EBV-miR-BART5-5p regulates RORA to promote proliferation and migration of gastric cancer cells.

{"sci_version": "1.0", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:40638694", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 2, "content_hash": "sha256:1bf84c9f227c2ce43d9cd0246309e2013e661cf4f59d737d2b02fc14114c6874", "created_at": "2026-11-01T10:25:51Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T14:01:43Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "converter": "sep_to_sci_v1", "source_package_schema": "urn:bntrg:sep:1.0.0"}, "paper": {"state": "partial", "title": "EBV-miR-BART5-5p regulates RORA to promote proliferation and migration of gastric cancer cells.", "doi": "10.1371/journal.pone.0327323", "pmid": "40638694", "authors": null, "journal": "PloS one", "year": 2025, "abstract": null, "claims": [{"id": "claim-1", "statement": "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding", "kind": "quantitative", "state": "complete", "target": {"value": 910.0, "unit": "co-expressed genes", "tolerance": null, "source": "chars 1542-1634 of source sha256 65c0a204d65672f7265f2e887030401bc3b9b361b7f4e3992ff33fc5e4dc9919"}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40638694", "locator": "chars 1542-1634 of source sha256 65c0a204d65672f7265f2e887030401bc3b9b361b7f4e3992ff33fc5e4dc9919", "quote": "In this study, differential expression and WGCNA analyses identified 910 co-expressed genes."}]}], "gaps": ["abstract", "authors"]}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate and its interval from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The number a replication must land on, and the sentence it came from.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:40638694"], "outputs": ["the published estimate, its unit and its interval"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data behind the published result", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:not_downloaded", "description": "The published result cannot be recomputed without the data the paper analysed.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the analysis programme", "kind": "analysis", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "description": "Re-run the paper's analysis on the source data and produce the registered result. | SEP input not carried into the asset list: materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40638694", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the registered result"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded", "step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40638694' does not resolve to a declared asset"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:40638694", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0327323", "sha256": "sha256:65c0a204d65672f7265f2e887030401bc3b9b361b7f4e3992ff33fc5e4dc9919", "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1371/journal.pone.0327323", "version": null, "note": "Source read by the package builder: full_text.", "structure": {"access_state": "full_text"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:40638694:1", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:8ab99a963290e4ac62ae2713c83a1ac4e7dafded0ec58e5149622a54b28c4e0a", "bytes": 903, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[3]/table-wrap[1]#pone.0327323.t001", "version": null, "note": "Clinical features of GC patients in the TCGA dataset.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC12244631", "section_index": 3, "section_title": "2.1 Data collection", "row_count": 32, "column_count": 2}, "table": {"label": "Table 1", "caption": "Clinical features of GC patients in the TCGA dataset.", "rows": [["Clinical features", "TCGA cohort"], ["Status (%)", ""], ["Alive", "230 (60.8%)"], ["Dead", "148 (39.2%)"], ["Age (%)", ""], ["≤65", "172 (45.5%)"], [">65", "206 (54.5%)"], ["Gender (%)", ""], ["Male", "237 (62.7%)"], ["Female", "141 (37.3%)"], ["Grade (%)", ""], ["G1", "8 (2.1%)"], ["G2", "127 (33.6%)"], ["G3", "243 (64.3%)"], ["WHO-Stage (%)", ""], ["Ⅰ", "48 (12.7%)"], ["Ⅱ", "120 (31.7%)"], ["Ⅲ", "169 (44.7%)"], ["Ⅳ", "41 (10.8%)"], ["AJCC-T stage (%)", ""], ["T1", "17 (4.5%)"], ["T2", "76 (20.1%)"], ["T3", "180 (47.6%)"], ["T4", "105 (27.8%)"], ["AJCC-N stage (%)", ""], ["N0", "120 (31.7%)"], ["N1", "100 (26.5%)"], ["N2", "79 (20.9%)"], ["N3", "79 (20.9%)"], ["AJCC-M stage (%)", ""], ["M0", "351 (92.9%)"], ["M1", "27 (7.1%)"]], "row_count": 32, "column_count": 2, "numeric_cells": 25, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[3]/table-wrap[1]#pone.0327323.t001"}}], "gaps": ["asset:source:pmid:40638694 not verified"]}, "analysis": {"state": "absent", "methods": [], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method", "targets"]}, "capability": {"state": "absent", "requirements": [], "gaps": ["capability"]}, "readiness": {"state": "partial", "tier": null, "blocking_axis": null, "blocked_on": null, "axes": {}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:40638694", "asset:table:pmid:40638694:1"], "steps": ["read_published_estimate"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": ["xml"], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["source:pmid:40638694"]}, "gaps": ["corpus_record_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"status": "blocked", "providers": [{"provider": "minimax", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "full-text-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "1cb410195e8c10e80bef37a0f0370c86638f71c8a2f2a3db5bbe91a336aa13bf", "source_hash": "65c0a204d65672f7265f2e887030401bc3b9b361b7f4e3992ff33fc5e4dc9919", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:a1990e659f5a4a5eb0a991615fc6c65096562b4cb2ce62be212ad0582a6e2096", "raw_response_chars": 4025}, {"provider": "minimax_alt", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "full-text-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "2e4896176b7f8e9cb9def5b530faef169a33bcf60fd06eae316e022a949c3abe", "source_hash": "65c0a204d65672f7265f2e887030401bc3b9b361b7f4e3992ff33fc5e4dc9919", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:fdf18df277881f06dda10469bbd476c538cd29fffb3d17da8c89a3826fc6f942", "raw_response_chars": 42833}], "target_providers": [{"provider": "minimax", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "6ede62d9ff15622656604695e6fac10f5641242ad2c09277978dcc1948353bf8", "source_hash": "65c0a204d65672f7265f2e887030401bc3b9b361b7f4e3992ff33fc5e4dc9919", "raw_response": "{\"parent_value\":910,\"unit\":\"co-expressed genes\",\"evidence\":\"In this study, differential expression and WGCNA analyses identified 910 co-expressed genes.\",\"target_result\":\"910 co-expressed genes\",\"number_stated\":true}", "reading": {"parent_value": 910, "unit": "co-expressed genes", "evidence": "In this study, differential expression and WGCNA analyses identified 910 co-expressed genes.", "target_result": "910 co-expressed genes", "number_stated": true, "source_locator": "chars 1542-1634 of source sha256 65c0a204d65672f7265f2e887030401bc3b9b361b7f4e3992ff33fc5e4dc9919"}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T15:19:05.508379+00:00"}, {"provider": "minimax_alt", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "6420a52914cede87c7da7541c76877d03eaf0af6a6f301196f86f97d684391bb", "source_hash": "65c0a204d65672f7265f2e887030401bc3b9b361b7f4e3992ff33fc5e4dc9919", "raw_response": "<think>We need answer JSON only. Need identify registered target headline numerical result paper states for main finding. Source has many numerical results. Need infer \"single numerical result that a replication of registered target has to reproduce.\" Headline numerical result likely 910 co-expressed/overlapping candidates? Main finding title mechanistic EBV-miR-BART5-5p regulates RORA, but paper's abstract/results explicitly says identified 910 co-expressed genes. They ask value paper states for registered target, not calculated. Could be \"910 co-expressed genes\" as headline numerical result. Need evidence exact contiguous quote containing number and attribution clause. Unit as paper prints: \"co-expressed genes\" maybe unit \"genes\". parent_value 910. Evidence perhaps \"In this study, differential expression and WGCNA analyses identified 910 co-expressed genes.\" Exact contiguous. target_result string headline: \"910 co-expressed genes\". number_stated true.\n\nBut need scrutinize possibility target is main finding, perhaps paper headline number in title absent. Numerical result candidates:\n- 910 co-expressed genes\n- 47 genes associated\n- 1,326 DEGs, 1,310 up, 16 down\n- 11 genes\n- survival 1,3,5 years.\n\"single numerical result that a replication of the registered target has to reproduce\" Registered target: headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding. Likely benchmark task asks extract numerical parent result. Main finding itself qualitative (miRNA regulates RORA), no number attached. Yet abstract includes \"identified 910 co-expressed genes\" as only quantitative result. They perhaps expect 910. User says if text states no number for registered target, false and say what text states instead. Does \"registered target\" correspond main finding and need numerical result specifically for it? They define target as headline numerical result paper states for main finding. We need find headline number. 910 is in abstract and repeated. Could be central headline numerical finding.\n\nNeed output valid JSON with no markdown. Evidence exact quote. Unit paper prints: \"co-expressed genes\"; likely unit \"genes\". target_result perhaps \"910 co-expressed genes\". Ensure exact quote. Let's consider if unit should be \"co-expressed genes\" because unit must printed. Usually schema asks unit string. Value 910, unit \"co-expressed genes\" or \"genes\". Paper says \"910 co-expressed genes.\" They may expect \"genes\". \"The unit must be the unit the paper prints.\" It prints genes. Could put \"co-expressed genes\" perhaps that is quantity descriptor not unit. Headline number only means parent_value 910, unit \"co-expressed genes\" maybe violates unit. Usually extraction output: parent_value number, unit e.g. \"genes\". target_result concise.\n\nNeed not quote more than clause. Evidence exact contiguous. Use source quote:\n\"In this study, differential expression and WGCNA analyses identified 910 co-expressed genes.\"\nThis is exact. target_result \"The study identified 910 co-expressed genes.\" Is that paraphrase okay target_result perhaps no restriction, evidence exact. Could say \"910 co-expressed genes identified by differential expression and WGCNA analyses.\" Headline number only perhaps target_result likely \"910 co-expressed genes\". They request \"Report the headline number only\". JSON requires strings. Let's produce.\n\nBut let's deeply assess ambiguity. Main finding is EBV-miR-BART5-5p promotes proliferation and migration by regulating RORA. No numerical result in text on proliferation/migration (fold changes etc.) included. If no number attached to registered target, should number_stated false. The phrase \"REGISTERED TARGET: the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding\" is generic benchmark instruction where target is likely selected from article and asks to find headline numerical result. In supplied text, the abstract's sole quantitative result is 910. They likely expect that. The mechanism is main finding but no number. Yet \"headline numerical result\" may refer 910 because it is first/headline number. Need infer task generation. The user explicitly emphasizes registered target and says if text states no number for registered target, false. Here source includes a headline numerical result \"identified 910 co-expressed genes.\" This is likely intended answer. Other numbers are secondary.\n\nCould evidence need include registered target direct wording? \"In this study, differential expression and WGCNA analyses identified 910 co-expressed genes.\" Attribution by text's wording. Good.\n\nUnit maybe \"genes\". JSON:\n{\"parent_value\":910,\"unit\":\"co-expressed genes\",\"evidence\":\"In this study, differential expression and WGCNA analyses identified 910 co-expressed genes.\",\"target_result\":\"910 co-expressed genes\",\"number_stated\":true}\n\"Report headline number only\" unit perhaps paper prints \"co-expressed genes.\" I'd use \"co-expressed genes\" as unit? Usually numerical result schema parent_value and unit separate. If quantity is number of genes, unit = \"co-expressed genes\" could be natural. They say \"unit must be unit paper prints.\" It prints \"co-expressed genes\", while generic unit \"genes\" is substring. \"Headline number only: the value...\" Could unit \"genes\" likely accepted. target_result perhaps \"910 co-expressed genes\". Let's answer concise JSON.</think>\n\n{\"parent_value\":910,\"unit\":\"co-expressed genes\",\"evidence\":\"In this study, differential expression and WGCNA analyses identified 910 co-expressed genes.\",\"target_result\":\"910 co-expressed genes\",\"number_stated\":true}", "reading": {"parent_value": 910, "unit": "co-expressed genes", "evidence": "In this study, differential expression and WGCNA analyses identified 910 co-expressed genes.", "target_result": "910 co-expressed genes", "number_stated": true, "source_locator": "chars 1542-1634 of source sha256 65c0a204d65672f7265f2e887030401bc3b9b361b7f4e3992ff33fc5e4dc9919"}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T15:19:12.188871+00:00"}], "agreement": false, "disagreements": {"target_result": {"minimax": "910 co-expressed genes", "minimax_alt": "910 co-expressed genes (910 overlapping candidates)", "decisive": false}, "analysis_methods": {"minimax": ["differential expression analysis", "Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA)", "Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis", "Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis", "protein-protein interaction network analysis"], "minimax_alt": ["Differential expression analysis", "Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA)", "Intersection of differentially expressed genes with the WGCNA hub module", "Gene Ontology and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis", "Protein-protein interaction network analysis", "Chi-square tests", "Wilcoxon signed-rank tests", "Prognostic nomogram construction and calibration", "Correlation analysis of RORA expression with immune-related genes and tumor mutation burden", "pRRophetic-based drug sensitivity analysis", "Single-cell gene expression analysis using TISCH"], "decisive": false}, "statistical_method": {"minimax": "Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA)", "minimax_alt": "Differential expression analysis and Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA)", "decisive": true}}, "agreement_basis": {"policy": "decisive_fields", "decisive_fields": ["work_type", "number_stated", "parent_value", "unit"]}, "blinded": true}, "human_critique": {"status": "not_run", "reviewer": null, "signed_at": null, "conflict_checked": false, "commentary": null}, "stages": [{"key": "target_materials", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "independent_readings", "status": "blocked", "reason": "The independent readings are incomplete or disagree; the source evidence must resolve the difference.", "evidence": {"provider_errors": []}}, {"key": "source_resolution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "protocol_reconstruction", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_execution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_comparison", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "publication", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}], "gaps": ["review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.blocked"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "package:bc3eef8f3e5662cdc91423ce7446e53bff91f75dd3b5cfd42e3615940714e654", "type": "sep_package", "label": "SEP v1 package for pmid:40638694"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity:conversion:pmid:40638694", "type": "conversion", "used": ["package:bc3eef8f3e5662cdc91423ce7446e53bff91f75dd3b5cfd42e3615940714e654"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:minimax", "type": "model", "label": "minimax"}, {"id": "agent:minimax_alt", "type": "model", "label": "minimax_alt"}, {"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}], "source_run_id": "run-20261023T122449232913", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:40638694", "parent_hash": "sha256:a3defb2c8b0ee9bd4d3a08923c4c7fafb36686bd282db69f3cd9b69c7fe4cfbe", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["abstract", "asset:source:pmid:40638694 not verified", "authors", "capability", "corpus_record_absent", "execution.not_run", "method", "review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.blocked", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded", "step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40638694' does not resolve to a declared asset", "targets"]}