-4", "pmid": "40319430", "authors": ["Fengfeng Wang", "Fei Meng", "Stanley Sau Ching Wong"], "journal": "Pain and therapy", "year": 2025, "abstract": "INTRODUCTION: Lumbar prolapsed disc (LPD) is a leading cause of low back pain, contributing significantly to global disability and healthcare burden. This study aimed to develop machine learning models to predict the risk of LPD by analysing gene expression profiles for early detection.\nMETHODS: Transcriptomic data from peripheral blood samples were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, with dataset GSE150408 used for training and GSE124272 for testing. The training dataset included 17 patients with sciatica resulting from LPD, all of whom had magnetic resonance imaging confirmation of single-level LPD at either the L4/5 or L5/S1 levels. Data from 17 healthy volunteers were used as controls. Recursive feature elimination (RFE) was employed to identify the most relevant gene signatures among 23 pain-related genes. Machine learning models, including support vector machine (SVM), random forest, k-nearest neighbours (KNN), logistic regression, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), were trained and evaluated. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), F1 score, and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC).\nRESULTS: Eight key gene signatures were identified as significant predictors of LPD, with MMP9 exhibiting the highest importance score. Most of these genes were differentially expressed between patients with LPD and healthy controls (p < 0.05). Among the models, random forest demonstrated the highest accuracy (0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.85) and MCC (0.64, 95% CI 0.53-0.76), followed by KNN, XGBoost, and SVM. Overall, the random forest model exhibited the most robust performance in predicting the risk of LPD.\nCONCLUSION: The results of our study suggest that machine learning models based on pain-related gene signatures may identify patients at high risk of developing LPD with reasonably high accuracy. These prediction models could perhaps be integrated into clinical diagnostic tools to enhance early diagnosis and prevention.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "We used t test or Mann–Whitney U test to compare the expression levels of selected gene signatures between two groups, with significance determined by a p value less than 0.05.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40319430", "locator": "sections[10] \"Statistical Analysis\" paragraph 2", "quote": "We used t test or Mann–Whitney U test to compare the expression levels of selected gene signatures between two groups, with significance determined by a p value less than 0.05."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The datasets used and/or analysed in the current study were obtained from the publicly available Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE150408 and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE124272).", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40319430", "locator": "sections[21] \"notes\" paragraph 1", "quote": "The datasets used and/or analysed in the current study were obtained from the publicly available Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE150408 and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE124272)."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "Among the models, random forest demonstrated the highest accuracy (0.80, 95% CI 0.73–0.85) and MCC (0.64, 95% CI 0.53–0.76), followed by KNN, XGBoost, and SVM.", "kind": "quantitative", "target": {"value": 95.0, "unit": "per cent", "tolerance": null, "source": "Among the models, random forest demonstrated the highest accuracy (0.80, 95% CI 0.73–0.85) and MCC (0.64, 95% CI 0.53–0.76), followed by KNN, XGBoost, and SVM."}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40319430", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "Among the models, random forest demonstrated the highest accuracy (0.80, 95% CI 0.73–0.85) and MCC (0.64, 95% CI 0.53–0.76), followed by KNN, XGBoost, and SVM."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "Among the models, random forest demonstrated the highest accuracy (0.80, 95% CI 0.73–0.85) and MCC (0.64, 95% CI 0.53–0.76), followed by KNN, XGBoost, and SVM.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:40319430"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE124272"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "method:machine_learning_random_forest", "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE124272"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:run_analysis blocked on method:machine_learning_random_forest"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:40319430", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-025-00744-4", "sha256": "sha256:2717b409446d1ed76f3f0f5353ea608a740cb4786a4badf9b32549d56d4cacb9", "bytes": 31518, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1007/s40122-025-00744-4", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC12085505", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE124272", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE124272", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE124272", "version": null, "note": "The datasets used and/or analysed in the current study were obtained from the publicly available Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE150408 and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE124272).", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The datasets used and/or analysed in the current study were obtained from the publicly available Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE150408 and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE124272).", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM3526782", "GSM3526783", "GSM3526784", "GSM3526785", "GSM3526786", "GSM3526787", "GSM3526788", "GSM3526789", "GSM3526790", "GSM3526791", "GSM3526792", "GSM3526793", "GSM3526794", "GSM3526795", "GSM3526796", "GSM3526797"], "sample_count": 16, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "21185", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Transcriptome signatures reveal candidate key genes in the whole blood of patients with lumbar disc prolapse", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE150408", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE150408", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE150408", "version": null, "note": "The datasets used and/or analysed in the current study were obtained from the publicly available Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE150408 and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE124272).", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The datasets used and/or analysed in the current study were obtained from the publicly available Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE150408 and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE124272).", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM4548691", "GSM4548692", "GSM4548693", "GSM4548694", "GSM4548695", "GSM4548696", "GSM4548697", "GSM4548698", "GSM4548699", "GSM4548700", "GSM4548701", "GSM4548702", "GSM4548703", "GSM4548704", "GSM4548705", "GSM4548706", "GSM4548707", "GSM4548708", "GSM4548709", "GSM4548710", "GSM4548711", "GSM4548712", "GSM4548713", "GSM4548714", "GSM4548715", "GSM4548716", "GSM4548717", "GSM4548718", "GSM4548719", "GSM4548720", "GSM4548721", "GSM4548722", "GSM4548723", "GSM4548724", "GSM4548725", "GSM4548726", "GSM4548727", "GSM4548728", "GSM4548729", "GSM4548730", "GSM4548731", "GSM4548732", "GSM4548733", "GSM4548734", "GSM4548735", "GSM4548736", "GSM4548737", "GSM4548738", "GSM4548739", "GSM4548740", "GSM4548741", "GSM4548742", "GSM4548743", "GSM4548744", "GSM4548745", "GSM4548746", "GSM4548747", "GSM4548748", "GSM4548749"], "sample_count": 59, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "21185", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Identification of key genes potentially related to intervertebral disc degeneration by microarray analysis", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T17:30:42Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE124272 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE124272 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE150408 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE150408 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "machine_learning", "specific": "random_forest", "label": "Machine learning", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["machine_learning_random_forest"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["labelled_feature_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "random forest"}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "machine_learning", "specific": "support_vector_machine", "label": "Machine learning", "dsl_operations": ["train_classifier", "cross_validate", "roc_auc"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["labelled_feature_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "support vector machine"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "machine_learning", "specific": "gradient_boosting", "label": "Machine learning", "dsl_operations": ["train_classifier", "cross_validate", "roc_auc"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["labelled_feature_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "Gradient Boosting"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "regression_modelling", "specific": "logistic", "label": "Regression modelling", "dsl_operations": ["glm_logit_fit"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["predictors_and_outcome"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "logistic regression"}}, {"id": "method-5", "family": null, "specific": null, "label": "t test or Mann–Whitney U test", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": null, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": [], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "We used t test or Mann–Whitney U test to compare the expression levels of selected gene signatures between two groups, with significance determined by a p value less than 0.05."}}], "targets": [{"id": "target-published-estimate", "claim_id": "claim-target-result", "operation": "cross_validate", "expected_value": 95.0, "unit": "per cent", "tolerance": null, "state": "complete", "note": "The published estimate as the reader quoted it from the paper. No tolerance is published because the paper states none."}], "gaps": ["method.reader_named_unmapped", "method.machine_learning_random_forest"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": false, "required_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["machine_learning_random_forest"], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: random_forest."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE150408", "GSE124272"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE150408", "GSE124272"], "statements": ["The datasets used and/or analysed in the current study were obtained from the publicly available Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE150408 and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE124272)."], "basis": "The paper names GSE150408, GSE124272 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:40319430", "data:geo:GSE124272"], "steps": []}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [{"operation": "machine_learning_random_forest", "unlocks_papers": null, "priority": null}], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE124272"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T19:51:41Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 8991, "completion_tokens": 1733, "cached_tokens": 264}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:40319430", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:40319430"}, {"id": "source:pmid:40319430", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 40319430 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE124272", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE124272"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:40319430", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:40319430"}, {"id": "source:pmid:40319430", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 40319430 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE124272", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE124272"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-40319430", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:40319430"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE124272", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE124272"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:40319430", "parent_hash": "sha256:4b785bc375104eaca96765e50aa698262975c1c2b269a0224d3f59aaa73fda55", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE124272 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE124272 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE150408 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE150408 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.machine_learning_random_forest", "method.reader_named_unmapped", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:run_analysis blocked on method:machine_learning_random_forest"], "assays": [{"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "machine_learning", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 0.7, "evidence": ["random forest"], "order_basis": "analysis_only", "id": "assay:1"}]}