Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:40638021

Cellular senescence and disulfide death-related genes as biological markers of breast cancer prognosis.

Discover oncology · 2025 doi:10.1007/s12672-025-03142-6

Paper

partial

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

absent

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:40638021
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:b6de3c661920b67266c6299402c19d8ec1e4723fbc1a39cdea666a694cb7c6d2
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T10:25:51Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T14:01:43Z
generator object · 3 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
converter
sep_to_sci_v1
source_package_schema
urn:bntrg:sep:1.0.0
paper object · 10 fields
state
partial
title
Cellular senescence and disulfide death-related genes as biological markers of breast cancer prognosis.
doi
10.1007/s12672-025-03142-6
pmid
40638021
authors
null
journal
Discover oncology
year
2025
abstract
null
claims array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-1
statement
the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding
kind
quantitative
state
complete
target object · 4 fields
value
17
unit
differential genes
tolerance
null
source
chars 1127-1234 of source sha256 a69280a7f06454ae1f7444a6ec315691ac0cf11293efa1cb323b7f2ce222b7e0
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:40638021
locator
chars 1127-1234 of source sha256 a69280a7f06454ae1f7444a6ec315691ac0cf11293efa1cb323b7f2ce222b7e0
quote
In this study, 17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death were screened.
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
abstract
[1]
authors
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate and its interval from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The number a replication must land on, and the sentence it came from.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:40638021
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate, its unit and its interval
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data behind the published result
kind
data-preparation
state
blocked
blocked_on
data:not_downloaded
description
The published result cannot be recomputed without the data the paper analysed.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the analysis programme
kind
analysis
state
blocked
blocked_on
no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment
description
Re-run the paper's analysis on the source data and produce the registered result. | SEP input not carried into the asset list: materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40638021
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the registered result
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded
[1]
step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment
[2]
step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40638021' does not resolve to a declared asset
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 7 items
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:40638021
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-025-03142-6
sha256
sha256:a69280a7f06454ae1f7444a6ec315691ac0cf11293efa1cb323b7f2ce222b7e0
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.1007/s12672-025-03142-6
version
null
note
Source read by the package builder: full_text.
structure object · 1 field
access_state
full_text
[1] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:40638021:1
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:5ebfa67dfa0511e334b1c78fb18f9b027cae15a868e4c18ca6e11cde2e695d9b
bytes
602
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[3]/table-wrap[1]#Tab1
version
null
note
Patient characteristics of BRCA patients in the TCGA-BRCA datasets
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC12246268
section_index
3
section_title
Data download
row_count
16
column_count
2
table object · 8 fields
label
Table 1
caption
Patient characteristics of BRCA patients in the TCGA-BRCA datasets
rows array · 16 items
[0] array · 2 items
[0]
Characteristics
[1]
Overall
[1] array · 1 item
[0]
Gender, n (%)
[2] array · 2 items
[0]
Female
[1]
1102 (98.9%)
[3] array · 2 items
[0]
Male
[1]
12 (1.1%)
[4] array · 1 item
[0]
Age, n (%)
[5] array · 2 items
[0]
The < 60
[1]
595 (53.5%)
[6] array · 2 items
[0]
60 or higher
[1]
518 (46.5%)
[7] array · 1 item
[0]
Pathologic stage, n (%)
[8] array · 2 items
[0]
Stage X
[1]
13 (1.2%)
[9] array · 2 items
[0]
Stage II
[1]
634 (57.5%)
[10] array · 2 items
[0]
Stage I
[1]
184 (16.7%)
[11] array · 2 items
[0]
Stage III
[1]
252 (22.8%)
[12] array · 2 items
[0]
Stage IV
[1]
20 (1.8%)
[13] array · 1 item
[0]
Event, n (%)
[14] array · 2 items
[0]
Alive
[1]
958 (86%)
[15] array · 2 items
[0]
Dead
[1]
156 (14%)
locator
section[3]/table-wrap[1]#Tab1
[2] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:40638021:2
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:7a235e48f7570a764742813a585e846b787606351d9c4a7bec48f0fd40c284d5
bytes
1375
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[14]/table-wrap[1]#Tab2
version
null
note
List of cs & drdegs of differential expression analysis
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC12246268
section_index
14
section_title
Breast cancer-related inflammation and neutrophil extracellular traps related differentially expressed genes
row_count
18
column_count
5
table object · 8 fields
label
Table 2
caption
List of cs & drdegs of differential expression analysis
rows array · 18 items
[0] array · 5 items
[0]
Gene symbol
[1]
Description
[2]
logFC
[3]
adj.p
[4]
Group
[1] array · 5 items
[0]
FANCI
[1]
FA complementation group I
[2]
1.694735
[3]
3.13 e-52
[4]
Up
[2] array · 5 items
[0]
CHD4
[1]
Chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 4
[2]
0.893369
[3]
6.89 e-40
[4]
Up
[3] array · 5 items
[0]
RPN1
[1]
Ribophorin I
[2]
0.687019
[3]
1.06 e-25
[4]
Up
[4] array · 5 items
[0]
PRC1
[1]
Protein regulator of cytokinesis 1
[2]
1.138129
[3]
5.24 e-25
[4]
Up
[5] array · 5 items
[0]
NDUFS2
[1]
NADH: ubiquinone oxidoreductase core subunit S2
[2]
0.724369
[3]
2.60 e-24
[4]
Up
[6] array · 5 items
[0]
PRDX1
[1]
Peroxiredoxin 1
[2]
0.838091
[3]
1.39 e-23
[4]
Up
[7] array · 5 items
[0]
RRP1
[1]
Ribosomal RNA processing 1
[2]
0.769460
[3]
1.54 e-19
[4]
Up
[8] array · 5 items
[0]
HNRNPU
[1]
Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein U
[2]
0.516024
[3]
5.24 e-19
[4]
Up
[9] array · 5 items
[0]
NDUFB10
[1]
NADH: ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunit B10
[2]
0.683526
[3]
7.03 e-18
[4]
Up
[10] array · 5 items
[0]
ME1
[1]
Malic enzyme 1
[2]
1.411086
[3]
1.94 e-17
[4]
Down
[11] array · 5 items
[0]
MYH10
[1]
Myosin heavy chain 10
[2]
0.739338
[3]
9.57 e-16
[4]
Down
[12] array · 5 items
[0]
SLC3A2
[1]
Solute carrier family 3 member 2
[2]
0.529644
[3]
3.44 e-12
[4]
Up
[13] array · 5 items
[0]
FLNA
[1]
Filamin A
[2]
0.670460
[3]
9.73 e-11
[4]
Down
[14] array · 5 items
[0]
DBN1
[1]
Drebrin 1
[2]
0.531038
[3]
4.06 e-09
[4]
Up
[15] array · 5 items
[0]
IPO4
[1]
Importin 4
[2]
0.518470
[3]
1.85 e-07
[4]
Up
[16] array · 5 items
[0]
MYH6
[1]
Nyosin heavy chain 6
[2]
0.500838
[3]
1.55 e-03
[4]
Up
[17] array · 5 items
[0]
ACTN2
[1]
Actinin alpha 2
[2]
0.604824
[3]
2.11 e-02
[4]
Up
locator
section[14]/table-wrap[1]#Tab2
[3] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:40638021:3
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:746f95188fc426260e58964f3b7ba6b77c783150f740b6c5947e3e17b6b17a08
bytes
2108
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[16]/table-wrap[1]#Tab3
version
null
note
Results of GO and KEGG enrichment analysis for hub genes
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC12246268
section_index
16
section_title
Gene ontology (GO) and pathway (KEGG) enrichment analysis
row_count
21
column_count
7
table object · 8 fields
label
Table 3
caption
Results of GO and KEGG enrichment analysis for hub genes
rows array · 21 items
[0] array · 7 items
[0]
ONTOLOGY
[1]
ID
[2]
Description
[3]
GeneRatio
[4]
BgRatio
[5]
p value
[6]
q value
[1] array · 7 items
[0]
BP
[1]
GO:0140694
[2]
Non-membrane-bounded organelle assembly
[3]
5/11
[4]
408/18,870
[5]
1.91 e-06
[6]
4.96 e-04
[2] array · 7 items
[0]
BP
[1]
GO:0090307
[2]
Mitotic spindle assembly
[3]
3/11
[4]
71/18,870
[5]
8.24 e-06
[6]
9.62 e-04
[3] array · 7 items
[0]
BP
[1]
GO:0055013
[2]
Cardiac muscle cell development
[3]
3/11
[4]
86/18,870
[5]
1.47 e-05
[6]
9.62 e-04
[4] array · 7 items
[0]
BP
[1]
GO:0045185
[2]
Maintenance of protein location
[3]
3/11
[4]
93/18,870
[5]
1.86 e-05
[6]
9.62 e-04
[5] array · 7 items
[0]
BP
[1]
GO:0055006
[2]
Cardiac cell development
[3]
3/11
[4]
93/18,870
[5]
1.86 e-05
[6]
9.62 e-04
[6] array · 7 items
[0]
CC
[1]
GO:0042641
[2]
Actomyosin
[3]
3/11
[4]
76/19,886
[5]
8.66 e-06
[6]
1.84 e-04
[7] array · 7 items
[0]
CC
[1]
GO:0032432
[2]
Actin filament bundle
[3]
3/11
[4]
79/19,886
[5]
9.73 e-06
[6]
1.84 e-04
[8] array · 7 items
[0]
CC
[1]
GO:0005938
[2]
Cell cortex
[3]
4/11
[4]
305/19,886
[5]
1.64 e-05
[6]
1.91 e-04
[9] array · 7 items
[0]
CC
[1]
GO:0030863
[2]
Cortical cytoskeleton
[3]
3/11
[4]
105/19,886
[5]
2.29 e-05
[6]
1.91 e-04
[10] array · 7 items
[0]
CC
[1]
GO:1990023
[2]
Mitotic spindle midzone
[3]
2/11
[4]
14/19,886
[5]
2.52 e-05
[6]
1.91 e-04
[11] array · 7 items
[0]
MF
[1]
GO:0003779
[2]
Actin binding
[3]
6/11
[4]
438/18,496
[5]
7.12 e-08
[6]
2.32 e-06
[12] array · 7 items
[0]
MF
[1]
GO:0051015
[2]
Actin filament binding
[3]
4/11
[4]
208/18,496
[5]
4.82 e-06
[6]
7.86 e-05
[13] array · 7 items
[0]
MF
[1]
GO:0000146
[2]
Microfilament motor activity
[3]
2/11
[4]
37/18,496
[5]
2.12 e-04
[6]
1.46 e-03
[14] array · 7 items
[0]
MF
[1]
GO:0008137
[2]
NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) activity
[3]
2/11
[4]
41/18,496
[5]
2.60 e-04
[6]
1.46 e-03
[15] array · 7 items
[0]
MF
[1]
GO:0050136
[2]
NADH dehydrogenase (quinone) activity
[3]
2/11
[4]
42/18,496
[5]
2.73 e-04
[6]
1.46 e-03
[16] array · 7 items
[0]
KEGG
[1]
hsa04820
[2]
Cytoskeleton in muscle cells
[3]
3/9
[4]
232/8779
[5]
1.36 e-03
[6]
3.44 e-02
[17] array · 7 items
[0]
KEGG
[1]
hsa00190
[2]
Oxidative phosphorylation
[3]
2/9
[4]
134/8779
[5]
7.76 e-03
[6]
6.49 e-02
[18] array · 7 items
[0]
KEGG
[1]
hsa04723
[2]
Retrograde endocannabinoid signaling
[3]
2/9
[4]
148/8779
[5]
9.40 e-03
[6]
6.49 e-02
[19] array · 7 items
[0]
KEGG
[1]
hsa04932
[2]
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
[3]
2/9
[4]
155/8779
[5]
1.03 e-02
[6]
6.49 e-02
[20] array · 7 items
[0]
KEGG
[1]
hsa04814
[2]
Motor proteins
[3]
2/9
[4]
193/8779
[5]
1.56 e-02
[6]
6.99 e-02
locator
section[16]/table-wrap[1]#Tab3
[4] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:40638021:4
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:ccffe95668ad5001fcfaa16cff14190428df8e18398e8feb63decf34dafe8582
bytes
1085
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[18]/table-wrap[1]#Tab4
version
null
note
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis results in dataset TCGA-BRCA
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC12246268
section_index
18
section_title
Clinical prognosis of prognosis of BRCA risk model
row_count
13
column_count
6
table object · 8 fields
label
Table 4
caption
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis results in dataset TCGA-BRCA
rows array · 13 items
[0] array · 4 items
[0]
Characteristics
[1]
Total(N)
[2]
Univariate analysis
[3]
Multivariate analysis
[1] array · 4 items
[0]
Hazard ratio (95% CI)
[1]
P value
[2]
Hazard ratio (95% CI)
[3]
P value
[2] array · 6 items
[0]
Age
[1]
1111
[2]
1.030 (1.018–1.043)
[3]
< 0.001
[4]
1.032 (1.019–1.045)
[5]
< 0.001
[3] array · 6 items
[0]
Gender
[1]
1111
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[4] array · 6 items
[0]
Female
[1]
1099
[2]
Reference
[3]
[4]
[5]
[5] array · 6 items
[0]
Male
[1]
12
[2]
0.826 (0.115–5.914)
[3]
0.849
[4]
[5]
[6] array · 6 items
[0]
Pathologic stage
[1]
1100
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[7] array · 6 items
[0]
Stage X
[1]
13
[2]
Reference
[3]
[4]
Reference
[5]
[8] array · 6 items
[0]
Stage II
[1]
632
[2]
0.404 (0.184–0.887)
[3]
0.024
[4]
0.542 (0.239–1.229)
[5]
0.142
[9] array · 6 items
[0]
Stage I
[1]
183
[2]
0.239 (0.098–0.585)
[3]
0.002
[4]
0.276 (0.110–0.690)
[5]
0.006
[10] array · 6 items
[0]
Stage III
[1]
252
[2]
0.720 (0.321–1.616)
[3]
0.426
[4]
0.989 (0.429–2.280)
[5]
0.979
[11] array · 6 items
[0]
Stage IV
[1]
20
[2]
3.119 (1.258–7.733)
[3]
0.014
[4]
3.702 (1.429–9.591)
[5]
0.007
[12] array · 6 items
[0]
Riskscore
[1]
1111
[2]
2.790 (1.332–5.845)
[3]
0.007
[4]
2.736 (1.322–5.660)
[5]
0.007
locator
section[18]/table-wrap[1]#Tab4
[5] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:40638021:5
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:4d007088755fcce1ed1fb091550a3af23b5d199eaccab6d3bc26761a34a897b4
bytes
707
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[19]/table-wrap[1]#Tab5
version
null
note
Results of GSEA between HighRisk and LowRisk groups in TCGA-BRCA
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC12246268
section_index
19
section_title
Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) between high and low risk groups
row_count
5
column_count
7
table object · 8 fields
label
Table 5
caption
Results of GSEA between HighRisk and LowRisk groups in TCGA-BRCA
rows array · 5 items
[0] array · 7 items
[0]
Description
[1]
setSize
[2]
enrichmentScore
[3]
NES
[4]
p value
[5]
p.adjust
[6]
q value
[1] array · 7 items
[0]
FOROUTAN_TGFB_EMT_UP
[1]
191
[2]
0.670715
[3]
1.982562
[4]
1.00 e–10
[5]
5.40 e–09
[6]
4.09 e–09
[2] array · 7 items
[0]
HAMAI_APOPTOSIS_VIA_TRAIL_DN
[1]
200
[2]
0.661818
[3]
1.955824
[4]
1.00 e–10
[5]
5.40 e–09
[6]
4.09 e–09
[3] array · 7 items
[0]
MANALO_HYPOXIA_UP
[1]
205
[2]
0.577646
[3]
1.721653
[4]
1.39 e–06
[5]
3.25 e–05
[6]
2.46 e–05
[4] array · 7 items
[0]
WP_CLOCK_CONTROLLED_AUTOPHAGY_IN_BONE_METABOLISM
[1]
79
[2]
0.570416
[3]
1.507286
[4]
4.84 e–03
[5]
3.17 e–02
[6]
2.40 e–02
locator
section[19]/table-wrap[1]#Tab5
[6] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:40638021:6
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:1c9d92a616c0ea08913aa2d4168bda75b1b5fc8101e378a4e8d25d59de92554e
bytes
3024
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[20]/table-wrap[1]#Tab6
version
null
note
Results of GSVA between HighRisk and LowRisk groups in TCGA-BRCA
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC12246268
section_index
20
section_title
Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) between high and low risk groups
row_count
21
column_count
7
table object · 8 fields
label
Table 6
caption
Results of GSVA between HighRisk and LowRisk groups in TCGA-BRCA
rows array · 21 items
[0] array · 7 items
[0]
Pathway
[1]
logFC
[2]
AveExpr
[3]
t
[4]
p value
[5]
p.adj
[6]
B
[1] array · 7 items
[0]
REACTOME COHESIN LOADING ONTO CHROMATIN
[1]
0.683958
[2]
0.014722
[3]
14.027838
[4]
2.48 e–41
[5]
2.72 e–39
[6]
83.04751574
[2] array · 7 items
[0]
KEGG MEDICUS VARIANT MUTATION CAUSED ABERRANT TDP43 TO ELECTRON TRANSFER IN COMPLEX I
[1]
0.628659
[2]
0.030956
[3]
16.272197
[4]
1.19 e–53
[5]
3.65 e–50
[6]
111.1577524
[3] array · 7 items
[0]
BIOCARTA SM PATHWAY
[1]
0.622017
[2]
0.035641
[3]
13.560288
[4]
6.37 e–39
[5]
5.14 e–37
[6]
77.55253894
[4] array · 7 items
[0]
KEGG MEDICUS REFERENCE ELECTRON TRANSFER IN COMPLEX I
[1]
0.617775
[2]
0.030148
[3]
15.862947
[4]
2.57 e–51
[5]
1.97 e–48
[6]
105.8305778
[5] array · 7 items
[0]
KEGG MEDICUS VARIANT MUTATION CAUSED ABERRANT SNCA TO ELECTRON TRANSFER IN COMPLEX I
[1]
0.614814
[2]
0.030303
[3]
16.124722
[4]
8.34 e–53
[5]
8.86 e–50
[6]
109.2283146
[6] array · 7 items
[0]
KEGG MEDICUS VARIANT MUTATION INACTIVATED PINK1 TO ELECTRON TRANSFER IN COMPLEX I
[1]
0.604036
[2]
0.027893
[3]
15.694261
[4]
2.29 e–50
[5]
1.41 e–47
[6]
103.659778
[7] array · 7 items
[0]
KEGG MEDICUS REFERENCE ELECTRON TRANSFER IN COMPLEX IV
[1]
0.586651
[2]
0.043349
[3]
13.747677
[4]
7.00 e–40
[5]
6.14 e–38
[6]
79.73895965
[8] array · 7 items
[0]
WP MITOCHONDRIAL COMPLEX IV ASSEMBLY
[1]
0.584076
[2]
0.039660
[3]
15.029613
[4]
1.11 e–46
[5]
2.83 e–44
[6]
95.25335853
[9] array · 7 items
[0]
KEGG MEDICUS VARIANT MUTATION CAUSED ABERRANT ABETA TO ELECTRON TRANSFER IN COMPLEX I
[1]
0.580893
[2]
0.031078
[3]
16.121782
[4]
8.67 e–53
[5]
8.86 e–50
[6]
109.1899596
[10] array · 7 items
[0]
WP OXIDATIVE PHOSPHORYLATION
[1]
0.579747
[2]
0.030429
[3]
15.262776
[4]
5.80 e–48
[5]
1.98 e–45
[6]
98.17528547
[11] array · 7 items
[0]
REACTOME SYNTHESIS OF PIPS AT THE LATE ENDOSOME MEMBRANE
[1]
0.573853
[2]
0.017783
[3]
14.106654
[4]
9.61 e–42
[5]
1.23 e–39
[6]
83.98675399
[12] array · 7 items
[0]
REACTOME ESTABLISHMENT OF SISTER CHROMATID COHESION
[1]
0.572678
[2]
0.000526
[3]
11.862888
[4]
1.12 e–30
[5]
3.65 e–29
[6]
58.76660765
[13] array · 7 items
[0]
KEGG MEDICUS ENV FACTOR ARSENIC TO ELECTRON TRANSFER IN COMPLEX IV
[1]
0.568529
[2]
0.034534
[3]
13.824710
[4]
2.81 e–40
[5]
2.69 e–38
[6]
80.64397225
[14] array · 7 items
[0]
KEGG MEDICUS PATHOGEN SARS COV 2 NSP1 TO TRANSLATION INITIATION
[1]
0.567768
[2]
0.011387
[3]
11.455160
[4]
8.04 e–29
[5]
2.04 e–27
[6]
54.54160621
[15] array · 7 items
[0]
REACTOME COMPLEX I BIOGENESIS
[1]
0.567167
[2]
0.031600
[3]
15.479217
[4]
3.66 e–49
[5]
1.87 e–46
[6]
100.9140272
[16] array · 7 items
[0]
KEGG MEDICUS VARIANT MUTATION CAUSED ABERRANT ABETA TO ELECTRON TRANSFER IN COMPLEX IV
[1]
0.563139
[2]
0.041208
[3]
13.646078
[4]
2.33 e–39
[5]
1.98 e–37
[6]
78.55085747
[17] array · 7 items
[0]
KEGG MEDICUS REFERENCE MITOCHONDRIAL COMPLEX UCP1 IN THERMOGENESIS
[1]
0.560582
[2]
0.031512
[3]
15.190851
[4]
1.45 e–47
[5]
4.43 e–45
[6]
97.27077613
[18] array · 7 items
[0]
REACTOME SYNTHESIS OF PIPS AT THE EARLY ENDOSOME MEMBRANE
[1]
0.559183
[2]
0.023874
[3]
14.739691
[4]
4.15 e–45
[5]
7.95 e–43
[6]
91.66204077
[19] array · 7 items
[0]
REACTOME FORMATION OF ATP BY CHEMIOSMOTIC COUPLING
[1]
0.553467
[2]
0.034266
[3]
12.515277
[4]
9.48 e–34
[5]
4.09 e–32
[6]
65.76370443
[20] array · 7 items
[0]
KEGG MEDICUS REFERENCE TRANSLATION INITIATION
[1]
0.551029
[2]
0.003208
[3]
11.127211
[4]
2.30 e–27
[5]
5.07 e–26
[6]
51.22827855
locator
section[20]/table-wrap[1]#Tab6
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
asset:source:pmid:40638021 not verified
analysis object · 4 fields
state
absent
methods array · 0 items
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
method
[1]
targets
capability object · 3 fields
state
absent
requirements array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
capability
readiness object · 8 fields
state
partial
tier
null
blocked_on
null
axes object · 0 fields
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
assets array · 7 items
[0]
source:pmid:40638021
[1]
asset:table:pmid:40638021:1
[2]
asset:table:pmid:40638021:2
[3]
asset:table:pmid:40638021:3
[4]
asset:table:pmid:40638021:4
[5]
asset:table:pmid:40638021:5
[6]
asset:table:pmid:40638021:6
steps array · 1 item
[0]
read_published_estimate
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 1 item
[0]
xml
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:40638021
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
corpus_record_absent
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 7 fields
status
blocked
providers array · 2 items
[0] object · 7 fields
provider
minimax
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
prompt_version
full-text-reading-v1
prompt_hash
85e9ccfcde31ab54d5a222ab96a87446b130bdf34ae8be4702931a18eb77a47f
source_hash
a69280a7f06454ae1f7444a6ec315691ac0cf11293efa1cb323b7f2ce222b7e0
raw_response_sha256
sha256:440d6514c22d1fc2aa1209bc7674f21dd9d3f3a7d860d92ba9bf0be0c14355b4
raw_response_chars
5325
[1] object · 7 fields
provider
minimax_alt
model
MiniMax-M3
prompt_version
full-text-reading-v1
prompt_hash
a3b53727313655f747c715f9f17b8a873b02f8871ea713ae2cf248a331830327
source_hash
a69280a7f06454ae1f7444a6ec315691ac0cf11293efa1cb323b7f2ce222b7e0
raw_response_sha256
sha256:faf00cbd0cf5ac76763b6f21528118decab6b44b5e71e182a41c75a8b54aaf6a
raw_response_chars
46190
target_providers array · 2 items
[0] object · 8 fields
provider
minimax
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
prompt_version
replication-target-v2
prompt_hash
5f3c52a6a53baf095e6de5ce341f60a4202f6bdd750d6056efd6bb2f6597fd64
source_hash
a69280a7f06454ae1f7444a6ec315691ac0cf11293efa1cb323b7f2ce222b7e0
raw_response
{"parent_value":17,"unit":"differential genes","evidence":"In this study, 17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death were screened.","target_result":"17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death were screened.","number_stated":true}
reading object · 6 fields
parent_value
17
unit
differential genes
evidence
In this study, 17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death were screened.
target_result
17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death were screened.
number_stated
true
source_locator
chars 1127-1234 of source sha256 a69280a7f06454ae1f7444a6ec315691ac0cf11293efa1cb323b7f2ce222b7e0
recorded_at
2026-10-31T15:19:15.892965+00:00
[1] object · 8 fields
provider
minimax_alt
model
MiniMax-M3
prompt_version
replication-target-v2
prompt_hash
8b0ec927e6aa67a5cfc9dfab79c2fbd8d8b6252469d78bf3c33278d69e8c73e2
source_hash
a69280a7f06454ae1f7444a6ec315691ac0cf11293efa1cb323b7f2ce222b7e0
raw_response
<think>We need parse task carefully. Need output JSON object exact schema. Need identify single numerical result replication of registered target headline number for main finding. Need interpret source. We must only supplied source text. Need determine which numerical result qualifies headline main finding. We have paper excerpt abstract and methods/results partially. Headline numerical result likely "17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death were screened." Or "multifactor Cox regression model had a clinical predictive effect of 5 years > 3 years > 1 year." Need examine what registered target means: "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding". Need pick single numerical result headline number, value paper itself states, not calc etc. We need assess source specifics. Need maybe number 17 differential genes associated ... main finding. Or 2 LASSO regression model genes. Source abstract: "In this study, 17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death were screened. Single multifactor Cox regression analysis was performed to construct a prognostic risk model for breast cancer, and the results showed that the LASSO regression model contained 2 LASSO regression model genes: ACTN2, CHD4. Combined with the clinical information, the utility of the LASSO risk score and pathological stage for the prognostic risk model for breast cancer was significantly higher than that of the other variables; in addition, our constructed multifactor Cox regression model had a clinical predictive effect of 5 years > 3 years > 1 year." Headline numerical result likely 17. Need careful user prompt wording "single numerical result that a replication of the registered target has to reproduce. Report the headline number only: the value the paper itself states for the registered target, not a value you calculated, converted, averaged or reconstructed. The unit must be the unit the paper prints. The evidence must be an exact, contiguous quotation from SOURCE TEXT that contains the number; do not shorten it, do not add an ellipsis and do not paraphrase it. Attribution may be carried by the text's own wording: a number may be attached to the target by a parenthetical list, by the word 'respectively', or by words that name the target directly. When that is how the text links them, quote the whole clause so a reader can check the attribution for themselves. If the text states no number for the registered target, set number_stated to false, leave parent_value at 0, leave unit and evidence empty, and say in target_result what the text does state instead." We need produce headline number. They may be evaluating specific registered target; "REGISTERED TARGET: the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding" generic. Need choose most headline numeric finding. 17 differential genes vs 2 LASSO genes vs predictive time horizons. "the headline numerical result" could be "17" number screened as primary result. We should reason using natural scientific headline. Main finding prognostic model uses 17 differential genes, LASSO contains 2 genes ACTN2 CHD4. They want single numerical result replication has reproduce. Is most headline numerical result 17? Likely yes, as first key numerical in abstract. Need inspect full source text maybe missing section where "11 Hub Genes" found and "421 DEGs", 143 up 278 down. But those not main finding. Target main finding "Predictive models constructed based on genes related to cellular senescence and disulfide death predict the prognosis of breast cancer patients." Numerical result for main finding likely "17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death were screened" because it quantifies target basis. Or "2 LASSO regression model genes" because prognostic model central? Need judge. Could be dataset benchmark task where target is "headline numerical result" and expects one number reported. We need not provide several. Need select one. Let's parse abstract complete: "Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with diverse prognosis and treatment outcomes. The aim of this study was to reveal the genes related to cellular senescence and disulfide death in breast cancer and to explore their potential mechanisms and clinical applications in breast cancer. In this study, we screened differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death based on publicly available data, constructed a protein-protein interaction network (PPI Network), and explored the functions of differential genes by Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis. A prognostic risk model was constructed in the breast cancer dataset TCGA-BRCA, and a single multifactorial Cox regression was performed to assess the effect of differential genes on prognosis based on clinical information. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and gene set variant analysis (GSVA) were performed based on the median values of key prognostic gene risk scores grouped together. In this study, 17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death were screened. Single multifactor Cox regression analysis was performed to construct a prognostic risk model for breast cancer, and the results showed that the LASSO regression model contained 2 LASSO regression model genes: ACTN2, CHD4. Combined with the clinical information, the utility of the LASSO risk score and pathological stage for the prognostic risk model for breast cancer was significantly higher than that of the other variables; in addition, our constructed multifactor Cox regression model had a clinical predictive effect of 5 years > 3 years > 1 year." If tasked single headline number, in scientific abstract these often numerical outcomes aren't headline unless one key sample size or count. There is no AUC/C-index. They might expect 17 genes (main count). Wording "registered target" is generic from some rubric. Main finding is "17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death were screened". Maybe target_result should state that exactly or summary. unit likely "differential genes" or "genes". Headline value 17; unit paper prints "differential genes". Evidence whole exact sentence. Need use JSON string. But must decide whether 2 is headline. "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding" could most directly refer "Single multifactor Cox regression ... LASSO regression model contained 2 LASSO regression model genes: ACTN2, CHD4." Since main finding is a prognostic risk model and 2 model genes. Why 17 vs 2? They call "headline" likely first/most central abstract finding. We need maximize. Maybe task designed to detect replication target as reported "17 differential genes" rather than count calculated from list. 17 is salient in abstract. They often ask similar: "Read supplied paper text and find the single numerical result that a replication of the registered target has to reproduce." They want headline numeric result. Usually e.g. population, effect, sample size? Here no explicit registered metric. Could be "17". There is no title statistic. Let's consider output expected shape unit. If "17 differential genes", unit might "differential genes". Paper prints "17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death". It is a count; unit "differential genes". The prompt says "The unit must be the unit the paper prints." Means if paper prints "years", must use years; if "genes", use genes. For 17 evidence, unit "differential genes" likely. If target 2, unit "LASSO regression model genes". This weird repeated wording fits exact. "Report the headline number only" likely parent_value only one. target_result description not multiple values. Could say "The study screened 17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death." Evidence same. number_stated true. But we should explore possibility false: no number for registered target because "main finding" is prediction of prognosis (qualitative). Yet source contains counts, so not false. They explicitly have fallback. We shouldn't false since there is number. Need deliver direct. We have time/tokens but no need. We already wrote analysis per developer but final only JSON. Need make sure no invalid char? Fine. Let's think systematically what is a "headline numerical result". In abstracts, the results sentence enumerates: 1 17 differential genes ... screened 2 LASSO model 2 genes ACTN2 CHD4 3 utility significantly higher (no numeric) 4 clinical predictive effect of 5 years > 3 years > 1 year. Which is singular and can be replicated? 17 genes screening (depends on DEG thresholds) central basis. 2 genes model central final model. "Headline numerical result" perhaps 2 since directly number of LASSO model genes. But target definition has no explicit "gene count". Need infer "main finding" corresponds to the title "Cellular senescence and disulfide death-related genes as biological markers of breast cancer prognosis", main conclusion risk models. A replication needs reproduce 17 initial genes vs 2 final model genes? Likely "17" because headline screening result common in abstracts, while 2 is a detail. We must pick. We can look for clues in user phrase "the value the paper itself states for the registered target, not a value you calculated, converted, averaged or reconstructed." Here 17 or 2 or 421 etc all stated. They might want avoid computing "2" from ACTN2, CHD4. Why explicitly mention not calculated? Because for this paper, the target might be 2 genes and someone might reconstruct it from the list. Hmm! Important. They say "not a value you calculated, converted, averaged or reconstructed." General instruction but this source includes "LASSO regression model contained 2 LASSO regression model genes: ACTN2, CHD4." If target registered as "number of LASSO model genes" could reconstruct 2 from names but they want printed 2. However registered target here is generic "the headline numerical result ... main finding", and printed "17" no reconstruction needed either. Maybe dataset intentionally generic target because "headline numerical result" is 17. They mention not calculated to avoid choosing 421 or 143+278 or 11 etc. "Attribution may be carried by the text's own wording: a number may be attached to the target by a parenthetical list, by the word 'respectively', or by words that name the target directly. When that is how the text links them, quote the whole clause so a reader can check the attribution for themselves." This generic instruction likely assembled for dataset of varied papers and exact evidence extraction. Here counts attached by direct wording. We should quote full sentence for 17. Main finding could be "number of differential genes" not performance. I'd choose 17. Need target_result brief same as evidence. Unit "differential genes" (printed). Parent_value 17. Should we unit be "genes" rather than "differential genes"? It says "unit must be the unit the paper prints." The unit paper prints directly next to number is "differential genes". Use "differential genes". Exact evidence "In this study, 17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death were screened." Yes. target_result could "The study screened 17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death." It repeats number but that's fine? "Report headline number only" means probably no multiple numbers but text can repeat. No need number in target_result? Schema requires. Could state "The study screened 17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death." Good. Double check no invalid JSON types: parent_value number 17, unit string, evidence string, target_result string, number_stated boolean true. Final only JSON no markdown per developer.</think> {"parent_value":17,"unit":"differential genes","evidence":"In this study, 17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death were screened.","target_result":"The study screened 17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death.","number_stated":true}
reading object · 6 fields
parent_value
17
unit
differential genes
evidence
In this study, 17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death were screened.
target_result
The study screened 17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death.
number_stated
true
source_locator
chars 1127-1234 of source sha256 a69280a7f06454ae1f7444a6ec315691ac0cf11293efa1cb323b7f2ce222b7e0
recorded_at
2026-10-31T15:19:42.835396+00:00
agreement
false
disagreements object · 3 fields
target_result object · 3 fields
minimax
The LASSO regression model contained 2 genes: ACTN2 and CHD4.
minimax_alt
Seventeen cellular-senescence- and disulfide-death-related differential genes were screened; the LASSO prognostic risk model contained 2 genes (ACTN2 and CHD4), and the multifactor Cox regression model had clinical predictive effect ordered as 5 years > 3 years > 1 year.
decisive
false
analysis_methods object · 3 fields
minimax array · 12 items
[0]
LASSO regression
[1]
Single multifactorial Cox regression
[2]
Gene Ontology enrichment analysis
[3]
KEGG pathway enrichment analysis
[4]
Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA)
[5]
Gene set variation analysis (GSVA)
[6]
limma differential analysis
[7]
Independent Student's T-Test
[8]
Mann-Whitney U Test (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test)
[9]
Kruskal-Wallis test
[10]
Spearman correlation analysis
[11]
Benjamini-Hochberg p-value correction
minimax_alt array · 9 items
[0]
Differential gene screening based on publicly available data; the specific screening procedure was not stated
[1]
LASSO regression
[2]
Single multifactor Cox regression
[3]
Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network construction
[4]
Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis
[5]
Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis
[6]
Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA)
[7]
Gene set variation analysis (GSVA)
[8]
limma differential analysis
decisive
false
statistical_method object · 3 fields
minimax
LASSO regression
minimax_alt
LASSO regression and single multifactor Cox regression analysis
decisive
true
agreement_basis object · 2 fields
policy
decisive_fields
decisive_fields array · 4 items
[0]
work_type
[1]
number_stated
[2]
parent_value
[3]
unit
blinded
true
human_critique object · 5 fields
status
not_run
reviewer
null
signed_at
null
conflict_checked
false
commentary
null
stages array · 7 items
[0] object · 4 fields
key
target_materials
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[1] object · 4 fields
key
independent_readings
status
blocked
reason
The independent readings are incomplete or disagree; the source evidence must resolve the difference.
evidence object · 1 field
provider_errors array · 0 items
[2] object · 4 fields
key
source_resolution
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[3] object · 4 fields
key
protocol_reconstruction
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[4] object · 4 fields
key
control_execution
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[5] object · 4 fields
key
control_comparison
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[6] object · 4 fields
key
publication
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
review.human_critique
[1]
review.machine_critique.blocked
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
id
package:b2944d1ba48d11c133211abd9a7ab4afbd85e08747f71c167cbe8ce83580bfb1
type
sep_package
label
SEP v1 package for pmid:40638021
activities array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity:conversion:pmid:40638021
type
conversion
used array · 1 item
[0]
package:b2944d1ba48d11c133211abd9a7ab4afbd85e08747f71c167cbe8ce83580bfb1
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax
type
model
label
minimax
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax_alt
type
model
label
minimax_alt
[2] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
source_run_id
run-20261023T122449232913
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:40638021
parent_hash
sha256:3cf65222b2c26768baf8aa15f23d58ec0ffa8cad9c96d1851ba18d687f7234c3
fork_of
null
gaps array · 13 items
[0]
abstract
[1]
asset:source:pmid:40638021 not verified
[2]
authors
[3]
capability
[4]
corpus_record_absent
[5]
execution.not_run
[6]
method
[7]
review.human_critique
[8]
review.machine_critique.blocked
[9]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded
[10]
step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment
[11]
step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40638021' does not resolve to a declared asset
[12]
targets
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.0", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:40638021", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 2, "content_hash": "sha256:b6de3c661920b67266c6299402c19d8ec1e4723fbc1a39cdea666a694cb7c6d2", "created_at": "2026-11-01T10:25:51Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T14:01:43Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "converter": "sep_to_sci_v1", "source_package_schema": "urn:bntrg:sep:1.0.0"}, "paper": {"state": "partial", "title": "Cellular senescence and disulfide death-related genes as biological markers of breast cancer prognosis.", "doi": "10.1007/s12672-025-03142-6", "pmid": "40638021", "authors": null, "journal": "Discover oncology", "year": 2025, "abstract": null, "claims": [{"id": "claim-1", "statement": "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding", "kind": "quantitative", "state": "complete", "target": {"value": 17.0, "unit": "differential genes", "tolerance": null, "source": "chars 1127-1234 of source sha256 a69280a7f06454ae1f7444a6ec315691ac0cf11293efa1cb323b7f2ce222b7e0"}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40638021", "locator": "chars 1127-1234 of source sha256 a69280a7f06454ae1f7444a6ec315691ac0cf11293efa1cb323b7f2ce222b7e0", "quote": "In this study, 17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death were screened."}]}], "gaps": ["abstract", "authors"]}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate and its interval from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The number a replication must land on, and the sentence it came from.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:40638021"], "outputs": ["the published estimate, its unit and its interval"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data behind the published result", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:not_downloaded", "description": "The published result cannot be recomputed without the data the paper analysed.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the analysis programme", "kind": "analysis", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "description": "Re-run the paper's analysis on the source data and produce the registered result. | SEP input not carried into the asset list: materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40638021", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the registered result"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded", "step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40638021' does not resolve to a declared asset"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:40638021", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-025-03142-6", "sha256": "sha256:a69280a7f06454ae1f7444a6ec315691ac0cf11293efa1cb323b7f2ce222b7e0", "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1007/s12672-025-03142-6", "version": null, "note": "Source read by the package builder: full_text.", "structure": {"access_state": "full_text"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:40638021:1", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:5ebfa67dfa0511e334b1c78fb18f9b027cae15a868e4c18ca6e11cde2e695d9b", "bytes": 602, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[3]/table-wrap[1]#Tab1", "version": null, "note": "Patient characteristics of BRCA patients in the TCGA-BRCA datasets", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC12246268", "section_index": 3, "section_title": "Data download", "row_count": 16, "column_count": 2}, "table": {"label": "Table 1", "caption": "Patient characteristics of BRCA patients in the TCGA-BRCA datasets", "rows": [["Characteristics", "Overall"], ["Gender, n (%)"], ["Female", "1102 (98.9%)"], ["Male", "12 (1.1%)"], ["Age, n (%)"], ["The < 60", "595 (53.5%)"], ["60 or higher", "518 (46.5%)"], ["Pathologic stage, n (%)"], ["Stage X", "13 (1.2%)"], ["Stage II", "634 (57.5%)"], ["Stage I", "184 (16.7%)"], ["Stage III", "252 (22.8%)"], ["Stage IV", "20 (1.8%)"], ["Event, n (%)"], ["Alive", "958 (86%)"], ["Dead", "156 (14%)"]], "row_count": 16, "column_count": 2, "numeric_cells": 13, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[3]/table-wrap[1]#Tab1"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:40638021:2", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:7a235e48f7570a764742813a585e846b787606351d9c4a7bec48f0fd40c284d5", "bytes": 1375, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[14]/table-wrap[1]#Tab2", "version": null, "note": "List of cs & drdegs of differential expression analysis", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC12246268", "section_index": 14, "section_title": "Breast cancer-related inflammation and neutrophil extracellular traps related differentially expressed genes", "row_count": 18, "column_count": 5}, "table": {"label": "Table 2", "caption": "List of cs & drdegs of differential expression analysis", "rows": [["Gene symbol", "Description", "logFC", "adj.p", "Group"], ["FANCI", "FA complementation group I", "1.694735", "3.13 e-52", "Up"], ["CHD4", "Chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 4", "0.893369", "6.89 e-40", "Up"], ["RPN1", "Ribophorin I", "0.687019", "1.06 e-25", "Up"], ["PRC1", "Protein regulator of cytokinesis 1", "1.138129", "5.24 e-25", "Up"], ["NDUFS2", "NADH: ubiquinone oxidoreductase core subunit S2", "0.724369", "2.60 e-24", "Up"], ["PRDX1", "Peroxiredoxin 1", "0.838091", "1.39 e-23", "Up"], ["RRP1", "Ribosomal RNA processing 1", "0.769460", "1.54 e-19", "Up"], ["HNRNPU", "Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein U", "0.516024", "5.24 e-19", "Up"], ["NDUFB10", "NADH: ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunit B10", "0.683526", "7.03 e-18", "Up"], ["ME1", "Malic enzyme 1", "1.411086", "1.94 e-17", "Down"], ["MYH10", "Myosin heavy chain 10", "0.739338", "9.57 e-16", "Down"], ["SLC3A2", "Solute carrier family 3 member 2", "0.529644", "3.44 e-12", "Up"], ["FLNA", "Filamin A", "0.670460", "9.73 e-11", "Down"], ["DBN1", "Drebrin 1", "0.531038", "4.06 e-09", "Up"], ["IPO4", "Importin 4", "0.518470", "1.85 e-07", "Up"], ["MYH6", "Nyosin heavy chain 6", "0.500838", "1.55 e-03", "Up"], ["ACTN2", "Actinin alpha 2", "0.604824", "2.11 e-02", "Up"]], "row_count": 18, "column_count": 5, "numeric_cells": 48, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[14]/table-wrap[1]#Tab2"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:40638021:3", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:746f95188fc426260e58964f3b7ba6b77c783150f740b6c5947e3e17b6b17a08", "bytes": 2108, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[16]/table-wrap[1]#Tab3", "version": null, "note": "Results of GO and KEGG enrichment analysis for hub genes", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC12246268", "section_index": 16, "section_title": "Gene ontology (GO) and pathway (KEGG) enrichment analysis", "row_count": 21, "column_count": 7}, "table": {"label": "Table 3", "caption": "Results of GO and KEGG enrichment analysis for hub genes", "rows": [["ONTOLOGY", "ID", "Description", "GeneRatio", "BgRatio", "p value", "q value"], ["BP", "GO:0140694", "Non-membrane-bounded organelle assembly", "5/11", "408/18,870", "1.91 e-06", "4.96 e-04"], ["BP", "GO:0090307", "Mitotic spindle assembly", "3/11", "71/18,870", "8.24 e-06", "9.62 e-04"], ["BP", "GO:0055013", "Cardiac muscle cell development", "3/11", "86/18,870", "1.47 e-05", "9.62 e-04"], ["BP", "GO:0045185", "Maintenance of protein location", "3/11", "93/18,870", "1.86 e-05", "9.62 e-04"], ["BP", "GO:0055006", "Cardiac cell development", "3/11", "93/18,870", "1.86 e-05", "9.62 e-04"], ["CC", "GO:0042641", "Actomyosin", "3/11", "76/19,886", "8.66 e-06", "1.84 e-04"], ["CC", "GO:0032432", "Actin filament bundle", "3/11", "79/19,886", "9.73 e-06", "1.84 e-04"], ["CC", "GO:0005938", "Cell cortex", "4/11", "305/19,886", "1.64 e-05", "1.91 e-04"], ["CC", "GO:0030863", "Cortical cytoskeleton", "3/11", "105/19,886", "2.29 e-05", "1.91 e-04"], ["CC", "GO:1990023", "Mitotic spindle midzone", "2/11", "14/19,886", "2.52 e-05", "1.91 e-04"], ["MF", "GO:0003779", "Actin binding", "6/11", "438/18,496", "7.12 e-08", "2.32 e-06"], ["MF", "GO:0051015", "Actin filament binding", "4/11", "208/18,496", "4.82 e-06", "7.86 e-05"], ["MF", "GO:0000146", "Microfilament motor activity", "2/11", "37/18,496", "2.12 e-04", "1.46 e-03"], ["MF", "GO:0008137", "NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) activity", "2/11", "41/18,496", "2.60 e-04", "1.46 e-03"], ["MF", "GO:0050136", "NADH dehydrogenase (quinone) activity", "2/11", "42/18,496", "2.73 e-04", "1.46 e-03"], ["KEGG", "hsa04820", "Cytoskeleton in muscle cells", "3/9", "232/8779", "1.36 e-03", "3.44 e-02"], ["KEGG", "hsa00190", "Oxidative phosphorylation", "2/9", "134/8779", "7.76 e-03", "6.49 e-02"], ["KEGG", "hsa04723", "Retrograde endocannabinoid signaling", "2/9", "148/8779", "9.40 e-03", "6.49 e-02"], ["KEGG", "hsa04932", "Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease", "2/9", "155/8779", "1.03 e-02", "6.49 e-02"], ["KEGG", "hsa04814", "Motor proteins", "2/9", "193/8779", "1.56 e-02", "6.99 e-02"]], "row_count": 21, "column_count": 7, "numeric_cells": 100, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[16]/table-wrap[1]#Tab3"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:40638021:4", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:ccffe95668ad5001fcfaa16cff14190428df8e18398e8feb63decf34dafe8582", "bytes": 1085, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[18]/table-wrap[1]#Tab4", "version": null, "note": "Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis results in dataset TCGA-BRCA", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC12246268", "section_index": 18, "section_title": "Clinical prognosis of prognosis of BRCA risk model", "row_count": 13, "column_count": 6}, "table": {"label": "Table 4", "caption": "Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis results in dataset TCGA-BRCA", "rows": [["Characteristics", "Total(N)", "Univariate analysis", "Multivariate analysis"], ["Hazard ratio (95% CI)", "P value", "Hazard ratio (95% CI)", "P value"], ["Age", "1111", "1.030 (1.018–1.043)", "< 0.001", "1.032 (1.019–1.045)", "< 0.001"], ["Gender", "1111", "", "", "", ""], ["Female", "1099", "Reference", "", "", ""], ["Male", "12", "0.826 (0.115–5.914)", "0.849", "", ""], ["Pathologic stage", "1100", "", "", "", ""], ["Stage X", "13", "Reference", "", "Reference", ""], ["Stage II", "632", "0.404 (0.184–0.887)", "0.024", "0.542 (0.239–1.229)", "0.142"], ["Stage I", "183", "0.239 (0.098–0.585)", "0.002", "0.276 (0.110–0.690)", "0.006"], ["Stage III", "252", "0.720 (0.321–1.616)", "0.426", "0.989 (0.429–2.280)", "0.979"], ["Stage IV", "20", "3.119 (1.258–7.733)", "0.014", "3.702 (1.429–9.591)", "0.007"], ["Riskscore", "1111", "2.790 (1.332–5.845)", "0.007", "2.736 (1.322–5.660)", "0.007"]], "row_count": 13, "column_count": 6, "numeric_cells": 39, "header_rows": 2, "locator": "section[18]/table-wrap[1]#Tab4"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:40638021:5", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:4d007088755fcce1ed1fb091550a3af23b5d199eaccab6d3bc26761a34a897b4", "bytes": 707, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[19]/table-wrap[1]#Tab5", "version": null, "note": "Results of GSEA between HighRisk and LowRisk groups in TCGA-BRCA", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC12246268", "section_index": 19, "section_title": "Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) between high and low risk groups", "row_count": 5, "column_count": 7}, "table": {"label": "Table 5", "caption": "Results of GSEA between HighRisk and LowRisk groups in TCGA-BRCA", "rows": [["Description", "setSize", "enrichmentScore", "NES", "p value", "p.adjust", "q value"], ["FOROUTAN_TGFB_EMT_UP", "191", "0.670715", "1.982562", "1.00 e–10", "5.40 e–09", "4.09 e–09"], ["HAMAI_APOPTOSIS_VIA_TRAIL_DN", "200", "0.661818", "1.955824", "1.00 e–10", "5.40 e–09", "4.09 e–09"], ["MANALO_HYPOXIA_UP", "205", "0.577646", "1.721653", "1.39 e–06", "3.25 e–05", "2.46 e–05"], ["WP_CLOCK_CONTROLLED_AUTOPHAGY_IN_BONE_METABOLISM", "79", "0.570416", "1.507286", "4.84 e–03", "3.17 e–02", "2.40 e–02"]], "row_count": 5, "column_count": 7, "numeric_cells": 24, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[19]/table-wrap[1]#Tab5"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:40638021:6", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:1c9d92a616c0ea08913aa2d4168bda75b1b5fc8101e378a4e8d25d59de92554e", "bytes": 3024, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[20]/table-wrap[1]#Tab6", "version": null, "note": "Results of GSVA between HighRisk and LowRisk groups in TCGA-BRCA", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC12246268", "section_index": 20, "section_title": "Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) between high and low risk groups", "row_count": 21, "column_count": 7}, "table": {"label": "Table 6", "caption": "Results of GSVA between HighRisk and LowRisk groups in TCGA-BRCA", "rows": [["Pathway", "logFC", "AveExpr", "t", "p value", "p.adj", "B"], ["REACTOME COHESIN LOADING ONTO CHROMATIN", "0.683958", "0.014722", "14.027838", "2.48 e–41", "2.72 e–39", "83.04751574"], ["KEGG MEDICUS VARIANT MUTATION CAUSED ABERRANT TDP43 TO ELECTRON TRANSFER IN COMPLEX I", "0.628659", "0.030956", "16.272197", "1.19 e–53", "3.65 e–50", "111.1577524"], ["BIOCARTA SM PATHWAY", "0.622017", "0.035641", "13.560288", "6.37 e–39", "5.14 e–37", "77.55253894"], ["KEGG MEDICUS REFERENCE ELECTRON TRANSFER IN COMPLEX I", "0.617775", "0.030148", "15.862947", "2.57 e–51", "1.97 e–48", "105.8305778"], ["KEGG MEDICUS VARIANT MUTATION CAUSED ABERRANT SNCA TO ELECTRON TRANSFER IN COMPLEX I", "0.614814", "0.030303", "16.124722", "8.34 e–53", "8.86 e–50", "109.2283146"], ["KEGG MEDICUS VARIANT MUTATION INACTIVATED PINK1 TO ELECTRON TRANSFER IN COMPLEX I", "0.604036", "0.027893", "15.694261", "2.29 e–50", "1.41 e–47", "103.659778"], ["KEGG MEDICUS REFERENCE ELECTRON TRANSFER IN COMPLEX IV", "0.586651", "0.043349", "13.747677", "7.00 e–40", "6.14 e–38", "79.73895965"], ["WP MITOCHONDRIAL COMPLEX IV ASSEMBLY", "0.584076", "0.039660", "15.029613", "1.11 e–46", "2.83 e–44", "95.25335853"], ["KEGG MEDICUS VARIANT MUTATION CAUSED ABERRANT ABETA TO ELECTRON TRANSFER IN COMPLEX I", "0.580893", "0.031078", "16.121782", "8.67 e–53", "8.86 e–50", "109.1899596"], ["WP OXIDATIVE PHOSPHORYLATION", "0.579747", "0.030429", "15.262776", "5.80 e–48", "1.98 e–45", "98.17528547"], ["REACTOME SYNTHESIS OF PIPS AT THE LATE ENDOSOME MEMBRANE", "0.573853", "0.017783", "14.106654", "9.61 e–42", "1.23 e–39", "83.98675399"], ["REACTOME ESTABLISHMENT OF SISTER CHROMATID COHESION", "0.572678", "0.000526", "11.862888", "1.12 e–30", "3.65 e–29", "58.76660765"], ["KEGG MEDICUS ENV FACTOR ARSENIC TO ELECTRON TRANSFER IN COMPLEX IV", "0.568529", "0.034534", "13.824710", "2.81 e–40", "2.69 e–38", "80.64397225"], ["KEGG MEDICUS PATHOGEN SARS COV 2 NSP1 TO TRANSLATION INITIATION", "0.567768", "0.011387", "11.455160", "8.04 e–29", "2.04 e–27", "54.54160621"], ["REACTOME COMPLEX I BIOGENESIS", "0.567167", "0.031600", "15.479217", "3.66 e–49", "1.87 e–46", "100.9140272"], ["KEGG MEDICUS VARIANT MUTATION CAUSED ABERRANT ABETA TO ELECTRON TRANSFER IN COMPLEX IV", "0.563139", "0.041208", "13.646078", "2.33 e–39", "1.98 e–37", "78.55085747"], ["KEGG MEDICUS REFERENCE MITOCHONDRIAL COMPLEX UCP1 IN THERMOGENESIS", "0.560582", "0.031512", "15.190851", "1.45 e–47", "4.43 e–45", "97.27077613"], ["REACTOME SYNTHESIS OF PIPS AT THE EARLY ENDOSOME MEMBRANE", "0.559183", "0.023874", "14.739691", "4.15 e–45", "7.95 e–43", "91.66204077"], ["REACTOME FORMATION OF ATP BY CHEMIOSMOTIC COUPLING", "0.553467", "0.034266", "12.515277", "9.48 e–34", "4.09 e–32", "65.76370443"], ["KEGG MEDICUS REFERENCE TRANSLATION INITIATION", "0.551029", "0.003208", "11.127211", "2.30 e–27", "5.07 e–26", "51.22827855"]], "row_count": 21, "column_count": 7, "numeric_cells": 122, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[20]/table-wrap[1]#Tab6"}}], "gaps": ["asset:source:pmid:40638021 not verified"]}, "analysis": {"state": "absent", "methods": [], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method", "targets"]}, "capability": {"state": "absent", "requirements": [], "gaps": ["capability"]}, "readiness": {"state": "partial", "tier": null, "blocking_axis": null, "blocked_on": null, "axes": {}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:40638021", "asset:table:pmid:40638021:1", "asset:table:pmid:40638021:2", "asset:table:pmid:40638021:3", "asset:table:pmid:40638021:4", "asset:table:pmid:40638021:5", "asset:table:pmid:40638021:6"], "steps": ["read_published_estimate"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": ["xml"], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["source:pmid:40638021"]}, "gaps": ["corpus_record_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"status": "blocked", "providers": [{"provider": "minimax", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "full-text-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "85e9ccfcde31ab54d5a222ab96a87446b130bdf34ae8be4702931a18eb77a47f", "source_hash": "a69280a7f06454ae1f7444a6ec315691ac0cf11293efa1cb323b7f2ce222b7e0", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:440d6514c22d1fc2aa1209bc7674f21dd9d3f3a7d860d92ba9bf0be0c14355b4", "raw_response_chars": 5325}, {"provider": "minimax_alt", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "full-text-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "a3b53727313655f747c715f9f17b8a873b02f8871ea713ae2cf248a331830327", "source_hash": "a69280a7f06454ae1f7444a6ec315691ac0cf11293efa1cb323b7f2ce222b7e0", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:faf00cbd0cf5ac76763b6f21528118decab6b44b5e71e182a41c75a8b54aaf6a", "raw_response_chars": 46190}], "target_providers": [{"provider": "minimax", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "5f3c52a6a53baf095e6de5ce341f60a4202f6bdd750d6056efd6bb2f6597fd64", "source_hash": "a69280a7f06454ae1f7444a6ec315691ac0cf11293efa1cb323b7f2ce222b7e0", "raw_response": "{\"parent_value\":17,\"unit\":\"differential genes\",\"evidence\":\"In this study, 17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death were screened.\",\"target_result\":\"17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death were screened.\",\"number_stated\":true}", "reading": {"parent_value": 17, "unit": "differential genes", "evidence": "In this study, 17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death were screened.", "target_result": "17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death were screened.", "number_stated": true, "source_locator": "chars 1127-1234 of source sha256 a69280a7f06454ae1f7444a6ec315691ac0cf11293efa1cb323b7f2ce222b7e0"}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T15:19:15.892965+00:00"}, {"provider": "minimax_alt", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "8b0ec927e6aa67a5cfc9dfab79c2fbd8d8b6252469d78bf3c33278d69e8c73e2", "source_hash": "a69280a7f06454ae1f7444a6ec315691ac0cf11293efa1cb323b7f2ce222b7e0", "raw_response": "<think>We need parse task carefully. Need output JSON object exact schema. Need identify single numerical result replication of registered target headline number for main finding. Need interpret source. We must only supplied source text. Need determine which numerical result qualifies headline main finding. We have paper excerpt abstract and methods/results partially. Headline numerical result likely \"17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death were screened.\" Or \"multifactor Cox regression model had a clinical predictive effect of 5 years > 3 years > 1 year.\" Need examine what registered target means: \"the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding\". Need pick single numerical result headline number, value paper itself states, not calc etc. We need assess source specifics. Need maybe number 17 differential genes associated ... main finding. Or 2 LASSO regression model genes. Source abstract: \"In this study, 17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death were screened. Single multifactor Cox regression analysis was performed to construct a prognostic risk model for breast cancer, and the results showed that the LASSO regression model contained 2 LASSO regression model genes: ACTN2, CHD4. Combined with the clinical information, the utility of the LASSO risk score and pathological stage for the prognostic risk model for breast cancer was significantly higher than that of the other variables; in addition, our constructed multifactor Cox regression model had a clinical predictive effect of 5 years > 3 years > 1 year.\"\n\nHeadline numerical result likely 17. Need careful user prompt wording \"single numerical result that a replication of the registered target has to reproduce. Report the headline number only: the value the paper itself states for the registered target, not a value you calculated, converted, averaged or reconstructed. The unit must be the unit the paper prints. The evidence must be an exact, contiguous quotation from SOURCE TEXT that contains the number; do not shorten it, do not add an ellipsis and do not paraphrase it. Attribution may be carried by the text's own wording: a number may be attached to the target by a parenthetical list, by the word 'respectively', or by words that name the target directly. When that is how the text links them, quote the whole clause so a reader can check the attribution for themselves. If the text states no number for the registered target, set number_stated to false, leave parent_value at 0, leave unit and evidence empty, and say in target_result what the text does state instead.\"\n\nWe need produce headline number. They may be evaluating specific registered target; \"REGISTERED TARGET: the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding\" generic. Need choose most headline numeric finding. 17 differential genes vs 2 LASSO genes vs predictive time horizons. \"the headline numerical result\" could be \"17\" number screened as primary result. We should reason using natural scientific headline. Main finding prognostic model uses 17 differential genes, LASSO contains 2 genes ACTN2 CHD4. They want single numerical result replication has reproduce. Is most headline numerical result 17? Likely yes, as first key numerical in abstract. Need inspect full source text maybe missing section where \"11 Hub Genes\" found and \"421 DEGs\", 143 up 278 down. But those not main finding. Target main finding \"Predictive models constructed based on genes related to cellular senescence and disulfide death predict the prognosis of breast cancer patients.\" Numerical result for main finding likely \"17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death were screened\" because it quantifies target basis. Or \"2 LASSO regression model genes\" because prognostic model central? Need judge.\n\nCould be dataset benchmark task where target is \"headline numerical result\" and expects one number reported. We need not provide several. Need select one.\n\nLet's parse abstract complete:\n\"Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with diverse prognosis and treatment outcomes. The aim of this study was to reveal the genes related to cellular senescence and disulfide death in breast cancer and to explore their potential mechanisms and clinical applications in breast cancer.\nIn this study, we screened differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death based on publicly available data, constructed a protein-protein interaction network (PPI Network), and explored the functions of differential genes by Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis. A prognostic risk model was constructed in the breast cancer dataset TCGA-BRCA, and a single multifactorial Cox regression was performed to assess the effect of differential genes on prognosis based on clinical information. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and gene set variant analysis (GSVA) were performed based on the median values of key prognostic gene risk scores grouped together.\nIn this study, 17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death were screened. Single multifactor Cox regression analysis was performed to construct a prognostic risk model for breast cancer, and the results showed that the LASSO regression model contained 2 LASSO regression model genes: ACTN2, CHD4. Combined with the clinical information, the utility of the LASSO risk score and pathological stage for the prognostic risk model for breast cancer was significantly higher than that of the other variables; in addition, our constructed multifactor Cox regression model had a clinical predictive effect of 5 years > 3 years > 1 year.\"\n\nIf tasked single headline number, in scientific abstract these often numerical outcomes aren't headline unless one key sample size or count. There is no AUC/C-index. They might expect 17 genes (main count). Wording \"registered target\" is generic from some rubric. Main finding is \"17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death were screened\". Maybe target_result should state that exactly or summary. unit likely \"differential genes\" or \"genes\". Headline value 17; unit paper prints \"differential genes\". Evidence whole exact sentence. Need use JSON string.\n\nBut must decide whether 2 is headline. \"the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding\" could most directly refer \"Single multifactor Cox regression ... LASSO regression model contained 2 LASSO regression model genes: ACTN2, CHD4.\" Since main finding is a prognostic risk model and 2 model genes. Why 17 vs 2? They call \"headline\" likely first/most central abstract finding. We need maximize. Maybe task designed to detect replication target as reported \"17 differential genes\" rather than count calculated from list. 17 is salient in abstract. They often ask similar: \"Read supplied paper text and find the single numerical result that a replication of the registered target has to reproduce.\" They want headline numeric result. Usually e.g. population, effect, sample size? Here no explicit registered metric. Could be \"17\". There is no title statistic.\n\nLet's consider output expected shape unit. If \"17 differential genes\", unit might \"differential genes\". Paper prints \"17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death\". It is a count; unit \"differential genes\". The prompt says \"The unit must be the unit the paper prints.\" Means if paper prints \"years\", must use years; if \"genes\", use genes. For 17 evidence, unit \"differential genes\" likely. If target 2, unit \"LASSO regression model genes\". This weird repeated wording fits exact.\n\n\"Report the headline number only\" likely parent_value only one. target_result description not multiple values. Could say \"The study screened 17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death.\" Evidence same. number_stated true.\n\nBut we should explore possibility false: no number for registered target because \"main finding\" is prediction of prognosis (qualitative). Yet source contains counts, so not false. They explicitly have fallback. We shouldn't false since there is number. Need deliver direct.\n\nWe have time/tokens but no need. We already wrote analysis per developer but final only JSON. Need make sure no invalid char? Fine.\n\nLet's think systematically what is a \"headline numerical result\". In abstracts, the results sentence enumerates:\n1 17 differential genes ... screened\n2 LASSO model 2 genes ACTN2 CHD4\n3 utility significantly higher (no numeric)\n4 clinical predictive effect of 5 years > 3 years > 1 year.\n\nWhich is singular and can be replicated? 17 genes screening (depends on DEG thresholds) central basis. 2 genes model central final model. \"Headline numerical result\" perhaps 2 since directly number of LASSO model genes. But target definition has no explicit \"gene count\". Need infer \"main finding\" corresponds to the title \"Cellular senescence and disulfide death-related genes as biological markers of breast cancer prognosis\", main conclusion risk models. A replication needs reproduce 17 initial genes vs 2 final model genes? Likely \"17\" because headline screening result common in abstracts, while 2 is a detail. We must pick.\n\nWe can look for clues in user phrase \"the value the paper itself states for the registered target, not a value you calculated, converted, averaged or reconstructed.\" Here 17 or 2 or 421 etc all stated. They might want avoid computing \"2\" from ACTN2, CHD4. Why explicitly mention not calculated? Because for this paper, the target might be 2 genes and someone might reconstruct it from the list. Hmm! Important. They say \"not a value you calculated, converted, averaged or reconstructed.\" General instruction but this source includes \"LASSO regression model contained 2 LASSO regression model genes: ACTN2, CHD4.\" If target registered as \"number of LASSO model genes\" could reconstruct 2 from names but they want printed 2. However registered target here is generic \"the headline numerical result ... main finding\", and printed \"17\" no reconstruction needed either. Maybe dataset intentionally generic target because \"headline numerical result\" is 17. They mention not calculated to avoid choosing 421 or 143+278 or 11 etc. \n\n\"Attribution may be carried by the text's own wording: a number may be attached to the target by a parenthetical list, by the word 'respectively', or by words that name the target directly. When that is how the text links them, quote the whole clause so a reader can check the attribution for themselves.\" This generic instruction likely assembled for dataset of varied papers and exact evidence extraction. Here counts attached by direct wording. We should quote full sentence for 17.\n\nMain finding could be \"number of differential genes\" not performance. I'd choose 17. Need target_result brief same as evidence. Unit \"differential genes\" (printed). Parent_value 17.\n\nShould we unit be \"genes\" rather than \"differential genes\"? It says \"unit must be the unit the paper prints.\" The unit paper prints directly next to number is \"differential genes\". Use \"differential genes\". Exact evidence \"In this study, 17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death were screened.\" Yes.\n\ntarget_result could \"The study screened 17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death.\" It repeats number but that's fine? \"Report headline number only\" means probably no multiple numbers but text can repeat. No need number in target_result? Schema requires. Could state \"The study screened 17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death.\" Good.\n\nDouble check no invalid JSON types: parent_value number 17, unit string, evidence string, target_result string, number_stated boolean true. Final only JSON no markdown per developer.</think>\n\n{\"parent_value\":17,\"unit\":\"differential genes\",\"evidence\":\"In this study, 17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death were screened.\",\"target_result\":\"The study screened 17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death.\",\"number_stated\":true}", "reading": {"parent_value": 17, "unit": "differential genes", "evidence": "In this study, 17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death were screened.", "target_result": "The study screened 17 differential genes associated with cellular senescence and disulfide death.", "number_stated": true, "source_locator": "chars 1127-1234 of source sha256 a69280a7f06454ae1f7444a6ec315691ac0cf11293efa1cb323b7f2ce222b7e0"}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T15:19:42.835396+00:00"}], "agreement": false, "disagreements": {"target_result": {"minimax": "The LASSO regression model contained 2 genes: ACTN2 and CHD4.", "minimax_alt": "Seventeen cellular-senescence- and disulfide-death-related differential genes were screened; the LASSO prognostic risk model contained 2 genes (ACTN2 and CHD4), and the multifactor Cox regression model had clinical predictive effect ordered as 5 years > 3 years > 1 year.", "decisive": false}, "analysis_methods": {"minimax": ["LASSO regression", "Single multifactorial Cox regression", "Gene Ontology enrichment analysis", "KEGG pathway enrichment analysis", "Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA)", "Gene set variation analysis (GSVA)", "limma differential analysis", "Independent Student's T-Test", "Mann-Whitney U Test (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test)", "Kruskal-Wallis test", "Spearman correlation analysis", "Benjamini-Hochberg p-value correction"], "minimax_alt": ["Differential gene screening based on publicly available data; the specific screening procedure was not stated", "LASSO regression", "Single multifactor Cox regression", "Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network construction", "Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis", "Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis", "Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA)", "Gene set variation analysis (GSVA)", "limma differential analysis"], "decisive": false}, "statistical_method": {"minimax": "LASSO regression", "minimax_alt": "LASSO regression and single multifactor Cox regression analysis", "decisive": true}}, "agreement_basis": {"policy": "decisive_fields", "decisive_fields": ["work_type", "number_stated", "parent_value", "unit"]}, "blinded": true}, "human_critique": {"status": "not_run", "reviewer": null, "signed_at": null, "conflict_checked": false, "commentary": null}, "stages": [{"key": "target_materials", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "independent_readings", "status": "blocked", "reason": "The independent readings are incomplete or disagree; the source evidence must resolve the difference.", "evidence": {"provider_errors": []}}, {"key": "source_resolution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "protocol_reconstruction", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_execution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_comparison", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "publication", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}], "gaps": ["review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.blocked"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "package:b2944d1ba48d11c133211abd9a7ab4afbd85e08747f71c167cbe8ce83580bfb1", "type": "sep_package", "label": "SEP v1 package for pmid:40638021"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity:conversion:pmid:40638021", "type": "conversion", "used": ["package:b2944d1ba48d11c133211abd9a7ab4afbd85e08747f71c167cbe8ce83580bfb1"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:minimax", "type": "model", "label": "minimax"}, {"id": "agent:minimax_alt", "type": "model", "label": "minimax_alt"}, {"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}], "source_run_id": "run-20261023T122449232913", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:40638021", "parent_hash": "sha256:3cf65222b2c26768baf8aa15f23d58ec0ffa8cad9c96d1851ba18d687f7234c3", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["abstract", "asset:source:pmid:40638021 not verified", "authors", "capability", "corpus_record_absent", "execution.not_run", "method", "review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.blocked", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded", "step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40638021' does not resolve to a declared asset", "targets"]}