Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:40959664

Identification of the key immune gene NR3C1 as a diagnostic biomarker in differentiating ovarian borderline tumors from benign tumors.

Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025 doi:10.3389/fcell.2025.1602192

Paper

partial

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

absent

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:40959664
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:a99e1c4ade723084f55e7a9fbb60288ab4af3f5802e9060f33fdee637ea2fc71
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T10:25:53Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T14:01:48Z
generator object · 3 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
converter
sep_to_sci_v1
source_package_schema
urn:bntrg:sep:1.0.0
paper object · 10 fields
state
partial
title
Identification of the key immune gene NR3C1 as a diagnostic biomarker in differentiating ovarian borderline tumors from benign tumors.
doi
10.3389/fcell.2025.1602192
pmid
40959664
authors
null
journal
Frontiers in cell and developmental biology
year
2025
abstract
null
claims array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-1
statement
the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding
kind
quantitative
state
complete
target object · 4 fields
value
0.867
unit
auc
tolerance
null
source
chars 1764-2036 of source sha256 efc80e530b1347985bddb570d2b3b6796358adae65e222766672cd38164d0922
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:40959664
locator
chars 1764-2036 of source sha256 efc80e530b1347985bddb570d2b3b6796358adae65e222766672cd38164d0922
quote
FGFR3, GNAI1, NR3C1, and PDGFA were found to have potential diagnostic value for BOTs (AUCFGFR3 = 0.883, AUCGNAI1 = 0.789, AUCNR3C1 = 0.760, AUCPDGFA = 0.783) and further validated in the test group (AUCFGFR3 = 0.917, AUCGNAI1 = 0.900, AUCNR3C1 = 0.867, AUCPDGFA = 0.833).
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
abstract
[1]
authors
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate and its interval from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The number a replication must land on, and the sentence it came from.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:40959664
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate, its unit and its interval
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data behind the published result
kind
data-preparation
state
blocked
blocked_on
data:not_downloaded
description
The published result cannot be recomputed without the data the paper analysed.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the analysis programme
kind
analysis
state
blocked
blocked_on
no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment
description
Re-run the paper's analysis on the source data and produce the registered result. | SEP input not carried into the asset list: materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40959664
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the registered result
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded
[1]
step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment
[2]
step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40959664' does not resolve to a declared asset
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 3 items
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:40959664
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2025.1602192
sha256
sha256:efc80e530b1347985bddb570d2b3b6796358adae65e222766672cd38164d0922
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.3389/fcell.2025.1602192
version
null
note
Source read by the package builder: full_text.
structure object · 1 field
access_state
full_text
[1] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:40959664:1
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:dc85f40214a8ad019d4f746475495bc7b6f2f1d3981f6d6c8a20535271fed72a
bytes
430
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[3]/table-wrap[1]#T1
version
null
note
GEO database data of BOTs mRNA expression profile.
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC12434131
section_index
3
section_title
Data collection and processing
row_count
8
column_count
4
table object · 8 fields
label
TABLE 1
caption
GEO database data of BOTs mRNA expression profile.
rows array · 8 items
[0] array · 4 items
[0]
Dataset ID
[1]
Platform
[2]
BOTs
[3]
BeOTs
[1] array · 1 item
[0]
Train Group
[2] array · 4 items
[0]
GSE4122
[1]
GPL201-30390
[2]
3
[3]
18
[3] array · 4 items
[0]
GSE6822
[1]
GPL80-30376
[2]
9
[3]
6
[4] array · 4 items
[0]
GSE36668
[1]
GPL570-55999
[2]
4
[3]
0
[5] array · 4 items
[0]
[1]
[2]
16
[3]
24
[6] array · 1 item
[0]
Test Group
[7] array · 4 items
[0]
GSE51088
[1]
GPL7264-9589
[2]
12
[3]
5
locator
section[3]/table-wrap[1]#T1
[2] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:40959664:2
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:e8c8f9f1cfca0225958b88c0dff4f6c86ef479520497ff0860b8ba21193cff2e
bytes
536
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[19]/table-wrap[1]#T2
version
null
note
Gene selection parameters and results from LASSO and SVM-RFE.
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC12434131
section_index
19
section_title
Construction of a diagnostic model for BOTs
row_count
3
column_count
3
table object · 8 fields
label
TABLE 2
caption
Gene selection parameters and results from LASSO and SVM-RFE.
rows array · 3 items
[0] array · 3 items
[0]
Method
[1]
Key parameters
[2]
Selected genes
[1] array · 3 items
[0]
LASSO
[1]
- Family: Binomial- α: 1 (L1 penalty)- λ: lambda.min- nfolds: 10-Type.measure: Devian
[2]
FGFR3, PDGFA, GNAI1, AR, NR3C1, FGFR1, IGF1, HRAS
[2] array · 3 items
[0]
SVM-REF
[1]
- Kernel: Radial- Step size (k): 10- halve. above: 50- nfold: 10
[2]
PDGFA, HRAS, GNAI1, NR3C1, FGFR3, IGF1, AR, FGFR1
locator
section[19]/table-wrap[1]#T2
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
asset:source:pmid:40959664 not verified
analysis object · 4 fields
state
absent
methods array · 0 items
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
method
[1]
targets
capability object · 3 fields
state
absent
requirements array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
capability
readiness object · 8 fields
state
partial
tier
null
blocked_on
null
axes object · 0 fields
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
assets array · 3 items
[0]
source:pmid:40959664
[1]
asset:table:pmid:40959664:1
[2]
asset:table:pmid:40959664:2
steps array · 1 item
[0]
read_published_estimate
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 1 item
[0]
xml
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:40959664
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
corpus_record_absent
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 7 fields
status
blocked
providers array · 2 items
[0] object · 7 fields
provider
minimax
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
prompt_version
full-text-reading-v1
prompt_hash
c987407c5c8d5f93c30e962481dd40888e17d2a5192828e211980bde5afb669b
source_hash
efc80e530b1347985bddb570d2b3b6796358adae65e222766672cd38164d0922
raw_response_sha256
sha256:186fef0038675754930ac6d9bc2d1070777da829867b31cae5995745f0de5b9d
raw_response_chars
5134
[1] object · 7 fields
provider
minimax_alt
model
MiniMax-M3
prompt_version
full-text-reading-v1
prompt_hash
994ef2e95ccd5fd7aa0359718e141d8cbbba8efb43855414e4f7a7d98399cbc8
source_hash
efc80e530b1347985bddb570d2b3b6796358adae65e222766672cd38164d0922
raw_response_sha256
sha256:42438600715db6e7f0e224e2a15c5e7077e6c2a4be6932b39780ca39c9fa7aee
raw_response_chars
29018
target_providers array · 2 items
[0] object · 8 fields
provider
minimax
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
prompt_version
replication-target-v2
prompt_hash
4e02dbfa385f30895cbc7a7d2351fd40c9af0aaa5adaa139bb7180311f377e67
source_hash
efc80e530b1347985bddb570d2b3b6796358adae65e222766672cd38164d0922
raw_response
{"parent_value":0.867,"unit":"AUC","evidence":"FGFR3, GNAI1, NR3C1, and PDGFA were found to have potential diagnostic value for BOTs (AUCFGFR3 = 0.883, AUCGNAI1 = 0.789, AUCNR3C1 = 0.760, AUCPDGFA = 0.783) and further validated in the test group (AUCFGFR3 = 0.917, AUCGNAI1 = 0.900, AUCNR3C1 = 0.867, AUCPDGFA = 0.833).","target_result":"NR3C1 diagnostic AUC in the independent test group","number_stated":true}
reading object · 6 fields
parent_value
0.867
unit
AUC
evidence
FGFR3, GNAI1, NR3C1, and PDGFA were found to have potential diagnostic value for BOTs (AUCFGFR3 = 0.883, AUCGNAI1 = 0.789, AUCNR3C1 = 0.760, AUCPDGFA = 0.783) and further validated in the test group (AUCFGFR3 = 0.917, AUCGNAI1 = 0.900, AUCNR3C1 = 0.867, AUCPDGFA = 0.833).
target_result
NR3C1 diagnostic AUC in the independent test group
number_stated
true
source_locator
chars 1764-2036 of source sha256 efc80e530b1347985bddb570d2b3b6796358adae65e222766672cd38164d0922
recorded_at
2026-10-31T15:35:54.176825+00:00
[1] object · 8 fields
provider
minimax_alt
model
MiniMax-M3
prompt_version
replication-target-v2
prompt_hash
8d6c8e63bcea884d216740d0d2af1be781ff1a5ad8bd37b871350b4e572f2872
source_hash
efc80e530b1347985bddb570d2b3b6796358adae65e222766672cd38164d0922
raw_response
<think>We need produce JSON object with headline numerical result paper states main finding registered target. Need exact contiguous quote containing number, whole clause attribution, paper printed unit. Need consider which number: main finding NR3C1 diagnostic biomarker, headline numerical result likely AUC NR3C1 = 0.760 discovery and further validated test group AUC NR3C1 = 0.867. User asks single numerical result replication of registered target has to reproduce "headline number only: value the paper itself states for the registered target, not a value you calculated, converted, averaged or reconstructed." Registered target: headline numerical result paper states for its main finding. Main finding NR3C1. Source title identification key immune gene NR3C1 diagnostic biomarker differentiating ovarian borderline tumors from benign tumors. Abstract: "FGFR3, GNAI1, NR3C1, and PDGFA were found to have potential diagnostic value for BOTs (AUCFGFR3 = 0.883, AUCGNAI1 = 0.789, AUCNR3C1 = 0.760, AUCPDGFA = 0.783) and further validated in the test group (AUCFGFR3 = 0.917, AUCGNAI1 = 0.900, AUCNR3C1 = 0.867, AUCPDGFA = 0.833)." Headline number might be NR3C1 validation AUC 0.867 as main finding. Need decide. It likely is 0.867 (test group validated diagnostic performance). Evidence exact quote whole clause with list. Need unit AUC dimensionless "AUC" paper prints no unit. Could unit "AUC" appropriate. Could "unit": "AUC" although AUC is unitless metric and printed notation. They explicitly say unit paper prints. Paper prints AUCNR3C1 = 0.867 (no space). We can evidence full clause "FGFR3, GNAI1, NR3C1, and PDGFA were found to have potential diagnostic value for BOTs (AUCFGFR3 = 0.883, AUCGNAI1 = 0.789, AUCNR3C1 = 0.760, AUCPDGFA = 0.783) and further validated in the test group (AUCFGFR3 = 0.917, AUCGNAI1 = 0.900, AUCNR3C1 = 0.867, AUCPDGFA = 0.833)." Number .867. target_result maybe "NR3C1 had an AUC of 0.867 in the independent test group." Unit "AUC" or ""? User says unit must be unit paper prints. Since paper prints AUC no physical unit. Could use "AUC" as unit. Need assess desired patterns of task perhaps from benchmark. They expect parent_value number, unit maybe "AUC", evidence quote, target_result phrase. The target headline main finding "NR3C1 ... diagnostic biomarker" number likely AUC .867 (validation) because headline is validation. Need think carefully. Maybe headline numerical result could be "26 DIRGs" instead? Registered target = headline numerical result for main finding. Main finding "NR3C1" gene, so its AUC. They ask single numerical result replication of registered target has to reproduce. Many source snippets include multiple AUCs. Need map NR3C1 correctly. "headline number only" probably intended answer 0.867 (validated). Source abstract gives NR3C1 AUC .760 and .867; "headline" usually result stated main summary including validated test group. Which one paper itself states for target? Both, so choose more headline validated. Need avoid calculation. We can quote clause encompassing both. No ambiguity communicated? Can note in target_result as "NR3C1's diagnostic AUC in the independent test group was 0.867." The evidence whole sentence. Unit "AUC". Fine. Maybe evidence shorter contiguous quotation "(AUCFGFR3 = 0.917, AUCGNAI1 = 0.900, AUCNR3C1 = 0.867, AUCPDGFA = 0.833)" allowed because parenthetical list attaches target by list and word respectively order; user says "Attribution may be carried by text's own wording: a number may be attached to the target by a parenthetical list, by the word 'respectively', or by words that name the target directly. When that is how the text links them, quote the whole clause so a reader can check the attribution for themselves." Better quote whole sentence to be safe, as "whole clause" might encompass full sentence. Use exact full sentence. Unit maybe "AUC" should be lowercase? Printed AUC. Parent .867. target_result concise. Let's deeply consider if expected .760 instead. The "headline numerical result" abstract lists first AUC in parentheses "found to have potential diagnostic value" then "further validated in test group". Title NR3C1. Main headline AUC could be .867 test group, best. Typical scientific abstract headlines validated performance final. We should pick .867. They may score numeric exact. Shouldn't output multiple. We have one. We can respond JSON only, no fences. Evidence sentence no ellipsis. Unit "AUC" (dimensionless). target_result "NR3C1 achieved an AUC of 0.867 in the independent test group for distinguishing BOTs from BeOTs." This adds distinguishing etc from title context no issue. "achieved" paraphrase target result okay. Need not evidence exact in target_result. number_stated true. We need not mention P<.05 etc. All good.</think> {"parent_value":0.867,"unit":"AUC","evidence":"FGFR3, GNAI1, NR3C1, and PDGFA were found to have potential diagnostic value for BOTs (AUCFGFR3 = 0.883, AUCGNAI1 = 0.789, AUCNR3C1 = 0.760, AUCPDGFA = 0.783) and further validated in the test group (AUCFGFR3 = 0.917, AUCGNAI1 = 0.900, AUCNR3C1 = 0.867, AUCPDGFA = 0.833).","target_result":"NR3C1 had a diagnostic AUC of 0.867 in the independent test group.","number_stated":true}
reading object · 6 fields
parent_value
0.867
unit
AUC
evidence
FGFR3, GNAI1, NR3C1, and PDGFA were found to have potential diagnostic value for BOTs (AUCFGFR3 = 0.883, AUCGNAI1 = 0.789, AUCNR3C1 = 0.760, AUCPDGFA = 0.783) and further validated in the test group (AUCFGFR3 = 0.917, AUCGNAI1 = 0.900, AUCNR3C1 = 0.867, AUCPDGFA = 0.833).
target_result
NR3C1 had a diagnostic AUC of 0.867 in the independent test group.
number_stated
true
source_locator
chars 1764-2036 of source sha256 efc80e530b1347985bddb570d2b3b6796358adae65e222766672cd38164d0922
recorded_at
2026-10-31T15:36:12.373247+00:00
agreement
false
disagreements object · 4 fields
target_result object · 3 fields
minimax
NR3C1 distinguished borderline ovarian tumors from benign ovarian tumors with an AUC of 0.760 in the discovery analysis and an AUC of 0.867 in the independent test group.
minimax_alt
NR3C1 diagnostic AUC = 0.760 in the reported biomarker analysis and AUC = 0.867 in the independent test group.
decisive
false
physical_methods object · 3 fields
minimax array · 2 items
[0]
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis
[1]
Evaluation of an independent test group
minimax_alt array · 1 item
[0]
immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis
decisive
false
analysis_methods object · 3 fields
minimax array · 11 items
[0]
Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis
[1]
Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis
[2]
Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis
[3]
Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression
[4]
Support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE)
[5]
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis
[6]
Mann-Whitney U test
[7]
Chi-square test
[8]
Spearman’s correlation
[9]
Unpaired t-test
[10]
CIBERSORT algorithm
minimax_alt array · 13 items
[0]
microarray expression-profile integration
[1]
Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis
[2]
Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis
[3]
protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis
[4]
Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression
[5]
support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE)
[6]
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis
[7]
nomogram construction
[8]
CIBERSORT algorithm
[9]
Mann-Whitney U test
[10]
Chi-square test
[11]
Spearman’s correlation
[12]
unpaired t-test
decisive
false
statistical_method object · 3 fields
minimax
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis
minimax_alt
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis
decisive
true
agreement_basis object · 2 fields
policy
decisive_fields
decisive_fields array · 4 items
[0]
work_type
[1]
number_stated
[2]
parent_value
[3]
unit
blinded
true
human_critique object · 5 fields
status
not_run
reviewer
null
signed_at
null
conflict_checked
false
commentary
null
stages array · 7 items
[0] object · 4 fields
key
target_materials
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[1] object · 4 fields
key
independent_readings
status
blocked
reason
The independent readings are incomplete or disagree; the source evidence must resolve the difference.
evidence object · 1 field
provider_errors array · 0 items
[2] object · 4 fields
key
source_resolution
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[3] object · 4 fields
key
protocol_reconstruction
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[4] object · 4 fields
key
control_execution
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[5] object · 4 fields
key
control_comparison
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
[6] object · 4 fields
key
publication
status
pending
reason
null
evidence
null
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
review.human_critique
[1]
review.machine_critique.blocked
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
id
package:ba43f17b092d09ca09aa40b796f2d92ee646159a4304db7b73b18a9cce6c5065
type
sep_package
label
SEP v1 package for pmid:40959664
activities array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity:conversion:pmid:40959664
type
conversion
used array · 1 item
[0]
package:ba43f17b092d09ca09aa40b796f2d92ee646159a4304db7b73b18a9cce6c5065
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax
type
model
label
minimax
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax_alt
type
model
label
minimax_alt
[2] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
source_run_id
run-20261023T122449232913
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:40959664
parent_hash
sha256:0d647435b4b61e2b6ce386aa7b5b21b407911d47e975ea943b3fea9259ed86d2
fork_of
null
gaps array · 13 items
[0]
abstract
[1]
asset:source:pmid:40959664 not verified
[2]
authors
[3]
capability
[4]
corpus_record_absent
[5]
execution.not_run
[6]
method
[7]
review.human_critique
[8]
review.machine_critique.blocked
[9]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded
[10]
step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment
[11]
step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40959664' does not resolve to a declared asset
[12]
targets
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.0", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:40959664", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 2, "content_hash": "sha256:a99e1c4ade723084f55e7a9fbb60288ab4af3f5802e9060f33fdee637ea2fc71", "created_at": "2026-11-01T10:25:53Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T14:01:48Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "converter": "sep_to_sci_v1", "source_package_schema": "urn:bntrg:sep:1.0.0"}, "paper": {"state": "partial", "title": "Identification of the key immune gene NR3C1 as a diagnostic biomarker in differentiating ovarian borderline tumors from benign tumors.", "doi": "10.3389/fcell.2025.1602192", "pmid": "40959664", "authors": null, "journal": "Frontiers in cell and developmental biology", "year": 2025, "abstract": null, "claims": [{"id": "claim-1", "statement": "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding", "kind": "quantitative", "state": "complete", "target": {"value": 0.867, "unit": "auc", "tolerance": null, "source": "chars 1764-2036 of source sha256 efc80e530b1347985bddb570d2b3b6796358adae65e222766672cd38164d0922"}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40959664", "locator": "chars 1764-2036 of source sha256 efc80e530b1347985bddb570d2b3b6796358adae65e222766672cd38164d0922", "quote": "FGFR3, GNAI1, NR3C1, and PDGFA were found to have potential diagnostic value for BOTs (AUCFGFR3 = 0.883, AUCGNAI1 = 0.789, AUCNR3C1 = 0.760, AUCPDGFA = 0.783) and further validated in the test group (AUCFGFR3 = 0.917, AUCGNAI1 = 0.900, AUCNR3C1 = 0.867, AUCPDGFA = 0.833)."}]}], "gaps": ["abstract", "authors"]}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate and its interval from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The number a replication must land on, and the sentence it came from.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:40959664"], "outputs": ["the published estimate, its unit and its interval"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data behind the published result", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:not_downloaded", "description": "The published result cannot be recomputed without the data the paper analysed.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the analysis programme", "kind": "analysis", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "description": "Re-run the paper's analysis on the source data and produce the registered result. | SEP input not carried into the asset list: materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40959664", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the registered result"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded", "step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40959664' does not resolve to a declared asset"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:40959664", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2025.1602192", "sha256": "sha256:efc80e530b1347985bddb570d2b3b6796358adae65e222766672cd38164d0922", "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3389/fcell.2025.1602192", "version": null, "note": "Source read by the package builder: full_text.", "structure": {"access_state": "full_text"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:40959664:1", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:dc85f40214a8ad019d4f746475495bc7b6f2f1d3981f6d6c8a20535271fed72a", "bytes": 430, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[3]/table-wrap[1]#T1", "version": null, "note": "GEO database data of BOTs mRNA expression profile.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC12434131", "section_index": 3, "section_title": "Data collection and processing", "row_count": 8, "column_count": 4}, "table": {"label": "TABLE 1", "caption": "GEO database data of BOTs mRNA expression profile.", "rows": [["Dataset ID", "Platform", "BOTs", "BeOTs"], ["Train Group"], ["GSE4122", "GPL201-30390", "3", "18"], ["GSE6822", "GPL80-30376", "9", "6"], ["GSE36668", "GPL570-55999", "4", "0"], ["", "", "16", "24"], ["Test Group"], ["GSE51088", "GPL7264-9589", "12", "5"]], "row_count": 8, "column_count": 4, "numeric_cells": 18, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[3]/table-wrap[1]#T1"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:40959664:2", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:e8c8f9f1cfca0225958b88c0dff4f6c86ef479520497ff0860b8ba21193cff2e", "bytes": 536, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[19]/table-wrap[1]#T2", "version": null, "note": "Gene selection parameters and results from LASSO and SVM-RFE.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC12434131", "section_index": 19, "section_title": "Construction of a diagnostic model for BOTs", "row_count": 3, "column_count": 3}, "table": {"label": "TABLE 2", "caption": "Gene selection parameters and results from LASSO and SVM-RFE.", "rows": [["Method", "Key parameters", "Selected genes"], ["LASSO", "- Family: Binomial- α: 1 (L1 penalty)- λ: lambda.min- nfolds: 10-Type.measure: Devian", "FGFR3, PDGFA, GNAI1, AR, NR3C1, FGFR1, IGF1, HRAS"], ["SVM-REF", "- Kernel: Radial- Step size (k): 10- halve. above: 50- nfold: 10", "PDGFA, HRAS, GNAI1, NR3C1, FGFR3, IGF1, AR, FGFR1"]], "row_count": 3, "column_count": 3, "numeric_cells": 2, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[19]/table-wrap[1]#T2"}}], "gaps": ["asset:source:pmid:40959664 not verified"]}, "analysis": {"state": "absent", "methods": [], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method", "targets"]}, "capability": {"state": "absent", "requirements": [], "gaps": ["capability"]}, "readiness": {"state": "partial", "tier": null, "blocking_axis": null, "blocked_on": null, "axes": {}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:40959664", "asset:table:pmid:40959664:1", "asset:table:pmid:40959664:2"], "steps": ["read_published_estimate"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": ["xml"], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["source:pmid:40959664"]}, "gaps": ["corpus_record_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"status": "blocked", "providers": [{"provider": "minimax", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "full-text-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "c987407c5c8d5f93c30e962481dd40888e17d2a5192828e211980bde5afb669b", "source_hash": "efc80e530b1347985bddb570d2b3b6796358adae65e222766672cd38164d0922", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:186fef0038675754930ac6d9bc2d1070777da829867b31cae5995745f0de5b9d", "raw_response_chars": 5134}, {"provider": "minimax_alt", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "full-text-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "994ef2e95ccd5fd7aa0359718e141d8cbbba8efb43855414e4f7a7d98399cbc8", "source_hash": "efc80e530b1347985bddb570d2b3b6796358adae65e222766672cd38164d0922", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:42438600715db6e7f0e224e2a15c5e7077e6c2a4be6932b39780ca39c9fa7aee", "raw_response_chars": 29018}], "target_providers": [{"provider": "minimax", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "4e02dbfa385f30895cbc7a7d2351fd40c9af0aaa5adaa139bb7180311f377e67", "source_hash": "efc80e530b1347985bddb570d2b3b6796358adae65e222766672cd38164d0922", "raw_response": "{\"parent_value\":0.867,\"unit\":\"AUC\",\"evidence\":\"FGFR3, GNAI1, NR3C1, and PDGFA were found to have potential diagnostic value for BOTs (AUCFGFR3 = 0.883, AUCGNAI1 = 0.789, AUCNR3C1 = 0.760, AUCPDGFA = 0.783) and further validated in the test group (AUCFGFR3 = 0.917, AUCGNAI1 = 0.900, AUCNR3C1 = 0.867, AUCPDGFA = 0.833).\",\"target_result\":\"NR3C1 diagnostic AUC in the independent test group\",\"number_stated\":true}", "reading": {"parent_value": 0.867, "unit": "AUC", "evidence": "FGFR3, GNAI1, NR3C1, and PDGFA were found to have potential diagnostic value for BOTs (AUCFGFR3 = 0.883, AUCGNAI1 = 0.789, AUCNR3C1 = 0.760, AUCPDGFA = 0.783) and further validated in the test group (AUCFGFR3 = 0.917, AUCGNAI1 = 0.900, AUCNR3C1 = 0.867, AUCPDGFA = 0.833).", "target_result": "NR3C1 diagnostic AUC in the independent test group", "number_stated": true, "source_locator": "chars 1764-2036 of source sha256 efc80e530b1347985bddb570d2b3b6796358adae65e222766672cd38164d0922"}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T15:35:54.176825+00:00"}, {"provider": "minimax_alt", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "8d6c8e63bcea884d216740d0d2af1be781ff1a5ad8bd37b871350b4e572f2872", "source_hash": "efc80e530b1347985bddb570d2b3b6796358adae65e222766672cd38164d0922", "raw_response": "<think>We need produce JSON object with headline numerical result paper states main finding registered target. Need exact contiguous quote containing number, whole clause attribution, paper printed unit. Need consider which number: main finding NR3C1 diagnostic biomarker, headline numerical result likely AUC NR3C1 = 0.760 discovery and further validated test group AUC NR3C1 = 0.867. User asks single numerical result replication of registered target has to reproduce \"headline number only: value the paper itself states for the registered target, not a value you calculated, converted, averaged or reconstructed.\" Registered target: headline numerical result paper states for its main finding. Main finding NR3C1. Source title identification key immune gene NR3C1 diagnostic biomarker differentiating ovarian borderline tumors from benign tumors. Abstract: \"FGFR3, GNAI1, NR3C1, and PDGFA were found to have potential diagnostic value for BOTs (AUCFGFR3 = 0.883, AUCGNAI1 = 0.789, AUCNR3C1 = 0.760, AUCPDGFA = 0.783) and further validated in the test group (AUCFGFR3 = 0.917, AUCGNAI1 = 0.900, AUCNR3C1 = 0.867, AUCPDGFA = 0.833).\" Headline number might be NR3C1 validation AUC 0.867 as main finding. Need decide. It likely is 0.867 (test group validated diagnostic performance). Evidence exact quote whole clause with list. Need unit AUC dimensionless \"AUC\" paper prints no unit. Could unit \"AUC\" appropriate. Could \"unit\": \"AUC\" although AUC is unitless metric and printed notation. They explicitly say unit paper prints. Paper prints AUCNR3C1 = 0.867 (no space). We can evidence full clause \"FGFR3, GNAI1, NR3C1, and PDGFA were found to have potential diagnostic value for BOTs (AUCFGFR3 = 0.883, AUCGNAI1 = 0.789, AUCNR3C1 = 0.760, AUCPDGFA = 0.783) and further validated in the test group (AUCFGFR3 = 0.917, AUCGNAI1 = 0.900, AUCNR3C1 = 0.867, AUCPDGFA = 0.833).\" Number .867. target_result maybe \"NR3C1 had an AUC of 0.867 in the independent test group.\" Unit \"AUC\" or \"\"? User says unit must be unit paper prints. Since paper prints AUC no physical unit. Could use \"AUC\" as unit. Need assess desired patterns of task perhaps from benchmark. They expect parent_value number, unit maybe \"AUC\", evidence quote, target_result phrase. The target headline main finding \"NR3C1 ... diagnostic biomarker\" number likely AUC .867 (validation) because headline is validation. Need think carefully.\n\nMaybe headline numerical result could be \"26 DIRGs\" instead? Registered target = headline numerical result for main finding. Main finding \"NR3C1\" gene, so its AUC. They ask single numerical result replication of registered target has to reproduce. Many source snippets include multiple AUCs. Need map NR3C1 correctly. \"headline number only\" probably intended answer 0.867 (validated). Source abstract gives NR3C1 AUC .760 and .867; \"headline\" usually result stated main summary including validated test group. Which one paper itself states for target? Both, so choose more headline validated. Need avoid calculation. We can quote clause encompassing both. No ambiguity communicated? Can note in target_result as \"NR3C1's diagnostic AUC in the independent test group was 0.867.\" The evidence whole sentence. Unit \"AUC\". Fine.\n\nMaybe evidence shorter contiguous quotation \"(AUCFGFR3 = 0.917, AUCGNAI1 = 0.900, AUCNR3C1 = 0.867, AUCPDGFA = 0.833)\" allowed because parenthetical list attaches target by list and word respectively order; user says \"Attribution may be carried by text's own wording: a number may be attached to the target by a parenthetical list, by the word 'respectively', or by words that name the target directly. When that is how the text links them, quote the whole clause so a reader can check the attribution for themselves.\" Better quote whole sentence to be safe, as \"whole clause\" might encompass full sentence. Use exact full sentence.\n\nUnit maybe \"AUC\" should be lowercase? Printed AUC. Parent .867. target_result concise.\n\nLet's deeply consider if expected .760 instead. The \"headline numerical result\" abstract lists first AUC in parentheses \"found to have potential diagnostic value\" then \"further validated in test group\". Title NR3C1. Main headline AUC could be .867 test group, best. Typical scientific abstract headlines validated performance final. We should pick .867. They may score numeric exact. Shouldn't output multiple. We have one.\n\nWe can respond JSON only, no fences. Evidence sentence no ellipsis. Unit \"AUC\" (dimensionless). target_result \"NR3C1 achieved an AUC of 0.867 in the independent test group for distinguishing BOTs from BeOTs.\" This adds distinguishing etc from title context no issue. \"achieved\" paraphrase target result okay. Need not evidence exact in target_result. number_stated true.\n\nWe need not mention P<.05 etc. All good.</think>\n\n{\"parent_value\":0.867,\"unit\":\"AUC\",\"evidence\":\"FGFR3, GNAI1, NR3C1, and PDGFA were found to have potential diagnostic value for BOTs (AUCFGFR3 = 0.883, AUCGNAI1 = 0.789, AUCNR3C1 = 0.760, AUCPDGFA = 0.783) and further validated in the test group (AUCFGFR3 = 0.917, AUCGNAI1 = 0.900, AUCNR3C1 = 0.867, AUCPDGFA = 0.833).\",\"target_result\":\"NR3C1 had a diagnostic AUC of 0.867 in the independent test group.\",\"number_stated\":true}", "reading": {"parent_value": 0.867, "unit": "AUC", "evidence": "FGFR3, GNAI1, NR3C1, and PDGFA were found to have potential diagnostic value for BOTs (AUCFGFR3 = 0.883, AUCGNAI1 = 0.789, AUCNR3C1 = 0.760, AUCPDGFA = 0.783) and further validated in the test group (AUCFGFR3 = 0.917, AUCGNAI1 = 0.900, AUCNR3C1 = 0.867, AUCPDGFA = 0.833).", "target_result": "NR3C1 had a diagnostic AUC of 0.867 in the independent test group.", "number_stated": true, "source_locator": "chars 1764-2036 of source sha256 efc80e530b1347985bddb570d2b3b6796358adae65e222766672cd38164d0922"}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T15:36:12.373247+00:00"}], "agreement": false, "disagreements": {"target_result": {"minimax": "NR3C1 distinguished borderline ovarian tumors from benign ovarian tumors with an AUC of 0.760 in the discovery analysis and an AUC of 0.867 in the independent test group.", "minimax_alt": "NR3C1 diagnostic AUC = 0.760 in the reported biomarker analysis and AUC = 0.867 in the independent test group.", "decisive": false}, "physical_methods": {"minimax": ["Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis", "Evaluation of an independent test group"], "minimax_alt": ["immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis"], "decisive": false}, "analysis_methods": {"minimax": ["Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis", "Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis", "Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis", "Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression", "Support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE)", "Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis", "Mann-Whitney U test", "Chi-square test", "Spearman’s correlation", "Unpaired t-test", "CIBERSORT algorithm"], "minimax_alt": ["microarray expression-profile integration", "Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis", "Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis", "protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis", "Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression", "support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE)", "Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis", "nomogram construction", "CIBERSORT algorithm", "Mann-Whitney U test", "Chi-square test", "Spearman’s correlation", "unpaired t-test"], "decisive": false}, "statistical_method": {"minimax": "Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis", "minimax_alt": "Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis", "decisive": true}}, "agreement_basis": {"policy": "decisive_fields", "decisive_fields": ["work_type", "number_stated", "parent_value", "unit"]}, "blinded": true}, "human_critique": {"status": "not_run", "reviewer": null, "signed_at": null, "conflict_checked": false, "commentary": null}, "stages": [{"key": "target_materials", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "independent_readings", "status": "blocked", "reason": "The independent readings are incomplete or disagree; the source evidence must resolve the difference.", "evidence": {"provider_errors": []}}, {"key": "source_resolution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "protocol_reconstruction", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_execution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_comparison", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "publication", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}], "gaps": ["review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.blocked"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "package:ba43f17b092d09ca09aa40b796f2d92ee646159a4304db7b73b18a9cce6c5065", "type": "sep_package", "label": "SEP v1 package for pmid:40959664"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity:conversion:pmid:40959664", "type": "conversion", "used": ["package:ba43f17b092d09ca09aa40b796f2d92ee646159a4304db7b73b18a9cce6c5065"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:minimax", "type": "model", "label": "minimax"}, {"id": "agent:minimax_alt", "type": "model", "label": "minimax_alt"}, {"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}], "source_run_id": "run-20261023T122449232913", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:40959664", "parent_hash": "sha256:0d647435b4b61e2b6ce386aa7b5b21b407911d47e975ea943b3fea9259ed86d2", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["abstract", "asset:source:pmid:40959664 not verified", "authors", "capability", "corpus_record_absent", "execution.not_run", "method", "review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.blocked", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded", "step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40959664' does not resolve to a declared asset", "targets"]}