← All .science files
pmid:40826138
Multi-Omics analysis and in vitro validation reveal diagnostic and therapeutic roles of novel hub genes in ovarian cancer.
Hereditas · 2025 doi:10.1186/s41065-025-00535-z
Paper
partial
Experiment
partial
Data
partial
Analysis
absent
Execution
absent
Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
generator object · 3 fields
paper object · 10 fields
claims array · 1 item
gaps array · 2 items
experiment object · 8 fields
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
outputs array · 1 item
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 3 items
data object · 3 fields
assets array · 1 item
[0] object · 15 fields
structure object · 1 field
gaps array · 1 item
capability object · 3 fields
readiness object · 8 fields
axes object · 0 fields
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
assets array · 1 item
steps array · 1 item
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 1 item
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
gaps array · 1 item
review object · 5 fields
machine_critique object · 7 fields
providers array · 2 items
[0] object · 7 fields
[1] object · 7 fields
target_providers array · 2 items
[0] object · 8 fields
reading object · 6 fields
[1] object · 8 fields
reading object · 6 fields
disagreements object · 4 fields
target_result object · 3 fields
physical_methods object · 3 fields
minimax array · 5 items
minimax_alt array · 6 items
analysis_methods object · 3 fields
minimax array · 8 items
minimax_alt array · 13 items
statistical_method object · 3 fields
agreement_basis object · 2 fields
decisive_fields array · 4 items
human_critique object · 5 fields
stages array · 7 items
[0] object · 4 fields
[1] object · 4 fields
evidence object · 1 field
provider_errors array · 0 items
[2] object · 4 fields
[3] object · 4 fields
[4] object · 4 fields
[5] object · 4 fields
[6] object · 4 fields
gaps array · 2 items
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 1 item
activities array · 1 item
agents array · 3 items
lineage object · 4 fields
gaps array · 13 items
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.0", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:40826138", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 1, "content_hash": "sha256:8790c7c97bd1c7602a79b3f9cbe794ac2935b1c312312de4ce079fea41f1d55d", "created_at": "2026-11-01T10:25:52Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T10:25:52Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "converter": "sep_to_sci_v1", "source_package_schema": "urn:bntrg:sep:1.0.0"}, "paper": {"state": "partial", "title": "Multi-Omics analysis and in vitro validation reveal diagnostic and therapeutic roles of novel hub genes in ovarian cancer.", "doi": "10.1186/s41065-025-00535-z", "pmid": "40826138", "authors": null, "journal": "Hereditas", "year": 2025, "abstract": null, "claims": [{"id": "claim-1", "statement": "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding", "kind": "quantitative", "state": "complete", "target": {"value": 1.0, "unit": "auc", "tolerance": null, "source": "chars 878-937 of source sha256 a6cd0d66f4dc0241787f3c178d1a0a077784222cf3ecc9a240061b3c42f4ad0d"}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40826138", "locator": "chars 878-937 of source sha256 a6cd0d66f4dc0241787f3c178d1a0a077784222cf3ecc9a240061b3c42f4ad0d", "quote": "ROC analysis revealed high diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 1.0)."}]}], "gaps": ["abstract", "authors"]}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate and its interval from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The number a replication must land on, and the sentence it came from.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:40826138"], "outputs": ["the published estimate, its unit and its interval"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data behind the published result", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:not_downloaded", "description": "The published result cannot be recomputed without the data the paper analysed.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the analysis programme", "kind": "analysis", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "description": "Re-run the paper's analysis on the source data and produce the registered result. | SEP input not carried into the asset list: materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40826138", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the registered result"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded", "step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40826138' does not resolve to a declared asset"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:40826138", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1186/s41065-025-00535-z", "sha256": "sha256:a6cd0d66f4dc0241787f3c178d1a0a077784222cf3ecc9a240061b3c42f4ad0d", "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1186/s41065-025-00535-z", "version": null, "note": "Source read by the package builder: full_text.", "structure": {"access_state": "full_text"}}], "gaps": ["asset:source:pmid:40826138 not verified"]}, "analysis": {"state": "absent", "methods": [], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method", "targets"]}, "capability": {"state": "absent", "requirements": [], "gaps": ["capability"]}, "readiness": {"state": "partial", "tier": null, "blocking_axis": null, "blocked_on": null, "axes": {}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:40826138"], "steps": ["read_published_estimate"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": ["xml"], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["source:pmid:40826138"]}, "gaps": ["corpus_record_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"status": "blocked", "providers": [{"provider": "minimax", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "full-text-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "a001c6386ad236d3dea30d1e856380ffc3201b914422dae3a1e5b1757a7b389e", "source_hash": "a6cd0d66f4dc0241787f3c178d1a0a077784222cf3ecc9a240061b3c42f4ad0d", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:501c0d2dce7f3f01c7fc7ed1d071aed5285db365771be540009afd45f8797ecd", "raw_response_chars": 6582}, {"provider": "minimax_alt", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "full-text-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "ba51b152f480f86d4fcb3870f552f50dd869248fc7893d41b1156be14d5b60cc", "source_hash": "a6cd0d66f4dc0241787f3c178d1a0a077784222cf3ecc9a240061b3c42f4ad0d", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:853194d2c6a7255faf4b5f4874433da5a0cf19a8580e252c05d2e047afae8edd", "raw_response_chars": 63413}], "target_providers": [{"provider": "minimax", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "a72da114483771119d96d8ad3e705c6afcf9d8d4656a902811cd5a04a27c95aa", "source_hash": "a6cd0d66f4dc0241787f3c178d1a0a077784222cf3ecc9a240061b3c42f4ad0d", "raw_response": "{\"parent_value\":1.0,\"unit\":\"AUC\",\"evidence\":\"ROC analysis revealed high diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 1.0).\",\"target_result\":\"High diagnostic accuracy with an AUC of 1.0.\",\"number_stated\":true}", "reading": {"parent_value": 1.0, "unit": "AUC", "evidence": "ROC analysis revealed high diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 1.0).", "target_result": "High diagnostic accuracy with an AUC of 1.0.", "number_stated": true, "source_locator": "chars 878-937 of source sha256 a6cd0d66f4dc0241787f3c178d1a0a077784222cf3ecc9a240061b3c42f4ad0d"}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T15:30:47.126421+00:00"}, {"provider": "minimax_alt", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "c36bb8bf7f2c6927846bb6211e9e211d729d9a56c27cb040f9a1e8502c56b264", "source_hash": "a6cd0d66f4dc0241787f3c178d1a0a077784222cf3ecc9a240061b3c42f4ad0d", "raw_response": "<think>We need solve. Need only JSON. Need determine single numerical result headline main finding registered target \"the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding\". Need inspect text. We need identify likely AUC = 1.0 headline numerical result in abstract: \"ROC analysis revealed high diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 1.0).\" This likely target. Need carefully interpret instruction. Registered target is headline numerical result paper states for its main finding. User designed extraction task maybe wants headline value, likely AUC = 1.0. Need evidence exact contiguous quotation contains number, whole clause attribution. Need parent_value number 1.0, unit printed? \"AUC = 1.0\" AUC dimensionless; unit \"AUC\" perhaps paper prints \"AUC = 1.0\". Need decide. Need no numerical result for main finding? There are many p values sample counts etc. They specify single numerical result replication of registered target has to reproduce. Could be AUC 1.0 in abstract. Most headline number. Need assess candidate alternatives: 22 common DEGs, 4 hub genes, AUC = 1.0, diagnostic miRNA 0.82. The headline main finding is diagnostic/therapeutic roles of hub genes; abstract has ROC high accuracy AUC 1.0. It is indeed distinct headline numerical result. Evidence exact \"ROC analysis revealed high diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 1.0).\" Target_result \"AUC = 1.0\" number true. Unit \"AUC\" or \"AUROC\" (not printed). Must unit paper prints \"AUC\". They say unit must unit paper prints. \"AUC\" is an index, dimensionless. Need perhaps unit \"AUC\" suitable. Could be \"AUC\" unit from paper. Many extraction tasks expect unit maybe \"AUC\" and parent value 1.0. Need ensure evidence exact contiguous quote, full clause. \"Promoter methylation analysis showed hypomethylation in tumors, while ROC analysis revealed high diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 1.0).\" Could quote just sentence \"ROC analysis revealed high diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 1.0).\" It's exact. Maybe need include preceding clause? Attribution clear within sentence. Good.\n\nWe must not calculate. number_stated true. target_result \"AUC = 1.0\" or \"High diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 1.0).\" Use \"AUC = 1.0\". Parent_value 1.0 unit \"AUC\". Evidence exact. Need determine if should unit empty since AUC dimensionless. User asks \"unit must be unit paper prints.\" Paper prints \"AUC\" not \"unit\". Could use \"AUC\" as metric. They may expect \"AUC\" and not \"dimensionless\" (not printed). Good.\n\nBut let's deeply think task ambiguity. Could target be \"headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding\", in article title novel hub genes diagnostic and therapeutic roles. Abstract has headline \"AUC = 1.0\" clearly main finding. They intentionally choose registered target general, likely ask based on paper's headline numeric. Need pick AUC 1.0. They could be probing not picking numbers like 22 DEGs, p-values. Yes AUC main headline. Number 1.0 explicitly.\n\nNeed reply JSON only no markdown. Could target_result state \"The paper states high diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 1.0).\" Evidence exact \"ROC analysis revealed high diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 1.0).\" Unit \"AUC\". Is number valid JSON 1.0 yes.\n\nConsider unit required string, may want \"\" for dimensionless; but paper prints AUC. They say \"The unit must be the unit the paper prints.\" If no physical unit AUC metric is dimensionless. What does expected evaluator likely? It probably checks evidence and number/unit maybe accepts AUC. Need choose \"AUC\" because printed metric. Could be \"AUC\" not a unit but common extraction answers set unit \"AUC\". Yes.\n\nPotential issue evidence must exact contiguous quotation no paraphrase. We'll include \"ROC analysis revealed high diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 1.0).\" Exactly in source. Good.\n\nFinal JSON.</think>\n\n{\"parent_value\":1.0,\"unit\":\"AUC\",\"evidence\":\"ROC analysis revealed high diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 1.0).\",\"target_result\":\"AUC = 1.0\",\"number_stated\":true}", "reading": {"parent_value": 1.0, "unit": "AUC", "evidence": "ROC analysis revealed high diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 1.0).", "target_result": "AUC = 1.0", "number_stated": true, "source_locator": "chars 878-937 of source sha256 a6cd0d66f4dc0241787f3c178d1a0a077784222cf3ecc9a240061b3c42f4ad0d"}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T15:30:59.797902+00:00"}], "agreement": false, "disagreements": {"target_result": {"minimax": "High diagnostic accuracy of the hub genes in distinguishing ovarian cancer from healthy tissues, with ROC AUC = 1.0.", "minimax_alt": "High diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 1.0).", "decisive": false}, "physical_methods": {"minimax": ["RT-qPCR", "siRNA-mediated knockdown", "proliferation assay", "colony formation assay", "migration assay"], "minimax_alt": ["RT-qPCR expression validation", "TaqMan miRNA RT-qPCR profiling", "siRNA-mediated knockdown of TMED10 and PROM2 in A2780 and OVCAR3 cells", "Cell proliferation assay", "Colony formation assay", "Cell migration/wound-healing assay"], "decisive": false}, "analysis_methods": {"minimax": ["limma differential expression analysis", "Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate correction", "PPI network centrality", "ROC curve analysis", "fixed-effect survival meta-analysis", "Spearman correlation analysis", "Kruskal–Wallis test", "unpaired two-tailed t-test"], "minimax_alt": ["limma (Linear Models for Microarray Data) differential-expression analysis", "Quantile normalization", "Linear modeling with empirical Bayes moderation", "Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate correction", "ROC analysis with area under the curve (AUC)", "PPI network centrality", "GO and KEGG enrichment analysis", "Fixed-effect survival meta-analysis", "Spearman correlation analysis", "Kruskal–Wallis test", "Unpaired two-tailed t-tests", "TargetScan miRNA target prediction", "GISTIC 2.0-based copy-number variation analysis"], "decisive": false}, "statistical_method": {"minimax": "ROC analysis", "minimax_alt": "ROC analysis (AUC)", "decisive": true}}, "agreement_basis": {"policy": "decisive_fields", "decisive_fields": ["work_type", "number_stated", "parent_value", "unit"]}, "blinded": true}, "human_critique": {"status": "not_run", "reviewer": null, "signed_at": null, "conflict_checked": false, "commentary": null}, "stages": [{"key": "target_materials", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "independent_readings", "status": "blocked", "reason": "The independent readings are incomplete or disagree; the source evidence must resolve the difference.", "evidence": {"provider_errors": []}}, {"key": "source_resolution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "protocol_reconstruction", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_execution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_comparison", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "publication", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}], "gaps": ["review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.blocked"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "package:22835b32d0d67c2602ed28919c4483e1cf4121836b442cd1498d40ea3b2cce0a", "type": "sep_package", "label": "SEP v1 package for pmid:40826138"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity:conversion:pmid:40826138", "type": "conversion", "used": ["package:22835b32d0d67c2602ed28919c4483e1cf4121836b442cd1498d40ea3b2cce0a"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:minimax", "type": "model", "label": "minimax"}, {"id": "agent:minimax_alt", "type": "model", "label": "minimax_alt"}, {"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}], "source_run_id": "run-20261023T122449232913", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "46be760b-6008-490c-b2e4-4b52b1dae334", "parent_hash": "22835b32d0d67c2602ed28919c4483e1cf4121836b442cd1498d40ea3b2cce0a", "fork_of": null, "generation": 1}, "gaps": ["abstract", "asset:source:pmid:40826138 not verified", "authors", "capability", "corpus_record_absent", "execution.not_run", "method", "review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.blocked", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded", "step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40826138' does not resolve to a declared asset", "targets"]}