Transcriptomic Profiling of Gastric Cancer Reveals Key Biomarkers and Pathways via Bioinformatic Analysis.

{"sci_version": "1.0", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:40725485", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 1, "content_hash": "sha256:044ae19a8569ff16ac9951d93ffe72b343ae69c52f09e095b2e6338bd6991289", "created_at": "2026-11-01T10:25:52Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T10:25:52Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "converter": "sep_to_sci_v1", "source_package_schema": "urn:bntrg:sep:1.0.0"}, "paper": {"state": "partial", "title": "Transcriptomic Profiling of Gastric Cancer Reveals Key Biomarkers and Pathways via Bioinformatic Analysis.", "doi": "10.3390/genes16070829", "pmid": "40725485", "authors": null, "journal": "Genes", "year": 2025, "abstract": null, "claims": [{"id": "claim-1", "statement": "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding", "kind": "quantitative", "state": "complete", "target": {"value": 0.952, "unit": "auc", "tolerance": null, "source": "chars 10437-10665 of source sha256 b2d5114dbafd0c12c65000061db22b0c8e62bb0c31fa1cc1878726fc65581b12"}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40725485", "locator": "chars 10437-10665 of source sha256 b2d5114dbafd0c12c65000061db22b0c8e62bb0c31fa1cc1878726fc65581b12", "quote": "ROC curve analysis showed that the random forest classifier achieved excellent performance with an AUC of 0.952, maintaining an outstanding diagnostic accuracy of 93.5%, sensitivity of 96.4%, and specificity of 66.7% (Figure 3)."}]}], "gaps": ["abstract", "authors"]}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate and its interval from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The number a replication must land on, and the sentence it came from.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:40725485"], "outputs": ["the published estimate, its unit and its interval"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data behind the published result", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:not_downloaded", "description": "The published result cannot be recomputed without the data the paper analysed.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the analysis programme", "kind": "analysis", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "description": "Re-run the paper's analysis on the source data and produce the registered result. | SEP input not carried into the asset list: materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40725485", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the registered result"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded", "step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40725485' does not resolve to a declared asset"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:40725485", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16070829", "sha256": "sha256:b2d5114dbafd0c12c65000061db22b0c8e62bb0c31fa1cc1878726fc65581b12", "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3390/genes16070829", "version": null, "note": "Source read by the package builder: full_text.", "structure": {"access_state": "full_text"}}], "gaps": ["asset:source:pmid:40725485 not verified"]}, "analysis": {"state": "absent", "methods": [], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method", "targets"]}, "capability": {"state": "absent", "requirements": [], "gaps": ["capability"]}, "readiness": {"state": "partial", "tier": null, "blocking_axis": null, "blocked_on": null, "axes": {}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:40725485"], "steps": ["read_published_estimate"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": ["xml"], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["source:pmid:40725485"]}, "gaps": ["corpus_record_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"status": "blocked", "providers": [{"provider": "minimax", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "full-text-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "4d6e0d074131129f4e3c5311a73a052dab99f2f259fe9256911bec4d0834035b", "source_hash": "b2d5114dbafd0c12c65000061db22b0c8e62bb0c31fa1cc1878726fc65581b12", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:e7cd4b5b2e9449b5184c853a367b0dd8a6cbbacb008913ca5b70d17f6de1d235", "raw_response_chars": 5662}, {"provider": "minimax_alt", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "full-text-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "9cb8c644677e6f4b4cb009b89e27d89d969013eb39ff354bed4da181b704144b", "source_hash": "b2d5114dbafd0c12c65000061db22b0c8e62bb0c31fa1cc1878726fc65581b12", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:10e6151e42366858fe5c9f4a66c38db5e918363b7605ff0e151cbe49e44b1807", "raw_response_chars": 68521}], "target_providers": [{"provider": "minimax", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "50effd912dd018a06c990e9ecdf80b26c0d202bb33e5a457878b244678d08534", "source_hash": "b2d5114dbafd0c12c65000061db22b0c8e62bb0c31fa1cc1878726fc65581b12", "raw_response": "{\"parent_value\":0.952,\"unit\":\"AUC\",\"evidence\":\"ROC curve analysis showed that the random forest classifier achieved excellent performance with an AUC of 0.952, maintaining an outstanding diagnostic accuracy of 93.5%, sensitivity of 96.4%, and specificity of 66.7% (Figure 3).\",\"target_result\":\"The random forest classifier achieved an AUC of 0.952.\",\"number_stated\":true}", "reading": {"parent_value": 0.952, "unit": "AUC", "evidence": "ROC curve analysis showed that the random forest classifier achieved excellent performance with an AUC of 0.952, maintaining an outstanding diagnostic accuracy of 93.5%, sensitivity of 96.4%, and specificity of 66.7% (Figure 3).", "target_result": "The random forest classifier achieved an AUC of 0.952.", "number_stated": true, "source_locator": "chars 10437-10665 of source sha256 b2d5114dbafd0c12c65000061db22b0c8e62bb0c31fa1cc1878726fc65581b12"}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T15:23:43.677871+00:00"}, {"provider": "minimax_alt", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "9a18e6e432f9bacd392fa399fa6b3560320d070e8134f1772d352939f4b4cbfd", "source_hash": "b2d5114dbafd0c12c65000061db22b0c8e62bb0c31fa1cc1878726fc65581b12", "raw_response": "<think>We need answer JSON only. Need identify single numerical result replication registered target headline numerical result paper states for main finding. Likely AUC 0.952, headline main finding. Need unit printed. Evidence exact contiguous quote containing number, attribution. Need parent_value number 0.952, unit perhaps \"AUC\" or maybe unit empty? Asked unit must be unit paper prints. AUC is unitless metric. Likely unit \"AUC\". Evidence exact quote perhaps \"The random forest classifier achieved superior performance with an AUC of 0.952 and maintained excellent performance with an overall accuracy of 93.5%, sensitivity of 96.4%, and specificity of 66.7%.\" This directly attaches AUC. Headline number is AUC 0.952, main finding. Could quote sentence from Results/abstract. Need target_result perhaps \"AUC = 0.952\" or \"The random forest classifier achieved an AUC of 0.952.\" Must ensure exact evidence and no paraphrase. The instruction says report headline number only, value paper itself states for registered target. Evidence exact contiguous quotation containing number. JSON fields. Could evidence use exact sentence \"The random forest model demonstrated excellent classification performance (AUC = 0.952).\" That's exact contiguous source. Unit \"AUC\" (dimensionless perhaps). target_result \"AUC = 0.952\". number_stated true.\n\nNeed assess ambiguity: Headline numerical result main finding could perhaps 627 DEGs, or AUC 0.952, 55.6% concordance. Abstract highlights \"random forest model demonstrated excellent classification performance (AUC = 0.952)\" and conclusion biomarkers with diagnostic performance. Replication registered target likely headline number AUC. The phrase \"single numerical result\" strongly asks extract benchmark metric. Registered target generic \"headline numerical result paper states for its main finding.\" We need infer. AUC is main model performance. 627 DEGs also finding but likely less headline. They ask unit must paper prints. AUC itself metric. \"AUC = 0.952\" explicit.\n\nCould unit be \"\" because no unit? But schema asks unit and says unit must be unit paper prints. AUC is not technically unit but label. Usually these tasks expect unit field perhaps \"AUC\". For percentages etc. Since target \"headline numerical result\", likely parent_value 0.952, unit \"AUC\". Evidence exact.\n\nNeed output valid JSON, no markdown.</think>\n\n{\"parent_value\":0.952,\"unit\":\"AUC\",\"evidence\":\"The random forest model demonstrated excellent classification performance (AUC = 0.952).\",\"target_result\":\"AUC = 0.952\",\"number_stated\":true}", "reading": {"parent_value": 0.952, "unit": "AUC", "evidence": "The random forest model demonstrated excellent classification performance (AUC = 0.952).", "target_result": "AUC = 0.952", "number_stated": true, "source_locator": "chars 1202-1290 of source sha256 b2d5114dbafd0c12c65000061db22b0c8e62bb0c31fa1cc1878726fc65581b12"}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T15:23:47.052942+00:00"}], "agreement": false, "disagreements": {"target_result": {"minimax": "AUC = 0.952", "minimax_alt": "The random forest classifier achieved an AUC of 0.952.", "decisive": false}, "analysis_methods": {"minimax": ["Random forest classification", "Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis", "Five-fold cross-validation"], "minimax_alt": ["limma moderated t-tests for differential expression in the primary dataset", "DESeq2 for RNA-seq differential expression in the validation dataset", "Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate correction", "random forest classification", "receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis", "five-fold cross-validation", "principal component analysis (PCA)", "Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment with hypergeometric tests and FDR correction", "KEGG pathway analysis", "Hallmark gene set enrichment", "gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA)", "cross-dataset directionality and concordance analysis"], "decisive": false}, "statistical_method": {"minimax": "Random forest classifier evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with five-fold cross-validation", "minimax_alt": "receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis", "decisive": true}}, "agreement_basis": {"policy": "decisive_fields", "decisive_fields": ["work_type", "number_stated", "parent_value", "unit"]}, "blinded": true}, "human_critique": {"status": "not_run", "reviewer": null, "signed_at": null, "conflict_checked": false, "commentary": null}, "stages": [{"key": "target_materials", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "independent_readings", "status": "blocked", "reason": "The independent readings are incomplete or disagree; the source evidence must resolve the difference.", "evidence": {"provider_errors": []}}, {"key": "source_resolution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "protocol_reconstruction", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_execution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_comparison", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "publication", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}], "gaps": ["review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.blocked"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "package:cc20ee6b7fab71c42a80e91297bc1d2e00a368ee69994c7e9b515055df7f6f27", "type": "sep_package", "label": "SEP v1 package for pmid:40725485"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity:conversion:pmid:40725485", "type": "conversion", "used": ["package:cc20ee6b7fab71c42a80e91297bc1d2e00a368ee69994c7e9b515055df7f6f27"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:minimax", "type": "model", "label": "minimax"}, {"id": "agent:minimax_alt", "type": "model", "label": "minimax_alt"}, {"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}], "source_run_id": "run-20261023T122449232913", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "563b3c51-be8c-4c1f-bc5e-11a51decda08", "parent_hash": "cc20ee6b7fab71c42a80e91297bc1d2e00a368ee69994c7e9b515055df7f6f27", "fork_of": null, "generation": 1}, "gaps": ["abstract", "asset:source:pmid:40725485 not verified", "authors", "capability", "corpus_record_absent", "execution.not_run", "method", "review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.blocked", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded", "step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40725485' does not resolve to a declared asset", "targets"]}