Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:40453197

Comprehensive Analysis of the Role of Metabolic Features in Osteoporosis: A Multi-Omics Analysis.

Shengjia Chang · Weiwei Tao · Pengwen Shi · Huashan Wu · Hongjun Liu · Junjie Xu · Jianghua Chen · Jianfei Zhu

International journal of general medicine · 2025 doi:10.2147/IJGM.S515717

Paper

complete

Experiment

complete

Data

partial

Analysis

complete

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:40453197
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:0a235359eccbe9aa59581f68abfdfd3b13f04201d3943cc655417ee4ff050536
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T20:30:35Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:56:36Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Comprehensive Analysis of the Role of Metabolic Features in Osteoporosis: A Multi-Omics Analysis.
doi
10.2147/IJGM.S515717
pmid
40453197
authors array · 8 items
[0]
Shengjia Chang
[1]
Weiwei Tao
[2]
Pengwen Shi
[3]
Huashan Wu
[4]
Hongjun Liu
[5]
Junjie Xu
[6]
Jianghua Chen
[7]
Jianfei Zhu
journal
International journal of general medicine
year
2025
abstract
Purpose: This study aims to comprehensively explore the metabolic features related to the pathogenesis of osteoporosis (OP) through multi-omics analysis strategy. Patients and Methods: Gene expression profiles of OP patients (GSE56815) were downloaded from GEO, and metabolism-related genes (MRGs) were extracted. Plasma samples from 45 OP patients and 18 healthy controls (CON) were collected for metabolomics. We predicted miRNA and transcription factors (TFs) regulating the expression of MRGs on public databases ENCORI and JASPAR, and analyzed the expression levels of target miRNAs using miRNA sequencing of femoral tissues from 7 samples (OP:CON=4:3). Three machine learning algorithms were used to evaluate the diagnostic potential of metabolic signatures for OP. Results: A total of 402 significantly differentially expressed MRGs (DEMRGs) were identified in the transcriptome, and these DEMRGs were enriched in 11 metabolic pathways (P<0.05). Metabolomics identified 119 differential plasma metabolites, enriched in 5 metabolic pathways (P<0.05). Purine metabolism, Tryptophan metabolism, and Tyrosine metabolism were identified as key metabolic pathways and were significantly enriched in DEMRGs. Femoral miRNA sequencing found 124 differentially expressed miRNAs, with 23 regulating key metabolic pathway gene expression (P<0.05). Additionally, 13 differentially expressed TFs were predicted to regulate the expression levels of these 23 miRNAs. Finally, three MRGs and one plasma metabolite were selected based on the machine learning algorithm, with AUC of 0.782, 0.714, 0.772 and 0.836, respectively. The diagnostic performance of these metabolic features was better than that of traditional bone metabolism biochemical markers. Conclusion: This multi-omics study comprehensively explores the metabolic landscape in OP progression, highlighting the central role of metabolic features in the disease. The constructed multi-omics regulatory network aids in understanding the molecular mechanisms of metabolic features in OP progression.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
Differential expression analysis was conducted using the Limma software, defining p < 0.05 and |log2FC|≧1 as significantly differentially expressed miRNAs. Differential expression gene analysis was conducted using the “limma” R package, defining genes with P<0.05 as differentially expressed metabolic-related genes (DEMRGs). In this study, we employed three machine learning algorithms—Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)—to comprehensively explore metabolic feature biomarkers from MRGs and plasma metabolites.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:40453197
locator
sections[7] "Differential Expression Analysis of miRNAs" paragraph 2
quote
Differential expression analysis was conducted using the Limma software, defining p < 0.05 and |log2FC|≧1 as significantly differentially expressed miRNAs.
[1] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:40453197
locator
sections[8] "Extraction and Analysis of MRGs" paragraph 2
quote
Differential expression gene analysis was conducted using the “limma” R package, defining genes with P<0.05 as differentially expressed metabolic-related genes (DEMRGs).
[2] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:40453197
locator
sections[10] "Machine Learning-Based Selection of Metabolic Features Biomarkers" paragraph 2
quote
In this study, we employed three machine learning algorithms—Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)—to comprehensively explore metabolic feature biomarkers from MRGs and plasma metabolites.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:40453197
locator
sections[20] "Data Sharing Statement" paragraph 2
quote
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
Machine-learning analysis selected three metabolic-related genes and one plasma metabolite with respective AUCs of 0.782, 0.714, 0.772, and 0.836 for osteoporosis diagnosis.
kind
quantitative
target object · 4 fields
value
0.782
unit
auc
tolerance
null
source
Finally, three MRGs and one plasma metabolite were selected based on the machine learning algorithm, with AUC of 0.782, 0.714, 0.772 and 0.836, respectively.
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:40453197
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 3
quote
Finally, three MRGs and one plasma metabolite were selected based on the machine learning algorithm, with AUC of 0.782, 0.714, 0.772 and 0.836, respectively.
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
complete
objective
Machine-learning analysis selected three metabolic-related genes and one plasma metabolite with respective AUCs of 0.782, 0.714, 0.772, and 0.836 for osteoporosis diagnosis.
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:40453197
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE56815
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE56815
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 0 items
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 2 items
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:40453197
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S515717
sha256
sha256:4046e659767a492f8d32d4f3800b0243070a066ecfa7e5657f19d2eb8c0437f2
bytes
35284
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.2147/IJGM.S515717
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC12124299
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body_without_references
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
[1] object · 15 fields
id
data:geo:GSE56815
role
raw
format
geo-series
media_type
application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json
uri
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE56815
sha256
null
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
GSE56815
version
null
note
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
structure object · 15 fields
repository
GEO
access_route
GEO accession URL
access_statement_verbatim
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
access_statement_kind
data_availability_statement
sample_accessions array · 80 items
[0]
GSM1369756
[1]
GSM1369757
[2]
GSM1369758
[3]
GSM1369759
[4]
GSM1369760
[5]
GSM1369761
[6]
GSM1369762
[7]
GSM1369763
[8]
GSM1369764
[9]
GSM1369765
[10]
GSM1369766
[11]
GSM1369767
[12]
GSM1369768
[13]
GSM1369769
[14]
GSM1369770
[15]
GSM1369771
[16]
GSM1369772
[17]
GSM1369773
[18]
GSM1369774
[19]
GSM1369775
[20]
GSM1369776
[21]
GSM1369777
[22]
GSM1369778
[23]
GSM1369779
[24]
GSM1369780
[25]
GSM1369781
[26]
GSM1369782
[27]
GSM1369783
[28]
GSM1369784
[29]
GSM1369785
[30]
GSM1369786
[31]
GSM1369787
[32]
GSM1369788
[33]
GSM1369789
[34]
GSM1369790
[35]
GSM1369791
[36]
GSM1369792
[37]
GSM1369793
[38]
GSM1369794
[39]
GSM1369795
[40]
GSM1369796
[41]
GSM1369797
[42]
GSM1369798
[43]
GSM1369799
[44]
GSM1369800
[45]
GSM1369801
[46]
GSM1369802
[47]
GSM1369803
[48]
GSM1369804
[49]
GSM1369805
[50]
GSM1369806
[51]
GSM1369807
[52]
GSM1369808
[53]
GSM1369809
[54]
GSM1369810
[55]
GSM1369811
[56]
GSM1369812
[57]
GSM1369813
[58]
GSM1369814
[59]
GSM1369815
[60]
GSM1369816
[61]
GSM1369817
[62]
GSM1369818
[63]
GSM1369819
[64]
GSM1369820
[65]
GSM1369821
[66]
GSM1369822
[67]
GSM1369823
[68]
GSM1369824
[69]
GSM1369825
[70]
GSM1369826
[71]
GSM1369827
[72]
GSM1369828
[73]
GSM1369829
[74]
GSM1369830
[75]
GSM1369831
[76]
GSM1369832
[77]
GSM1369833
[78]
GSM1369834
[79]
GSM1369835
sample_count
80
group_sizes
null
group_sizes_basis
null
platform
96
taxon
Homo sapiens
title
Gene expression study of blood monocytes in pre- and postmenopausal females with low or high bone mineral density (HG-U133A)
resolution_checked_at
2026-11-01T15:39:54Z
resolution_check
identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read
downloaded
false
licence_read
false
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE56815 not downloaded
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE56815 licence not read
analysis object · 4 fields
state
complete
methods array · 5 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
differential_expression
specific
limma_voom
label
Differential expression analysis
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
normalise_counts
[1]
differential_expression_fit
[2]
fdr_bh
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
count_matrix_with_condition
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
reordered
quote
Differential expression analysis was conducted using the Limma software, defining p < 0.05 and |log2FC|≧1 as significantly differentially expressed miRNAs. Differential expression gene analysis was conducted using the “limma” R package, defining genes with P<0.05 as differentially expressed metabolic-related genes (DEMRGs). In this study, we employed three machine learning algorithms—Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)—to comprehensively explore metabolic feature biomarkers from MRGs and plasma metabolites.
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
machine_learning
specific
random_forest
label
Machine learning
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 1 item
[0]
machine_learning_random_forest
expressible
false
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
labelled_feature_matrix
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Random Forest
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
machine_learning
specific
support_vector_machine
label
Machine learning
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
train_classifier
[1]
cross_validate
[2]
roc_auc
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
labelled_feature_matrix
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Support Vector Machine
[3] object · 10 fields
id
method-4
family
correlation_analysis
specific
spearman
label
Correlation analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
spearman_rho
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
paired_numeric_columns
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Spearman correlation
[4] object · 10 fields
id
method-5
family
network_analysis
specific
pathway_enrichment
label
Network / pathway analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
pathway_enrich
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
edge_list
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
GO enrichment
targets array · 1 item
[0] object · 8 fields
id
target-published-estimate
claim_id
claim-target-result
operation
cross_validate
unit
auc
tolerance
null
state
complete
note
The published estimate as the reader quoted it from the paper. No tolerance is published because the paper states none.
gaps array · 0 items
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
complete
tier
R1
blocked_on
nothing:replicable_now
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 3 items
[0]
normalise_counts
[1]
differential_expression_fit
[2]
fdr_bh
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: limma_voom.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R1
reachable
true
accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE56815
resolved_accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE56815
statements array · 1 item
[0]
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
basis
The paper names GSE56815 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
normalise_counts
[1]
differential_expression_fit
[2]
fdr_bh
assets array · 2 items
[0]
source:pmid:40453197
[1]
data:geo:GSE56815
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE56815
gaps array · 0 items
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T19:53:48Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
reordered
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
9385
completion_tokens
3145
cached_tokens
264
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:40453197
type
paper
label
pmid:40453197
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:40453197
type
manuscript
label
PMID 40453197 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE56815
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE56815
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:40453197
type
paper
label
pmid:40453197
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:40453197
type
manuscript
label
PMID 40453197 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE56815
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE56815
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-40453197
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:40453197
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-GSE56815
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE56815
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:40453197
parent_hash
sha256:75f4cf29bb83276cc27867cf7dd6e37a3604035a0e99e9ab5c39801d8893fb5e
fork_of
null
gaps array · 6 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE56815 licence not read
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE56815 not downloaded
[2]
execution.not_run
[3]
review.human_critique
[4]
review.independent_reader
[5]
review.machine_critique
assays array · 2 items
[0] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_id
rna_seq
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.83
evidence array · 2 items
[0]
pressed MRGs (DEMRGs) were identified in the transcriptome, and these DEMRGs were enriched in 11 metabo
[1]
nalysis of OP Metabolic Features We filtered transcriptome data and identified a total of 2068 MRGs. Am
order_basis
paper_text_order:925
id
assay:1
[1] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
differential_expression
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 3 items
[0]
normalise_counts
[1]
differential_expression_fit
[2]
fdr_bh
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
Differential expression analysis was conducted using the Limma software, defining p < 0.05 and |log2FC|≧1 as significantly differentially expressed miRNAs. Differential expression gene analysis was conducted using the “limma” R package, defining genes with P<0.05 as differentially expressed metabolic-related genes (DEMRGs). In this study, we employed three machine learning algorithms—Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)—to comprehensively explore metabolic feature biomarkers from MRGs and plasma metabolites.
order_basis
consumes_earlier_output
id
assay:2
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:40453197", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 4, "content_hash": "sha256:0a235359eccbe9aa59581f68abfdfd3b13f04201d3943cc655417ee4ff050536", "created_at": "2026-11-01T20:30:35Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:56:36Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Comprehensive Analysis of the Role of Metabolic Features in Osteoporosis: A Multi-Omics Analysis.", "doi": "10.2147/IJGM.S515717", "pmid": "40453197", "authors": ["Shengjia Chang", "Weiwei Tao", "Pengwen Shi", "Huashan Wu", "Hongjun Liu", "Junjie Xu", "Jianghua Chen", "Jianfei Zhu"], "journal": "International journal of general medicine", "year": 2025, "abstract": "Purpose: This study aims to comprehensively explore the metabolic features related to the pathogenesis of osteoporosis (OP) through multi-omics analysis strategy.\nPatients and Methods: Gene expression profiles of OP patients (GSE56815) were downloaded from GEO, and metabolism-related genes (MRGs) were extracted. Plasma samples from 45 OP patients and 18 healthy controls (CON) were collected for metabolomics. We predicted miRNA and transcription factors (TFs) regulating the expression of MRGs on public databases ENCORI and JASPAR, and analyzed the expression levels of target miRNAs using miRNA sequencing of femoral tissues from 7 samples (OP:CON=4:3). Three machine learning algorithms were used to evaluate the diagnostic potential of metabolic signatures for OP.\nResults: A total of 402 significantly differentially expressed MRGs (DEMRGs) were identified in the transcriptome, and these DEMRGs were enriched in 11 metabolic pathways (P<0.05). Metabolomics identified 119 differential plasma metabolites, enriched in 5 metabolic pathways (P<0.05). Purine metabolism, Tryptophan metabolism, and Tyrosine metabolism were identified as key metabolic pathways and were significantly enriched in DEMRGs. Femoral miRNA sequencing found 124 differentially expressed miRNAs, with 23 regulating key metabolic pathway gene expression (P<0.05). Additionally, 13 differentially expressed TFs were predicted to regulate the expression levels of these 23 miRNAs. Finally, three MRGs and one plasma metabolite were selected based on the machine learning algorithm, with AUC of 0.782, 0.714, 0.772 and 0.836, respectively. The diagnostic performance of these metabolic features was better than that of traditional bone metabolism biochemical markers.\nConclusion: This multi-omics study comprehensively explores the metabolic landscape in OP progression, highlighting the central role of metabolic features in the disease. The constructed multi-omics regulatory network aids in understanding the molecular mechanisms of metabolic features in OP progression.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "Differential expression analysis was conducted using the Limma software, defining p < 0.05 and |log2FC|≧1 as significantly differentially expressed miRNAs. Differential expression gene analysis was conducted using the “limma” R package, defining genes with P<0.05 as differentially expressed metabolic-related genes (DEMRGs). In this study, we employed three machine learning algorithms—Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)—to comprehensively explore metabolic feature biomarkers from MRGs and plasma metabolites.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40453197", "locator": "sections[7] \"Differential Expression Analysis of miRNAs\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Differential expression analysis was conducted using the Limma software, defining p < 0.05 and |log2FC|≧1 as significantly differentially expressed miRNAs."}, {"asset": "source:pmid:40453197", "locator": "sections[8] \"Extraction and Analysis of MRGs\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Differential expression gene analysis was conducted using the “limma” R package, defining genes with P<0.05 as differentially expressed metabolic-related genes (DEMRGs)."}, {"asset": "source:pmid:40453197", "locator": "sections[10] \"Machine Learning-Based Selection of Metabolic Features Biomarkers\" paragraph 2", "quote": "In this study, we employed three machine learning algorithms—Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)—to comprehensively explore metabolic feature biomarkers from MRGs and plasma metabolites."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40453197", "locator": "sections[20] \"Data Sharing Statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "Machine-learning analysis selected three metabolic-related genes and one plasma metabolite with respective AUCs of 0.782, 0.714, 0.772, and 0.836 for osteoporosis diagnosis.", "kind": "quantitative", "target": {"value": 0.782, "unit": "auc", "tolerance": null, "source": "Finally, three MRGs and one plasma metabolite were selected based on the machine learning algorithm, with AUC of 0.782, 0.714, 0.772 and 0.836, respectively."}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40453197", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "Finally, three MRGs and one plasma metabolite were selected based on the machine learning algorithm, with AUC of 0.782, 0.714, 0.772 and 0.836, respectively."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "Machine-learning analysis selected three metabolic-related genes and one plasma metabolite with respective AUCs of 0.782, 0.714, 0.772, and 0.836 for osteoporosis diagnosis.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:40453197"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE56815"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE56815"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:40453197", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S515717", "sha256": "sha256:4046e659767a492f8d32d4f3800b0243070a066ecfa7e5657f19d2eb8c0437f2", "bytes": 35284, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.2147/IJGM.S515717", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC12124299", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE56815", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE56815", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE56815", "version": null, "note": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1369756", "GSM1369757", "GSM1369758", "GSM1369759", "GSM1369760", "GSM1369761", "GSM1369762", "GSM1369763", "GSM1369764", "GSM1369765", "GSM1369766", "GSM1369767", "GSM1369768", "GSM1369769", "GSM1369770", "GSM1369771", "GSM1369772", "GSM1369773", "GSM1369774", "GSM1369775", "GSM1369776", "GSM1369777", "GSM1369778", "GSM1369779", "GSM1369780", "GSM1369781", "GSM1369782", "GSM1369783", "GSM1369784", "GSM1369785", "GSM1369786", "GSM1369787", "GSM1369788", "GSM1369789", "GSM1369790", "GSM1369791", "GSM1369792", "GSM1369793", "GSM1369794", "GSM1369795", "GSM1369796", "GSM1369797", "GSM1369798", "GSM1369799", "GSM1369800", "GSM1369801", "GSM1369802", "GSM1369803", "GSM1369804", "GSM1369805", "GSM1369806", "GSM1369807", "GSM1369808", "GSM1369809", "GSM1369810", "GSM1369811", "GSM1369812", "GSM1369813", "GSM1369814", "GSM1369815", "GSM1369816", "GSM1369817", "GSM1369818", "GSM1369819", "GSM1369820", "GSM1369821", "GSM1369822", "GSM1369823", "GSM1369824", "GSM1369825", "GSM1369826", "GSM1369827", "GSM1369828", "GSM1369829", "GSM1369830", "GSM1369831", "GSM1369832", "GSM1369833", "GSM1369834", "GSM1369835"], "sample_count": 80, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "96", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Gene expression study of blood monocytes in pre- and postmenopausal females with low or high bone mineral density (HG-U133A)", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE56815 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE56815 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "differential_expression", "specific": "limma_voom", "label": "Differential expression analysis", "dsl_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["count_matrix_with_condition"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "reordered", "quote": "Differential expression analysis was conducted using the Limma software, defining p < 0.05 and |log2FC|≧1 as significantly differentially expressed miRNAs. Differential expression gene analysis was conducted using the “limma” R package, defining genes with P<0.05 as differentially expressed metabolic-related genes (DEMRGs). In this study, we employed three machine learning algorithms—Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)—to comprehensively explore metabolic feature biomarkers from MRGs and plasma metabolites."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "machine_learning", "specific": "random_forest", "label": "Machine learning", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["machine_learning_random_forest"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["labelled_feature_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Random Forest"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "machine_learning", "specific": "support_vector_machine", "label": "Machine learning", "dsl_operations": ["train_classifier", "cross_validate", "roc_auc"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["labelled_feature_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Support Vector Machine"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "correlation_analysis", "specific": "spearman", "label": "Correlation analysis", "dsl_operations": ["spearman_rho"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["paired_numeric_columns"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Spearman correlation"}}, {"id": "method-5", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "pathway_enrichment", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "GO enrichment"}}], "targets": [{"id": "target-published-estimate", "claim_id": "claim-target-result", "operation": "cross_validate", "expected_value": 0.782, "unit": "auc", "tolerance": null, "state": "complete", "note": "The published estimate as the reader quoted it from the paper. No tolerance is published because the paper states none."}], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: limma_voom."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE56815"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE56815"], "statements": ["The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author."], "basis": "The paper names GSE56815 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "assets": ["source:pmid:40453197", "data:geo:GSE56815"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE56815"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T19:53:48Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "reordered", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 9385, "completion_tokens": 3145, "cached_tokens": 264}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:40453197", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:40453197"}, {"id": "source:pmid:40453197", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 40453197 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE56815", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE56815"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:40453197", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:40453197"}, {"id": "source:pmid:40453197", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 40453197 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE56815", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE56815"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-40453197", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:40453197"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE56815", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE56815"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:40453197", "parent_hash": "sha256:75f4cf29bb83276cc27867cf7dd6e37a3604035a0e99e9ab5c39801d8893fb5e", "fork_of": null, "generation": 3}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE56815 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE56815 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "rna_seq", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.83, "evidence": ["pressed MRGs (DEMRGs) were identified in the transcriptome, and these DEMRGs were enriched in 11 metabo", "nalysis of OP Metabolic Features We filtered transcriptome data and identified a total of 2068 MRGs. Am"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:925", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "differential_expression", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["Differential expression analysis was conducted using the Limma software, defining p < 0.05 and |log2FC|≧1 as significantly differentially expressed miRNAs. Differential expression gene analysis was conducted using the “limma” R package, defining genes with P<0.05 as differentially expressed metabolic-related genes (DEMRGs). In this study, we employed three machine learning algorithms—Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)—to comprehensively explore metabolic feature biomarkers from MRGs and plasma metabolites."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:2"}]}