Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:40724909

Organ-Specific Small Protein Networks in 100 kDa Ultrafiltrates: Functional Analysis and Implications for Neuroregenerative Medicine.

Jakub Peter Slivka · Chris Bauer · Tasneem Halhouli · Alexander Younsi · Michelle B F Wong · Mike K S Chan · Thomas Skutella

International journal of molecular sciences · 2025 doi:10.3390/ijms26146659

Paper

complete

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

complete

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:40724909
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:e9c11ceba471a5f9a61d9c4dcf2ea1c17300168cbb7ecf65b319df653d110ba8
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T20:30:49Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:56:54Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Organ-Specific Small Protein Networks in 100 kDa Ultrafiltrates: Functional Analysis and Implications for Neuroregenerative Medicine.
doi
10.3390/ijms26146659
pmid
40724909
authors array · 7 items
[0]
Jakub Peter Slivka
[1]
Chris Bauer
[2]
Tasneem Halhouli
[3]
Alexander Younsi
[4]
Michelle B F Wong
[5]
Mike K S Chan
[6]
Thomas Skutella
journal
International journal of molecular sciences
year
2025
abstract
In this research, the proteomic landscape of 100 kDa protein extract sourced from rabbit brain was compared to extracts from liver and from organ mixture (OM). Our aim was to compare the efficacy of Nanomised Organo Peptides (NOP) ultrafiltrates from two different tissues and a tissue mixture for inducing neurite outgrowth, and subsequently to identify the molecular networks and proteins that could explain such effects. Proteins were isolated by gentle homogenization followed by crossflow ultrafiltration. Proteomic evaluation involved gel electrophoresis, complemented by mass spectrometry and bioinformatics. GO (Gene Ontology) and protein analysis of the mass spectrometry results identified a diverse array of proteins involved in critical specific biological functions, including neuronal development, regulation of growth, immune response, and lipid and metal binding. Data from this study are accessible from the ProteomeXchange repository (identifier PXD051701). Our findings highlight the presence of small proteins that play key roles in metabolic processes and biosynthetic modulation. In vitro outgrowth experiments with neural stem cells (NSCs) showed that 100 kDa protein extracts from the brain resulted in a greater increase in neurite length compared to the liver and organ mixture extracts. The protein networks identified in the NOP ultrafiltrates may significantly improve biological therapeutic strategies related to neural differentiation and outgrowth. This comprehensive proteomic analysis of 100 kDa ultrafiltrates revealed a diverse array of proteins involved in key biological processes, such as neuronal development, metabolic regulation, and immune response. Brain-specific extracts demonstrated the capacity to promote neurite outgrowth in NSCs, suggesting potential application for neuroregenerative therapies. Our findings highlight the potential of small proteins and organ-specific proteins in the development of novel targeted treatments for various diseases, particularly those related to neurodegeneration and aging.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
Differences between groups were assessed by one-way ANOVA and considered statistically significant when the p-value was <0.05.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:40724909
locator
sections[25] "4.9. Data Analysis" paragraph 2
quote
Differences between groups were assessed by one-way ANOVA and considered statistically significant when the p-value was <0.05.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
The MS proteomics data was deposited in the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository (dataset identifiers PXD051701 and 10.6019/PXD051701).
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:40724909
locator
sections[32] "Data Availability Statement" paragraph 2
quote
The MS proteomics data was deposited in the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository (dataset identifiers PXD051701 and 10.6019/PXD051701).
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
Brain-derived ultrafiltrates produced greater neurite outgrowth in neural stem cells than liver or organ-mixture ultrafiltrates.
kind
qualitative
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:40724909
locator
sections[9] "3.1. Efficacy of CNS Extracts" paragraph 5
quote
The superior neurite outgrowth induced by brain extracts (121.4 μm vs. 89.8–96.8 μm for liver/OM) underscores their therapeutic potential, akin to natural compounds like Ginkgo biloba extract (GBE).
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
Brain-derived ultrafiltrates produced greater neurite outgrowth in neural stem cells than liver or organ-mixture ultrafiltrates.
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:40724909
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
blocked
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 1 item
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:40724909
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26146659
sha256
sha256:0a4e4f81fee40d7aef2d68f748add63e3b906bd6106424b028cb4e900b42a9b7
bytes
92043
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.3390/ijms26146659
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC12294768
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
gaps array · 0 items
analysis object · 4 fields
state
complete
methods array · 1 item
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
group_comparison
specific
anova
label
Group comparison
dsl_operations array · 4 items
[0]
group_summary
[1]
welch_t
[2]
bootstrap_mean_difference
[3]
group_comparison_anova
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
two_or_more_groups_continuous
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
Differences between groups were assessed by one-way ANOVA and considered statistically significant when the p-value was <0.05.
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 0 items
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
blocked
tier
R4
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 4 items
[0]
group_summary
[1]
welch_t
[2]
bootstrap_mean_difference
[3]
group_comparison_anova
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: anova.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R4
reachable
false
accessions array · 1 item
[0]
PXD051701 and 10.6019/PXD051701
resolved_accessions array · 0 items
statements array · 1 item
[0]
The MS proteomics data was deposited in the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository (dataset identifiers PXD051701 and 10.6019/PXD051701).
basis
The paper names PXD051701 and 10.6019/PXD051701, but the accession does not resolve in the repository (no reason recorded), so the data cannot be reached from here. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 4 items
[0]
group_summary
[1]
welch_t
[2]
bootstrap_mean_difference
[3]
group_comparison_anova
assets array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:40724909
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:accession_absent
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T19:58:02Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
23917
completion_tokens
1672
cached_tokens
264
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:40724909
type
paper
label
pmid:40724909
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:40724909
type
manuscript
label
PMID 40724909 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:40724909
type
paper
label
pmid:40724909
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:40724909
type
manuscript
label
PMID 40724909 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-40724909
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:40724909
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-None
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:40724909
parent_hash
sha256:68e816d9ea2acc6c889564bbc7ac2ffbd5a68bf67f4976401e4ce3d4f2dc2395
fork_of
null
gaps array · 5 items
[0]
execution.not_run
[1]
review.human_critique
[2]
review.independent_reader
[3]
review.machine_critique
[4]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
assays array · 2 items
[0] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_id
mass_spectrometry
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.99
evidence array · 4 items
[0]
nvolved gel electrophoresis, complemented by mass spectrometry and bioinformatics. GO (Gene Ontology) and p
[1]
(Gene Ontology) and protein analysis of the mass spectrometry results identified a diverse array of protei
[2]
Advances and Limitations Tris-Tricine-PAGE, LC-MS/MS, and 100 kDa ultrafiltration were used in th
[3]
trifugal ultrafiltration in conjunction with LC-MS/MS was effective in discovering new cerebrospin
order_basis
paper_text_order:667
id
assay:1
[1] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
group_comparison
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 4 items
[0]
group_summary
[1]
welch_t
[2]
bootstrap_mean_difference
[3]
group_comparison_anova
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
Differences between groups were assessed by one-way ANOVA and considered statistically significant when the p-value was <0.05.
order_basis
consumes_earlier_output
id
assay:2
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:40724909", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 4, "content_hash": "sha256:e9c11ceba471a5f9a61d9c4dcf2ea1c17300168cbb7ecf65b319df653d110ba8", "created_at": "2026-11-01T20:30:49Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:56:54Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Organ-Specific Small Protein Networks in 100 kDa Ultrafiltrates: Functional Analysis and Implications for Neuroregenerative Medicine.", "doi": "10.3390/ijms26146659", "pmid": "40724909", "authors": ["Jakub Peter Slivka", "Chris Bauer", "Tasneem Halhouli", "Alexander Younsi", "Michelle B F Wong", "Mike K S Chan", "Thomas Skutella"], "journal": "International journal of molecular sciences", "year": 2025, "abstract": "In this research, the proteomic landscape of 100 kDa protein extract sourced from rabbit brain was compared to extracts from liver and from organ mixture (OM). Our aim was to compare the efficacy of Nanomised Organo Peptides (NOP) ultrafiltrates from two different tissues and a tissue mixture for inducing neurite outgrowth, and subsequently to identify the molecular networks and proteins that could explain such effects. Proteins were isolated by gentle homogenization followed by crossflow ultrafiltration. Proteomic evaluation involved gel electrophoresis, complemented by mass spectrometry and bioinformatics. GO (Gene Ontology) and protein analysis of the mass spectrometry results identified a diverse array of proteins involved in critical specific biological functions, including neuronal development, regulation of growth, immune response, and lipid and metal binding. Data from this study are accessible from the ProteomeXchange repository (identifier PXD051701). Our findings highlight the presence of small proteins that play key roles in metabolic processes and biosynthetic modulation. In vitro outgrowth experiments with neural stem cells (NSCs) showed that 100 kDa protein extracts from the brain resulted in a greater increase in neurite length compared to the liver and organ mixture extracts. The protein networks identified in the NOP ultrafiltrates may significantly improve biological therapeutic strategies related to neural differentiation and outgrowth. This comprehensive proteomic analysis of 100 kDa ultrafiltrates revealed a diverse array of proteins involved in key biological processes, such as neuronal development, metabolic regulation, and immune response. Brain-specific extracts demonstrated the capacity to promote neurite outgrowth in NSCs, suggesting potential application for neuroregenerative therapies. Our findings highlight the potential of small proteins and organ-specific proteins in the development of novel targeted treatments for various diseases, particularly those related to neurodegeneration and aging.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "Differences between groups were assessed by one-way ANOVA and considered statistically significant when the p-value was <0.05.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40724909", "locator": "sections[25] \"4.9. Data Analysis\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Differences between groups were assessed by one-way ANOVA and considered statistically significant when the p-value was <0.05."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The MS proteomics data was deposited in the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository (dataset identifiers PXD051701 and 10.6019/PXD051701).", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40724909", "locator": "sections[32] \"Data Availability Statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The MS proteomics data was deposited in the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository (dataset identifiers PXD051701 and 10.6019/PXD051701)."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "Brain-derived ultrafiltrates produced greater neurite outgrowth in neural stem cells than liver or organ-mixture ultrafiltrates.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40724909", "locator": "sections[9] \"3.1. Efficacy of CNS Extracts\" paragraph 5", "quote": "The superior neurite outgrowth induced by brain extracts (121.4 μm vs. 89.8–96.8 μm for liver/OM) underscores their therapeutic potential, akin to natural compounds like Ginkgo biloba extract (GBE)."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "Brain-derived ultrafiltrates produced greater neurite outgrowth in neural stem cells than liver or organ-mixture ultrafiltrates.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:40724909"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:40724909", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26146659", "sha256": "sha256:0a4e4f81fee40d7aef2d68f748add63e3b906bd6106424b028cb4e900b42a9b7", "bytes": 92043, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3390/ijms26146659", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC12294768", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}], "gaps": []}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "anova", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "Differences between groups were assessed by one-way ANOVA and considered statistically significant when the p-value was <0.05."}}], "targets": [], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "data", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: anova."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R4", "reachable": false, "accessions": ["PXD051701 and 10.6019/PXD051701"], "resolved_accessions": [], "statements": ["The MS proteomics data was deposited in the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository (dataset identifiers PXD051701 and 10.6019/PXD051701)."], "basis": "The paper names PXD051701 and 10.6019/PXD051701, but the accession does not resolve in the repository (no reason recorded), so the data cannot be reached from here. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "assets": ["source:pmid:40724909"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:None"]}, "gaps": ["data:accession_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T19:58:02Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 23917, "completion_tokens": 1672, "cached_tokens": 264}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:40724909", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:40724909"}, {"id": "source:pmid:40724909", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 40724909 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:40724909", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:40724909"}, {"id": "source:pmid:40724909", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 40724909 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-40724909", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:40724909"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-None", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:None"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:40724909", "parent_hash": "sha256:68e816d9ea2acc6c889564bbc7ac2ffbd5a68bf67f4976401e4ce3d4f2dc2395", "fork_of": null, "generation": 3}, "gaps": ["execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "mass_spectrometry", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["nvolved gel electrophoresis, complemented by mass spectrometry and bioinformatics. GO (Gene Ontology) and p", "(Gene Ontology) and protein analysis of the mass spectrometry results identified a diverse array of protei", "Advances and Limitations Tris-Tricine-PAGE, LC-MS/MS, and 100 kDa ultrafiltration were used in th", "trifugal ultrafiltration in conjunction with LC-MS/MS was effective in discovering new cerebrospin"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:667", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "group_comparison", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["Differences between groups were assessed by one-way ANOVA and considered statistically significant when the p-value was <0.05."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:2"}]}