Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:40746721

Machine learning-enhanced discovery of tsRNA-mRNA regulatory networks: identifying novel diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in breast cancer.

Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025 doi:10.3389/fphar.2025.1640192

Paper

partial

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

absent

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:40746721
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:13e9215edc6bf2bc97690329c0abd604b8713f6821ad302e449b3c6a5d2f97bc
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T10:25:52Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T10:25:52Z
generator object · 3 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
converter
sep_to_sci_v1
source_package_schema
urn:bntrg:sep:1.0.0
paper object · 10 fields
state
partial
title
Machine learning-enhanced discovery of tsRNA-mRNA regulatory networks: identifying novel diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in breast cancer.
doi
10.3389/fphar.2025.1640192
pmid
40746721
authors
null
journal
Frontiers in pharmacology
year
2025
abstract
null
claims array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-1
statement
the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding
kind
quantitative
state
complete
target object · 4 fields
value
0.98
unit
auc
tolerance
null
source
chars 1305-1371 of source sha256 82aa03dcc4f36ab4475e71e4eb195be0e5947f7f673c0975fd671a0b74a619df
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:40746721
locator
chars 1305-1371 of source sha256 82aa03dcc4f36ab4475e71e4eb195be0e5947f7f673c0975fd671a0b74a619df
quote
achieving AUC of 0.98 in discovery and 0.82 in validation cohorts.
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
abstract
[1]
authors
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate and its interval from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The number a replication must land on, and the sentence it came from.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:40746721
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate, its unit and its interval
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data behind the published result
kind
data-preparation
state
blocked
blocked_on
data:not_downloaded
description
The published result cannot be recomputed without the data the paper analysed.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the analysis programme
kind
analysis
state
blocked
blocked_on
no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment
description
Re-run the paper's analysis on the source data and produce the registered result. | SEP input not carried into the asset list: materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40746721
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the registered result
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded
[1]
step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment
[2]
step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40746721' does not resolve to a declared asset
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 1 item
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:40746721
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1640192
sha256
sha256:82aa03dcc4f36ab4475e71e4eb195be0e5947f7f673c0975fd671a0b74a619df
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.3389/fphar.2025.1640192
version
null
note
Source read by the package builder: full_text.
structure object · 1 field
access_state
full_text
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
asset:source:pmid:40746721 not verified
analysis object · 4 fields
state
absent
methods array · 0 items
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
method
[1]
targets
capability object · 3 fields
state
absent
requirements array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
capability
readiness object · 8 fields
state
partial
tier
null
blocked_on
null
axes object · 0 fields
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
assets array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:40746721
steps array · 1 item
[0]
read_published_estimate
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 1 item
[0]
xml
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:40746721
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
corpus_record_absent
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 7 fields
status
passed
providers array · 2 items
[0] object · 7 fields
provider
minimax
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
prompt_version
full-text-reading-v1
prompt_hash
af88fc5e6ec5ed2d008aa6036d054c0b6371d8ab99b9198af435e0978a40773c
source_hash
82aa03dcc4f36ab4475e71e4eb195be0e5947f7f673c0975fd671a0b74a619df
raw_response_sha256
sha256:dff1159e651ecef5d7263ffda070fcbb488181f8543ac18676d73b6dd02c71a2
raw_response_chars
5825
[1] object · 7 fields
provider
minimax_alt
model
MiniMax-M3
prompt_version
full-text-reading-v1
prompt_hash
73203f22639d14c1f095d0f0933119d87c24b34100fb61149e8695a1af0bdb1f
source_hash
82aa03dcc4f36ab4475e71e4eb195be0e5947f7f673c0975fd671a0b74a619df
raw_response_sha256
sha256:9572f83d08f427bb57d74685c0c0f2e688c6836eb5b0a23ea0ec9fdea6ec7d00
raw_response_chars
49246
target_providers array · 2 items
[0] object · 8 fields
provider
minimax
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
prompt_version
replication-target-v2
prompt_hash
e0c4eaaffcb8a2dbad3933943dd6e77f843b2a9d9d406f24ff935213c65d3d68
source_hash
82aa03dcc4f36ab4475e71e4eb195be0e5947f7f673c0975fd671a0b74a619df
raw_response
{"parent_value":0.98,"unit":"AUC","evidence":"achieving AUC of 0.98 in discovery and 0.82 in validation cohorts.","target_result":"0.98","number_stated":true}
reading object · 6 fields
parent_value
0.98
unit
AUC
evidence
achieving AUC of 0.98 in discovery and 0.82 in validation cohorts.
target_result
0.98
number_stated
true
source_locator
chars 1305-1371 of source sha256 82aa03dcc4f36ab4475e71e4eb195be0e5947f7f673c0975fd671a0b74a619df
recorded_at
2026-10-31T15:24:35.529110+00:00
[1] object · 8 fields
provider
minimax_alt
model
MiniMax-M3
prompt_version
replication-target-v2
prompt_hash
c4fb1dd6fceee421e4169df3e01c3ccae7e83dc07fa061a371b2f4348f45f983
source_hash
82aa03dcc4f36ab4475e71e4eb195be0e5947f7f673c0975fd671a0b74a619df
raw_response
<think>We need answer JSON only. Need identify single numerical result replication registered target headline numerical result paper states main finding. Source abstract/results: four-tsRNA signature achieving AUC 0.98 discovery and 0.82 validation. Registered target vaguely "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding". Need choose headline number. Likely AUC 0.98, unit AUC. Need exact contiguous quotation containing number and attribution whole clause. Evidence exact quote perhaps "We identified 297 differentially expressed tsRNAs and developed a four-tsRNA signature (...) achieving AUC of 0.98 in discovery and 0.82 in validation cohorts." But asks single numerical result and headline number only, value paper states for registered target. Is target perhaps main finding is diagnostic signature performance. Which one? Headline AUC likely 0.98 discovery. Yet there are two AUC values. They ask "single numerical result" perhaps headline number only likely AUC 0.98. Unit must printed: "AUC" (dimensionless, paper prints AUC). Evidence exact clause. Need target_result perhaps brief statement, maybe "The four-tsRNA diagnostic signature achieved an AUC of 0.98 in the discovery cohort." Ensure no paraphrase in evidence. Could quote full sentence. parent_value 0.98, unit "AUC". number_stated true. But think deeply: registered target "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding". Main finding perhaps four-tsRNA signature, headline numerical result AUC 0.98 in discovery and 0.82 validation. User says single numerical result, headline number only. There is ambiguity which AUC. Maybe headline is discovery AUC 0.98. The wording "value the paper itself states for the registered target" likely benchmark setup expects one parent value. The source's abstract main result includes AUC 0.98 discovery and 0.82 validation. Which registered target? Registered target itself generic. Perhaps target asks "headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding" means identify primary number, likely 0.98. Need not output multiple. Could evidence quote complete clause including both, but parent_value one. Exact quote includes number. They might want whole clause because attribution may be carried by wording. Quote sentence is safe. Need valid JSON no markdown. target_result string. Unit "AUC" rather than "AUC (area under curve)" because paper prints AUC. Could unit perhaps empty because AUC dimensionless? User says unit must be unit paper prints. It prints "AUC of 0.98"; so unit "AUC". Let's formulate. Evidence exact contiguous quote from source. Could quote: "We identified 297 differentially expressed tsRNAs and developed a four-tsRNA signature (tRF-21-FSXMSL73E, tRF-20-XSXMSL73, tRF-23-FSXMSL73 30H, tRF-23-YJE76INB0J) achieving AUC of 0.98 in discovery and 0.82 in validation cohorts." This contains headline 0.98 and full clause. Is quote "do not shorten it" perhaps they mean evidence quote containing number cannot truncate sentence? Exact full sentence ideal. target_result "The four-tsRNA diagnostic signature achieved AUC of 0.98 in the discovery cohort." This is paraphrase okay outside evidence. Could say headline number only in parent_value. Fine. Potential issue: registered target is perhaps "headline numerical result" and both AUC values mean no single numerical result? But likely benchmark expects 0.98. Let's inspect language. They ask find "single numerical result that a replication of the registered target has to reproduce. Report the headline number only: the value the paper itself states for the registered target, not a value you calculated, converted, averaged or reconstructed." This is generic extraction instruction, target description generic perhaps deliberately asks headline. The abstract says "develop a four-tsRNA signature ... achieving AUC of 0.98 in discovery and 0.82 in validation cohorts." Which is the headline numerical result? Usually headline metric is AUC 0.98 discovery, 0.82 validation. But they demand single. Perhaps "registered target" may refer to "headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding," and likely target result selected in source's title/abstract. The main finding is signature, and there are two cohort results. Maybe target could be discovery performance only because headline is 0.98. Evidence could include both, though they requested headline number only perhaps evidence can contain other number because exact clause includes both. Is that violating "Report headline number only"? The JSON evidence quote necessarily includes 0.82 if full sentence. They said exact contiguous quotation containing the number; don't shorten it; attribution can be carried by parenthetical list etc. "When that is how the text links them, quote the whole clause so a reader can check the attribution for themselves." Could quote a narrower contiguous exact clause that attributes 0.98, but source has no subordinate clause separately except entire sentence. Yet "four-tsRNA signature (...) achieving AUC of 0.98 in discovery and 0.82 in validation cohorts." includes both. Can't omit. Could perhaps quote "achieving AUC of 0.98 in discovery" but not contiguous because source says "and 0.82..." after. They insist exact contiguous and do not shorten. So whole sentence with both is right. But report number only in parent_value. Could evidence use abstract first sentence exactly. Ensure punctuation and Unicode. JSON escapes? Fine. Could target_result mention both? They say target_result what text states if no number only. Since number stated, likely concise "The four-tsRNA signature achieved AUC of 0.98 in discovery and 0.82 in validation cohorts." But then reports second number in target_result despite headline only? Better "The four-tsRNA signature achieved an AUC of 0.98 in the discovery cohort." Yet this paraphrases. Fine. Need perhaps parent_value=0.98, unit="AUC", evidence exact full sentence, target_result "The four-tsRNA diagnostic signature achieved AUC of 0.98 in the discovery cohort.", true. Let's ensure no issue with "developed a four-tsRNA signature" also has number four but not numerical result. Main finding could be 297 DE tsRNAs? No, headline result likely diagnostic AUC. The title emphasizes biomarkers and targets. Abstract's most salient performance number is AUC. "headline numerical result" likely 0.98. Let's answer JSON only.</think> {"parent_value":0.98,"unit":"AUC","evidence":"We identified 297 differentially expressed tsRNAs and developed a four-tsRNA signature (tRF-21-FSXMSL73E, tRF-20-XSXMSL73, tRF-23-FSXMSL730H, tRF-23-YJE76INB0J) achieving AUC of 0.98 in discovery and 0.82 in validation cohorts.","target_result":"The four-tsRNA diagnostic signature achieved an AUC of 0.98 in the discovery cohort.","number_stated":true}
reading object · 6 fields
parent_value
0.98
unit
AUC
evidence
We identified 297 differentially expressed tsRNAs and developed a four-tsRNA signature (tRF-21-FSXMSL73E, tRF-20-XSXMSL73, tRF-23-FSXMSL730H, tRF-23-YJE76INB0J) achieving AUC of 0.98 in discovery and 0.82 in validation cohorts.
target_result
The four-tsRNA diagnostic signature achieved an AUC of 0.98 in the discovery cohort.
number_stated
true
source_locator
chars 1144-1371 of source sha256 82aa03dcc4f36ab4475e71e4eb195be0e5947f7f673c0975fd671a0b74a619df
recorded_at
2026-10-31T15:24:43.800186+00:00
agreement
true
disagreements object · 2 fields
target_result object · 3 fields
minimax
A four-tsRNA signature (tRF-21-FSXMSL73E, tRF-20-XSXMSL73, tRF-23-FSXMSL730H, tRF-23-YJE76INB0J) achieved AUC of 0.98 in the discovery cohort and 0.82 in the validation cohort.
minimax_alt
We identified 297 differentially expressed tsRNAs and developed a four-tsRNA signature (tRF-21-FSXMSL73E, tRF-20-XSXMSL73, tRF-23-FSXMSL730H, tRF-23-YJE76INB0J) achieving AUC of 0.98 in discovery and 0.82 in validation cohorts.
decisive
false
analysis_methods object · 3 fields
minimax array · 20 items
[0]
Random forest algorithm
[1]
DESeq2
[2]
Wald test
[3]
Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate control
[4]
Unsupervised hierarchical clustering with Euclidean distance and complete linkage
[5]
Wilcoxon rank-sum test
[6]
ComBat batch-effect correction
[7]
Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s post hoc test
[8]
Kaplan-Meier method
[9]
Log-rank test
[10]
Cox proportional hazards regression
[11]
CIBERSORT
[12]
Spearman’s correlation
[13]
ESTIMATE algorithm
[14]
Pearson correlation analysis
[15]
GSVA
[16]
GSEA
[17]
WGCNA
[18]
Student’s t-test
[19]
One-way ANOVA
minimax_alt array · 11 items
[0]
Custom bioinformatics pipeline for tsRNA profile extraction
[1]
DESeq2 differential expression analysis with median-of-ratios normalization and the Wald test
[2]
Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate control
[3]
Random forest algorithm for diagnostic model development
[4]
Correlation analysis and RNAhybrid for tsRNA-mRNA regulatory relationship identification
[5]
Wilcoxon rank-sum test and ComBat batch-effect correction for pan-cancer expression analysis
[6]
Student's t-test, one-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Dunn's post hoc test
[7]
Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards regression
[8]
CIBERSORT and ESTIMATE algorithms with Spearman's rank correlation for immune infiltration analysis
[9]
Pearson correlation for drug sensitivity analysis
[10]
Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA), Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), and Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA)
decisive
false
agreement_basis object · 2 fields
policy
decisive_fields
decisive_fields array · 4 items
[0]
work_type
[1]
number_stated
[2]
parent_value
[3]
unit
blinded
true
human_critique object · 5 fields
status
not_run
reviewer
null
signed_at
null
conflict_checked
false
commentary
null
stages array · 7 items
[0] object · 4 fields
key
target_materials
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[1] object · 4 fields
key
independent_readings
status
passed
reason
The independent readings are incomplete or disagree; the source evidence must resolve the difference.
evidence object · 1 field
provider_errors array · 0 items
[2] object · 4 fields
key
source_resolution
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[3] object · 4 fields
key
protocol_reconstruction
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[4] object · 4 fields
key
control_execution
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[5] object · 4 fields
key
control_comparison
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[6] object · 4 fields
key
publication
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
review.human_critique
[1]
review.machine_critique.passed
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
id
package:a79a77a0911a76d0697aa77d6a14eb3f32509e6dd31de73a87bff25b1888f78b
type
sep_package
label
SEP v1 package for pmid:40746721
activities array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity:conversion:pmid:40746721
type
conversion
used array · 1 item
[0]
package:a79a77a0911a76d0697aa77d6a14eb3f32509e6dd31de73a87bff25b1888f78b
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax
type
model
label
minimax
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax_alt
type
model
label
minimax_alt
[2] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
source_run_id
run-20261023T122449232913
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
4c3857ac-5f1b-49ac-ac16-0d757dc207db
parent_hash
a79a77a0911a76d0697aa77d6a14eb3f32509e6dd31de73a87bff25b1888f78b
fork_of
null
gaps array · 13 items
[0]
abstract
[1]
asset:source:pmid:40746721 not verified
[2]
authors
[3]
capability
[4]
corpus_record_absent
[5]
execution.not_run
[6]
method
[7]
review.human_critique
[8]
review.machine_critique.passed
[9]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded
[10]
step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment
[11]
step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40746721' does not resolve to a declared asset
[12]
targets
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.0", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:40746721", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 1, "content_hash": "sha256:13e9215edc6bf2bc97690329c0abd604b8713f6821ad302e449b3c6a5d2f97bc", "created_at": "2026-11-01T10:25:52Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T10:25:52Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "converter": "sep_to_sci_v1", "source_package_schema": "urn:bntrg:sep:1.0.0"}, "paper": {"state": "partial", "title": "Machine learning-enhanced discovery of tsRNA-mRNA regulatory networks: identifying novel diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in breast cancer.", "doi": "10.3389/fphar.2025.1640192", "pmid": "40746721", "authors": null, "journal": "Frontiers in pharmacology", "year": 2025, "abstract": null, "claims": [{"id": "claim-1", "statement": "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding", "kind": "quantitative", "state": "complete", "target": {"value": 0.98, "unit": "auc", "tolerance": null, "source": "chars 1305-1371 of source sha256 82aa03dcc4f36ab4475e71e4eb195be0e5947f7f673c0975fd671a0b74a619df"}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40746721", "locator": "chars 1305-1371 of source sha256 82aa03dcc4f36ab4475e71e4eb195be0e5947f7f673c0975fd671a0b74a619df", "quote": "achieving AUC of 0.98 in discovery and 0.82 in validation cohorts."}]}], "gaps": ["abstract", "authors"]}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate and its interval from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The number a replication must land on, and the sentence it came from.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:40746721"], "outputs": ["the published estimate, its unit and its interval"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data behind the published result", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:not_downloaded", "description": "The published result cannot be recomputed without the data the paper analysed.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the analysis programme", "kind": "analysis", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "description": "Re-run the paper's analysis on the source data and produce the registered result. | SEP input not carried into the asset list: materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40746721", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the registered result"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded", "step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40746721' does not resolve to a declared asset"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:40746721", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1640192", "sha256": "sha256:82aa03dcc4f36ab4475e71e4eb195be0e5947f7f673c0975fd671a0b74a619df", "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3389/fphar.2025.1640192", "version": null, "note": "Source read by the package builder: full_text.", "structure": {"access_state": "full_text"}}], "gaps": ["asset:source:pmid:40746721 not verified"]}, "analysis": {"state": "absent", "methods": [], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method", "targets"]}, "capability": {"state": "absent", "requirements": [], "gaps": ["capability"]}, "readiness": {"state": "partial", "tier": null, "blocking_axis": null, "blocked_on": null, "axes": {}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:40746721"], "steps": ["read_published_estimate"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": ["xml"], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["source:pmid:40746721"]}, "gaps": ["corpus_record_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"status": "passed", "providers": [{"provider": "minimax", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "full-text-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "af88fc5e6ec5ed2d008aa6036d054c0b6371d8ab99b9198af435e0978a40773c", "source_hash": "82aa03dcc4f36ab4475e71e4eb195be0e5947f7f673c0975fd671a0b74a619df", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:dff1159e651ecef5d7263ffda070fcbb488181f8543ac18676d73b6dd02c71a2", "raw_response_chars": 5825}, {"provider": "minimax_alt", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "full-text-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "73203f22639d14c1f095d0f0933119d87c24b34100fb61149e8695a1af0bdb1f", "source_hash": "82aa03dcc4f36ab4475e71e4eb195be0e5947f7f673c0975fd671a0b74a619df", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:9572f83d08f427bb57d74685c0c0f2e688c6836eb5b0a23ea0ec9fdea6ec7d00", "raw_response_chars": 49246}], "target_providers": [{"provider": "minimax", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "e0c4eaaffcb8a2dbad3933943dd6e77f843b2a9d9d406f24ff935213c65d3d68", "source_hash": "82aa03dcc4f36ab4475e71e4eb195be0e5947f7f673c0975fd671a0b74a619df", "raw_response": "{\"parent_value\":0.98,\"unit\":\"AUC\",\"evidence\":\"achieving AUC of 0.98 in discovery and 0.82 in validation cohorts.\",\"target_result\":\"0.98\",\"number_stated\":true}", "reading": {"parent_value": 0.98, "unit": "AUC", "evidence": "achieving AUC of 0.98 in discovery and 0.82 in validation cohorts.", "target_result": "0.98", "number_stated": true, "source_locator": "chars 1305-1371 of source sha256 82aa03dcc4f36ab4475e71e4eb195be0e5947f7f673c0975fd671a0b74a619df"}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T15:24:35.529110+00:00"}, {"provider": "minimax_alt", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "c4fb1dd6fceee421e4169df3e01c3ccae7e83dc07fa061a371b2f4348f45f983", "source_hash": "82aa03dcc4f36ab4475e71e4eb195be0e5947f7f673c0975fd671a0b74a619df", "raw_response": "<think>We need answer JSON only. Need identify single numerical result replication registered target headline numerical result paper states main finding. Source abstract/results: four-tsRNA signature achieving AUC 0.98 discovery and 0.82 validation. Registered target vaguely \"the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding\". Need choose headline number. Likely AUC 0.98, unit AUC. Need exact contiguous quotation containing number and attribution whole clause. Evidence exact quote perhaps \"We identified 297 differentially expressed tsRNAs and developed a four-tsRNA signature (...) achieving AUC of 0.98 in discovery and 0.82 in validation cohorts.\" But asks single numerical result and headline number only, value paper states for registered target. Is target perhaps main finding is diagnostic signature performance. Which one? Headline AUC likely 0.98 discovery. Yet there are two AUC values. They ask \"single numerical result\" perhaps headline number only likely AUC 0.98. Unit must printed: \"AUC\" (dimensionless, paper prints AUC). Evidence exact clause. Need target_result perhaps brief statement, maybe \"The four-tsRNA diagnostic signature achieved an AUC of 0.98 in the discovery cohort.\" Ensure no paraphrase in evidence. Could quote full sentence. parent_value 0.98, unit \"AUC\". number_stated true.\n\nBut think deeply: registered target \"the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding\". Main finding perhaps four-tsRNA signature, headline numerical result AUC 0.98 in discovery and 0.82 validation. User says single numerical result, headline number only. There is ambiguity which AUC. Maybe headline is discovery AUC 0.98. The wording \"value the paper itself states for the registered target\" likely benchmark setup expects one parent value. The source's abstract main result includes AUC 0.98 discovery and 0.82 validation. Which registered target? Registered target itself generic. Perhaps target asks \"headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding\" means identify primary number, likely 0.98. Need not output multiple. Could evidence quote complete clause including both, but parent_value one. Exact quote includes number. They might want whole clause because attribution may be carried by wording. Quote sentence is safe.\n\nNeed valid JSON no markdown. target_result string. Unit \"AUC\" rather than \"AUC (area under curve)\" because paper prints AUC. Could unit perhaps empty because AUC dimensionless? User says unit must be unit paper prints. It prints \"AUC of 0.98\"; so unit \"AUC\". Let's formulate.\n\nEvidence exact contiguous quote from source. Could quote:\n\"We identified 297 differentially expressed tsRNAs and developed a four-tsRNA signature (tRF-21-FSXMSL73E, tRF-20-XSXMSL73, tRF-23-FSXMSL73 30H, tRF-23-YJE76INB0J) achieving AUC of 0.98 in discovery and 0.82 in validation cohorts.\"\nThis contains headline 0.98 and full clause. Is quote \"do not shorten it\" perhaps they mean evidence quote containing number cannot truncate sentence? Exact full sentence ideal. target_result \"The four-tsRNA diagnostic signature achieved AUC of 0.98 in the discovery cohort.\" This is paraphrase okay outside evidence. Could say headline number only in parent_value. Fine.\n\nPotential issue: registered target is perhaps \"headline numerical result\" and both AUC values mean no single numerical result? But likely benchmark expects 0.98. Let's inspect language. They ask find \"single numerical result that a replication of the registered target has to reproduce. Report the headline number only: the value the paper itself states for the registered target, not a value you calculated, converted, averaged or reconstructed.\" This is generic extraction instruction, target description generic perhaps deliberately asks headline. The abstract says \"develop a four-tsRNA signature ... achieving AUC of 0.98 in discovery and 0.82 in validation cohorts.\" Which is the headline numerical result? Usually headline metric is AUC 0.98 discovery, 0.82 validation. But they demand single. Perhaps \"registered target\" may refer to \"headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding,\" and likely target result selected in source's title/abstract. The main finding is signature, and there are two cohort results. Maybe target could be discovery performance only because headline is 0.98. Evidence could include both, though they requested headline number only perhaps evidence can contain other number because exact clause includes both. Is that violating \"Report headline number only\"? The JSON evidence quote necessarily includes 0.82 if full sentence. They said exact contiguous quotation containing the number; don't shorten it; attribution can be carried by parenthetical list etc. \"When that is how the text links them, quote the whole clause so a reader can check the attribution for themselves.\" Could quote a narrower contiguous exact clause that attributes 0.98, but source has no subordinate clause separately except entire sentence. Yet \"four-tsRNA signature (...) achieving AUC of 0.98 in discovery and 0.82 in validation cohorts.\" includes both. Can't omit. Could perhaps quote \"achieving AUC of 0.98 in discovery\" but not contiguous because source says \"and 0.82...\" after. They insist exact contiguous and do not shorten. So whole sentence with both is right. But report number only in parent_value.\n\nCould evidence use abstract first sentence exactly. Ensure punctuation and Unicode. JSON escapes? Fine.\n\nCould target_result mention both? They say target_result what text states if no number only. Since number stated, likely concise \"The four-tsRNA signature achieved AUC of 0.98 in discovery and 0.82 in validation cohorts.\" But then reports second number in target_result despite headline only? Better \"The four-tsRNA signature achieved an AUC of 0.98 in the discovery cohort.\" Yet this paraphrases. Fine.\n\nNeed perhaps parent_value=0.98, unit=\"AUC\", evidence exact full sentence, target_result \"The four-tsRNA diagnostic signature achieved AUC of 0.98 in the discovery cohort.\", true.\n\nLet's ensure no issue with \"developed a four-tsRNA signature\" also has number four but not numerical result. Main finding could be 297 DE tsRNAs? No, headline result likely diagnostic AUC. The title emphasizes biomarkers and targets. Abstract's most salient performance number is AUC. \"headline numerical result\" likely 0.98. Let's answer JSON only.</think>\n\n{\"parent_value\":0.98,\"unit\":\"AUC\",\"evidence\":\"We identified 297 differentially expressed tsRNAs and developed a four-tsRNA signature (tRF-21-FSXMSL73E, tRF-20-XSXMSL73, tRF-23-FSXMSL730H, tRF-23-YJE76INB0J) achieving AUC of 0.98 in discovery and 0.82 in validation cohorts.\",\"target_result\":\"The four-tsRNA diagnostic signature achieved an AUC of 0.98 in the discovery cohort.\",\"number_stated\":true}", "reading": {"parent_value": 0.98, "unit": "AUC", "evidence": "We identified 297 differentially expressed tsRNAs and developed a four-tsRNA signature (tRF-21-FSXMSL73E, tRF-20-XSXMSL73, tRF-23-FSXMSL730H, tRF-23-YJE76INB0J) achieving AUC of 0.98 in discovery and 0.82 in validation cohorts.", "target_result": "The four-tsRNA diagnostic signature achieved an AUC of 0.98 in the discovery cohort.", "number_stated": true, "source_locator": "chars 1144-1371 of source sha256 82aa03dcc4f36ab4475e71e4eb195be0e5947f7f673c0975fd671a0b74a619df"}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T15:24:43.800186+00:00"}], "agreement": true, "disagreements": {"target_result": {"minimax": "A four-tsRNA signature (tRF-21-FSXMSL73E, tRF-20-XSXMSL73, tRF-23-FSXMSL730H, tRF-23-YJE76INB0J) achieved AUC of 0.98 in the discovery cohort and 0.82 in the validation cohort.", "minimax_alt": "We identified 297 differentially expressed tsRNAs and developed a four-tsRNA signature (tRF-21-FSXMSL73E, tRF-20-XSXMSL73, tRF-23-FSXMSL730H, tRF-23-YJE76INB0J) achieving AUC of 0.98 in discovery and 0.82 in validation cohorts.", "decisive": false}, "analysis_methods": {"minimax": ["Random forest algorithm", "DESeq2", "Wald test", "Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate control", "Unsupervised hierarchical clustering with Euclidean distance and complete linkage", "Wilcoxon rank-sum test", "ComBat batch-effect correction", "Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s post hoc test", "Kaplan-Meier method", "Log-rank test", "Cox proportional hazards regression", "CIBERSORT", "Spearman’s correlation", "ESTIMATE algorithm", "Pearson correlation analysis", "GSVA", "GSEA", "WGCNA", "Student’s t-test", "One-way ANOVA"], "minimax_alt": ["Custom bioinformatics pipeline for tsRNA profile extraction", "DESeq2 differential expression analysis with median-of-ratios normalization and the Wald test", "Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate control", "Random forest algorithm for diagnostic model development", "Correlation analysis and RNAhybrid for tsRNA-mRNA regulatory relationship identification", "Wilcoxon rank-sum test and ComBat batch-effect correction for pan-cancer expression analysis", "Student's t-test, one-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Dunn's post hoc test", "Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards regression", "CIBERSORT and ESTIMATE algorithms with Spearman's rank correlation for immune infiltration analysis", "Pearson correlation for drug sensitivity analysis", "Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA), Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), and Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA)"], "decisive": false}}, "agreement_basis": {"policy": "decisive_fields", "decisive_fields": ["work_type", "number_stated", "parent_value", "unit"]}, "blinded": true}, "human_critique": {"status": "not_run", "reviewer": null, "signed_at": null, "conflict_checked": false, "commentary": null}, "stages": [{"key": "target_materials", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "independent_readings", "status": "passed", "reason": "The independent readings are incomplete or disagree; the source evidence must resolve the difference.", "evidence": {"provider_errors": []}}, {"key": "source_resolution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "protocol_reconstruction", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_execution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_comparison", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "publication", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}], "gaps": ["review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.passed"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "package:a79a77a0911a76d0697aa77d6a14eb3f32509e6dd31de73a87bff25b1888f78b", "type": "sep_package", "label": "SEP v1 package for pmid:40746721"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity:conversion:pmid:40746721", "type": "conversion", "used": ["package:a79a77a0911a76d0697aa77d6a14eb3f32509e6dd31de73a87bff25b1888f78b"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:minimax", "type": "model", "label": "minimax"}, {"id": "agent:minimax_alt", "type": "model", "label": "minimax_alt"}, {"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}], "source_run_id": "run-20261023T122449232913", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "4c3857ac-5f1b-49ac-ac16-0d757dc207db", "parent_hash": "a79a77a0911a76d0697aa77d6a14eb3f32509e6dd31de73a87bff25b1888f78b", "fork_of": null, "generation": 1}, "gaps": ["abstract", "asset:source:pmid:40746721 not verified", "authors", "capability", "corpus_record_absent", "execution.not_run", "method", "review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.passed", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded", "step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40746721' does not resolve to a declared asset", "targets"]}