Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:40672061

A novel miRNA-based model for predicting the 3-year recurrence risk of hepatocellular carcinoma following liver transplantation.

Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025 doi:10.21037/jgo-2025-9

Paper

partial

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

absent

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:40672061
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:19a82fb07aaa89f9d459cb95a110bec45fdfebd0fb1bbeffc40da7414980e0aa
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T10:25:51Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T14:01:44Z
generator object · 3 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
converter
sep_to_sci_v1
source_package_schema
urn:bntrg:sep:1.0.0
paper object · 10 fields
state
partial
title
A novel miRNA-based model for predicting the 3-year recurrence risk of hepatocellular carcinoma following liver transplantation.
doi
10.21037/jgo-2025-9
pmid
40672061
authors
null
journal
Journal of gastrointestinal oncology
year
2025
abstract
null
claims array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-1
statement
the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding
kind
qualitative
state
blocked
target object · 4 fields
value
null
unit
null
tolerance
null
source
null
evidence array · 0 items
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
abstract
[1]
authors
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate and its interval from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The number a replication must land on, and the sentence it came from.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:40672061
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate, its unit and its interval
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data behind the published result
kind
data-preparation
state
blocked
blocked_on
data:not_downloaded
description
The published result cannot be recomputed without the data the paper analysed.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the analysis programme
kind
analysis
state
blocked
blocked_on
no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment
description
Re-run the paper's analysis on the source data and produce the registered result. | SEP input not carried into the asset list: materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40672061
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the registered result
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded
[1]
step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment
[2]
step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40672061' does not resolve to a declared asset
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 3 items
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:40672061
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-2025-9
sha256
sha256:2c47cb6f2515f267edf1153515fb495f310b57cecf1bc7f7ef96c3a955f2237b
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.21037/jgo-2025-9
version
null
note
Source read by the package builder: full_text.
structure object · 1 field
access_state
full_text
[1] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:40672061:1
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:d0aa2b68028b5da6bebec976bec79c7efb0a44138618700c12e6c647b8013cb3
bytes
724
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[11]/table-wrap[1]#t1
version
null
note
Logistic regression model analyses of the correlations between the five miRNAs expression in HCC tissues and the 3-year recurrence of HCC following liver transplantation
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC12261023
section_index
11
section_title
Construction and validation of a miRNA-based risk score
row_count
7
column_count
5
table object · 8 fields
label
Table 1
caption
Logistic regression model analyses of the correlations between the five miRNAs expression in HCC tissues and the 3-year recurrence of HCC following liver transplantation
rows array · 7 items
[0] array · 4 items
[0]
Variables
[1]
Univariate analysis
[2]
[3]
Multivariate analysis
[1] array · 3 items
[0]
OR (95% CI)
[1]
P value
[2]
Coefficient (β)
[2] array · 5 items
[0]
hsa-miR-454
[1]
2.877 (1.398, 5.922)
[2]
0.004
[3]
[4]
1.232
[3] array · 5 items
[0]
hsa-miR-1293
[1]
2.207 (1.211, 4.021)
[2]
0.01
[3]
[4]
1.259
[4] array · 5 items
[0]
hsa-miR-139
[1]
0.434 (0.239, 0.787)
[2]
0.006
[3]
[4]
−1.004
[5] array · 5 items
[0]
hsa-miR-99a
[1]
0.466 (0.252, 0.862)
[2]
0.02
[3]
[4]
−0.493
[6] array · 5 items
[0]
hsa-miR-130a
[1]
0.428 (0.234, 0.783)
[2]
0.006
[3]
[4]
−0.449
locator
section[11]/table-wrap[1]#t1
[2] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:40672061:2
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:0c7c0468c4a4e2b72eb1da7f0452f7d7438047e4cfb151d8e7b8d44450f93213
bytes
558
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[12]/table-wrap[1]#t2
version
null
note
Logistic regression model analyses of risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence within 3 years after liver transplantation
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC12261023
section_index
12
section_title
Establishment and validation of a combined model
row_count
4
column_count
6
table object · 8 fields
label
Table 2
caption
Logistic regression model analyses of risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence within 3 years after liver transplantation
rows array · 4 items
[0] array · 4 items
[0]
Variables
[1]
Univariate analysis
[2]
[3]
Multivariate analysis
[1] array · 4 items
[0]
OR (95% CI)
[1]
P value
[2]
OR (95% CI)
[3]
P value
[2] array · 6 items
[0]
Milan criteria
[1]
2.955 (1.049, 8.325)
[2]
0.04
[3]
[4]
7.494 (1.444, 38.908)
[5]
0.02
[3] array · 6 items
[0]
Risk score
[1]
2.718 (1.683, 4.390)
[2]
<0.001
[3]
[4]
3.074 (1.760, 5.372)
[5]
<0.001
locator
section[12]/table-wrap[1]#t2
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
asset:source:pmid:40672061 not verified
analysis object · 4 fields
state
absent
methods array · 0 items
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
method
[1]
targets
capability object · 3 fields
state
absent
requirements array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
capability
readiness object · 8 fields
state
partial
tier
null
blocked_on
null
axes object · 0 fields
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
assets array · 3 items
[0]
source:pmid:40672061
[1]
asset:table:pmid:40672061:1
[2]
asset:table:pmid:40672061:2
steps array · 1 item
[0]
read_published_estimate
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 1 item
[0]
xml
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:40672061
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
corpus_record_absent
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 7 fields
status
blocked
providers array · 2 items
[0] object · 7 fields
provider
minimax
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
prompt_version
full-text-reading-v1
prompt_hash
5a17f1b4010e8b53774efe188d78493cf4ec17ab4aa844ef889e7f4de3ac6d1f
source_hash
2c47cb6f2515f267edf1153515fb495f310b57cecf1bc7f7ef96c3a955f2237b
raw_response_sha256
sha256:63e32721c8fa3afe54a6559e3f60fea63d039d32292019adf35b1f834dc39c94
raw_response_chars
4908
[1] object · 7 fields
provider
minimax_alt
model
MiniMax-M3
prompt_version
full-text-reading-v1
prompt_hash
2bf20f01b60a880d58c2f1a6bad4bce9b1d10a0765d81cc44f2a3a7b4dbc0f8f
source_hash
2c47cb6f2515f267edf1153515fb495f310b57cecf1bc7f7ef96c3a955f2237b
raw_response_sha256
sha256:3187882ab9e7b4029ead2b94f52f54d569fa33e26883c9e434a0dac32a3e77fd
raw_response_chars
60262
target_providers array · 2 items
[0] object · 8 fields
provider
minimax
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
prompt_version
replication-target-v2
prompt_hash
19ac11d2620bfbc676ec6d75454e8a0484c7d278b3e7281fd87bb338e51fdf9e
source_hash
2c47cb6f2515f267edf1153515fb495f310b57cecf1bc7f7ef96c3a955f2237b
raw_response
{"parent_value":0.901,"unit":"AUC","evidence":"The five miRNA-based risk score displayed a good predictive efficacy for the 3-year recurrence risk of HCC post-LT [area under the curve (AUC) =0.901, P<0.001].","target_result":"AUC = 0.901","number_stated":true}
reading object · 6 fields
parent_value
0.901
unit
AUC
evidence
The five miRNA-based risk score displayed a good predictive efficacy for the 3-year recurrence risk of HCC post-LT [area under the curve (AUC) =0.901, P<0.001].
target_result
AUC = 0.901
number_stated
true
source_locator
chars 1203-1363 of source sha256 2c47cb6f2515f267edf1153515fb495f310b57cecf1bc7f7ef96c3a955f2237b
recorded_at
2026-10-31T15:21:18.735523+00:00
[1] object · 8 fields
provider
minimax_alt
model
MiniMax-M3
prompt_version
replication-target-v2
prompt_hash
af0ce5158e01bde795837fb8d19da34f995600c53861de3c1ecb0d9d02227044
source_hash
2c47cb6f2515f267edf1153515fb495f310b57cecf1bc7f7ef96c3a955f2237b
raw_response
<think>We need answer JSON only. Need identify headline numerical result paper states for main finding. Registered target vague "headline numerical result ... main finding". Likely AUC=0.901 for five miRNA-based risk score. Or combined nomogram AUC=0.926? Need parse wording. Abstract: "The five miRNA-based risk score displayed a good predictive efficacy ... [area under curve (AUC)=0.901...]. Furthermore, a nomogram integrating... high predictive accuracy (AUC=0.926)... remarkably better than MC..." Main model headline result perhaps AUC 0.901; ultimate combined model perhaps 0.926. User asks "single numerical result that a replication of the registered target has to reproduce" and target registered "headline numerical result the paper itself states for its main finding". Need infer which number is headline. Likely 0.901 AUC because "five miRNA-based risk score" is main finding; combined nomogram also major. Title novel miRNA-based model. Headline numerical result likely AUC=0.901. Need unit exactly paper prints. Unit could "area under the curve (AUC)" or "AUC". Schema parent_value number, unit string. They request unit paper prints, evidence exact contiguous quotation containing number, don't shorten quote. Quote whole clause as needed. We can quote: "The five miRNA-based risk score displayed a good predictive efficacy for the 3-year recurrence risk of HCC post-LT [area under the curve (AUC) =0.901, P&lt;0.001]." This exact contiguous. Unit likely "AUC" (dimensionless). Target result sentence perhaps same. Need JSON valid escaping. number_stated true. parent_value 0.901, unit "AUC". Could unit be "area under the curve (AUC)"? "The unit must be the unit the paper prints." For AUC, dimensionless but paper prints "area under the curve (AUC)". Usually these extraction tasks expect unit perhaps "AUC". Need be precise. Maybe parent value 0.901 and unit "area under the curve (AUC)". Evidence exact quote. But determine headline number perhaps 0.926. Let's deeply assess likely source/task conventions. The prompt generated to extract claims only, registered target is semantic. "headline numerical result the paper itself states for its main finding." Main finding described perhaps five miRNA risk score, AUC 0.901. Combined nomogram is further development. "a replication of registered target has to reproduce." Likely expected metric from abstract. Could target_result say "AUC = 0.901 for five miRNA-based risk score predicting 3-year recurrence risk after LT." Evidence full sentence. Good. Need "headline number only" means only numeric result, but JSON includes evidence etc. We comply. Exact quote punctuation? Source has "[area under the curve (AUC) =0.901, P&lt;0.001]." Need exact spacing. Quote whole clause/sentence. Evidence exact contiguous. Unit must be paper prints. Could set "area under the curve (AUC)" precisely. Parent_value 0.901. target_result maybe "The five miRNA-based risk score had an area under the curve (AUC) =0.901 for predicting the 3-year recurrence risk of HCC post-LT." Though says only headline number, perhaps target_result should mention target, no extraneous numbers? They ask "Report headline number only: value ...". But schema includes target_result. Likely concise. We need not include P. Evidence necessarily includes P because exact sentence and cannot shorten? Could perhaps quote exact contiguous subclause "The five miRNA-based risk score displayed a good predictive efficacy for the 3-year recurrence risk of HCC post-LT [area under the curve (AUC) =0.901" but that ends awkwardly and is exact contiguous, yet "do not shorten it" means perhaps quote full clause including P. They explicitly say exact contiguous quotation contains number, do not shorten it, no ellipsis. "When that is how text links them, quote the whole clause." So full sentence including P best. Could evidence instead be exactly "[area under the curve (AUC) =0.901, P&lt;0.001]" but target attribution is previous sentence context, likely whole sentence. Yes. Does "unit" need no unit, because AUC is unitless? They say unit must be unit paper prints. In paper the metric label "area under the curve (AUC)" not a physical unit. Many schemas use unit string perhaps "AUC". Use "AUC". Yet "The unit must be the unit the paper prints." Paper prints AUC, so fine. JSON only. Ensure no markdown.</think> {"parent_value":0.901,"unit":"area under the curve (AUC)","evidence":"The five miRNA-based risk score displayed a good predictive efficacy for the 3-year recurrence risk of HCC post-LT [area under the curve (AUC) =0.901, P<0.001].","target_result":"The five miRNA-based risk score achieved an AUC of 0.901 for predicting 3-year HCC recurrence risk after liver transplantation.","number_stated":true}
reading object · 6 fields
parent_value
0.901
unit
area under the curve (AUC)
evidence
The five miRNA-based risk score displayed a good predictive efficacy for the 3-year recurrence risk of HCC post-LT [area under the curve (AUC) =0.901, P<0.001].
target_result
The five miRNA-based risk score achieved an AUC of 0.901 for predicting 3-year HCC recurrence risk after liver transplantation.
number_stated
true
source_locator
chars 1203-1363 of source sha256 2c47cb6f2515f267edf1153515fb495f310b57cecf1bc7f7ef96c3a955f2237b
recorded_at
2026-10-31T15:21:22.610368+00:00
agreement
false
disagreements object · 4 fields
target_result object · 3 fields
minimax
The nomogram integrating the miRNA-based model with Milan criteria achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.926 (P<0.001) for predicting 3-year HCC recurrence after liver transplantation.
minimax_alt
The five miRNA-based risk score displayed a good predictive efficacy for the 3-year recurrence risk of HCC post-LT [area under the curve (AUC) =0.901, P<0.001].
decisive
false
analysis_methods object · 3 fields
minimax array · 9 items
[0]
differential expression analysis
[1]
Kaplan-Meier method
[2]
least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-logistic regression
[3]
multivariate logistic regression
[4]
receiver operating characteristic curve analysis
[5]
area under the curve (AUC)
[6]
concordance index
[7]
calibration plots
[8]
decision curve analysis
minimax_alt array · 13 items
[0]
Differential expression analysis
[1]
Kaplan-Meier method
[2]
Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-logistic regression
[3]
Multivariate logistic regression
[4]
Concordance index
[5]
Calibration plots
[6]
Decision curve analysis
[7]
Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC)
[8]
Student’s t-test
[9]
Mann-Whitney test
[10]
DIANA-microT-CDS miRNA target prediction with Targetscan validation
[11]
Overlapping analysis of miRNA-mRNA negative regulatory relationships
[12]
Gene Ontology and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis with DAVID 6.7
decisive
false
statistical_method object · 3 fields
minimax
receiver operating characteristic curve analysis evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC)
minimax_alt
Area under the curve (AUC) analysis
decisive
true
unit object · 3 fields
minimax
AUC
minimax_alt
area under the curve (AUC)
decisive
true
agreement_basis object · 2 fields
policy
decisive_fields
decisive_fields array · 4 items
[0]
work_type
[1]
number_stated
[2]
parent_value
[3]
unit
blinded
true
human_critique object · 5 fields
status
not_run
reviewer
null
signed_at
null
conflict_checked
false
commentary
null
stages array · 7 items
[0] object · 4 fields
key
target_materials
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[1] object · 4 fields
key
independent_readings
status
blocked
reason
The independent readings are incomplete or disagree; the source evidence must resolve the difference.
evidence object · 1 field
provider_errors array · 0 items
[2] object · 4 fields
key
source_resolution
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[3] object · 4 fields
key
protocol_reconstruction
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[4] object · 4 fields
key
control_execution
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[5] object · 4 fields
key
control_comparison
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[6] object · 4 fields
key
publication
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
review.human_critique
[1]
review.machine_critique.blocked
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
id
package:3342053886f181f92f8af3bf09000d5b38ead8a0593ea1f14ac24c9ed84772b5
type
sep_package
label
SEP v1 package for pmid:40672061
activities array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity:conversion:pmid:40672061
type
conversion
used array · 1 item
[0]
package:3342053886f181f92f8af3bf09000d5b38ead8a0593ea1f14ac24c9ed84772b5
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax
type
model
label
minimax
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax_alt
type
model
label
minimax_alt
[2] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
source_run_id
run-20261023T122449232913
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:40672061
parent_hash
sha256:5b4561e45e0dc008e93815f6faa92c4abb194289e2db489aa363b9f1e3888ec1
fork_of
null
gaps array · 13 items
[0]
abstract
[1]
asset:source:pmid:40672061 not verified
[2]
authors
[3]
capability
[4]
corpus_record_absent
[5]
execution.not_run
[6]
method
[7]
review.human_critique
[8]
review.machine_critique.blocked
[9]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded
[10]
step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment
[11]
step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40672061' does not resolve to a declared asset
[12]
targets
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.0", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:40672061", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 2, "content_hash": "sha256:19a82fb07aaa89f9d459cb95a110bec45fdfebd0fb1bbeffc40da7414980e0aa", "created_at": "2026-11-01T10:25:51Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T14:01:44Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "converter": "sep_to_sci_v1", "source_package_schema": "urn:bntrg:sep:1.0.0"}, "paper": {"state": "partial", "title": "A novel miRNA-based model for predicting the 3-year recurrence risk of hepatocellular carcinoma following liver transplantation.", "doi": "10.21037/jgo-2025-9", "pmid": "40672061", "authors": null, "journal": "Journal of gastrointestinal oncology", "year": 2025, "abstract": null, "claims": [{"id": "claim-1", "statement": "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding", "kind": "qualitative", "state": "blocked", "target": {"value": null, "unit": null, "tolerance": null, "source": null}, "evidence": []}], "gaps": ["abstract", "authors"]}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate and its interval from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The number a replication must land on, and the sentence it came from.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:40672061"], "outputs": ["the published estimate, its unit and its interval"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data behind the published result", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:not_downloaded", "description": "The published result cannot be recomputed without the data the paper analysed.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the analysis programme", "kind": "analysis", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "description": "Re-run the paper's analysis on the source data and produce the registered result. | SEP input not carried into the asset list: materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40672061", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the registered result"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded", "step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40672061' does not resolve to a declared asset"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:40672061", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-2025-9", "sha256": "sha256:2c47cb6f2515f267edf1153515fb495f310b57cecf1bc7f7ef96c3a955f2237b", "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.21037/jgo-2025-9", "version": null, "note": "Source read by the package builder: full_text.", "structure": {"access_state": "full_text"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:40672061:1", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:d0aa2b68028b5da6bebec976bec79c7efb0a44138618700c12e6c647b8013cb3", "bytes": 724, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[11]/table-wrap[1]#t1", "version": null, "note": "Logistic regression model analyses of the correlations between the five miRNAs expression in HCC tissues and the 3-year recurrence of HCC following liver transplantation", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC12261023", "section_index": 11, "section_title": "Construction and validation of a miRNA-based risk score", "row_count": 7, "column_count": 5}, "table": {"label": "Table 1", "caption": "Logistic regression model analyses of the correlations between the five miRNAs expression in HCC tissues and the 3-year recurrence of HCC following liver transplantation", "rows": [["Variables", "Univariate analysis", "", "Multivariate analysis"], ["OR (95% CI)", "P value", "Coefficient (β)"], ["hsa-miR-454", "2.877 (1.398, 5.922)", "0.004", "", "1.232"], ["hsa-miR-1293", "2.207 (1.211, 4.021)", "0.01", "", "1.259"], ["hsa-miR-139", "0.434 (0.239, 0.787)", "0.006", "", "−1.004"], ["hsa-miR-99a", "0.466 (0.252, 0.862)", "0.02", "", "−0.493"], ["hsa-miR-130a", "0.428 (0.234, 0.783)", "0.006", "", "−0.449"]], "row_count": 7, "column_count": 5, "numeric_cells": 21, "header_rows": 2, "locator": "section[11]/table-wrap[1]#t1"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:40672061:2", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:0c7c0468c4a4e2b72eb1da7f0452f7d7438047e4cfb151d8e7b8d44450f93213", "bytes": 558, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[12]/table-wrap[1]#t2", "version": null, "note": "Logistic regression model analyses of risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence within 3 years after liver transplantation", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC12261023", "section_index": 12, "section_title": "Establishment and validation of a combined model", "row_count": 4, "column_count": 6}, "table": {"label": "Table 2", "caption": "Logistic regression model analyses of risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence within 3 years after liver transplantation", "rows": [["Variables", "Univariate analysis", "", "Multivariate analysis"], ["OR (95% CI)", "P value", "OR (95% CI)", "P value"], ["Milan criteria", "2.955 (1.049, 8.325)", "0.04", "", "7.494 (1.444, 38.908)", "0.02"], ["Risk score", "2.718 (1.683, 4.390)", "<0.001", "", "3.074 (1.760, 5.372)", "<0.001"]], "row_count": 4, "column_count": 6, "numeric_cells": 10, "header_rows": 2, "locator": "section[12]/table-wrap[1]#t2"}}], "gaps": ["asset:source:pmid:40672061 not verified"]}, "analysis": {"state": "absent", "methods": [], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method", "targets"]}, "capability": {"state": "absent", "requirements": [], "gaps": ["capability"]}, "readiness": {"state": "partial", "tier": null, "blocking_axis": null, "blocked_on": null, "axes": {}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:40672061", "asset:table:pmid:40672061:1", "asset:table:pmid:40672061:2"], "steps": ["read_published_estimate"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": ["xml"], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["source:pmid:40672061"]}, "gaps": ["corpus_record_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"status": "blocked", "providers": [{"provider": "minimax", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "full-text-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "5a17f1b4010e8b53774efe188d78493cf4ec17ab4aa844ef889e7f4de3ac6d1f", "source_hash": "2c47cb6f2515f267edf1153515fb495f310b57cecf1bc7f7ef96c3a955f2237b", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:63e32721c8fa3afe54a6559e3f60fea63d039d32292019adf35b1f834dc39c94", "raw_response_chars": 4908}, {"provider": "minimax_alt", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "full-text-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "2bf20f01b60a880d58c2f1a6bad4bce9b1d10a0765d81cc44f2a3a7b4dbc0f8f", "source_hash": "2c47cb6f2515f267edf1153515fb495f310b57cecf1bc7f7ef96c3a955f2237b", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:3187882ab9e7b4029ead2b94f52f54d569fa33e26883c9e434a0dac32a3e77fd", "raw_response_chars": 60262}], "target_providers": [{"provider": "minimax", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "19ac11d2620bfbc676ec6d75454e8a0484c7d278b3e7281fd87bb338e51fdf9e", "source_hash": "2c47cb6f2515f267edf1153515fb495f310b57cecf1bc7f7ef96c3a955f2237b", "raw_response": "{\"parent_value\":0.901,\"unit\":\"AUC\",\"evidence\":\"The five miRNA-based risk score displayed a good predictive efficacy for the 3-year recurrence risk of HCC post-LT [area under the curve (AUC) =0.901, P<0.001].\",\"target_result\":\"AUC = 0.901\",\"number_stated\":true}", "reading": {"parent_value": 0.901, "unit": "AUC", "evidence": "The five miRNA-based risk score displayed a good predictive efficacy for the 3-year recurrence risk of HCC post-LT [area under the curve (AUC) =0.901, P<0.001].", "target_result": "AUC = 0.901", "number_stated": true, "source_locator": "chars 1203-1363 of source sha256 2c47cb6f2515f267edf1153515fb495f310b57cecf1bc7f7ef96c3a955f2237b"}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T15:21:18.735523+00:00"}, {"provider": "minimax_alt", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "af0ce5158e01bde795837fb8d19da34f995600c53861de3c1ecb0d9d02227044", "source_hash": "2c47cb6f2515f267edf1153515fb495f310b57cecf1bc7f7ef96c3a955f2237b", "raw_response": "<think>We need answer JSON only. Need identify headline numerical result paper states for main finding. Registered target vague \"headline numerical result ... main finding\". Likely AUC=0.901 for five miRNA-based risk score. Or combined nomogram AUC=0.926? Need parse wording. Abstract: \"The five miRNA-based risk score displayed a good predictive efficacy ... [area under curve (AUC)=0.901...]. Furthermore, a nomogram integrating... high predictive accuracy (AUC=0.926)... remarkably better than MC...\" Main model headline result perhaps AUC 0.901; ultimate combined model perhaps 0.926. User asks \"single numerical result that a replication of the registered target has to reproduce\" and target registered \"headline numerical result the paper itself states for its main finding\". Need infer which number is headline. Likely 0.901 AUC because \"five miRNA-based risk score\" is main finding; combined nomogram also major. Title novel miRNA-based model. Headline numerical result likely AUC=0.901. Need unit exactly paper prints. Unit could \"area under the curve (AUC)\" or \"AUC\". Schema parent_value number, unit string. They request unit paper prints, evidence exact contiguous quotation containing number, don't shorten quote. Quote whole clause as needed. We can quote: \"The five miRNA-based risk score displayed a good predictive efficacy for the 3-year recurrence risk of HCC post-LT [area under the curve (AUC) =0.901, P&lt;0.001].\" This exact contiguous. Unit likely \"AUC\" (dimensionless). Target result sentence perhaps same. Need JSON valid escaping. number_stated true. parent_value 0.901, unit \"AUC\". Could unit be \"area under the curve (AUC)\"? \"The unit must be the unit the paper prints.\" For AUC, dimensionless but paper prints \"area under the curve (AUC)\". Usually these extraction tasks expect unit perhaps \"AUC\". Need be precise. Maybe parent value 0.901 and unit \"area under the curve (AUC)\". Evidence exact quote.\n\nBut determine headline number perhaps 0.926. Let's deeply assess likely source/task conventions. The prompt generated to extract claims only, registered target is semantic. \"headline numerical result the paper itself states for its main finding.\" Main finding described perhaps five miRNA risk score, AUC 0.901. Combined nomogram is further development. \"a replication of registered target has to reproduce.\" Likely expected metric from abstract. Could target_result say \"AUC = 0.901 for five miRNA-based risk score predicting 3-year recurrence risk after LT.\" Evidence full sentence. Good.\n\nNeed \"headline number only\" means only numeric result, but JSON includes evidence etc. We comply.\n\nExact quote punctuation? Source has \"[area under the curve (AUC) =0.901, P&lt;0.001].\" Need exact spacing. Quote whole clause/sentence. Evidence exact contiguous. Unit must be paper prints. Could set \"area under the curve (AUC)\" precisely. Parent_value 0.901. target_result maybe \"The five miRNA-based risk score had an area under the curve (AUC) =0.901 for predicting the 3-year recurrence risk of HCC post-LT.\" Though says only headline number, perhaps target_result should mention target, no extraneous numbers? They ask \"Report headline number only: value ...\". But schema includes target_result. Likely concise. We need not include P. Evidence necessarily includes P because exact sentence and cannot shorten? Could perhaps quote exact contiguous subclause \"The five miRNA-based risk score displayed a good predictive efficacy for the 3-year recurrence risk of HCC post-LT [area under the curve (AUC) =0.901\" but that ends awkwardly and is exact contiguous, yet \"do not shorten it\" means perhaps quote full clause including P. They explicitly say exact contiguous quotation contains number, do not shorten it, no ellipsis. \"When that is how text links them, quote the whole clause.\" So full sentence including P best.\n\nCould evidence instead be exactly \"[area under the curve (AUC) =0.901, P&lt;0.001]\" but target attribution is previous sentence context, likely whole sentence. Yes.\n\nDoes \"unit\" need no unit, because AUC is unitless? They say unit must be unit paper prints. In paper the metric label \"area under the curve (AUC)\" not a physical unit. Many schemas use unit string perhaps \"AUC\". Use \"AUC\". Yet \"The unit must be the unit the paper prints.\" Paper prints AUC, so fine.\n\nJSON only. Ensure no markdown.</think>\n\n{\"parent_value\":0.901,\"unit\":\"area under the curve (AUC)\",\"evidence\":\"The five miRNA-based risk score displayed a good predictive efficacy for the 3-year recurrence risk of HCC post-LT [area under the curve (AUC) =0.901, P<0.001].\",\"target_result\":\"The five miRNA-based risk score achieved an AUC of 0.901 for predicting 3-year HCC recurrence risk after liver transplantation.\",\"number_stated\":true}", "reading": {"parent_value": 0.901, "unit": "area under the curve (AUC)", "evidence": "The five miRNA-based risk score displayed a good predictive efficacy for the 3-year recurrence risk of HCC post-LT [area under the curve (AUC) =0.901, P<0.001].", "target_result": "The five miRNA-based risk score achieved an AUC of 0.901 for predicting 3-year HCC recurrence risk after liver transplantation.", "number_stated": true, "source_locator": "chars 1203-1363 of source sha256 2c47cb6f2515f267edf1153515fb495f310b57cecf1bc7f7ef96c3a955f2237b"}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T15:21:22.610368+00:00"}], "agreement": false, "disagreements": {"target_result": {"minimax": "The nomogram integrating the miRNA-based model with Milan criteria achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.926 (P<0.001) for predicting 3-year HCC recurrence after liver transplantation.", "minimax_alt": "The five miRNA-based risk score displayed a good predictive efficacy for the 3-year recurrence risk of HCC post-LT [area under the curve (AUC) =0.901, P<0.001].", "decisive": false}, "analysis_methods": {"minimax": ["differential expression analysis", "Kaplan-Meier method", "least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-logistic regression", "multivariate logistic regression", "receiver operating characteristic curve analysis", "area under the curve (AUC)", "concordance index", "calibration plots", "decision curve analysis"], "minimax_alt": ["Differential expression analysis", "Kaplan-Meier method", "Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-logistic regression", "Multivariate logistic regression", "Concordance index", "Calibration plots", "Decision curve analysis", "Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC)", "Student’s t-test", "Mann-Whitney test", "DIANA-microT-CDS miRNA target prediction with Targetscan validation", "Overlapping analysis of miRNA-mRNA negative regulatory relationships", "Gene Ontology and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis with DAVID 6.7"], "decisive": false}, "statistical_method": {"minimax": "receiver operating characteristic curve analysis evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC)", "minimax_alt": "Area under the curve (AUC) analysis", "decisive": true}, "unit": {"minimax": "AUC", "minimax_alt": "area under the curve (AUC)", "decisive": true}}, "agreement_basis": {"policy": "decisive_fields", "decisive_fields": ["work_type", "number_stated", "parent_value", "unit"]}, "blinded": true}, "human_critique": {"status": "not_run", "reviewer": null, "signed_at": null, "conflict_checked": false, "commentary": null}, "stages": [{"key": "target_materials", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "independent_readings", "status": "blocked", "reason": "The independent readings are incomplete or disagree; the source evidence must resolve the difference.", "evidence": {"provider_errors": []}}, {"key": "source_resolution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "protocol_reconstruction", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_execution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_comparison", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "publication", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}], "gaps": ["review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.blocked"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "package:3342053886f181f92f8af3bf09000d5b38ead8a0593ea1f14ac24c9ed84772b5", "type": "sep_package", "label": "SEP v1 package for pmid:40672061"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity:conversion:pmid:40672061", "type": "conversion", "used": ["package:3342053886f181f92f8af3bf09000d5b38ead8a0593ea1f14ac24c9ed84772b5"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:minimax", "type": "model", "label": "minimax"}, {"id": "agent:minimax_alt", "type": "model", "label": "minimax_alt"}, {"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}], "source_run_id": "run-20261023T122449232913", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:40672061", "parent_hash": "sha256:5b4561e45e0dc008e93815f6faa92c4abb194289e2db489aa363b9f1e3888ec1", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["abstract", "asset:source:pmid:40672061 not verified", "authors", "capability", "corpus_record_absent", "execution.not_run", "method", "review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.blocked", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded", "step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40672061' does not resolve to a declared asset", "targets"]}