Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:40443672

Bioinformatics meets machine learning: identifying circulating biomarkers for vitiligo across blood and tissues.

Qiyu Wang · Jingwei Yuan · Mengdi Zhang · Haiyan Jia · Hongjie Lu · Yan Wu

Frontiers in immunology · 2025 doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1543355

Paper

complete

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

complete

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:40443672
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:6a5a1ceacf592fe0da5e26c13cda8cd1c615e7baa99a629f91e0e0030ced04cd
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T20:30:34Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:56:36Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Bioinformatics meets machine learning: identifying circulating biomarkers for vitiligo across blood and tissues.
doi
10.3389/fimmu.2025.1543355
pmid
40443672
authors array · 6 items
[0]
Qiyu Wang
[1]
Jingwei Yuan
[2]
Mengdi Zhang
[3]
Haiyan Jia
[4]
Hongjie Lu
[5]
Yan Wu
journal
Frontiers in immunology
year
2025
abstract
Background: Vitiligo is a skin disorder characterized by the progressive loss of pigmentation in the skin and mucous membranes. The exact aetiology and pathogenesis of vitiligo remain incompletely understood. Methods: First, a microarray dataset of blood samples from multiple patients with vitiligo was collected from GEO database.The limma package was used to analyze the microarray data and identify significant differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The merged microarray data were then used for WGCNA to identify modules of features genes. DEGs selected with the limma package and module genes derived from the WGCNA were intersected using the Venn package in R. Enrichment analyses were performed on the overlapping genes, including Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes methodology. Advanced screening was performed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and support vector machine techniques from the machine learning toolkit. CIBERSORT was used to analyse the immune cell composition in the microarray data to assess the relationships among these genes and immune cells. Biological samples were obtained from the patients, and gene expression analysis was performed to evaluate the levels of core genes throughout the progression of vitiligo. Finally, we obtained the microarray datasets GSE53146 and GSE75819 from the affected skin of vitiligo patients and GSE205155 from healthy skin to perform expression analysis and gene set enrichment analysis of the hub genes. Results: Two hub genes, HMGA1 and PSMD13, were identified via machine learning and WGCNA. The analysis of immune cell infiltration suggested that different immune cell types could play a role in the progression of vitiligo. Moreover, these hub genes exhibited varying degrees of association with immune cell profiles. qRT-PCR analysis of blood samples from vitiligo patients revealed notable downregulation of the hub genes. Analysis of the microarray datasets derived from skin lesions revealed that HMGA1 expression levels remained relatively stable, whereas PSMD13 expression levels markedly decreased. Conclusion: PSMD13 may influence vitiligo development via the Nod-like receptor signaling pathway and could serve as a potential diagnostic marker for evaluating skin lesions in vitiligo.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
The R package “limma” was used to identify DEGs between the vitiligo patient group and healthy control group for both the GSE90880 and GSE80009 datasets.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:40443672
locator
sections[4] "Identification of DEGs" paragraph 2
quote
The R package “limma” was used to identify DEGs between the vitiligo patient group and healthy control group for both the GSE90880 and GSE80009 datasets.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:40443672
locator
sections[29] "Data availability statement" paragraph 2
quote
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/.
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
Two hub genes, HMGA1 and PSMD13, were identified via machine learning and WGCNA.
kind
qualitative
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:40443672
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 3
quote
Two hub genes, HMGA1 and PSMD13, were identified via machine learning and WGCNA.
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
Two hub genes, HMGA1 and PSMD13, were identified via machine learning and WGCNA.
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:40443672
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
blocked
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 1 item
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:40443672
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1543355
sha256
sha256:bd91b10e735706c309f0b92f0fa55dd381d7417e50448a751ba03b13e47fb1bf
bytes
47052
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.3389/fimmu.2025.1543355
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC12119563
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
gaps array · 0 items
analysis object · 4 fields
state
complete
methods array · 4 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
differential_expression
specific
limma_voom
label
Differential expression analysis
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
normalise_counts
[1]
differential_expression_fit
[2]
fdr_bh
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
count_matrix_with_condition
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
The R package “limma” was used to identify DEGs between the vitiligo patient group and healthy control group for both the GSE90880 and GSE80009 datasets.
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
machine_learning
specific
random_forest
label
Machine learning
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 1 item
[0]
machine_learning_random_forest
expressible
false
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
labelled_feature_matrix
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
random forest
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
machine_learning
specific
support_vector_machine
label
Machine learning
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
train_classifier
[1]
cross_validate
[2]
roc_auc
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
labelled_feature_matrix
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
support vector machine
[3] object · 10 fields
id
method-4
family
regression_modelling
specific
logistic
label
Regression modelling
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
glm_logit_fit
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
predictors_and_outcome
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
logistic regression
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 0 items
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
blocked
tier
R4
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 3 items
[0]
normalise_counts
[1]
differential_expression_fit
[2]
fdr_bh
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: limma_voom.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R4
reachable
false
accessions array · 5 items
[0]
GSE90880 (GPL8300)
[1]
GSE80009 (GPL16951)
[2]
GSE53146 (GPL14951)
[3]
GSE75819 (GPL6884)
[4]
GSE205155 (GPL14550)
resolved_accessions array · 0 items
statements array · 1 item
[0]
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/.
basis
The paper names GSE90880 (GPL8300), GSE80009 (GPL16951), GSE53146 (GPL14951), GSE75819 (GPL6884), GSE205155 (GPL14550), but the accession does not resolve in the repository (no reason recorded, no reason recorded, no reason recorded, no reason recorded, no reason recorded), so the data cannot be reached from here. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
normalise_counts
[1]
differential_expression_fit
[2]
fdr_bh
assets array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:40443672
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:accession_absent
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T19:53:34Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
13750
completion_tokens
2213
cached_tokens
256
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:40443672
type
paper
label
pmid:40443672
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:40443672
type
manuscript
label
PMID 40443672 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:40443672
type
paper
label
pmid:40443672
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:40443672
type
manuscript
label
PMID 40443672 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-40443672
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:40443672
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-None
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:40443672
parent_hash
sha256:fc296727af6921ef9acb482ccf6f3ab5d52b692caee8774343827e2da52b5dd3
fork_of
null
gaps array · 5 items
[0]
execution.not_run
[1]
review.human_critique
[2]
review.independent_reader
[3]
review.machine_critique
[4]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
assays array · 2 items
[0] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_id
microarray
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.99
evidence array · 4 items
[0]
n incompletely understood. Methods: First, a microarray dataset of blood samples from multiple patie
[1]
se.The limma package was used to analyze the microarray data and identify significant differentially
[2]
rentially expressed genes (DEGs). The merged microarray data were then used for WGCNA to identify mo
[3]
o analyse the immune cell composition in the microarray data to assess the relationships among these
order_basis
paper_text_order:295
id
assay:1
[1] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
differential_expression
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 3 items
[0]
normalise_counts
[1]
differential_expression_fit
[2]
fdr_bh
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
The R package “limma” was used to identify DEGs between the vitiligo patient group and healthy control group for both the GSE90880 and GSE80009 datasets.
order_basis
consumes_earlier_output
id
assay:2
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:40443672", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 4, "content_hash": "sha256:6a5a1ceacf592fe0da5e26c13cda8cd1c615e7baa99a629f91e0e0030ced04cd", "created_at": "2026-11-01T20:30:34Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:56:36Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Bioinformatics meets machine learning: identifying circulating biomarkers for vitiligo across blood and tissues.", "doi": "10.3389/fimmu.2025.1543355", "pmid": "40443672", "authors": ["Qiyu Wang", "Jingwei Yuan", "Mengdi Zhang", "Haiyan Jia", "Hongjie Lu", "Yan Wu"], "journal": "Frontiers in immunology", "year": 2025, "abstract": "Background: Vitiligo is a skin disorder characterized by the progressive loss of pigmentation in the skin and mucous membranes. The exact aetiology and pathogenesis of vitiligo remain incompletely understood.\nMethods: First, a microarray dataset of blood samples from multiple patients with vitiligo was collected from GEO database.The limma package was used to analyze the microarray data and identify significant differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The merged microarray data were then used for WGCNA to identify modules of features genes. DEGs selected with the limma package and module genes derived from the WGCNA were intersected using the Venn package in R. Enrichment analyses were performed on the overlapping genes, including Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes methodology. Advanced screening was performed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and support vector machine techniques from the machine learning toolkit. CIBERSORT was used to analyse the immune cell composition in the microarray data to assess the relationships among these genes and immune cells. Biological samples were obtained from the patients, and gene expression analysis was performed to evaluate the levels of core genes throughout the progression of vitiligo. Finally, we obtained the microarray datasets GSE53146 and GSE75819 from the affected skin of vitiligo patients and GSE205155 from healthy skin to perform expression analysis and gene set enrichment analysis of the hub genes.\nResults: Two hub genes, HMGA1 and PSMD13, were identified via machine learning and WGCNA. The analysis of immune cell infiltration suggested that different immune cell types could play a role in the progression of vitiligo. Moreover, these hub genes exhibited varying degrees of association with immune cell profiles. qRT-PCR analysis of blood samples from vitiligo patients revealed notable downregulation of the hub genes. Analysis of the microarray datasets derived from skin lesions revealed that HMGA1 expression levels remained relatively stable, whereas PSMD13 expression levels markedly decreased.\nConclusion: PSMD13 may influence vitiligo development via the Nod-like receptor signaling pathway and could serve as a potential diagnostic marker for evaluating skin lesions in vitiligo.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "The R package “limma” was used to identify DEGs between the vitiligo patient group and healthy control group for both the GSE90880 and GSE80009 datasets.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40443672", "locator": "sections[4] \"Identification of DEGs\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The R package “limma” was used to identify DEGs between the vitiligo patient group and healthy control group for both the GSE90880 and GSE80009 datasets."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40443672", "locator": "sections[29] \"Data availability statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "Two hub genes, HMGA1 and PSMD13, were identified via machine learning and WGCNA.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40443672", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "Two hub genes, HMGA1 and PSMD13, were identified via machine learning and WGCNA."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "Two hub genes, HMGA1 and PSMD13, were identified via machine learning and WGCNA.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:40443672"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:40443672", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1543355", "sha256": "sha256:bd91b10e735706c309f0b92f0fa55dd381d7417e50448a751ba03b13e47fb1bf", "bytes": 47052, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3389/fimmu.2025.1543355", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC12119563", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}], "gaps": []}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "differential_expression", "specific": "limma_voom", "label": "Differential expression analysis", "dsl_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["count_matrix_with_condition"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "The R package “limma” was used to identify DEGs between the vitiligo patient group and healthy control group for both the GSE90880 and GSE80009 datasets."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "machine_learning", "specific": "random_forest", "label": "Machine learning", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["machine_learning_random_forest"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["labelled_feature_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "random forest"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "machine_learning", "specific": "support_vector_machine", "label": "Machine learning", "dsl_operations": ["train_classifier", "cross_validate", "roc_auc"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["labelled_feature_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "support vector machine"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "regression_modelling", "specific": "logistic", "label": "Regression modelling", "dsl_operations": ["glm_logit_fit"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["predictors_and_outcome"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "logistic regression"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "data", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: limma_voom."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R4", "reachable": false, "accessions": ["GSE90880 (GPL8300)", "GSE80009 (GPL16951)", "GSE53146 (GPL14951)", "GSE75819 (GPL6884)", "GSE205155 (GPL14550)"], "resolved_accessions": [], "statements": ["Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/."], "basis": "The paper names GSE90880 (GPL8300), GSE80009 (GPL16951), GSE53146 (GPL14951), GSE75819 (GPL6884), GSE205155 (GPL14550), but the accession does not resolve in the repository (no reason recorded, no reason recorded, no reason recorded, no reason recorded, no reason recorded), so the data cannot be reached from here. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "assets": ["source:pmid:40443672"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:None"]}, "gaps": ["data:accession_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T19:53:34Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 13750, "completion_tokens": 2213, "cached_tokens": 256}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:40443672", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:40443672"}, {"id": "source:pmid:40443672", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 40443672 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:40443672", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:40443672"}, {"id": "source:pmid:40443672", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 40443672 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-40443672", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:40443672"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-None", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:None"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:40443672", "parent_hash": "sha256:fc296727af6921ef9acb482ccf6f3ab5d52b692caee8774343827e2da52b5dd3", "fork_of": null, "generation": 3}, "gaps": ["execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "microarray", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["n incompletely understood. Methods: First, a microarray dataset of blood samples from multiple patie", "se.The limma package was used to analyze the microarray data and identify significant differentially", "rentially expressed genes (DEGs). The merged microarray data were then used for WGCNA to identify mo", "o analyse the immune cell composition in the microarray data to assess the relationships among these"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:295", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "differential_expression", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["The R package “limma” was used to identify DEGs between the vitiligo patient group and healthy control group for both the GSE90880 and GSE80009 datasets."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:2"}]}